Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
52 "Neoplasms"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Special Article
Current Status of the National Cancer Screening Program in Korea: History, Achievements, and Future Directions
Kyeongmin Lee, Mina Suh, Kui Son Choi
J Prev Med Public Health. 2025;58(4):337-347.   Published online June 21, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.25.268
  • 17,976 View
  • 416 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. To reduce this burden, the Korean government established the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) in 1999, initially offering stomach, breast, and cervical cancer screening to Medical Aid Program (MAP) beneficiaries. By 2019, the NCSP had broadened both its eligible population and the range of cancers screened—stomach, liver, cervical, breast, colorectal, and lung—for both MAP recipients and health insurance beneficiaries. Since its inception, participation and adherence to recommended screening have risen steadily, driven by nationwide policy initiatives and expanded access. Over the past 2 decades, the NCSP has played a key role in reducing the incidence of stomach, liver, colorectal, and cervical cancers while increasing detection at precancerous stages, especially for cervical and colorectal cancers. Five-year relative survival rates for major cancers—most notably stomach, colorectal, and breast—have also improved substantially. Accumulated evidence, including cancer detection rates, stage distribution at diagnosis, and mortality reduction, underscores the program’s effectiveness in facilitating early detection and reducing cancer-specific deaths. Notably, Korea’s mortality-to-incidence ratio for major cancers remains well below the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development average, illustrating the impact of the nation’s comprehensive cancer control strategies. Continued research, surveillance, and refinement of evidence-based screening guidelines will be critical to further enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the NCSP.
Summary
Korean summary
한국의 국가암검진 사업은 도입 이후 지난 20여 년간 암 발생률과 사망률 감소에 크게 기여해왔다. 본 연구에서는 한국의 국가암검진 프로그램의 도입 이후 발전과정을 살펴보고, 암 질병부담 감소에 기여한 주요성과들을 고찰하였다. 또한, 국가암검진의 효과성을 높이기 위해 근거에 기반한 암검진 권고안 개정의 필요성을 논의하고, 향후 국가암검진 사업의 지속적인 성과 향상을 위한 발전방안을 제시하였다.
Key Message
Since its inception, Korea’s National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) has played a critical role in reducing cancer incidence and mortality over the past two decades. This study presents a comprehensive review of the NCSP’s development and its key contributions to alleviating the national cancer burden. In addition, it emphasizes the necessity of updating cancer screening guidelines in accordance with the latest scientific evidence and outlines strategic directions to further strengthen the program’s effectiveness and long-term outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Practice of Cytopathology in Korea: A 40‐Year Evolution Through Standardization, Digital Transformation, and Global Partnership
    Yosep Chong, Ran Hong, Hyeong Ju Kwon, Haeryoung Kim, Lucia Kim, Soon Jae Kim, Yoon Jung Choi
    Diagnostic Cytopathology.2026; 54(2): 146.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer incidence, survival analysis and predictions (Monastir, Tunisia: 2002–2030)
    Cyrine Bennasrallah, Amani Maatouk, Mariem Kacem, Wafa Dhouib, Hela Abroug, Manel Ben Fredj, Leila Safer, Sonia Zaied, Moncef Mokni, Ines Bouanène, Asma Belguith Sriha, Imen Zemni, Mohamed Ali Chaouch
    PLOS One.2026; 21(1): e0339603.     CrossRef
  • Strengthening colonoscopy screening in primary care: A preventive imperative before the coming surge
    Manas Pustake, Raman Kumar
    Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2026; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • A Clinicopathologic, Molecular, and Prognostic Comparison Between Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Korea: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Sung Bin Park, Hoon Sup Koo, Dae Sung Kim, Jieun Ryu, Jieun Shin, Jun Suk Oh, Kyu Chan Huh
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(5): 1736.     CrossRef
  • Inequalities in breast cancer incidence and mortality in women with and without disabilities in South Korea: A population-based cohort study
    Hee-Yeon Kang, Eunjung Park, Thi Tra Bui, Byungmi Kim, Jin-Kyoung Oh
    Preventive Medicine Reports.2025; 59: 103242.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing cancer risk awareness and screening management through artificial intelligence: a narrative review
    Jiaxuan Wu, Xiaolong Tang, Qian Zheng, Xinhang Gu, Li Ma, Jinghong Xian, Hui Mao, Jiadi Gan, Guiyi Ji
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Temporal trends and future projections of six major cancers among women of childbearing age in northeast Asia: analysis of data from the global burden of disease study 2021
    Jingqian Liang, Baogeng Huai, Zeping Yang, Shan Zhang, Haoliang Cui, Jianyi Zhang, Deshan Liu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Cohort Profile
Etiome Study Using Molecular Epigenetic Markers and Lung Organoid in Korean School Meal Service Workers (Etiome Study in S-meal Workers): Study Protocol
Sungji Moon, Soseul Sung, Sue K. Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2025;58(3):231-240.   Published online April 10, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.25.020
  • 5,050 View
  • 409 Download
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
School meal service workers may face an increased risk of lung cancer due to the nature of their work. This study aims to assess environmental exposure levels during occupational cooking among these workers in Seoul, Korea, and to examine the associations with carcinogen-associated biomarkers. Additionally, the study seeks to verify lung carcinogenesis through experiments using lung organoids treated with carcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and particulate matter. Here, we introduce the study protocol and outline our research strategies. This etiome study employs molecular epidemiological approaches involving at least 200 school meal service workers from 25-30 school cafeterias in Seoul, as well as in vitro lung organoid experiments. The study includes a questionnaire survey to analyze workers’ occupational environments, focusing on exposure to hazardous substances such as cooking oil fumes and assessing the use of personal protective equipment (e.g., masks) and the presence of ventilation systems. We measure molecular epigenomic biomarkers, including PAH adducts and metabolites along with methylation markers, in the exposure and control groups. Additionally, lung organoid experiments are performed to investigate the potential for lung cancer development due to respiratory carcinogen exposure in cooks. This study is expected to contribute to health risk assessments and the establishment of preventive strategies for meal service workers.
Summary
Korean summary
조리업 종사자의 폐암 발생 위험도가 높다고 보고되지만 실제 발암 물질에 어느정도 노출되어 있는지 전 세계적으로 아직까지 밝혀진 바 없습니다. 본 연구는 서울시내 학교 조리업 종사자 모집과 발암물질 노출 마커 측정 대한 방법론적인 논문이며 향후 추적 관찰할 수 있는 코호트 연구에 대한 초석 역할을 합니다.
Key Message
Although previous studies have reported an increased risk of lung cancer among cooking workers, the extent of their exposure to carcinogens has not yet been well characterized globally. This study presents the methodology for recruiting school cooking workers in Seoul and measuring biomarkers of carcinogen exposure. It serves as a foundational step toward establishing a prospective cohort for long-term follow-up.
Original Articles
Beyond Medical Bills: High Prevalence of Financial Toxicity and Diverse Management Strategies Among Vietnamese Patients With Cancer
Binh Thang Tran, Thanh Gia Nguyen, Dinh Duong Le, Minh Tu Nguyen, Nhan P. T. Nguyen, Minh Hanh Nguyen, The Due Ong
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024;57(4):407-419.   Published online June 24, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.24.090
  • 7,216 View
  • 302 Download
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
This study was conducted to measure financial toxicity (FT) among patients with cancer in Vietnam using the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) and to describe the cost management strategies employed by these patients.
Methods
This comprehensive cross-sectional study enrolled 634 patients from 2 specialized oncology hospitals in Vietnam. Using COST cut-off scores, FT was classified as none/mild (≥26), moderate (14-25), or severe (≤13). Cost management strategies, or coping mechanisms, were classified into 4 groups: lifestyle changes, financial resource strategies, treatment modifications, and support seeking.
Results
The prevalence of FT was 91.8%, with 51.7% of participants demonstrating severe and 40.1% exhibiting moderate FT. Severe FT was significantly associated with female, low education level, unstable employment, low household economic status, and advanced cancer stage. The most common coping strategies were as follows: among lifestyle changes, reducing spending on basic items and leisure activities (78.7%) and cutting back on essential household expenses (66.4%); among financial resource strategies, borrowing money from relatives or friends (49.1%) and withdrawing funds from retirement or savings accounts (34.1%); within treatment modifications, switching treatment facilities or doctors due to cost concerns (9.3%); and within support seeking, obtaining help from welfare or community organizations (18.8%). All strategies were significantly more likely to be used by patients with severe FT.
Conclusions
FT was highly prevalent among patients with cancer. Most patients relied on lifestyle adjustments and coping strategies, underscoring the need for improved financial support systems to alleviate the economic burden associated with cancer care.
Summary
Key Message
- This first large-scale analysis looks into the financial toxicity faced by patients with cancer in Vietnam, as an example of low- and middle-income countries.
- Financial toxicity was remarkably high prevalent and strongly associated with patient- level factors.
- Patients experiencing financial toxicity tend to use various cost-coping strategies.
- These findings underscore the need for routine screening for financial toxicity risk and interventions.
Health-related Quality of Life in Elderly Asian American and Non-Hispanic White Cancer Survivors
Suzanne Vang
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023;56(5):440-448.   Published online September 13, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.464
  • 5,595 View
  • 114 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDF
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to assess predictors of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in elderly Asian American and non-Hispanic White cancer survivors.
Methods
We conducted cross-sectional secondary data analyses using the combined datasets from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey.
Results
Elderly Asian American cancer survivors reported a lower mental HRQoL but a comparable physical HRQoL relative to elderly non-Hispanic White cancer survivors. Stress factors, such as comorbidities, difficulties with activities of daily living, and a history of depressive symptoms, along with coping resources like self-rated health and the ability to take the survey in English, were significantly associated with mental and physical HRQoL. Among elderly Asian American cancer survivors, a significantly lower mental HRQoL was observed among those taking the survey in the Chinese language.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that race exerts a differential impact on HRQoL. Interventions should be designed to address the distinct cultural, linguistic, and systemic needs of elderly Asian American cancer survivors. Such an approach could assist in reducing cancer-related health disparities.
Summary
Key Message
Secondary data analyses of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey combined datasets reveal that elderly Asian American cancer survivors had poorer mental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to their non-Hispanic White counterparts. Elderly Asian American cancer survivors who did not complete the survey in English had significantly worse mental HRQoL than their Asian American counterparts who did. These findings point to the need for increased research to identify and address the distinct cultural, linguistic, and system-related needs of elderly Asian American cancer survivors in order to optimize HRQoL in this population.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association of quality of life in older patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study from China
    Min Xiao, Lei Ji, Xiaoyan Qian, Xi Chen, Meng Xiu, Zhuoran Li, Heng Cao, Shanshan Chen, Qing Li, Qiao Li, Xiang Wang, Jiani Wang, Yiqun Li, Xiaojuan Zheng, Jintao Zhang, Pin Zhang
    BMJ Open.2025; 15(1): e085842.     CrossRef
  • Quality of life in older patients with cancer and related unmet needs: a scoping review
    Franziska Springer, Ayumu Matsuoka, Kyoko Obama, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Yosuke Uchitomi, Maiko Fujimori
    Acta Oncologica.2025; 64: 516.     CrossRef
  • Equitable Aging Among Migrants: A Concept Analysis and Model Development for Transcultural Nursing Care
    Areej Al-Hamad, Yasin M. Yasin, Sepali Guruge, Kateryna Metersky, Lu Wang, Cristina Catallo, Hasina Amanzai, Zhixi Cecilia Zhuang, Rezwana Rahman, Andy Zhang
    Journal of Transcultural Nursing.2025; 36(6): 644.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of self-reported management program of cancer patients
    Cheolkyung Sin, Dong Yeop Lee, Hyeyeong Kim, Hyeon-Su Im, Su-Jin Koh, Dong Yoon Kang
    DIGITAL HEALTH.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Operational Definitions of Colorectal Cancer in the Korean National Health Insurance Database
Hyeree Park, Yu Rim Kim, Yerin Pyun, Hyundeok Joo, Aesun Shin
J Prev Med Public Health. 2023;56(4):312-318.   Published online May 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.23.033
  • 9,787 View
  • 193 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
We reviewed the operational definitions of colorectal cancer (CRC) from studies using the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and compared CRC incidence derived from the commonly used operational definitions in the literature with the statistics reported by the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR).
Methods
We searched the MEDLINE and KoreaMed databases to identify studies containing operational definitions of CRC, published until January 15, 2021. All pertinent data concerning the study period, the utilized database, and the outcome variable were extracted. Within the NHIS-National Sample Cohort, age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) of CRC were calculated for each operational definition found in the literature between 2005 and 2019. These rates were then compared with ASRs from the KCCR.
Results
From the 62 eligible studies, 9 operational definitions for CRC were identified. The most commonly used operational definition was “C18-C20” (n=20), followed by “C18-C20 with claim code for treatment” (n=3) and “C18-C20 with V193 (code for registered cancer patients’ payment deduction)” (n=3). The ASRs reported using these operational definitions were lower than the ASRs from KCCR, except for “C18-C20 used as the main diagnosis.” The smallest difference in ASRs was observed for “C18-C20,” followed by “C18- C20 with V193,” and “C18-C20 with claim code for hospitalization or code for treatment.”
Conclusions
In defining CRC patients utilizing the NHIS database, the ASR derived through the operational definition of “C18-C20 as the main diagnosis” was comparable to the ASR from the KCCR. Depending on the study hypothesis, operational definitions using treatment codes may be utilized.
Summary
Korean summary
- 국민건강보험공단 자료 기반 연구에서 사용된 대장암의 조작적 정의를 검토하고 각 조작적 정의에 따른 대장암의 연령표준화발생률을 중앙암등록본부에서 보고한 수치와 비교하였다. - 62개의 출판된 문헌을 검토하여 9개의 조작적 정의를 확인하였고 이 중 "C18-C20"이 가장 일반적으로 사용되었다. - "C18-C20"을 주진단으로 정의한 경우의 연령표준화발생률은 중앙암등록본부에서 보고한 연령표준화발생률과 가장 유사하였다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • RA and risk of colorectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study
    Keun Hye Jeon, Jinhyung Jung, Mi Hee Cho, Dagyeong Lee, Kyungdo Han, In Young Cho, Dong Wook Shin
    Rheumatology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Who Dies Alone? Demographics, Underlying Diseases, and Healthcare Utilization Patterns of Lonely Death Individuals in Korea
    Haibin Bai, Jae-ryun Lee, Min Jung Kang, Young-Ho Jun, Hye Yeon Koo, Jieun Yun, Jee Hoon Sohn, Jin Yong Lee, Hyejin Lee
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2025; 58(2): 218.     CrossRef
  • Validation of Diagnostic Code Definitions for Identifying Patient in Korean Health Insurance Claims Data: A Scoping Review
    Kyoung-Hoon Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Worsening of health disparities across COVID-19 pandemic stages in Korea
    Hyejin Lee, Hyunwoo Nam, Jae-ryun Lee, Hyemin Jung, Jin Yong Lee
    Epidemiology and Health.2024; 46: e2024038.     CrossRef
  • An epidemic of cataract surgery in Korea: the effects of private health insurance on the National Health Insurance Service
    Hyejin Lee, Soo-Hee Hwang, Choon-Seon Park, Seol-Hee Chung, Catherine L. Chen, Jin Yong Lee, Jin Soo Lee
    Epidemiology and Health.2024; 46: e2024015.     CrossRef
  • National Trends in Rotavirus Enteritis among Infants in South Korea, 2010–2021: A Nationwide Cohort
    Hyun Jee Lee, Yujin Choi, Jaeyu Park, Yong-Sung Choi, Dong Keon Yon, Do Hyun Kim
    Children.2023; 10(9): 1436.     CrossRef
  • Real-world data analysis on effectiveness of integrative therapies: A practical guide to study design and data analysis using healthcare databases
    Ye-Seul Lee, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha
    Integrative Medicine Research.2023; 12(4): 101000.     CrossRef
Projection of Cancer Incidence and Mortality From 2020 to 2035 in the Korean Population Aged 20 Years and Older
Youjin Hong, Sangjun Lee, Sungji Moon, Soseul Sung, Woojin Lim, Kyungsik Kim, Seokyung An, Jeoungbin Choi, Kwang-Pil Ko, Inah Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Sue K. Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022;55(6):529-538.   Published online October 17, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.128
  • 18,679 View
  • 261 Download
  • 10 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
This study aimed to identify the current patterns of cancer incidence and estimate the projected cancer incidence and mortality between 2020 and 2035 in Korea.
Methods
Data on cancer incidence cases were extracted from the Korean Statistical Information Service from 2000 to 2017, and data on cancer-related deaths were extracted from the National Cancer Center from 2000 to 2018. Cancer cases and deaths were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition. For the current patterns of cancer incidence, age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) and age-standardized mortality rates were investigated using the 2000 mid-year estimated population aged over 20 years and older. A joinpoint regression model was used to determine the 2020 to 2035 trends in cancer.
Results
Overall, cancer cases were predicted to increase from 265 299 in 2020 to 474 085 in 2035 (growth rate: 1.8%). The greatest increase in the ASIR was projected for prostate cancer among male (7.84 vs. 189.53 per 100 000 people) and breast cancer among female (34.17 vs. 238.45 per 100 000 people) from 2000 to 2035. Overall cancer deaths were projected to increase from 81 717 in 2020 to 95 845 in 2035 (average annual growth rate: 1.2%). Although most cancer mortality rates were projected to decrease, those of breast, pancreatic, and ovarian cancer among female were projected to increase until 2035.
Conclusions
These up-to-date projections of cancer incidence and mortality in the Korean population may be a significant resource for implementing cancer-related regulations or developing cancer treatments.
Summary
Korean summary
최근 고령화 시대로 접어들고 암의 위험요인들에 대한 노출률이 변화함에 따라 암의 발생률 및 사망률에 대해서 관찰하는 것은 중요한 일이 되었다. 따라서, 본 연구는 한국인에서 2035년까지의 암에 대한 발생률과 사망률을 Joinpoint regression 모델을 이용하여 예측하였다. 남성에서는 전립선암, 여성에서는 유방암이 연령표준화 발생률이 가장 높았으며 대부분의 연령표준화 사망률은 감소하는 것으로 예상되지만 여성의 유방암, 췌장암, 난소암이 증가될 것으로 예상된다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Preventable Cancers Caused by Infection in Korea From 2015 to 2030
    Sungji Moon, Jeoungbin Choi, Soseul Sung, Youjin Hong, Kwang-Pil Ko, Jung Eun Lee, Inah Kim, Seungho Ryu, Sun Ha Jee, Guen Hui Kim, Sun Young Yang, Aesun Shin, Sun-Seog Kweon, Jeongseon Kim, Jieun Jang, Sangjun Lee, Kyungsik Kim, Woojin Lim, Yoon-Jung Cho
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fraction of Cancer Attributable to Carcinogenic Drugs in Korea from 2015 to 2030
    Woojin Lim, Soseul Sung, Youjin Hong, Sungji Moon, Sangjun Lee, Kyungsik Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Inah Kim, Kwang-Pil Ko, Sue K. Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 57(3): 635.     CrossRef
  • Preventable cancer cases and deaths attributable to tobacco smoking in Korea from 2015 to 2030
    Soseul Sung, Jihye An, Jeehi Jung, Hyeon Sook Lee, Sungji Moon, Inah Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Aesun Shin, Sun Ha Jee, Sun-Seog Kweon, Min-Ho Shin, Sangmin Park, Seungho Ryu, Sun Young Yang, Seung Ho Choi, Jeongseon Kim, Sang-Wook Yi, Yoon-Jung Choi, Youjin Hong
    Epidemiology and Health.2025; 47: e2025008.     CrossRef
  • Preventable cancer cases and deaths attributable to alcohol consumption in Korea from 2015 to 2030
    Soseul Sung, Jihye An, Jeehi Jung, Hyeon Sook Lee, Sungji Moon, Inah Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Aesun Shin, Sun Ha Jee, Sun-Seog Kweon, Min-Ho Shin, Sangmin Park, Seungho Ryu, Sun Young Yang, Seung Ho Choi, Jeongseon Kim, Sang-Wook Yi, Yoon-Jung Choi, Youjin Hong
    Epidemiology and Health.2025; 47: e2025009.     CrossRef
  • Preventable cancer cases and deaths attributable to deficit of physical activity in Korea from 2015 to 2030
    Soseul Sung, Sungji Moon, Jihye An, Jeehi Jung, Hyeon Sook Lee, Youjin Hong, Sangjun Lee, Woojin Lim, Kyungsik Kim, Inah Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Sun Ha Jee, Aesun Shin, Ji-Yeob Choi, Sun-Seog Kweon, Min-Ho Shin, Sangmin Park, Seungho Ryu, Sun Young Yang, Seung
    Epidemiology and Health.2025; 47: e2025010.     CrossRef
  • Fraction of cancer incidence and mortality attributable to dietary factors in Korea from 2015 to 2030
    Hyun Jeong Cho, Jin Young Yoo, Ga-Eun Yie, An Na Kim, Soseul Sung, Sungji Moon, Youjin Hong, Sangjun Lee, Inah Kim, Kwang-Pil Ko, Sun-Seog Kweon, Jung Eun Lee, Sue K. Park
    Epidemiology and Health.2025; 47: e2025065.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of Green, Delta, and Monte Carlo Methods to Select an Optimal Approach for Calculating the 95% Confidence Interval of the Population-attributable Fraction: Guidance for Epidemiological Research
    Sangjun Lee, Sungji Moon, Kyungsik Kim, Soseul Sung, Youjin Hong, Woojin Lim, Sue K. Park
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2024; 57(5): 499.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Population Attributable Fractions of Cancer Incidence and Mortality Linked to Excess Body Weight in Korea from 2015 to 2030
    Youjin Hong, Jihye An, Jeehi Jung, Hyeon Sook Lee, Soseul Sung, Sungji Moon, Inah Kim, Jung Eun Lee, Aesun Shin, Sun Ha Jee, Sun-Seog Kweon, Min-Ho Shin, Sangmin Park, Seung-Ho Ryu, Sun Young Yang, Seung Ho Choi, Jeongseon Kim, Sang-Wook Yi, Yoon-Jung Cho
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2024; 39(6): 921.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning Model for Prostate Cancer Prediction in Korean Men
    Sukjung Choi, Beomgi So, Shane Oh, Hongzoo Park, Sang Wook Lee, Geehyun Song, Jong Min Lee, Jung Ki Jo, Seon Hyeok Kim, Si Eun Lee, Eun-Bi Cho, Jae Hung Jung, Jeong Hyun Kim
    Journal of Urologic Oncology.2024; 22(3): 201.     CrossRef
  • Changes in metabolic syndrome and the risk of breast and endometrial cancer according to menopause in Korean women
    Thi Xuan Mai Tran, Soyeoun Kim, Boyoung Park
    Epidemiology and Health.2023; 45: e2023049.     CrossRef
The Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Colorectal Cancer Risk by Obesity Status in Korean Women: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Seong-geun Moon, Boyoung Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022;55(5):475-484.   Published online September 21, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.286
  • 6,826 View
  • 141 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
This study aimed to determine the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Korean women with obesity.
Methods
Cancer-free women (n=6 142 486) aged 40-79 years, who underwent National Health Insurance Service health examinations in 2009 and 2010 were included. The incidence of CRC was followed until 2018. The hazard ratio (HR) of MetS for the incidence of colon and rectal cancer was analyzed according to body mass index (BMI) categories, adjusting for confounders such as women’s reproductive factors. In addition, the heterogeneity of associations across BMI categories was assessed.
Results
Women with MetS were at increased risk of colon and rectal cancer compared to women without MetS (HR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 1.23 and HR,1.15; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.20), respectively. The HR of MetS for colon cancer across BMI categories was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.19), 1.14 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.20), and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.21) in women with BMIs <23.0 kg/m2, 23.0-24.9 kg/m2, and ≥25.0 kg/m2, respectively. The HR of MetS for rectal cancer across corresponding BMI categories was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.26), 1.14 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.23), and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.20). The heterogeneity of associations across BMI categories was not significant in either colon or rectal cancer (p=0.587 for colon cancer and p=0.927 for rectal cancer).
Conclusions
Women with MetS were at increased risk of colon and rectal cancer. Clinical and public health strategies should be considered for primary CRC prevention with an emphasis on improving women’s metabolic health across all BMI groups.
Summary
Korean summary
한국 여성에서 대사증후군은 대장암 발생과 직장암 발생에 유의한 위험요인으로 보인다. 이는 체질량지수를 층화하고 여성력과 관련된 요인들을 보정하더라도 유의했다. 한국 여성의 대장암 및 직장암 예방을 위해 비만도에 관계 없이 대사증후군 요소를 관리하는 것이 필요하다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Metabolic Syndrome Components and Cancer Risk in Normal-Weight Subjects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in over 18 Million Individuals
    Yasmin Ezzatvar, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia, Jacqueline Páez-Herrera, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda, Óscar Caballero
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(2): 538.     CrossRef
  • The Association of Urinary Zinc with Metabolic Syndrome and the Mediating Role of Liver Enzymes in the Bouyei Ethnic Group in China
    Fei Xiao, Yuxin Hu, Yuan Wang, Yuxin Zhang, Enhui Zhou, Tingting Yang, Feng Hong
    Cardiovascular Toxicology.2025; 25(8): 1139.     CrossRef
  • Age-Related Differences in Anthropometric and Lifestyle Factors Linked to Metabolic Syndrome in Women with Overweight and Obesity: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Edyta Łuszczki, Magdalena Zielińska, Łukasz Oleksy, Artur Stolarczyk, Katarzyna Dereń
    Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity.2025; Volume 18: 1765.     CrossRef
  • Association of metabolic obesity phenotypes with risk of overall and site-specific cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Yahya Mahamat-saleh, Dagfinn Aune, Heinz Freisling, Sheetal Hardikar, Rola Jaafar, Sabina Rinaldi, Marc J. Gunter, Laure Dossus
    British Journal of Cancer.2024; 131(9): 1480.     CrossRef
  • Overweight and obesity significantly increase colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 66 studies revealing a 25–57% elevation in risk
    Zoltan Ungvari, Mónika Fekete, Peter Varga, Andrea Lehoczki, János Tibor Fekete, Anna Ungvari, Balázs Győrffy
    GeroScience.2024; 47(3): 3343.     CrossRef
  • Increased risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality in middle-aged Korean women with prediabetes and diabetes: a population-based study
    Thi Xuan Mai Tran, Soyeoun Kim, Huiyeon Song, Boyoung Park
    Epidemiology and Health.2023; 45: e2023080.     CrossRef
Special Article
Statin Intake and Gastric Cancer Risk: An Updated Subgroup Meta-analysis Considering Immortal Time Bias
Jong-Myon Bae
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022;55(5):424-427.   Published online August 18, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.22.209
  • 6,437 View
  • 118 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDF
A retrospective record-linkage study (RLS) based on medical records containing drug prescription histories involves immortal time bias (ITB). Thus, it is necessary to control for this bias in the research planning and analysis stages. Furthermore, a summary of a metaanalysis including RLSs that did not control for ITB showed that specific drugs had a preventive effect on the occurrence of the disease. Previous meta-analytic results of three systematic reviews evaluating the association between statin intake and gastric cancer risk showed that the summary hazard ratio (sHR) of the RLSs was lower than 1 and was statistically significant. We should consider the possibility of ITB in the sHR of RLSs and interpret the results carefully.
Summary
Korean summary
이차자료를 활용하여 구축한 코호트 추적연구는 immortal time bias가 개입될 개연성을 염두에 두어야 한다. 이들 연구결과들을 제외한 메타분석 결과 스타닌 복용에 따른 위암발생 위험 감소는 관련성이 없다는 결과를 도출하였다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Statin repurposing in gastrointestinal cancer: from metabolic reprogramming to immunoregulation
    Miaorong Xu, Chi-Chiu Yu, Henry Kwun-Hang Chung, Jingying Zhou
    Journal of Leukocyte Biology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors use and the risk of gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shih-Wei Lai, Bing-Fang Hwang, Yu-Hung Kuo, Chiu-Shong Liu, Kuan-Fu Liao
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Estimation of Utility Weights for Prostate-related Health States in Korea
Seon-Ha Kim, Minsu Ock, Min-Woo Jo, Sungchan Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022;55(3):243-252.   Published online May 4, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.21.426
  • 6,382 View
  • 119 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
Very limited previous research has investigated the utility weights of prostate-related diseases in the general population in Korea. The purpose of this study was to calculate the utility of prostate-related health states in the Korean general public using the standard gamble (SG) method.
Methods
Seven health states for hypothetical prostate cancers, 1 for benign prostate hyperplasia, and 1 for erectile dysfunction were developed based on patient education material and previous publications. In total, 460 responses from the Korean general population were used to analyze the utility of prostate-related health states. Computer-assisted personal interviews were conducted, and utility values were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and SG. Mean utility values were calculated for each prostate-related health state.
Results
The mean utility values of prostate cancer derived from SG ranged from 0.281 (metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer) to 0.779 (localized prostate cancer requiring prostatectomy). The utility value of benign prostate hyperplasia was 0.871, and that of erectile dysfunction was 0.812. The utility values obtained using the SG method in all conditions were higher than the values obtained by VAS. There were no significant demographic variables affecting utility values in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Our findings might be useful for economic evaluation and utility calculation of screening and interventions for prostate-related conditions in the general population.
Summary
Korean summary
이 연구는 일반인구집단을 대상으로 7개의 전립선 암 상태와 전립선 비대증, 발기부전상태의 효용값을 표준기회선택법을 이용하여 산출하였다. 전립선암 상태에 따라 평균 효용값은 0.281에서 0.779범위였다. 연구 결과는 전립선 관련 상태의 중재의 효용 계산이나 경제성 평가에 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Improving Collaborative Engagement in Health State Valuation: A Scoping Review of Current Practices and Emerging Recommendations
    Philip A. Powell, Victoria Gale, Gurdas Singh, Anthea Sutton, Janine Verstraete, Nancy Devlin, Michael Herdman, Simone Schieskow, Jill Carlton
    PharmacoEconomics.2026; 44(2): 141.     CrossRef
  • Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of health state utility values in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Elena Castro, Rhett Figliuzzi, Sarah Walsh, Samantha Craigie, Jonathan Nazari, Alexander Niyazov, Imtiaz A Samjoo
    The Oncologist.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Lung Cancer Screening With Low-dose Chest Computed Tomography: Experience From Radon-contaminated Regions in Kazakhstan
Alexandra Panina, Dilyara Kaidarova, Zhamilya Zholdybay, Akmaral Ainakulova, Jandos Amankulov, Dias Toleshbayev, Zhanar Zhakenova, Arman Khozhayev
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022;55(3):273-279.   Published online April 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.21.600
  • 9,869 View
  • 143 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
The aim of this study was to present the baseline results of a pilot project conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of lung cancer screening using low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) in regions with excessive radon levels in the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Methods
In total, 3671 participants were screened by low-dose chest CT. Current, former, and never-smokers who resided in regions with elevated levels of radon in drinking water sources and indoor air, aged between 40 and 75 with no history of any cancer, and weighing less than 140 kg were included in the study. All lung nodules were categorized according to the American College of Radiology Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS 1.0).
Results
Overall, 614 (16.7%) participants had positive baseline CT findings (Lung-RADS categories 3 and 4). Seventy-four cancers were detected, yielding an overall cancer detection rate of 2.0%, with 10.8% (8/74) stage I and a predominance of stage III (59.4%; 44/74). Women never-smokers and men current smokers had the highest cancer detection rates, at 2.9% (12/412) and 6.1% (12/196), respectively. Compared to never-smokers, higher odds ratios (ORs) of lung cancer detection were found in smokers (OR,2.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 4.05, p<0.001) and former smokers (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.06 to 5.06, p=0.003). The most common histologic type of cancer was adenocarcinoma (58.1%).
Conclusions
Implementation of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in regions with elevated radon levels is an effective method for both smokers and never-smokers.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Lung cancer screening for never smokers: current evidence and future directions
    Kay Choong See
    Singapore Medical Journal.2026; 67(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • First Central Asian Forum on Lung Cancer
    Jandos Amankulov, David F. Yankelevitz, Amangeldi Mukhamejan, Rowena Yip, Emanuela Taioli, Bruce Pyenson, James Mulshine, Claudia I. Henschke
    JTO Clinical and Research Reports.2026; 7(1): 100898.     CrossRef
  • LDCT uptake and determinants of lung cancer screening in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yue Hu, Yuntong Zhao, Pei Dong, Wuqi Qiu, Ayan Mao
    Frontiers in Public Health.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of working conditions on the health of workers in contact with chrysotile-containing dust
    U. S. Shaikhattarova, Y. Zh. Otarov, E. V. Kovalevskiy, А. К. Kuandykova, Zh. Zh. Zharylkassyn, А. V. Alexeyev, М. К. Tilemissov, C. U. Ismailov
    Medicine and ecology.2024; (3): 27.     CrossRef
  • Secondary prevention and treatment innovation of early stage non-small cell lung cancer: Impact on diagnostic-therapeutic pathway from a multidisciplinary perspective
    Giulia Pasello, Daniela Scattolin, Laura Bonanno, Francesca Caumo, Andrea Dell'Amore, Elena Scagliori, Mariaenrica Tinè, Fiorella Calabrese, Gaetano Benati, Matteo Sepulcri, Cristina Baiocchi, Michele Milella, Federico Rea, Valentina Guarneri
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2023; 116: 102544.     CrossRef
  • Performance of Lung-RADS in different target populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yifei Mao, Jiali Cai, Marjolein A. Heuvelmans, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Harry J. M. Groen, Matthijs Oudkerk, Marleen Vonder, Monique D. Dorrius, Geertruida H. de Bock
    European Radiology.2023; 34(3): 1877.     CrossRef
Association Between Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers and the Risk of Lung Cancer Among Patients With Hypertension From the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort
Sungji Moon, Hae-Young Lee, Jieun Jang, Sue K. Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(6):476-486.   Published online November 3, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.20.405
  • 8,798 View
  • 175 Download
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of lung cancer in relation to angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use among patients with hypertension from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with hypertension who started to take antihypertensive medications and had a treatment period of at least 6 months. We calculated the weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of lung cancer associated with ARB use compared with calcium channel blocker (CCB) use using inverse probability treatment weighting. Results: Among a total of 60 469 subjects with a median follow-up time of 7.8 years, 476 cases of lung cancer were identified. ARB use had a protective effect on lung cancer compared with CCB use (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.96). Consistent findings were found in analyses considering patients who changed or discontinued their medication (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.77), as well as for women (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.93), patients without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.00), never-smokers (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.99), and non-drinkers (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.97). In analyses with different comparison antihypertensive medications, the overall protective effects of ARBs on lung cancer risk remained consistent. Conclusions: The results of the present study suggest that ARBs could decrease the risk of lung cancer. More evidence is needed to establish the causal effect of ARBs on the incidence of lung cancer.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness and Safety of Common Non-Oncologic Pharmaceuticals in Cancer Management: A Systematic Review
    Luc ZONGO, Théodora M. ZOHONCON, Bakary Tientigui DEMBELE, Heiko LANGE, Rosemary R. CANFUA, Davy P-W BEMBAMBA, Yilédoma T. M. LENGANE, Wilfried F. P. TRAORE, Lucien KABORE, Michel PALUKU MUKULULI, Raogo OUEDRAOGO, Mimtiri S. ZONGO, Esther Hor
    Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics.2025; 15(10): 304.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors Associated With Incidence of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sindhu Bhaarrati Naidu, Allegra Wisking, Akul Karoshi, Sarah Burdett, Peter J. Godolphin, Sanjay Popat, Sam M. Janes, Neal Navani
    JTO Clinical and Research Reports.2025; 6(12): 100910.     CrossRef
  • Effects of ACE inhibitors/ARBs on lung cancer; an updated mini-review on recent data
    Zahra Golestani Hotkani, Tella Sadighpour, Ali Shirbacheh, Kamran Shirbache
    Journal of Renal Endocrinology.2024; 10: e25175.     CrossRef
  • Association between Statins and Incidence of Cancer in Patients with Dyslipidemia Using Large-Scale Health Insurance Claims Data
    Ayako Maeda-Minami, Masayuki Takagi, Yasunari Mano, Hideki Ishikawa, Yutaka Matsuyama, Michihiro Mutoh
    Cancer Prevention Research.2023; 16(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Associated with a Decreased Risk of Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Zexu Wang, Lingyun Wei, Cheng Yin, Wang Li, Bing Wan
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(2): 243.     CrossRef
  • The association between angiotensin receptor blockers and lung, bladder, and colon cancer development: A 10-year multicentric retrospective Lebanese study
    Yara G. Dagher, Sandra El Helou, Karen G. Haifa, Issam G. Chalhoub, Rita T. Boulos, Bachir Atallah, Fadi Nasr, Issam Kassab, Mirna N. Chahine
    Medicine.2023; 102(36): e34901.     CrossRef
  • Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Cancer Risk: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
    Kayeong Shin, Jiwoo Yang, Yeuni Yu, Eunjeong Son, Kihun Kim, Yun Hak Kim
    SSRN Electronic Journal .2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Local Renin Angiotensin System in the Common Types of Cancer
    Moudhi Almutlaq, Abir Abdullah Alamro, Hassan S. Alamri, Amani Ahmed Alghamdi, Tlili Barhoumi
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Brief Report
Estimating the Survival of Patients With Lung Cancer: What Is the Best Statistical Model?
Siavosh Abedi, Ghasem Janbabaei, Mahdi Afshari, Mahmood Moosazadeh, Masoumeh Rashidi Alashti, Akbar Hedayatizadeh-Omran, Reza Alizadeh-Navaei, Ehsan Abedini
J Prev Med Public Health. 2019;52(2):140-144.   Published online February 18, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.17.090
  • 9,099 View
  • 172 Download
  • 8 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
Investigating the survival of patients with cancer is vitally necessary for controlling the disease and for assessing treatment methods. This study aimed to compare various statistical models of survival and to determine the survival rate and its related factors among patients suffering from lung cancer.
Methods
In this retrospective cohort, the cumulative survival rate, median survival time, and factors associated with the survival of lung cancer patients were estimated using Cox, Weibull, exponential, and Gompertz regression models. Kaplan-Meier tables and the log-rank test were also used to analyze the survival of patients in different subgroups.
Results
Of 102 patients with lung cancer, 74.5% were male. During the follow-up period, 80.4% died. The incidence rate of death among patients was estimated as 3.9 (95% confidence [CI], 3.1 to 4.8) per 100 person-months. The 5-year survival rate for all patients, males, females, patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and patients with small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) was 17%, 13%, 29%, 21%, and 0%, respectively. The median survival time for all patients, males, females, those with NSCLC, and those with SCLC was 12.7 months, 12.0 months, 16.0 months, 16.0 months, and 6.0 months, respectively. Multivariate analyses indicated that the hazard ratios (95% CIs) for male sex, age, and SCLC were 0.56 (0.33 to 0.93), 1.03 (1.01 to 1.05), and 2.91 (1.71 to 4.95), respectively.
Conclusions
Our results showed that the exponential model was the most precise. This model identified age, sex, and type of cancer as factors that predicted survival in patients with lung cancer.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Associations of biological aging with the morbidity and all-cause mortality of patients with lung cancer
    Qihang Xie, Haoran Qu, Siyu Xie, Wenhao Li, Rui Ouyang, Chengxiang Zhang, Ming Du
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor – Commentary on “Continued tobacco use beyond cancer diagnosis in India – A systematic review and meta-analysis”
    Ruihang Luo, Maosen Liu, Wei Zhong, Hongyi Lai, Kun Ai, Mingshan Liu
    Journal of Cancer Policy.2025; 46: 100661.     CrossRef
  • Primary and Acquired Resistance against Immune Check Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Qinying Sun, Xiangzhen Wei, Zhonglin Wang, Yan Zhu, Weiying Zhao, Yuchao Dong
    Cancers.2022; 14(14): 3294.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Residential Concentration of PM2.5 Analyzed as Time-Varying Covariate on the Survival Rate of Lung Cancer Patients: A 15-Year Hospital-Based Study in Upper Northern Thailand
    Nawapon Nakharutai, Patrinee Traisathit, Natthapat Thongsak, Titaporn Supasri, Pimwarat Srikummoon, Salinee Thumronglaohapun, Phonpat Hemwan, Imjai Chitapanarux
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(8): 4521.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of inability to live independently in the course of lung cancer
    Marek Tradecki, Jolanta Ziółkowska, Roma Roemer-Ślimak, Grzegorz Mazur, Aleksandra Butrym
    Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej.2022; 76(1): 402.     CrossRef
  • Deep learning-based tumor microenvironment segmentation is predictive of tumor mutations and patient survival in non-small-cell lung cancer
    Alicja Rączkowska, Iwona Paśnik, Michał Kukiełka, Marcin Nicoś, Magdalena A. Budzinska, Tomasz Kucharczyk, Justyna Szumiło, Paweł Krawczyk, Nicola Crosetto, Ewa Szczurek
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biology of NSCLC: Interplay between Cancer Cells, Radiation and Tumor Immune Microenvironment
    Slavisa Tubin, Mohammad K. Khan, Seema Gupta, Branislav Jeremic
    Cancers.2021; 13(4): 775.     CrossRef
  • Immune Infiltration Profiling in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer and Their Clinical Significance: Study Based on Gene Expression Measurements
    Fangyao Chen, Yuhui Yang, Yaling Zhao, Leilei Pei, Hong Yan
    DNA and Cell Biology.2019; 38(11): 1387.     CrossRef
Original Articles
The Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Cholecystectomy or Appendectomy: A Population-based Cohort Study in Korea
Joonki Lee, Sunho Choe, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Aesun Shin
J Prev Med Public Health. 2018;51(6):281-288.   Published online October 29, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.18.105
  • 13,712 View
  • 245 Download
  • 38 Crossref
AbstractAbstract AbstractSummary PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
We investigated the association between cholecystectomy or appendectomy and the subsequent risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Korean population.
Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted with the National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort of Korea; this sample was followed up from January 1, 2002, until the date of CRC incidence, loss to follow-up, or December 31, 2015. The exposure status of cholecystectomy and appendectomy was treated as a time-varying covariate. The calculated risk of CRC was stratified by follow-up period, and the association between these surgical procedures and CRC was investigated by a Cox regression model applying appropriate lag periods.
Results
A total of 707 663 individuals were identified for analysis. The study population was followed up for an average of 13.66 years, and 4324 CRC cases were identified. The hazard ratio (HR) of CRC was elevated in the first year after cholecystectomy (HR, 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 2.89) and in the first year and 2-3 years after appendectomy (HR, 4.22; 95% CI, 2.87 to 6.20; HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.36 to 4.03, respectively). The HRs of CRC after applying 1 year of lag after cholecystectomy and 3 years of lag after appendectomy were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.57 to 1.13) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.51 to 1.16), respectively.
Conclusions
The risk of CRC increased in the first year after cholecystectomy and appendectomy, implying the possibility of bias. When appropriate lag periods after surgery were applied, no association was found between cholecystectomy or appendectomy and CRC.
Summary
Korean summary
본 연구는 담낭절제술, 충수돌기절제술 후 대장암의 발생위험에 관한 연구로 국민건강보험공단 표본코호트자료를 사용한 후향적코호트 연구이다. 총 707 663명을 대상으로 연구를 진행하였으며, 담낭절제술을 시행한 환자들은 수술 후 1년 이내에서 대장암의 위험도가 유의하게 증가하였으나 이후 관련성을 보이지 않았고, 충수돌기절제술을 시행한 환자들은 수술 후 1년, 2~3년에서 유의하게 위험도가 증가하였으나, 이후에는 관련성을 보이지 않았다. 이 결과는 역인과관계의 가능성을 시사하며 이것을 고려하였을 때, 담낭절제술과 충수돌기절제술은 대장암의 발생위험과의 연관성을 보이지 않았다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • ERCP Combined with Single Operator Cholangioscope-Guided Transpapillary Gallbladder Polyps Resection: A Novel Alternative Approach
    Liying Tao, Hongguang Wang, Hailu Wu, Yadong Feng, Qingmei Guo, Ruihua Shi
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gallbladder disease and colorectal cancer: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study
    Qiang Hu, Jing Sun
    Discover Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Acute Appendicitis as a Harbinger of Colorectal Neoplasms in Patients Aged 40 or Older: A Scoping Review
    Andrea Spota, Marina Englesakis, Sami Chadi, David Gomez, Eisar Al-Sukhni
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Increased diagnosis of hepato-biliary-pancreatic cancer after cholecystectomy: a population-based study
    Young Ae Kim, Hak Jun Kim, Mee Joo Kang, Sung-Sik Han, Hyeong Min Park, Sang-Jae Park
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association Between Cholecystectomy and Colorectal Cancer
    Adithya Sathya Narayana, Sreekar Agumbe Pai, Advaith N. Rao, Anisha Dhavaleshwar
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 16(6): 1504.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Immunological Role of the Microbial Composition of the Appendix and the Associated Risks of Appendectomies
    Tarequl Islam, Md Shahjalal Sagor, Noshin Tabassum Tamanna, Md Kamrul Islam Bappy, Danishuddin, Md Azizul Haque, Maximilian Lackner
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2025; 15(3): 112.     CrossRef
  • Mortality and cardiovascular disease after cholecystectomy in type 2 diabetes: A nationwide longitudinal cohort study
    Han Na Jung, Ji Hye Heo, Eun Roh, Kyung‐Do Han, Jun Goo Kang, Seong Jin Lee, Sung‐Hee Ihm
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences.2025; 32(7): 514.     CrossRef
  • The Associations Between Gallstone Disease and Pan‐Cancer Incidence Risk Based on Over 13 Million Participants
    Wenqian Yu, Jin Zhou, Jing Luo, Jing Xia, Shiyi Li, Linjun Xie, YaZhou He, Hongyu Li, Guoheng Jiang, Xin Chen, Xuan Bai, Min Mao, Xin Wang
    Cancer Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Impact of the Appendix on Intestinal Microbiome and Colorectal Cancer
    钟玲 王
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(05): 1407.     CrossRef
  • Appendectomy and Long-term Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Overall and by Tumor Fusobacterium nucleatum Status
    Hidetaka Kawamura, Tomotaka Ugai, Yasutoshi Takashima, Kazuo Okadome, Takashi Shimizu, Kosuke Mima, Naohiko Akimoto, Koichiro Haruki, Kota Arima, Melissa Zhao, Juha P. Väyrynen, Kana Wu, Xuehong Zhang, Kimmie Ng, Jonathan A. Nowak, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt,
    Annals of Surgery.2025; 282(2): 319.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer Risk Following Cholecystectomy: An Updated Systematic Review
    Pierre-Henri Nelis, Stefano Grotto, Kenza Azra Ibis, Nashaira Nahar, Azzadinne Belhaj, Myriam Benhadda, Aude Vanlander, Nouredin Messaoudi
    Cancers.2025; 17(19): 3114.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Cholecystectomy on Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Review on Risk Factors and the Association
    Parsa Lorestani, Ferdos Faghihkhorasani, Homina Saffar, Behnam Darabi, Yasaman Tavakoli, Amir Mohammad Lorestani, Mohammad Ghiasi, Kimia Jazi
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The association between appendectomy and increased invasion of ascending colon cancer: a retrospective study involving 880 patients
    Xu Sun, Rui Li, Wen Zhao, Dingchang Li, Guanglong Dong
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond a vestigial organ: effects of the appendix on gut microbiome and colorectal cancer
    Daniel Ren Yi Yap, Rashid N Lui, Jens Samol, Joanne Ngeow, Joseph JY Sung, Sunny H Wong
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(5): 826.     CrossRef
  • Trends in colorectal cancer screening compliance and incidence among 60‐ to 74‐year‐olds in China
    Mingqing Zhang, Yongdan Zhang, Lu Guo, Lizhong Zhao, Haoren Jing, Xiao Yang, Wen Zhang, Yong Zhang, Zhenguo Nie, Siwei Zhu, Shiwu Zhang, Xipeng Zhang
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Role of Appendectomy in the Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer
    M.I. A. Nezhad, N. P. Yabandeh
    Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology.2024; 34(2): 83.     CrossRef
  • Appendix removal affects the subsequent cancer risk in Asian adults: A territory-wide population-based cohort study
    Chenhao Hu, Cosmos Liutao Guo, Harry Cheuk-Hay Lau, Feiyu Shi, Zhe Zhang, Gang Guo, Gaixia Liu, Yinnan Chen, Louis Ho-Shing Lau, Lei Zhang, Xuejun Sun, Sunny Hei Wong, Lei Zhang, Junjun She, Jun Yu
    Cancer Letters.2024; 598: 217087.     CrossRef
  • Risk of colorectal cancer and adenoma after an appendectomy: results from three large prospective cohort studies and meta-analysis
    Yiwen Zhang, Jaewon Khil, Xiaoshuang Feng, Tomotaka Ugai, Shuji Ogino, Edward Giovannucci
    Cancer Causes & Control.2024; 35(11): 1457.     CrossRef
  • Effect of smoking on the risk of gastrointestinal cancer after cholecystectomy: A national population-based cohort study
    Minseob Kim, Kyung-Do Han, Seung-Hyun Ko, Yoonkyung Woo, Jae Hyun Han
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(9): 2796.     CrossRef
  • Cholecystectomy Is a Risk Factor for Proximal Colon Cancer That May Also Relate to its Aggressiveness
    Raymundo A. Muñoz, Andrei A. Ramos, Francisco J. Miranda, José E. De La Rosa, Alfonzo E. Muñoz, Aáron A. Ramírez, Eva P. Chavez, Guillermo Gallardo, Salvador Pizarro
    Journal of Surgical Research.2024; 304: 152.     CrossRef
  • The Appendix Orchestrates T-Cell Mediated Immunosurveillance in Colitis-Associated Cancer
    Maxime K. Collard, Julien Tourneur-Marsille, Mathieu Uzzan, Miguel Albuquerque, Maryline Roy, Anne Dumay, Jean-Noël Freund, Jean-Pierre Hugot, Nathalie Guedj, Xavier Treton, Yves Panis, Eric Ogier-Denis
    Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 15(3): 665.     CrossRef
  • Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with appendicitis over the age of 40 years
    Mei Sze Lee, Alben Thomas, John F. Pearson, Rachel Purcell, Francis Frizelle, Tamara Glyn
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(4): 624.     CrossRef
  • Risk of colorectal cancer after appendectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Zhuhui Liu, Xinyue Ma, Chunqi Zhu, Jing‐Yuan Fang
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2023; 38(3): 350.     CrossRef
  • Does postcholecystectomy increase the risk of colorectal cancer?
    Zhenyu Dong, Ruixian Shi, Pengda Li, Xiaobiao Song, Fan Dong, Jianmin Zhu, Riga Wu, Zhi Liang, Mingyue Du, Jijun Wang, Zhigang Yang
    Frontiers in Microbiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The association between prescription drugs and colorectal cancer prognosis: a nationwide cohort study using a medication-wide association study
    Hyeong-Taek Woo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Aesun Shin
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cholecystectomy Increases the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in the Korean Population
    Ji Hye Huh, Kyong Joo Lee, Yun Kyung Cho, Shinje Moon, Yoon Jung Kim, Eun Roh, Kyung-do Han, Dong Hee Koh, Jun Goo Kang, Seong Jin Lee, Sung-Hee Ihm
    Annals of Surgery.2023; 278(2): e264.     CrossRef
  • No association between cholecystectomy and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Lulin Yu, Wenjing Liu, Yici Yan, Yu Jiang, Xin Gao, Shanming Ruan
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Operational Definitions of Colorectal Cancer in the Korean National Health Insurance Database
    Hyeree Park, Yu Rim Kim, Yerin Pyun, Hyundeok Joo, Aesun Shin
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2023; 56(4): 312.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing advanced colorectal neoplasm anatomic site distribution in China: An epidemiological study based on colorectal cancer screening data
    Kailong Zhao, Hongzhou Li, Baofeng Zhang, Wenwen Pang, Suying Yan, Xinzhu Zhao, Xinyu Liu, Wanting Wang, Qiurong Han, Yao Yao, Tianhao Chu, Zhiqiang Feng, Qinghuai Zhang, Chunze Zhang
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(24): 22252.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer risk following appendectomy: a pooled analysis of three large prospective cohort studies
    Joseph A. Rothwell, Nagisa Mori, Fanny Artaud, Agnès Fournier, Marco Conte, Marie‐Christine Boutron‐Ruault, Simon S. M. Chan, Marc J. Gunter, Neil Murphy, Gianluca Severi
    Cancer Communications.2022; 42(5): 486.     CrossRef
  • Appendectomy and the subsequent risk of cancer: A prospective population-based cohort study with long follow-up
    A.L. van den Boom, B.D.A. Lavrijssen, J. Fest, M.A. Ikram, B.H. Stricker, C.H.J. van Eijck, R. Ruiter
    Cancer Epidemiology.2022; 77: 102120.     CrossRef
  • Cholecystectomy-induced secondary bile acids accumulation ameliorates colitis through inhibiting monocyte/macrophage recruitment
    Yun Liu, Jun Xu, Xinhua Ren, Yu Zhang, Ziliang Ke, Jianhua Zhou, Yang Wang, Yifan Zhang, Yulan Liu
    Gut Microbes.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Review of Colorectal Cancer in Terms of Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Development, Symptoms and Diagnosis
    Tomasz Sawicki, Monika Ruszkowska, Anna Danielewicz, Ewa Niedźwiedzka, Tomasz Arłukowicz, Katarzyna E. Przybyłowicz
    Cancers.2021; 13(9): 2025.     CrossRef
  • Increased Risk of Major Depressive Disorder After Cholecystectomy: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea
    Eun Hyo Jin, Kyungdo Han, Dong Ho Lee, Cheol Min Shin, Joo Hyun Lim, Hyuk Yoon, Nayoung Kim
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2021; 12(4): e00339.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the distribution of the locations of colorectal cancer after appendectomy and cholecystectomy
    Szabolcs Ábrahám, Tibor Németh, Ria Benkő, Mária Matuz, Aurél Ottlakán, Dániel Váczi, Attila Paszt, Zsolt Simonka, György Lázár
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Smoking status before and after colorectal cancer diagnosis and mortality in Korean men: A population‐based cohort study
    Doeun Jang, Sunho Choe, Ji Won Park, Seung‐Yong Jeong, Aesun Shin
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(24): 9641.     CrossRef
  • Prognosis of Patients with Colorectal Cancer with Diabetes According to Medication Adherence: A Population-Based Cohort Study
    Sunho Choe, Joonki Lee, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Young Min Cho, Byung-Joo Park, Aesun Shin
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2020; 29(6): 1120.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in preschool children
    Sajad Ahmad Wani, Gowher Nazir Mufti, Nisar Ahmad Bhat, Aejaz Ahsan Baba, Faheem Andrabi, Mudasir Hamid, Shahid Shazad
    Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery.2019; 1(3): 119.     CrossRef
Demographic and Survivorship Disparities in Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in the United States
Munseok Seo, James R. Langabeer II
J Prev Med Public Health. 2018;51(5):242-247.   Published online August 23, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.18.092
  • 16,470 View
  • 180 Download
  • 20 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
To examine survivorship disparities in demographic factors and risk status for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which accounts for more than 75% of all urinary bladder cancers, but is highly curable with early identification and treatment. Methods: We used the US National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries over a 19-year period (1988-2006) to examine survivorship disparities in age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status of patients and risk status classified by histologic grade, stage, size of tumor, and number of multiple primary tumors among NMIBC patients (n=29 326). We applied Kaplan-Meier (K-M) and Cox proportional hazard methods for survival analysis. Results: Among all urinary bladder cancer patients, the majority of NMIBCs were in male (74.1%), non-Latino white (86.7%), married (67.8%), and low-risk (37.6%) to intermediate-risk (44.8%) patients. The mean age was 68 years. Survivorship (in median life years) was highest for non-Latino white (5.4 years), married (5.4 years), and low-risk (5.7 years) patients (K-M analysis, p<0.001). We found significantly lower survivorship for elderly, male (female hazard ratio [HR], 0.96), Latino (HR, 1.20), and unmarried (married HR, 0.93) patients. Conclusions: Survivorship disparities were ubiquitous across age, sex, race/ethnicity, and marital status groups. Non-white, unmarried, and elderly patients had significantly shorter survivorship. The implications of these findings include the need for a heightened focus on health policy and more organized efforts to improve access to care in order to increase the chances of survival for all patients.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Area deprivation and cancer‐specific mortality in non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: a statewide analysis
    Carlo Silvani, Alfonso Santangelo, Jack Considine, Anna Tylecki, Alex Stephens, Adam Mssika, Benjamin Robinson, Sebastiano Nazzani, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Nicola Nicolai, Emanuele Montanari, Craig Rogers, Firas
    BJU International.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Event‐free survival and complete response rate as surrogate endpoints for overall survival in high‐risk non–muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: A meta‐analysis of bacillus Calmette‐Guérin—naive or —remote cases
    Rituparna Bhattacharya, Kalé Kponee‐Shovein, Yipeng Gao, Yan Song, Jingyi Liu, Katherine Wei, Ekta Kapadia, Haojie Li, Ashish M. Kamat
    Cancer.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metastasis development in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Michael Leyderman, Thenappan Chandrasekar, Petros Grivas, Roger Li, Seetharam Bhat, Alina Basnet, Oleg Shapiro, Joseph Jacob, Michael A. Daneshvar, Eyal Kord, Gennady Bratslavsky, Hanan Goldberg
    Nature Reviews Urology.2025; 22(6): 375.     CrossRef
  • Socioeconomic disparities in survival of patients with non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma
    Bohdan Baralo, Peter T. Daniels, Cody A. McIntire, Rajesh Thirumaran, John W. Melson, Asit K. Paul
    World Journal of Urology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • N6-methyladenosine-modified circ_104797 sustains cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer through acting as RNA sponges
    Congjie Xu, Jiaquan Zhou, Xiaoting Zhang, Xinli Kang, Shuan Liu, Mi Song, Cheng Chang, Youtu Lin, Yang Wang
    Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Propensity Score-Based Comparison regarding Renal, Functional, and Surgical Outcome of Continent Cutaneous Urinary Diversions in Patients with Benign Chronic Bladder Diseases and Patients with Bladder Cancer
    Vincent Scheper, Anna Katharina Seitz, Hubert Kübler, Arkadius Kocot, Charis Kalogirou, Marcel Schwinger
    Urologia Internationalis.2024; 108(6): 539.     CrossRef
  • Nomogram for predicting all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality after TURBT for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Yao Luo, Sujing Wei, Jing Yang, Zaixiang Tan
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disparities in the prevalence and management of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
    Angela Estevez, Sumedh Kaul, Aaron Fleishman, Ruslan Korets, Peter Chang, Andrew Wagner, Joaquim Bellmunt, Aria F. Olumi, Heidi Rayala, Boris Gershman
    Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.2023; 41(5): 255.e15.     CrossRef
  • Intermediate and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an overview of epidemiology, burden, and unmet needs
    Kristin Grabe-Heyne, Christof Henne, Paramananthan Mariappan, Götz Geiges, Johannes Pöhlmann, Richard F. Pollock
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Treatment Outcomes of High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) in Real-World Evidence (RWE) Studies: Systematic Literature Review (SLR)
    Mihaela Georgiana Musat, Christina Soeun Kwon, Elizabeth Masters, Slaven Sikirica, Debduth B Pijush, Anna Forsythe
    ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research.2022; Volume 14: 35.     CrossRef
  • Management, Surveillance Patterns, and Costs Associated With Low-Grade Papillary Stage Ta Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Among Older Adults, 2004-2013
    Kelly K. Bree, Yong Shan, Patrick J. Hensley, Niyati Lobo, Chengrui Hu, Douglas S. Tyler, Karim Chamie, Ashish M. Kamat, Stephen B. Williams
    JAMA Network Open.2022; 5(3): e223050.     CrossRef
  • Gender Disparities in Bladder Cancer-Specific Survival in High Poverty Areas Utilizing Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS)
    Laura Bukavina, Megan Prunty, Kirtishri Mishra, Helen Sun, David Sheyn, Britt Conroy, Amr Mahran, Gregory MacLennan, Fredrick Schumacher, Lee Ponsky, Sarah Markt
    Urology.2021; 151: 163.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of survival in elderly patients treated with uretero-cutaneostomy or ileal conduit after radical cystectomy
    Shang Huang, Hanzhong Chen, Teng Li, Xiaoyong Pu, Jiumin Liu, Xuecheng Bi
    BMC Geriatrics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-Muscular Invasive Bladder Cancer: Re-envisioning Therapeutic Journey from Traditional to Regenerative Interventions
    Kuan-Wei Shih, Wei-Chieh Chen, Ching-Hsin Chang, Ting-En Tai, Jeng-Cheng Wu, Andy C. Huang, Ming-Che Liu
    Aging and disease.2021; 12(3): 868.     CrossRef
  • The impact of the social construct of race on outcomes among bacille Calmette‐Guérin‐treated patients with high‐risk non‐muscle–invasive bladder cancer in an equal‐access setting
    Corinne Lawler, Lin Gu, Lauren E. Howard, Brandee Branche, Emily Wiggins, Aditya Srinivasan, Meagan L. Foster, Zachary Klaassen, Amanda M. De Hoedt, Jeffrey R. Gingrich, Dan Theodorescu, Stephen J. Freedland, Stephen B. Williams
    Cancer.2021; 127(21): 3998.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Intravesical Chemotherapy on the Survival of Patients with Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Transurethral Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study Among Older Adults
    Ashis K. Das, Devi K. Mishra, Saji S. Gopalan
    The Open Urology & Nephrology Journal.2021; 14(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Marital Status and Prognostic Nomogram for Bladder Cancer With Distant Metastasis: A SEER-Based Study
    Liangjun Tao, Xinyuan Pan, Lixiang Zhang, Jiawei Wang, Zican Zhang, Li Zhang, Chaozhao Liang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Back pain following instillations of BCG for superficial bladder cancer is not a reactive complication: review of 30 Mycobacterium bovis BCG vertebral osteomyelitis cases
    Simon Cadiou, Omar Al Tabaa, Chi-Duc Nguyen, Marine Faccin, Raphaël Guillin, Matthieu Revest, Pascal Guggenbuhl, Eric Houvenagel, Edouard Pertuiset, Guillaume Coiffier
    Clinical Rheumatology.2019; 38(6): 1773.     CrossRef
  • Does Health Insurance Modify the Association Between Race and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Urinary Bladder Malignancy in the U.S.?
    Juliana Morales, Aaron Malles, Marrell Kimble, Pura Rodriguez de la Vega, Grettel Castro, Alan M. Nieder, Noël C. Barengo
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(18): 3393.     CrossRef
  • Чи може бути гормонотерапія елементом комбінованого радикального лікування хворих на низькодиференційований рак сечового міхура?
    P. G. Yakovlev
    Шпитальна хірургія. Журнал імені Л. Я. Ковальчука.2019; (3): 75.     CrossRef
Family Members of Cancer Patients in Korea Are at an Increased Risk of Medically Diagnosed Depression
Youngdae Cho, Yongwoo Jeon, Sung-In Jang, Eun-Cheol Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2018;51(2):100-108.   Published online February 19, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.17.166
  • 10,337 View
  • 235 Download
  • 10 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
Family members are often cancer patients’ primary source of social and emotional support and make a major contribution to how well patients manage their illness. We compared the prevalence of depression in the family members of cancer patients and the general population. Methods: This study used the data from the fourth, fifth, and sixth rounds of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The variable of interest was the presence of a cohabitating cancer patient in the family and the dependent variable was the presence of diagnosed depression. Results: The odds of having medically diagnosed depression in those with a cohabitating cancer patient in the family were significantly higher than among those who did not have cancer patients in their families (odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 2.17; p=0.009). The OR for females was 1.59, and this increase was statistically significant (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.31; p=0.02). Conclusions: We need to invest more effort into diagnosing and managing depression in the family members of cancer patients. This will have an impact both on their quality of life and on the well-being of patients, as supporters and caregivers play an instrumental role in helping patients manage their illness.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Trastorno depresivo en pacientes con diagnóstico de cáncer: revisión narrativa de la literatura
    Javier A Cahuana-Berrocal, Jesús Iglesias-Acosta, Ana Isabel Tafur Bermejo
    Revista Med.2024; 31(2): 79.     CrossRef
  • Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review
    María Dolores Guerra-Martín, María Del Rocío Casado-Espinosa, Yelena Gavira-López, Cristina Holgado-Castro, Inmaculada López-Latorre, Álvaro Borrallo-Riego
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(2): 1570.     CrossRef
  • Association between changes in having of cancer patients in the family and depression: A longitudinal panel study
    Yun Seo Jang, Na-Young Yoon, Kyungduk Hurh, Eun-Cheol Park, Min Jin Ha
    Journal of Affective Disorders.2023; 333: 482.     CrossRef
  • Determinants of Quality of Life in Family Caregivers of Patients With Leukemia: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Nahla M. Al Ali, Amjad Eid, Nabela Aljada
    Sage Open.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Consistency between patients and families in recognizing cancer chemotherapy side effects: A questionnaire survey
    Fukuko Horio, Tokunori Ikeda, Yurimi Arake, Nodoka Kawashima, Erina Eto, Makoto Matsukura, Isao Fujii, Yuji Uchida
    Cancer Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early-Career Physician Burnout
    Leelach Rothschild, Ciera Ward
    Anesthesiology Clinics.2022; 40(2): 315.     CrossRef
  • Informal caregivers’ quality of life and management strategies following the transformation of their cancer caregiving role: A qualitative systematic review
    Yingying Cai, Alison Simons, Samantha Toland, Junfeng Zhang, Kexin Zheng
    International Journal of Nursing Sciences.2021; 8(2): 227.     CrossRef
  • Risk of major depressive disorder in spouses of cancer patients in Japan: A cohort study using health insurance‐based claims data
    Tatsuo Akechi, Izumi Mishiro, Shinji Fujimoto, Katsuhito Murase
    Psycho-Oncology.2020; 29(7): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Caregiving experiences of Korean family caregivers of cancer patients: An integrative literature review
    Eunice E. Lee, Shin‐Young Lee
    Psycho-Oncology.2020; 29(10): 1486.     CrossRef
  • The Measure of the Family Caregivers’ Experience
    Mercedes Guilabert, Paloma Amil, Asunción González-Mestre, Esther Gil-Sánchez, Anna Vila, Joan Carles Contel, Juan Carlos Ansotegui, Olga Solas, Ma Teresa Bacigalupe, Paloma Fernández-Cano, Marisa Arteagoitia, José Joaquín Mira
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018; 15(9): 2040.     CrossRef
A Survival Analysis of Gastric or Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated With Surgery: Comparison of Capital and a Non-capital City
Nam-Soo Hong, Kyeong Soo Lee, Sin Kam, Gyu Seog Choi, Oh Kyoung Kwon, Dong Hee Ryu, Sang Won Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50(5):283-293.   Published online July 3, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.17.043
  • 9,012 View
  • 225 Download
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
The objective of the present study was to compare prognosis of patients with gastric or colorectal cancer according to places where they received surgeries. Methods: The cancer patients underwent surgeries in sampled hospitals located in Daegu were matched 1:1 to the patients who visited sampled hospitals in Seoul using propensity score method. After the occurrences of death were examined, Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and the log-rank test was performed to compare the survival curves. Results: A total of six out of 291 gastric cancer patients who had surgeries in Daegu died (2.1%) and ten deaths (3.4%) occurred from patients went Seoul hospitals. Out of 84 gastric cancer patients who had chemotherapy after surgeries in Daegu, 13 (15.5%) patients died while 18 (21.4%) deaths occurred among patients underwent surgeries in Seoul. Six deaths (6.9%) out of 87 colorectal cancer patients who had surgeries in Daegu were reported. Five patients (5.7%) died among the patients underwent surgeries in Seoul. Among the colorectal cancer patients with chemotherapy after surgeries, 13 patients (12.4%) who visited hospitals in Daegu and 14 (13.3%) patients who used medical centers in Seoul died. There were no significant differences according to places where patients used medical services. Conclusions: The result of this study is expected to be used as basic data for policy making to resolve centralization problem of cancer patients and to help patients to make rational choices in selection of medical centers.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Competing risk and random survival forest models for predicting survival in post-resection elderly stage I–III colorectal cancer patients
    Qian Zhang, Rongxuan Xu, Wenchong Zhen, Xueting Bai, Zihan Li, Yixin Zhang, Wei Wu, Zhihan Yao, Xiaofeng Li
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Medical travel patterns for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment in South Korea: National Health Insurance data from 2013 to 2021
    Sungmin Kim, Naeun Kim, Hyung-Sik Lee, Mina Kim, Hoseob Kim, Youngmin Choi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Domestic medical travel from non-Seoul regions to Seoul for initial breast cancer treatment: a nationwide cohort study
    Jae Ho Jeong, Jinhong Jung, Hee Jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Beom-Seok Ko, Byung Ho Son, Kyung Hae Jung, Il Yong Chung
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 71.     CrossRef
  • MCR1 and KPC2 Co-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia: First Case in Korea
    Ji Young Park, Sang Taek Heo, Ki Tae Kwon, Do Young Song, Kwang Jun Lee, Ji Ae Choi
    Infection & Chemotherapy.2019; 51(4): 399.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Residential Area and Hospital Bed Size on the Use of Hospital in Other Regions for Cancer Inpatients
    Sung-Soo Kim
    Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2018; 43(1): 18.     CrossRef
Reviews
Breast Density and Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(6):367-375.   Published online October 21, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.054
  • 22,627 View
  • 336 Download
  • 67 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
The established theory that breast density is an independent predictor of breast cancer risk is based on studies targeting white women in the West. More Asian women than Western women have dense breasts, but the incidence of breast cancer is lower among Asian women. This meta-analysis investigated the association between breast density in mammography and breast cancer risk in Asian women.
Methods
PubMed and Scopus were searched, and the final date of publication was set as December 31, 2015. The effect size in each article was calculated using the interval-collapse method. Summary effect sizes (sESs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by conducting a meta-analysis applying a random effect model. To investigate the dose-response relationship, random effect dose-response meta-regression (RE-DRMR) was conducted.
Results
Six analytical epidemiology studies in total were selected, including one cohort study and five case-control studies. A total of 17 datasets were constructed by type of breast density index and menopausal status. In analyzing the subgroups of premenopausal vs. postmenopausal women, the percent density (PD) index was confirmed to be associated with a significantly elevated risk for breast cancer (sES, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.52 to 3.21; I2=50.0%). The RE-DRMR results showed that the risk of breast cancer increased 1.73 times for each 25% increase in PD in postmenopausal women (95% CI, 1.20 to 2.47).
Conclusions
In Asian women, breast cancer risk increased with breast density measured using the PD index, regardless of menopausal status. We propose the further development of a breast cancer risk prediction model based on the application of PD in Asian women.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Germline pathogenic variants in Asian American/Pacific Islander women with breast cancer
    Annie Tang, Katherine Schulz-Costello, Veronica Jones, Jennifer Tseng
    The American Journal of Surgery.2026; 253: 116786.     CrossRef
  • Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening in China: A Systematic Review of Costs and Cost-Effectiveness
    Anqi Liu, Keyi Li, Jiunn Wang, Caroline S. Clarke, Rachael M. Hunter
    Value in Health Regional Issues.2026; 54: 101589.     CrossRef
  • Mammographic density and breast cancer risk among Black American women
    Etienne X. Holder, Zahna Bigham, Kerrie P. Nelson, Mollie E. Barnard, Julie R. Palmer, Kimberly A. Bertrand
    International Journal of Cancer.2025; 156(6): 1173.     CrossRef
  • Breast density assessment via quantitative sound-speed measurement using conventional ultrasound transducers
    Can Deniz Bezek, Monika Farkas, Dieter Schweizer, Rahel A. Kubik-Huch, Orcun Goksel
    European Radiology.2025; 35(3): 1490.     CrossRef
  • Mammographic density as a predictor of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in over six million South Korean women
    Sung Hun Kim, Ga Eun Park, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Dale P. Sandler, Kyungdo Han, Yong‐Moon Mark Park
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2025; 211(2): 341.     CrossRef
  • A combined risk model shows viability for personalized breast cancer risk assessment in the Indonesian population: A case/control study
    Bijak Rabbani, Sabrina Gabriel Tanu, Kevin Nathanael Ramanto, Jessica Audrienna, Eric Aria Fernandez, Fatma Aldila, Mar Gonzalez-Porta, Margareta Deidre Valeska, Jessline Haruman, Lorina Handayani Ulag, Yusuf Maulana, Kathleen Irena Junusmin, Margareta Am
    PLOS One.2025; 20(5): e0321545.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Predictors of Subsequent Breast Cancer Events Detected on Abbreviated MRI in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer
    Na Lae Eun, Ji Hyun Youk, Jeong-Ah Kim, Yoon Jin Cha, Soong June Bae, Sung Gwe Ahn, Joon Jeong, Hyejin Yang, Hye Sun Lee, Eun Ju Son
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(23): 2953.     CrossRef
  • Ten-Year Follow-Up of Mammography and Ultrasonography for Detection of Locoregional Breast Cancer Recurrence in Asian Female Patients
    Joon Suk Moon, In Hee Lee, Byeongju Kang, Ho Yong Park, Hye Jung Kim, Won Hwa Kim, Yee Soo Chae, Soo Jung Lee, Jeeyeon Lee
    Cancers.2025; 18(1): 64.     CrossRef
  • Intelligent scoring system based on dynamic optical breast imaging for early detection of breast cancer
    Yaoyao Li, Yipei Zhang, Qiang Yu, Chenglong He, Xiguo Yuan
    Biomedical Optics Express.2024; 15(3): 1515.     CrossRef
  • Physical Activity and Mammographic Density in Japanese Women
    Mihye Lee, Rina Kotake, Hideko Yamauchi
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2024; 33(3): 365.     CrossRef
  • The association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song Bai, Di Song, Ming Chen, Xiaoshu Lai, Jinfeng Xu, Fajin Dong
    BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polygenic risk score-based prediction of breast cancer risk in Taiwanese women with dense breast using a retrospective cohort study
    Chih-Chiang Hung, Sin-Hua Moi, Hsin-I Huang, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Chi-Cheng Huang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Causes and Risk Factors of Breast Cancer, What Do We Know for Sure? An Evidence Synthesis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Borghild Løyland, Ida Hellum Sandbekken, Ellen Karine Grov, Inger Utne
    Cancers.2024; 16(8): 1583.     CrossRef
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Markov Modeling Study
    Wei-Shiuan Chung, Thomas T. H. Wan, Yu Tsz Shiu, Hon-Yi Shi
    Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health.2024; 14(3): 933.     CrossRef
  • Association of area- and volumetric-mammographic density and breast cancer risk in women of Asian descent: a case control study
    Shivaani Mariapun, Weang-Kee Ho, Mikael Eriksson, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib, Cheng-Har Yip, Kartini Rahmat, Per Hall, Soo-Hwang Teo
    Breast Cancer Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward ultrasound screening for breast cancer among women
    Shaozhong Liu, Shukai Zheng, Mengzhen Qin, Yifeng Xie, Kun Yang, Xiaozhen Liu
    Frontiers in Public Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and shear-wave elastography for small breast nodules
    Yan Shen, Jie He, Miao Liu, Jiaojiao Hu, Yonglin Wan, Tingting Zhang, Jun Ding, Jiangnan Dong, Xiaohong Fu
    PeerJ.2024; 12: e17677.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Semi-Supervised Learning Techniques in Identifying Calcifications in X-ray Mammography and the Impact of Different Classification Probabilities
    Miu Sakaida, Takaaki Yoshimura, Minghui Tang, Shota Ichikawa, Hiroyuki Sugimori, Kenji Hirata, Kohsuke Kudo
    Applied Sciences.2024; 14(14): 5968.     CrossRef
  • Non-genetic factors and breast cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses
    Anneza Yiallourou, Katerina Pantavou, Georgios Markozannes, Antonis Pilavas, Andrea Georgiou, Andria Hadjikou, Mary Economou, Neophytos Christodoulou, Konstantinos Letsos, Elina Khattab, Chrystalleni Kossyva, Maria Constantinou, Melanie Theodoridou, Danie
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • AI Use in Mammography for Diagnosing Metachronous Contralateral Breast Cancer
    Mio Adachi, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Toshiyuki Ishiba, Miyako Nara, Sakiko Maruya, Kumiko Hayashi, Yuichi Kumaki, Emi Yamaga, Leona Katsuta, Du Hao, Mikael Hartman, Feng Mengling, Goshi Oda, Kazunori Kubota, Ukihide Tateishi
    Journal of Imaging.2024; 10(9): 211.     CrossRef
  • Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Improves Early Breast Cancer Detection and Survival in Taiwan
    Pei-Shan Wu, Yu-Ting Hong, Chiao-Hsuan Shen, Chao-Hsien Lee, Chen-Pin Chou
    Journal of Breast Imaging.2024; 6(6): 601.     CrossRef
  • Development of a QMSIW Antenna Sensor for Tumor Detection Utilizing a Hemispherical Multilayered Dielectric Breast-Shaped Phantom
    Maddirala Vijaya Lakshmi Bhavani, Divya Chaturvedi, Tiruganesh Lanka, Arvind Kumar
    IEEE Sensors Journal.2024; 24(20): 32080.     CrossRef
  • Screening of malignant neoplasms of the breast as part of the medical examination of certain groups of the adult population. Guidelines
    O. M. Drapkina, A. D. Kaprin, I. I. Almazova, L. Yu. Drozdova, E. S. Ivanova, N. I. Rozhkova, N. A. Rubtsova, J. V. Khailova, R. N. Shepel
    Primary Health Care (Russian Federation).2024; 1(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • Breast Tumor Detection and Diagnosis Using an Improved Faster R-CNN in DCE-MRI
    Haitian Gui, Han Jiao, Li Li, Xinhua Jiang, Tao Su, Zhiyong Pang
    Bioengineering.2024; 11(12): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer in Korean women
    Yon Ho Jee, Weang-Kee Ho, Sohee Park, Douglas F Easton, Soo-Hwang Teo, Keum Ji Jung, Peter Kraft
    International Journal of Epidemiology.2023; 52(3): 796.     CrossRef
  • Estimating Age-Specific Mean Sojourn Time of Breast Cancer and Sensitivity of Mammographic Screening by Breast Density among Korean Women
    Eunji Choi, Mina Suh, So-Youn Jung, Kyu-Won Jung, Sohee Park, Jae Kwan Jun, Kui Son Choi
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(1): 136.     CrossRef
  • Current Trends in the Utilization of Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer
    I-Wen Pan, Tina W.F. Yen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Ya-Chen Tina Shih
    JCO Oncology Practice.2023; 19(7): 446.     CrossRef
  • International Interobserver Variability of Breast Density Assessment
    Leah H. Portnow, Lina Choridah, Kardinah Kardinah, Triwulan Handarini, Ruud Pijnappel, Adriana M.J. Bluekens, Lucien E.M. Duijm, Peter K. Schoub, Pamela S. Smilg, Liat Malek, Jessica W.T. Leung, Sughra Raza
    Journal of the American College of Radiology.2023; 20(7): 671.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Analysis of Mammography for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in Asian Women
    Hayoung Kim, Jihe Lim, Hyug-Gi Kim, Yunji Lim, Bo Kyoung Seo, Min Sun Bae
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(13): 2247.     CrossRef
  • The diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography for recurrent breast cancer after breast conserving treatment
    Piyakan Pathanasethpong, Supajit Nawapun, Payia Chadbunchachai, Ongart Somintara, Chaiwat Apivatanasiri, Arunnit Boonrod
    European Journal of Radiology Open.2023; 11: 100514.     CrossRef
  • Fine-needle aspiration biopsy possibilities in studying the molecular genetic landscape of breast tissue
    V.  V.  Rodionov, O.  V.  Burmenskaya, V.  V.  Kometova, A.  A.  Smetnik, M.  V.  Rodionova, D.  Yu.  Trofimov, L.  A.  Ashrafyan, G.  T.  Sukhikh
    Tumors of female reproductive system.2023; 19(4): 16.     CrossRef
  • miR-146a Enhances the Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to Paclitaxel by Downregulating IRAK1
    Yalun Li, Weilong Li, Jun Lin, Chunjing Lv, Guangdong Qiao
    Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals.2022; 37(8): 624.     CrossRef
  • Current status of AYA-generation breast cancer: trends worldwide and in Japan
    Manabu Futamura, Kazuhiro Yoshida
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses
    Matteo Interlenghi, Christian Salvatore, Veronica Magni, Gabriele Caldara, Elia Schiavon, Andrea Cozzi, Simone Schiaffino, Luca Alessandro Carbonaro, Isabella Castiglioni, Francesco Sardanelli
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(1): 187.     CrossRef
  • Global guidelines for breast cancer screening: A systematic review
    Wenhui Ren, Mingyang Chen, Youlin Qiao, Fanghui Zhao
    The Breast.2022; 64: 85.     CrossRef
  • Utility of U-Net for the objective segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region on clinical digital mammograms
    Mika Yamamuro, Yoshiyuki Asai, Naomi Hashimoto, Nao Yasuda, Hiorto Kimura, Takahiro Yamada, Mitsutaka Nemoto, Yuichi Kimura, Hisashi Handa, Hisashi Yoshida, Koji Abe, Masahiro Tada, Hitoshi Habe, Takashi Nagaoka, Seiun Nin, Kazunari Ishii, Yohan Kondo
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2022; 8(4): 045016.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Disparities in Asian Women: The Need for Disaggregated Research
    Lauren Fane, Tithi Biswas, Charulata Jindal, Yuk Ming Choi, Jimmy T. Efird
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9790.     CrossRef
  • Vertical Breast Displacement in Asian Women During Exercise: influence of Bra Type, Size and Different Parts of the Breast
    Xinyang Sheng, Xiaona Chen, Mark John Lake
    Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe.2022; 30(3): 1.     CrossRef
  • Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature
    Akila Anandarajah, Yongzhen Chen, Graham A. Colditz, Angela Hardi, Carolyn Stoll, Shu Jiang
    Breast Cancer Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach
    William Lotter, Abdul Rahman Diab, Bryan Haslam, Jiye G. Kim, Giorgia Grisot, Eric Wu, Kevin Wu, Jorge Onieva Onieva, Yun Boyer, Jerrold L. Boxerman, Meiyun Wang, Mack Bandler, Gopal R. Vijayaraghavan, A. Gregory Sorensen
    Nature Medicine.2021; 27(2): 244.     CrossRef
  • Association between changes in mammographic density category and the risk of breast cancer: A nationwide cohort study in East‐Asian women
    Soyeoun Kim, Boyoung Park
    International Journal of Cancer.2021; 148(11): 2674.     CrossRef
  • Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Nancy R. Kressin, Tracy A. Battaglia, Jolie B. Wormwood, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Christine M. Gunn
    Journal of the American College of Radiology.2021; 18(5): 685.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Lesion Detection and Classification in mammograms using Deep Neural
    A R J Silalahi
    IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.2021; 1115(1): 012018.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer
    Serena C. Houghton, Susan E. Hankinson
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2021; 30(5): 822.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the Screening Efficiency of Breast Cancer by Combining Conventional Medical Imaging Examinations With Circulating Tumor Cells
    Yang Gao, Wan-Hung Fan, Chaohui Duan, Wenhe Zhao, Jun Zhang, Xixiong Kang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the diagnostic performances of circulating tumor cells and the serum tumor markers CEA, CA125, and CA15-3 for breast cancer: a retrospective case-control study
    Yi Luan, Jie Wei, Ke Wang, Donghao Cai, Xiaohong Luo, Wanhung Fan, Haijiang Wang, Chaohui Duan
    Journal of Bio-X Research.2021; 04(02): 60.     CrossRef
  • Meme kanseri olan Türk kadın hastalarda meme dansitesinin klinik ve patolojik bulgularla ilişkileri
    Nihan TURHAN, Dilek YILMAZ, Levent YEŞİLYURT
    Pamukkale Medical Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidence and assessment of parenchymal patterns of ultrasonography for breast cancer detection among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study
    Zhongtao Bao, Yanchun Zhao, Shuqiang Chen, Xiaoyu Chen, Xiang Xu, Linglin Wei, Ling Chen
    BMC Medical Imaging.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Relationship Between Breast Density Change During Menopause and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Korean Women
    Danbee Kang, Ji-Yeon Kim, Ji-Young Kim, Han Song Mun, Sook Ja Yoon, Jieun Lee, Gayeon Han, Young-Hyuck Im, Soo-Young Shin, Se Kyung Lee, Jong-Han Yu, Kyung-Hyun Lee, Mincheol Kim, Dohyun Park, Yoon-Ho Choi, Ok Soon Jeong, Jean Hyoung Lee, Se Yong Jekal, J
    Cancer Prevention Research.2021; 14(12): 1119.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Portable Microwave Imaging Device for Breast Cancer Detection
    Mio Adachi, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Mio Mori, Kazunori Kubota, Goshi Oda, Takamaro Kikkawa
    Diagnostics.2021; 12(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Primary prevention of breast cancer
    V.F. Levshin
    Profilakticheskaya meditsina.2021; 24(11): 117.     CrossRef
  • Immigration history, lifestyle characteristics, and breast density in the Vietnamese American Women’s Health Study: a cross-sectional analysis
    Eunjung Lee, Namphuong Doanvo, MiHee Lee, Zayar Soe, Alice W. Lee, Cam Van Doan, Dennis Deapen, Giske Ursin, Darcy Spicer, Peggy Reynolds, Anna H. Wu
    Cancer Causes & Control.2020; 31(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients
    Akimitsu Yamada, Kazutaka Narui, Toshihiko Satake, Shoko Adachi, Mikiko Tanabe, Daisuke Shimizu, Takashi Ishikawa, Itaru Endo
    Journal of Surgical Research.2020; 251: 78.     CrossRef
  • Density of breast: An independent risk factor for developing breast cancer, a prospective study at two premium breast centers
    Chia Hwee Lo, Xin Ying Chai, Shirley Shy Wen Ting, Sze Chao Ang, Xinlin Chin, Lay Teng Tan, Peeroo Saania, Tuan Nur' Azmah Tuan Mat, Seniyah Mat Sikin, Anil Gandhi
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(9): 3244.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Breast Density Implications and Breast Cancer Screening
    Jingge Lian, Kangan Li
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Incidence Trends by Estrogen Receptor Status Among Asian American Ethnic Groups, 1990–2014
    Alyssa W Tuan, Brittny C Davis Lynn, Pavel Chernyavskiy, Mandi Yu, Scarlett L Gomez, Gretchen L Gierach, Philip S Rosenberg
    JNCI Cancer Spectrum.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei-Hsin Yuan, Hui-Chen Hsu, Ying-Yuan Chen, Chia-Hung Wu
    British Journal of Cancer.2020; 123(4): 673.     CrossRef
  • Mammographic breast density, its changes, and breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women
    Eun Young Kim, Yoosoo Chang, Jiin Ahn, Ji‐Sup Yun, Yong Lai Park, Chan Heun Park, Hocheol Shin, Seungho Ryu
    Cancer.2020; 126(21): 4687.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population
    Kartini Rahmat, Nazimah Ab Mumin, Marlina Tanty Ramli Hamid, Farhana Fadzli, Wei Lin Ng, Nadia Fareeda Muhammad Gowdh
    Medicine.2020; 99(39): e22405.     CrossRef
  • How can additional ultrasonography screening improve the detection of occult breast cancer in women with dense breasts?
    Parisa Pishdad, Ameneh Moosavi, Reza Jalli, Fariba Zarei, Mahdi Saeedi-Moghadam, Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani
    Polish Journal of Radiology.2020; 85: 353.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of Women with Dense Breasts in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Cross-sectional Study
    Hye-Mi Jo, Eun Hye Lee, Kyungran Ko, Bong Joo Kang, Joo Hee Cha, Ann Yi, Hae Kyoung Jung, Jae Kwan Jun
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(4): 1295.     CrossRef
  • Methodological Challenges and Updated Findings from a Meta-analysis of the Association between Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer
    Daniela Bond-Smith, Jennifer Stone
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2019; 28(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI
    Daniel Förnvik, Masako Kataoka, Mami Iima, Akane Ohashi, Shotaro Kanao, Masakazu Toi, Kaori Togashi
    European Radiology.2018; 28(8): 3194.     CrossRef
  • Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?
    Sergio J. Sanabria, Orcun Goksel, Katharina Martini, Serafino Forte, Thomas Frauenfelder, Rahel A. Kubik-Huch, Marga B. Rominger
    European Radiology.2018; 28(8): 3165.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Matricellular Proteins and Tissue Stiffness in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Sirio Fiorino, Salomone Di Saverio, Paolo Leandri, Andrea Tura, Chiara Birtolo, Mauro Silingardi, Dario de Biase, Eli Avisar
    Future Oncology.2018; 14(16): 1601.     CrossRef
  • Molecular mechanisms of the preventable causes of cancer in the United States
    Erica A. Golemis, Paul Scheet, Tim N. Beck, Eward M. Scolnick, David J. Hunter, Ernest Hawk, Nancy Hopkins
    Genes & Development.2018; 32(13-14): 868.     CrossRef
  • Inactivated Sendai virus particle upregulates cancer cell expression of intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 and enhances natural killer cell sensitivity on cancer cells
    Simin Li, Tomoyuki Nishikawa, Yasufumi Kaneda
    Cancer Science.2017; 108(12): 2333.     CrossRef
The Effect of Breastfeeding Duration and Parity on the Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Ho Kyung Sung, Seung Hyun Ma, Ji-Yeob Choi, Yunji Hwang, Choonghyun Ahn, Byoung-Gie Kim, Yong-Man Kim, Jae Weon Kim, Sokbom Kang, Jaehoon Kim, Tae Jin Kim, Keun-Young Yoo, Daehee Kang, Suekyung Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(6):349-366.   Published online September 8, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.066
  • 23,364 View
  • 317 Download
  • 67 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Objectives
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize current evidence regarding the association of parity and duration of breastfeeding with the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
Methods
A systematic search of relevant studies published by December 31, 2015 was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. A random-effect model was used to obtain the summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results
Thirty-two studies had parity categories of 1, 2, and ≥3. The summary RRs for EOC were 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.79), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.65), and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.52), respectively. Small to moderate heterogeneity was observed for one birth (p<0.01; Q=59.46; I2=47.9%). Fifteen studies had breastfeeding categories of <6 months, 6-12 months, and >13 months. The summary RRs were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.87), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.79), respectively. Only small heterogeneity was observed for <6 months of breastfeeding (p=0.17; Q=18.79, I2=25.5%). Compared to nulliparous women with no history of breastfeeding, the joint effects of two births and <6 months of breastfeeding resulted in a 0.5-fold reduced risk for EOC.
Conclusions
The first birth and breastfeeding for <6 months were associated with significant reductions in EOC risk.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Experience of breastfeeding during hospitalization after birth: a qualitative study
    Cristina Nieto, Patricia Lopez-Mases, Rafael Vila-Candel, Esther Lazaro
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2026; 316: 114786.     CrossRef
  • Plant-Based Diets and Ovarian Cancer Risk
    Giovanna Esposito, Federica Turati, Silvia Mignozzi, Fabio Parazzini, Livia S. A. Augustin, Sara Vitale, Jerry Polesel, Luigino Dal Maso, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia
    Nutrients.2026; 18(3): 536.     CrossRef
  • Global trends, risk factors, and future projections of ovarian cancer burden among women aged 50 years and older: a systematic analysis based on GBD 2021
    Xinyu Dai, Ran Sun, Lina Peng, Can Liu, Yanming Lu
    International Journal of Surgery.2026; 112(2): 2457.     CrossRef
  • Effects of an Online Theory‐Based Educational Programme for Primiparous Women on Improving Breastfeeding‐Related Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Mei Sze Wong, Wai Tong Chien
    Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Breastfeeding and Maternal and Child Cardiometabolic Outcomes 10–14 Years after Delivery
    Yiwen Cui, Kartik K. Venkatesh, Anna Palatnik
    Breastfeeding Medicine.2025; 20(6): 402.     CrossRef
  • Associations between Parity, History of Breastfeeding, and T-cell Profile of Ovarian Tumors
    Jennifer M. Mongiovi, Mary K. Townsend, Allison F. Vitonis, Holly R. Harris, Jennifer A. Doherty, Ana Babic, Jonathan L. Hecht, T. Rinda Soong, Linda Titus, Jose R. Conejo-Garcia, Brooke L. Fridley, Shelley S. Tworoger, Kathryn L. Terry, Naoko Sasamoto
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2025; 34(4): 550.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian cancer risk and survival according to tumor sex hormone receptor expression: An ovarian Cancer association consortium and ovarian tumor tissue analysis consortium pooled analysis
    Zhuxuan Fu, Lauren Borho, Sarah E. Taylor, Linda E. Kelemen, Anna DeFazio, Penelope M. Webb, Martin Köbel, Nicola S. Meagher, Renhua Na, Antonis C. Antoniou, Alison H. Brand, Catherine J. Kennedy, Nikilyn Nevins, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Stac
    Gynecologic Oncology.2025; 198: 112.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer in pregnancy
    A.L. Chernyshova, A.A. Chernyakov, Yu.M. Trushchuk, O.S. Dil, Ya.I. Arkhipova
    Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist.2025; 25(3): 27.     CrossRef
  • Oxidative Stress, Parity History, and Remnant Follicles in the Aged Ovary: Insights on Ovarian Cancer Risk and Protection
    Ulises Urzúa, Arnaldo Marín, Enrique A. Castellón
    Antioxidants.2025; 14(7): 759.     CrossRef
  • Adherence to a Cholesterol‐Lowering Diet and the Risk of Female Hormone‐Related Cancers: An Analysis From a Case–Control Study Network
    Giovanna Esposito, Livia S. A. Augustin, David J. A. Jenkins, Monica Ferraroni, Fabio Parazzini, Anna Crispo, Luigino Dal Maso, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia, Jerry Polesel, Matteo Di Maso
    BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2025; 132(12): 1791.     CrossRef
  • History of Breastfeeding in Relation to Circulating Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarkers
    Nan Lin, Allison F. Vitonis, Jennifer M. Mongiovi, Leslie V. Farland, Tianyi Huang, Kathryn L. Terry, A. Heather Eliassen, Mary K. Townsend, Cuilin Zhang, Frank B. Hu, Naoko Sasamoto
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2025; 34(9): 1525.     CrossRef
  • Associations of breastfeeding with maternal and child health outcomes: umbrella review
    Jia-Zi Liu, Min-Qi Liao, Lu Zheng, Hao-Rong Li, Xin Su, Yong-Hui Feng, Jia-Min Qiu, Shi-Wen Zhang, Jun Cai, Shi-Yun Chen, Shi-Qi Huang, Hao-Kun Huang, Yan-Bin Ye, Sha-Sha Han, Sui Zhu, Da-Lin Lu, Kenneth Lo, Fang-Fang Zeng
    The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2025; 122(4): 1061.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a national population-based case-control study in Sweden
    Sarah Jonsson, Håkan Jonsson, Eva Lundin, Christel Häggström, Annika Idahl
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2024; 230(1): 75.e1.     CrossRef
  • Agricultural exposure and risk of ovarian cancer in the AGRIculture and CANcer (AGRICAN) cohort
    Marine Renier, Juliette Hippert, Louis-Bastien Weiswald, Séverine Tual, Matthieu Meryet-Figuiere, Nicolas Vigneron, Elisabeth Marcotullio, Isabelle Baldi, Pierre Lebailly
    Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2024; 81(2): 75.     CrossRef
  • Prenatal Counseling on the Maternal Health Benefits of Lactation: A Randomized Trial
    Eleanor B. Schwarz, Adrienne Hoyt-Austin, Margaret Fix, Laura R. Kair, Caidon Iwuagwu, Melissa J. Chen
    Breastfeeding Medicine.2024; 19(1): 52.     CrossRef
  • Awareness of the Maternal Health Benefits of Lactation Among U.S. Pregnant Individuals
    Caidon Iwuagwu, Melissa J. Chen, Adrienne E. Hoyt-Austin, Laura Kair, Margaret Fix, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
    Women's Health Issues.2024; 34(3): 283.     CrossRef
  • Breastfeeding’s protective role in alleviating ovarian cancer burden: a comprehensive review
    Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu, Getrude Uzoma Obeagu
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(5): 2805.     CrossRef
  • Fraction of cancers attributable to and prevented by reproductive factors and exogenous hormones use in Italy
    Federica Turati, Giulia Collatuzzo, Matteo Di Maso, Eva Negri, Giovanna Esposito, Gianfranco Alicandro, Matteo Malvezzi, Claudio Pelucchi, Paolo Boffetta, Carlo La Vecchia, Fabio Parazzini
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2024; 301: 49.     CrossRef
  • A dose–response meta-analysis of the relationship between number of pregnancies and risk of gynecological cancers
    Jalal Poorolajal, Amin Doosti-Irani, Ali Mohammad Karami, Marzieh Fattahi-Darghlou
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2024; 310(6): 2783.     CrossRef
  • Maternal Big Five personality traits and breastfeeding outcomes: what we know and what we don’t know
    Donata Bessey
    Frontiers in Public Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk for Second Primary Ovarian Cancer: A Large Population Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
    Haiyang Hu, Yangsheng Ren, Huixing Li, Tishuo Zhang, Lin Sun
    Oncology.2024; 103(8): 748.     CrossRef
  • Ovulation induction drug and ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang Yu, Jiafan Sun, Qiqin Wang, Wennian Yu, Anqi Wang, Shu Zhu, Wei Xu, Xiuli Wang
    Journal of Ovarian Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • La Salpingo-oforectomía o Salpingectomía como estrategia para prevenir el cáncer de ovario
    Scarlet Hochstatter Irarrázabal, Erwin Hochstatter Arduz
    Revista Medica.2023; 27(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • Stratifying the risk of ovarian cancer incidence by histologic subtypes in the Korean Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Study (Ko‐EVE)
    Soseul Sung, Youjin Hong, Byoung‐Gie Kim, Ji‐Yeob Choi, Jae Weon Kim, Sang‐Yoon Park, Jae‐Hoon Kim, Yong‐man Kim, Jong‐Min Lee, Tae Jin Kim, Sue K. Park
    Cancer Medicine.2023; 12(7): 8742.     CrossRef
  • Abortion and Female Cancer Risks among Women Aged 20 to 45 Years: A 10-Year Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan
    Cheng-Ting Shen, Shu-Yu Tai, Yu-Hsiang Tsao, Fang-Ming Chen, Hui-Min Hsieh
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2023; 20(4): 3682.     CrossRef
  • Lifetime ovulatory years and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multinational pooled analysis
    Zhuxuan Fu, Maria Mori Brooks, Sarah Irvin, Susan Jordan, Katja K H Aben, Hoda Anton-Culver, Elisa V Bandera, Matthias W Beckmann, Andrew Berchuck, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Jenny Chang-Claude, Linda S Cook, Daniel W Cramer, Kara L Cushing-Haugen, Jennifer A
    JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute.2023; 115(5): 539.     CrossRef
  • Role of breastfeeding on maternal and childhood cancers: An umbrella review of meta-analyses
    Dazhi Fan, Qing Xia, Dongxin Lin, Yubo Ma, Jiaming Rao, Li Liu, Hai Tang, Tingting Xu, Pengsheng Li, Gengdong Chen, Zixing Zhou, Xiaoling Guo, Zhifang Zhang, Zhengping Liu
    Journal of Global Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What does a doctor need to know about breastfeeding and adolescent health and pregnancy?
    Leandro Meirelles Nunes, Rossiclei de Souza Pinheiro, Izailza Matos Dantas Lopes, Darci Vieira da Silva Bonetto, Alda Elizabeth Boehler Iglesias Azevedo
    Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Deficiencies in the Intentions, Attitudes, and Knowledge of Future Healthcare Professionals Regarding Breastfeeding
    Marija Čatipović, Štefica Mikšić, Rajko Fureš, Zrinka Puharić, Dragica Pavlović
    Children.2023; 10(7): 1256.     CrossRef
  • Examining psychometric properties of the Iranian version of exclusive breastfeeding social support scale (EBFSS)
    Sepideh Mashayekh-Amiri, Mina Hosseinzadeh, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Sepideh Soltani, Mojgan Mirghafourvand
    BMC Psychology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Are pregnancy and parity associated with telomere length? A systematic review
    Nourit Houminer-Klepar, Shiran Bord, Elissa Epel, Orna Baron-Epel
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Global patterns and temporal trends in ovarian cancer morbidity, mortality, and burden from 1990 to 2019
    Afrooz Mazidimoradi, Zohre Momenimovahed, Yousef Khani, Armin Rezaei Shahrabi, Leila Allahqoli, Hamid Salehiniya
    Oncologie.2023; 25(6): 641.     CrossRef
  • Pregnancy, preeclampsia and maternal aging: From epidemiology to functional genomics
    Eliza C. Miller, Ashley Wilczek, Natalie A. Bello, Sarah Tom, Ronald Wapner, Yousin Suh
    Ageing Research Reviews.2022; 73: 101535.     CrossRef
  • Lifetime ovulations and epithelial ovarian cancer risk and survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhuxuan Fu, Sarah Taylor, Francesmary Modugno
    Gynecologic Oncology.2022; 165(3): 650.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Breastfeeding on Maternal Mental Health: A Systematic Review
    Megan Yuen, Olivia J. Hall, Grace A. Masters, Benjamin C. Nephew, Catherine Carr, Katherine Leung, Adrienne Griffen, Lynne McIntyre, Nancy Byatt, Tiffany A. Moore Simas
    Journal of Women's Health.2022; 31(6): 787.     CrossRef
  • Breastfeeding Among Pediatric Emergency Physicians
    Marissa Hendrickson, Cynthia S. Davey, Brian A. Harvey, Kari Schneider
    Pediatric Emergency Care.2022; 38(7): e1372.     CrossRef
  • A Follow-Up Study of Ovarian Cancer (OOPS): A Study Protocol
    Ting-Ting Gong, Fang-Hua Liu, Ya-Shu Liu, Shi Yan, He-Li Xu, Xin-Hui He, Yi-Fan Wei, Xue Qin, Song Gao, Yu-Hong Zhao, Qi-Jun Wu
    Frontiers in Nutrition.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Extraterrestrial Gynecology: Could Spaceflight Increase the Risk of Developing Cancer in Female Astronauts? An Updated Review
    Rosa Drago-Ferrante, Riccardo Di Fiore, Fathi Karouia, Yashwanth Subbannayya, Saswati Das, Begum Aydogan Mathyk, Shehbeel Arif, Ana Paula Guevara-Cerdán, Allen Seylani, Aman Singh Galsinh, Weronika Kukulska, Joseph Borg, Sherif Suleiman, David Marshall Po
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(13): 7465.     CrossRef
  • Behaviour, Attitudes and Knowledge of Healthcare Workers on Breastfeeding
    Marija Čatipović, Zrinka Puharić, Drita Puharić, Paula Čatipović, Josip Grgurić
    Children.2022; 9(8): 1173.     CrossRef
  • Lactancia materna
    E. Raimond, N. Leloux, R. Gabriel
    EMC - Ginecología-Obstetricia.2022; 58(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • Allaitement maternel
    E. Raimond, N. Leloux, R. Gabriel
    EMC - Obstétrique.2022; 45(3): 1.     CrossRef
  • Human Milk Microbiota and Oligosaccharides: A Glimpse into Benefits, Diversity, and Correlations
    Carole Ayoub Moubareck
    Nutrients.2021; 13(4): 1123.     CrossRef
  • Couples talk about breastfeeding: Interviews with parents about decision-making, challenges, and the role of fathers and professional support
    Erin J Henshaw, Maria Mayer, Sarina Balraj, Elsie Parmar, Kristine Durkin, Rita Snell
    Health Psychology Open.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of lactation and nutrition on health of nursing woman
    S. V. Orlova, E. A. Nikitina, A. N. Vodolazkaya, L. Yu. Volkova, E. V. Prokopenko
    Medical alphabet.2021; (21): 75.     CrossRef
  • Supporting Exclusive Breastfeeding Among Factory Workers and Their Unemployed Neighbors: Peer Counseling in Bangladesh
    Rukhsana Haider, Virginia Thorley
    Journal of Human Lactation.2020; 36(3): 414.     CrossRef
  • The Ketogenic Diet Including Breast Milk for Treatment of Infants with Severe Childhood Epilepsy: Feasibility, Safety, and Effectiveness
    Anastasia Dressler, Chiara Häfele, Vito Giordano, Franz Benninger, Petra Trimmel-Schwahofer, Gudrun Gröppel, Sharon Samueli, Martha Feucht, Christoph Male, Andreas Repa
    Breastfeeding Medicine.2020; 15(2): 72.     CrossRef
  • Gender of offspring and risk of ovarian cancer: The HOPE study
    Zhuxuan Fu, Kirsten Moysich, Roberta B. Ness, Francesmary Modugno
    Cancer Epidemiology.2020; 64: 101646.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian cancer screening: Current status and future directions
    Zachary Nash, Usha Menon
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2020; 65: 32.     CrossRef
  • “I was determined to breastfeed, and I always found a solution”: successful experiences of exclusive breastfeeding among Chinese mothers in Ireland
    Qianling Zhou, Haoyue Chen, Katherine M. Younger, Tanya M. Cassidy, John M. Kearney
    International Breastfeeding Journal.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Update on Screening and Prevention for Breast and Gynecological Cancers in Average and High Risk Individuals
    Anahid M Pahlawanian, Vanessa A Norris, Amelia M Jernigan, Brooke Morrell, Mignonne Morrell, Navya Nair, Amber M Karamanis, Erin M Dauchy, Michelle M Loch, Agustin A Garcia
    The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2020; 360(5): 489.     CrossRef
  • Association of Social and Community Factors with U.S. Breastfeeding Outcomes
    Leslie Kummer, Naomi Duke, Laurel Davis, Iris Borowsky
    Breastfeeding Medicine.2020; 15(10): 646.     CrossRef
  • Breastfeeding Among Mothers Who Have Experienced Childhood Maltreatment: A Review
    Amara Channell Doig, Michelle Jasczynski, Jamie L. Fleishman, Elizabeth M. Aparicio
    Journal of Human Lactation.2020; 36(4): 710.     CrossRef
  • Offspring sex and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a multinational pooled analysis of 12 case–control studies
    Francesmary Modugno, Zhuxuan Fu, Susan J. Jordan, AOCS Group, Jenny Chang-Claude, Renée T. Fortner, Marc T. Goodman, Kirsten B. Moysich, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Andrew Berchuck, Elisa V. Bandera, Bo Qin, Rebecca Sutphen, John R. McLaughlin, Usha Menon, Su
    European Journal of Epidemiology.2020; 35(11): 1025.     CrossRef
  • Translational Theragnosis of Ovarian Cancer: where do we stand?
    Maria Grazia Perrone, Oreste Luisi, Anna De Grassi, Savina Ferorelli, Gennaro Cormio, Antonio Scilimati
    Current Medicinal Chemistry.2020; 27(34): 5675.     CrossRef
  • Breastfeeding factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer
    Francesmary Modugno, Sharon L. Goughnour, Danielle Wallack, Robert P. Edwards, Kunle Odunsi, Joseph L. Kelley, Kirsten Moysich, Roberta B. Ness, Maria Mori Brooks
    Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 153(1): 116.     CrossRef
  • Flexible piecewise linear model for investigating dose‐response relationship in meta‐analysis: Methodology, examples, and comparison
    Chang Xu, Lehana Thabane, Tongzu Liu, ASM Borhan, Xin Sun
    Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.2019; 12(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • Critical questions in ovarian cancer research and treatment: Report of an American Association for Cancer Research Special Conference
    Robert C. Bast, Ursula A. Matulonis, Anil K. Sood, Ahmed A. Ahmed, Adaobi E. Amobi, Frances R. Balkwill, Monicka Wielgos‐Bonvallet, David D. L. Bowtell, James D. Brenton, Joan S. Brugge, Robert L. Coleman, Giulio F. Draetta, Kai Doberstein, Ronny I. Drapk
    Cancer.2019; 125(12): 1963.     CrossRef
  • Novel Approaches to Ovarian Cancer Screening
    Denise R. Nebgen, Karen H. Lu, Robert C. Bast
    Current Oncology Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Age at last birth and risk of developing epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yanjun Wu, Wenjun Sun, Xueling Xin, Weijing Wang, Dongfeng Zhang
    Bioscience Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of historical breastfeeding practices on the incidence of cancer in France in 2015
    Kevin D. Shield, Laure Dossus, Agnès Fournier, Claire Marant Micallef, Sabina Rinaldi, Agnès Rogel, Isabelle Heard, Sophie Pilleron, Freddie Bray, Isabelle Soerjomataram
    Cancer Causes & Control.2018; 29(3): 325.     CrossRef
  • The role of pregnancy, perinatal factors and hormones in maternal cancer risk: a review of the evidence
    R. Troisi, T. Bjørge, M. Gissler, T. Grotmol, C. M. Kitahara, S. M. Myrtveit Sæther, A. G. Ording, C. Sköld, H. T. Sørensen, B. Trabert, I. Glimelius
    Journal of Internal Medicine.2018; 283(5): 430.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian Cancer Prevention and Screening
    Usha Menon, Chloe Karpinskyj, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
    Obstetrics & Gynecology.2018; 131(5): 909.     CrossRef
  • Breastfeeding experience, challenges and service demands among Chinese mothers: A qualitative study in two cities
    Yan Zhang, Yi Jin, Carel Vereijken, Bernd Stahl, Hong Jiang
    Appetite.2018; 128: 263.     CrossRef
  • Postpartum Cardiomyopathy and Considerations for Breastfeeding
    Laura Kearney, Paul Wright, Sadeer Fhadil, Martin Thomas
    Cardiac Failure Review.2018; 4(2): 112.     CrossRef
  • Breastfeeding and the Benefits of Lactation for Women's Health
    Luiz Antonio Del Ciampo, Ieda Regina Lopes Del Ciampo
    Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics.2018; 40(06): 354.     CrossRef
  • Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-risk Women
    SARAH M. TEMKIN, JENNIFER BERGSTROM, GOLI SAMIMI, LORI MINASIAN
    Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology.2017; 60(4): 738.     CrossRef
  • Risk Reduction of Breast Cancer by Childbirth, Breastfeeding, and Their Interaction in Korean Women: Heterogeneous Effects Across Menopausal Status, Hormone Receptor Status, and Pathological Subtypes
    Seok Hun Jeong, Yoon Suk An, Ji-Yeob Choi, Boyoung Park, Daehee Kang, Min Hyuk Lee, Wonshik Han, Dong Young Noh, Keun-Young Yoo, Sue K. Park
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2017; 50(6): 401.     CrossRef
Helicobacter pylori Infection and Risk of Gastric Cancer in Korea: A Quantitative Systematic Review
Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(4):197-204.   Published online July 7, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.024
  • 17,078 View
  • 238 Download
  • 21 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
In the context of the global decrease in mortality due to gastric cancer, previous studies have reported that the effect of chronic Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection on the incidence of gastric cancer varies among regions. This systematic review was conducted to investigate H. pylori as a risk factor for gastric cancer in Korea, where the incidence of gastric cancer is among the highest in the world.
Methods
A search strategy was established to identify articles published in Korean as well as in English. Ultimately, we included observational studies conducted among Korean patients that designed with an age-matched and sex-matched control group that reported the odds ratio associated with H. pylori. Gastric cancer cases were subdivided into overall (OGC), cardia (CGC), non-cardia (NGC), early (EGC), advanced, intestinal (IGC), and diffuse forms of gastric cancer. Summary odds ratios (SORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in the meta-analysis using a random-effect model.
Results
Eleven case-control studies were ultimately selected. H. pylori was associated with an SOR of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.29 to 2.54) for OGC. Additionally, statistically significant risks were observed for CGC, NGC, EGC, and IGC.
Conclusions
Chronic H. pylori infection was found to raise the risk of gastric cancer among Koreans, with the highest risk observed for CGC and EGC (SOR=2.88 for both). Follow-up clinical epidemiologic studies are needed to assess the effects of current treatments aimed at eradicating H. pylori infections.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Burden of Gastrointestinal Tumors in Asian Countries, 1990–2021: An Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
    Donglin Jiang, Yangxue Wu, Ling Liu, Yajing Shen, Tiandong Li, Yin Lu, Peng Wang, Changqing Sun, Kaijuan Wang, Keyan Wang, Hua Ye
    Clinical Epidemiology.2024; Volume 16: 587.     CrossRef
  • Association between Helicobacter pylori and its eradication and the development of cancer
    Sven Heiko Loosen, Alexander Mertens, Isabel Klein, Catherine Leyh, Sarah Krieg, Jennis Kandler, Tom Luedde, Christoph Roderburg, Karel Kostev
    BMJ Open Gastroenterology.2024; 11(1): e001377.     CrossRef
  • The Utility of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Examination Versus Positron Emission Tomography–Computed Tomography in the Detection of Second Primary Lesions in Korean Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
    Min-Su Kim, In Sik Song, Kyoung Ho Oh, Jae-Gu Cho, Seung-Kuk Baek, Jeong-Soo Woo, Kwang-Yoon Jung, Soon Young Kwon
    Ear, Nose & Throat Journal.2022; 101(2): NP50.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Gastric Cancer Prevention: Updated Report From a Randomized Controlled Trial With 26.5 Years of Follow-up
    Lingjun Yan, Ying Chen, Fa Chen, Tao Tao, Zhijian Hu, Junzhuo Wang, Jianwang You, Benjamin C.Y. Wong, Jianshun Chen, Weimin Ye
    Gastroenterology.2022; 163(1): 154.     CrossRef
  • Association Between ALDH2 Polymorphism and Gastric Cancer Risk in Terms of Alcohol Consumption: A Meta‐Analysis
    Seung Joo Kang, Cheol Min Shin, Joohon Sung, Nayoung Kim
    Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research.2021; 45(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Antioxidant-Rich Diet, GSTP1 rs1871042 Polymorphism, and Gastric Cancer Risk in a Hospital-Based Case-Control Study
    Jimi Kim, Hyejin Kim, Jeonghee Lee, Il Ju Choi, Young-Il Kim, Jeongseon Kim
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Disaggregated mortality from gastrointestinal cancers in Asian Americans: Analysis of United States death records
    Robert J. Huang, Nora Sharp, Ruth Talamoa, Kristopher Kapphahn, Vedant Sathye, Bryant Lin, Malathi Srinivasan, Latha P. Palaniappan
    International Journal of Cancer.2021; 148(12): 2954.     CrossRef
  • Asian gastric cardia adenocarcinoma: A distinct and understudied cancer with etiologic similarities to both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and noncardia gastric adenocarcinoma
    Christian C. Abnet
    Journal of the National Cancer Center.2021; 1(2): 44.     CrossRef
  • Population Attributable Fraction of Helicobacter pylori Infection–Related Gastric Cancer in Korea: A Meta-Analysis
    Yoon Park, Moran Ki
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 53(3): 744.     CrossRef
  • Helicobacter pylori Is Associated With Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions of the Gastric Cardia Mucosa: Results of a Large Population-Based Study in China
    Shuanghua Xie, Shaoming Wang, Liyan Xue, Daniel R. S. Middleton, Chentao Guan, Changqing Hao, Jinwu Wang, Bianyun Li, Ru Chen, Xinqing Li, Wenqiang Wei
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Vitamin D Status and Gastric Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study in Koreans
    Jung Hyun Kwak, Jean Kyung Paik
    Nutrients.2020; 12(7): 2004.     CrossRef
  • Impact of previous metronidazole exposure on metronidazole-based second-line quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection
    Gil Ho Lee, Kee Myung Lee, Sung Jae Shin, Joon Koo Kang, Choong-Kyun Noh, Jin Hong Kim, Sun Gyo Lim
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2020; 35(5): 1094.     CrossRef
  • Unraveling the identity of gastric cardiac cancer
    Qin Huang, Matthew Read, Jason S. Gold, Xiao Ping Zou
    Journal of Digestive Diseases.2020; 21(12): 674.     CrossRef
  • Smoking status and subsequent gastric cancer risk in men compared with women: a meta-analysis of prospective observational studies
    Wen-Ya Li, Yunan Han, Hui-Mian Xu, Zhen-Ning Wang, Ying-Ying Xu, Yong-Xi Song, Hao Xu, Song-Cheng Yin, Xing-Yu Liu, Zhi-Feng Miao
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of malignancy in patients with psoriasis: a 15‐year nationwide population‐based prospective cohort study in Korea
    J.W. Lee, K.J. Jung, T.G. Kim, M. Lee, J. Oh, S.H. Jee, M.G. Lee
    Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.2019; 33(12): 2296.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Korea
    Kwang-Pil Ko
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2019; 62(8): 398.     CrossRef
  • Cathepsin S as a target in gastric cancer (Review)
    Adriano Da Costa, Fernando Santa‑Cruz, Luiz Mattos, Maria Aquino, Camila Martins, �lvaro Ferraz, Jos� Figueiredo
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Environmental contributions to gastrointestinal and liver cancer in the Asia–Pacific region
    Kwang‐Pil Ko, Aesun Shin, Sooyoung Cho, Sue K Park, Keun‐Young Yoo
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2018; 33(1): 111.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of the Hom family of outer membrane proteins in isolates from two geographically distinct regions: The United States and South Korea
    Stephanie L. Servetas, Aeryun Kim, Hanfu Su, Jeong‐Heon Cha, D. Scott Merrell
    Helicobacter.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Family history of gastric cancer is associated with the risk of colorectal neoplasia in Korean population
    Yoon Suk Jung, Nam Hee Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Soo-Kyung Park, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Park, Chong Il Sohn
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2017; 49(10): 1155.     CrossRef
  • Association between alcohol consumption and the risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies
    Zheng He, Ting-Ting Zhao, Hui-Mian Xu, Zhen-Ning Wang, Ying-Ying Xu, Yong-Xi Song, Zhong-Ran Ni, Hao Xu, Song-Cheng Yin, Xing-Yu Liu, Zhi-Feng Miao
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(48): 84459.     CrossRef
Original Article
Metabolic Risk Profile and Cancer in Korean Men and Women
Seulki Ko, Seok-Jun Yoon, Dongwoo Kim, A-Rim Kim, Eun-Jung Kim, Hye-Young Seo
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(3):143-152.   Published online May 18, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.021
  • 15,219 View
  • 304 Download
  • 44 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Associations between metabolic syndrome and several types of cancer have recently been documented.
Methods
We analyzed the sample cohort data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service from 2002, with a follow-up period extending to 2013. The cohort data included 99 565 individuals who participated in the health examination program and whose data were therefore present in the cohort database. The metabolic risk profile of each participant was assessed based on obesity, high serum glucose and total cholesterol levels, and high blood pressure. The occurrence of cancer was identified using Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age group, smoking status, alcohol intake, and regular exercise.
Results
A total of 5937 cases of cancer occurred during a mean follow-up period of 10.4 years. In men with a high-risk metabolic profile, the risk of colon cancer was elevated (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.71). In women, a high-risk metabolic profile was associated with a significantly increased risk of gallbladder and biliary tract cancer (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.24 to 3.42). Non-significantly increased risks were observed in men for pharynx, larynx, rectum, and kidney cancer, and in women for colon, liver, breast, and ovarian cancer.
Conclusions
The findings of this study support the previously suggested association between metabolic syndrome and the risk of several cancers. A high-risk metabolic profile may be an important risk factor for colon cancer in Korean men and gallbladder and biliary tract cancer in Korean women.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Associations between metabolic syndrome and cholangiocarcinoma risk: A large-scale population-based cohort study
    Tzu-I Chen, Ming-Huang Chen, Szu-Ching Yin, Chih-Jo Lin, Tram Kim Lam, Chia-Wei Huang, Yi-Ting Chen, Xia-Rong Liu, Yun-Zheng Gao, Wan-Lun Hsu, Hsuan-Yu Chen, Ta-Sen Yeh, Jill Koshiol, Mei-Hsuan Lee
    Hepatology.2026; 83(2): 261.     CrossRef
  • Liposome-engineered therapeutics: A promising frontier in ovarian cancer treatment
    Helia Mavaddat, Amirreza Peyrovinasab, Shirin Sirous Kabiri, Nasim Basiri, Ilia Khayatan, Seyed Mehrad Razavi, Malak Hekmati, Atena Esmaeili, Tannaz Jamialahmadi, Amir Hossein Abdolghaffari, Prashant Kesharwani, Amirhossein Sahebkar
    Tissue and Cell.2026; 98: 103138.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and increased susceptibility to renal cell carcinoma – a meta-analysis
    Yanyu Zhou, Yujun Chen, Heng Yang, Zhiqi Xu, Jinbiao Zhuang, Qitao Bian, Gongxian Wang
    BMC Nephrology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Qingling Wang, Shiduo Guo, Ruizhe Huang, Zhenju Xu, Dapeng Liang, Yichuan Huang, Yubo Sun, Weiqi Yang, Liwei Jiang
    Cancer Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of gynaecologic cancers in women with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Indra Kundu, Denny John, Iqra Ansari, Keechilat Pavithran, Susan Idicula-Thomas
    The Indian Journal of Medical Research.2025; 162: 197.     CrossRef
  • Hypertension and Ovarian Cancer Risk: a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies with 2,497,898 participants
    Agnieszka Drab, Krystian Wdowiak, Wiesław Kanadys, Maria Malm, Joanna Dolar-Szczasny, Urszula Religioni
    Archives of Medical Science.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of Metabolic Syndrome With Risk of Lung Cancer
    Mengmeng Li, Su-Mei Cao, Niki Dimou, Lan Wu, Ji-Bin Li, Jun Yang
    CHEST.2024; 165(1): 213.     CrossRef
  • Association between insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and its components and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jingxuan Liu, Rui Wang, Song Tan, Xiaohu Zhao, Aihua Hou
    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between metabolic syndrome and kidney cancer risk: a prospective cohort study
    Lin Wang, Han Du, Chao Sheng, Hongji Dai, Kexin Chen
    Lipids in Health and Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Interplay of Cardiometabolic Syndrome and Biliary Tract Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis with Gender-Specific Insights
    Vincenza Di Stasi, Antonella Contaldo, Lucia Birtolo, Endrit Shahini
    Cancers.2024; 16(19): 3432.     CrossRef
  • Survival benefit of metformin use according to cancer diagnosis in diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome
    Ji Soo Park, Soo Jin Moon, Hyung Seok Park, Sang-Hoon Cho
    Preventive Medicine Reports.2024; 48: 102928.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and risk of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ziyu Chen, Zesi Liu, Hongxia Yang, Chaosheng Liu, Fandou Kong
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Updated epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers in East Asia
    Junjie Huang, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno, Lin Zhang, Wanghong Xu, Sunny H. Wong, Siew C. Ng, Martin C. S. Wong
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 20(5): 271.     CrossRef
  • Association of metabolic syndrome and its components with the risk of kidney cancer: A cohort-based case-control study
    Runxue Jiang, Zhi Li, Xia Wang, Haifeng Cai, Shouling Wu, Shuohua Chen, Hailong Hu
    Technology and Health Care.2023; 31(4): 1235.     CrossRef
  • Association between metabolic syndrome and gastric cancer risk: results from the Health Examinees Study
    Dan Huang, Woo-Kyoung Shin, Katherine De la Torre, Hwi-Won Lee, Sukhong Min, Aesun Shin, Jong-Koo Lee, Daehee Kang
    Gastric Cancer.2023; 26(4): 481.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhao Zhang, Qinxiang Liu, Congcong Huang, Jun Wu, Yingsheng Wen
    Hormone and Metabolic Research.2023; 55(12): 846.     CrossRef
  • The association between metabolic risk factors, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and the incidence of liver cancer: a nationwide population-based cohort study
    Yu-Guang Chen, Chih-Wei Yang, Chi-Hsiang Chung, Ching-Liang Ho, Wei-Liang Chen, Wu-Chien Chien
    Hepatology International.2022; 16(4): 807.     CrossRef
  • The Importance of Metabolic Syndrome Status for the Risk of Non-Viral Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
    Yuri Cho, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Ju Yoo, Young Chang, Goh Eun Chung, In Young Choi, Sang-Hyun Park, Kyungdo Han, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon, Dong Wook Shin, Su Jong Yu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of Hypertension and Organ-Specific Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Morgan Connaughton, Mahsa Dabagh
    Healthcare.2022; 10(6): 1074.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Renal Cell Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Wurong Du, Kaibo Guo, Huimin Jin, Leitao Sun, Shanming Ruan, Qiaoling Song
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Colorectal Cancer Risk by Obesity Status in Korean Women: A Nationwide Cohort Study
    Seong-geun Moon, Boyoung Park
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2022; 55(5): 475.     CrossRef
  • The association between hypertension and colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies
    Kun Xuan, Tianming Zhao, Chenyu Sun, Akash S. Patel, Haixia Liu, Xin Chen, Guangbo Qu, Yehuan Sun
    European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2021; 30(1): 84.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and esophageal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta‑analysis
    Jinjia Zhang, Huadong Wu, Rongying Wang
    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marco Mariani, Michele Sassano, Stefania Boccia
    European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2021; 30(3): 239.     CrossRef
  • Persistent status of metabolic syndrome and risk of cholangiocarcinoma: A Korean nationwide population-based cohort study
    Joo-Hyun Park, Jung Y. Hong, Young S. Park, Gunseog Kang, Kyungdo Han, Joon O. Park
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 155: 97.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and the risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoding Shen, Yong Wang, Rui Zhao, Qianyi Wan, Yutao Wu, Lihao Zhao, Xiaoting Wu
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(10): 2215.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and its component traits present gender-specific association with liver cancer risk: a prospective cohort study
    Bin Xia, Jianjun Peng, De Toni Enrico, Kuiqing Lu, Eddie C. Cheung, Zichong Kuo, Qiangsheng He, Yan Tang, Anran Liu, Die Fan, Changhua Zhang, Yulong He, Yihang Pan, Jinqiu Yuan
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between Abdominal Obesity and Incident Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea
    Ga Eun Nam, Se-Jin Baek, Hong Bae Choi, Kyungdo Han, Jung-Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim
    Cancers.2020; 12(6): 1368.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Lung Cancer: An Analysis of Korean National Health Insurance Corporation Database
    Sooim Sin, Chang-Hoon Lee, Sun Mi Choi, Kyung-Do Han, Jinwoo Lee
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2020; 105(11): e4102.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and the incidence of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Li Qiao, Deliang Ma, Hui Lv, Ding Shi, Min Fei, Yu Chen, Fei Xie, Zhuoyan Wang, Ying Wang, Wanhua Liang, Peiying Hu
    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Syndrome and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Results of Propensity Score-Based Analyses in a Community-Based Cohort Study
    Jinsun Kim, Eun Young Park, Eunjung Park, Min Kyung Lim, Jin-Kyoung Oh, Byungmi Kim
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(22): 8687.     CrossRef
  • The Metabolic Syndrome Is a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ping Zhao, Ning Xia, Hong Zhang, Tingting Deng
    Obesity Facts.2020; 13(4): 384.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and liver-related events: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huina Ren, Junna Wang, Yue Gao, Fuwei Yang, Wenxiang Huang
    BMC Endocrine Disorders.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between blood pressure and risk of cancer development: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Aristeidis Seretis, Sofia Cividini, Georgios Markozannes, Xanthippi Tseretopoulou, David S. Lopez, Evangelia E. Ntzani, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metabolic syndrome and risk of ovarian and fallopian tube cancer in the United States: An analysis of linked SEER–Medicare data
    Kara A. Michels, Timothy S. McNeel, Britton Trabert
    Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 155(2): 294.     CrossRef
  • Association between metabolic syndrome and the incidence of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Zhibin Li, Hongfeng Han, Yuan Chang
    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Breast Cancer Risk: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Follow-Up Studies
    Meng Guo, Tingting Liu, Peiting Li, Tianying Wang, Chen Zeng, Meng Yang, Gang Li, Jiang Han, Wei Wu, Ruopeng Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Incidence of Colon Cancer Related to Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Consumption in Adults with Metabolic Syndrome: Prospective Cohort Study
    Ahra Jo, Heeyoung Oh
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2019; 49(6): 713.     CrossRef
  • Molecular targets for the therapy of cancer associated with metabolic syndrome (transcription and growth factors)
    Natalia V. Yunusova, Irina V. Kondakova, Larisa A. Kolomiets, Sergey G. Afanas'ev, Alena L. Chernyshova, Igor V. Kudryavtsev, Anastasia A. Tsydenova
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2018; 14(3): 134.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and risk factors of colorectal cancer based on 56 324 health checkups: A 7‐year retrospective cohort study
    Toshiko Fujii, Masayuki Ohisa, Toru Sako, Takayuki Harakawa, Kazuaki Sakamune, Shintaro Nagashima, Aya Sugiyama, Yuichiro Matsuura, Junko Tanaka
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2018; 33(4): 855.     CrossRef
  • The role of metabolic syndrome variant in the malignant tumors progression
    Natalia V. Yunusova, Irina V. Kondakova, Larisa A. Kolomiets, Sergey G. Afanas’ev, Anastasia Yu. Kishkina, Liudmila V. Spirina
    Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews.2018; 12(5): 807.     CrossRef
  • Specific features of colorectal cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome: a matched case-control analysis of 772 patients
    Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, Christine Denet, Nicolas Tabchouri, Gianfranco Donatelli, Philippe Wind, Christophe Louvet, Mostefa Bennamoun, Christos Christidis, Thierry Perniceni, David Fuks, Brice Gayet
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2018; 403(4): 443.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Work-Related Sedentary Time on Overall Health Profile in Active vs. Inactive Office Workers
    Pauline M. Genin, Pascal Dessenne, Julien Finaud, Bruno Pereira, Frederic Dutheil, David Thivel, Martine Duclos
    Frontiers in Public Health.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Case of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Arising from Barrett's Esophagus
    Joon Sung Kim, Byung-Wook Kim
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2016; 16(3): 169.     CrossRef
Review Article
Epstein-Barr Virus and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression of Case-control Studies
Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(2):97-107.   Published online March 4, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.15.068
  • 19,918 View
  • 209 Download
  • 52 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
Research on how the risk of gastric cancer increases with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is lacking. In a systematic review that investigated studies published until September 2014, the authors did not calculate the summary odds ratio (SOR) due to heterogeneity across studies. Therefore, we include here additional studies published until October 2015 and conduct a meta-analysis with meta-regression that controls for the heterogeneity among studies.
Methods
Using the studies selected in the previously published systematic review, we formulated lists of references, cited articles, and related articles provided by PubMed. From the lists, only case-control studies that detected EBV in tissue samples were selected. In order to control for the heterogeneity among studies, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed.
Results
In the 33 case-control results with adjacent non-cancer tissue, the total number of test samples in the case and control groups was 5280 and 4962, respectively. In the 14 case-control results with normal tissue, the total number of test samples in case and control groups was 1393 and 945, respectively. Upon meta-regression, the type of control tissue was found to be a statistically significant variable with regard to heterogeneity. When the control tissue was normal tissue of healthy individuals, the SOR was 3.41 (95% CI, 1.78 to 6.51; I-squared, 65.5%).
Conclusions
The results of the present study support the argument that EBV infection increases the risk of gastric cancer. In the future, age-matched and sex-matched case-control studies should be conducted.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Mechanisms of Metabolic Reprogramming Regulating Immunosuppression in the Gastric Cancer Tumor Microenvironment
    Wenting Dong, Xuepeng Qian, Honglin Liu, Jinhai Huo, Weiming Wang
    Biomolecules.2026; 16(1): 160.     CrossRef
  • Association between Helicobacter pylori and Epstein–Barr virus co-infection and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ngoc-Niem Bui, Shih-Chiang Huang, Thi Nhu Le Tran, Ngoc Hien Nguyen, Hang Nga Do, Ya-Fang Chiu, Chih-Ho Lai
    QJM: An International Journal of Medicine.2025; 118(8): 584.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus and JC virus in tissue samples of gastric cancer, non-malignant, and controls by polymerase chain reaction in northwest Iran
    Abolfazl Jafari-Sales, Afsoon Shariat, Hossein Bannazadeh-Baghi, Behzad Baradaran, Behboud Jafari
    Virus Genes.2025; 61(4): 455.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for gastric cancer: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Jin Long Liang, Hui Ming Yuan, Chao Quan, Jun Qiang Chen
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Understanding the epidemiology of gastric cancer: a review and case-only analysis from Italy
    Giulia Collatuzzo, Giulia Fiorini, Tommaso Renieri, Matteo Pavoni, Stefania Boccia, Antonietta D’Errico, Dino Vaira, Paolo Boffetta
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2025; 37(11): 1249.     CrossRef
  • Role of the VEGF in virus‐associated cancers
    Shaian Tavakolian, Seidamir Pasha Tabaeian, Abolfazl Namazi, Ebrahim Faghihloo, Abolfazl Akbari
    Reviews in Medical Virology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex-dependent different clinicopathological characterization of Epstein–Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma: a large-scale study
    Ji-Hyun Kim, Nayoung Kim, Du Hyun Song, Yonghoon Choi, Eun-Bi Jeon, Sihyun Kim, Yu Kyung Jun, Hyuk Yoon, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Dong Ho Lee, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Hye Seung Lee, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Do Joong Park, Hyung Ho Kim,
    Gastric Cancer.2024; 27(2): 221.     CrossRef
  • Investigating the relationship between Epstein‐Barr virus infection and gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Saman Dokanei, Dariush Minai‐Tehrani, Mohsen Moghoofei, Mosayeb Rostamian
    Health Science Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biological Activity of Natural and Synthetic Peptides as Anticancer Agents
    Luana Vittoria Bauso, Valeria La Fauci, Serena Munaò, Desirèe Bonfiglio, Alessandra Armeli, Noemi Maimone, Clelia Longo, Giovanna Calabrese
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(13): 7264.     CrossRef
  • Chromatin and noncoding RNA-mediated mechanisms of gastric tumorigenesis
    Adrian Kwan Ho Loe, Lexin Zhu, Tae-Hee Kim
    Experimental & Molecular Medicine.2023; 55(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Quantitative analysis of Epstein–Barr virus DNA in plasma and stomach biopsies of patients with gastric cancer
    Behrang Sarshari, Mehrdad Ravanshad, Amirhassan Rabbani, Raziyeh Zareh-Khoshchehreh, Fedra Mokhtari, Binazir Khanabadi, Seyed Reza Mohebbi, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
    Virus Genes.2023; 59(3): 351.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for gastric cancer: A comprehensive analysis of observational studies
    Yuqing Hui, Chunyi Tu, Danlei Liu, Huijie Zhang, Xiaobing Gong
    Frontiers in Public Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New Advances in Molecular Typing of Gastric Cancer
    志民 江
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(02): 2392.     CrossRef
  • Assessing Epstein–Barr virus in gastric cancer: clinicopathological features and prognostic implications
    Guanghua Li, Zhihao Zhou, Zhixiong Wang, Zhao Wang
    Infectious Agents and Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Landscape of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA Mutations and Clinical Features of EBV-Associated and Microsatellite Unstable Gastric Cancer
    A. M. Danishevich, N. I. Pospehova, A. M. Stroganova, D. A. Golovina, M. P. Nikulin, A. E. Kalinin, S. E. Nikolaev, I. S. Stilidi, L. N. Lyubchenko
    Molecular Biology.2023; 57(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • JC Polyomavirus T-antigen protein expression and the risk of colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
    Lenka J. Kimla, Taane G. Clark, Sri Banerjee, Susana Campino, Alvaro Galli
    PLOS ONE.2023; 18(3): e0283642.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation Of The Results Of Hematological Parameters Of Patients With Gastric Cancer
    Mehmet Ali GÜL, Duygu TOZCU, Nezahat KURT, Mustafa ÇAPRAZ
    Bozok Tıp Dergisi.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancers Attributable to Infections in the US in 2017
    Karena D. Volesky-Avellaneda, Samantha Morais, Stephen D. Walter, Thomas R. O’Brien, Allan Hildesheim, Eric A. Engels, Mariam El-Zein, Eduardo L. Franco
    JAMA Oncology.2023; 9(12): 1678.     CrossRef
  • Association between Environmental Temperature and Survival in Gastroesophageal Cancers: A Population Based Study
    Kush Gupta, Anthony George, Kristopher Attwood, Ashish Gupta, Arya Mariam Roy, Shipra Gandhi, Beas Siromoni, Anurag Singh, Elizabeth Repasky, Sarbajit Mukherjee
    Cancers.2023; 16(1): 74.     CrossRef
  • Landscape of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA Genes Mutations and Clinical Features of EBV-Associated and MSI Gastric Cancer
    A. M. Danishevich, N. I. Pospehova, A. M. Stroganova, D. A. Golovina, M. P. Nikulin, A. E. Kalinin, S. E. Nikolaev, I. S. Stilidi, L. N. Lyubchenko
    Молекулярная биология.2023; 57(1): 71.     CrossRef
  • Mycobacterial infection aggravates Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric preneoplastic pathology by redirection of de novo induced Treg cells
    Mariela Artola-Borán, Angela Fallegger, Martina Priola, Rima Jeske, Tim Waterboer, Anders B. Dohlman, Xiling Shen, Sebastian Wild, Jiazhuo He, Mitchell P. Levesque, Shida Yousefi, Hans-Uwe Simon, Phil F. Cheng, Anne Müller
    Cell Reports.2022; 38(6): 110359.     CrossRef
  • Long Non-coding RNAs in Gammaherpesvirus Infections: Their Roles in Tumorigenic Mechanisms
    Wen Liu, Yan Zhang, Bing Luo
    Frontiers in Microbiology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Gastric Carcinoma
    Bong Eun Lee
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2021; 21(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Sex as an effect modifier in the association between alcohol intake and gastric cancer risk
    Jong-Myon Bae
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2021; 13(5): 453.     CrossRef
  • Current and Potential Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer: a Critical Review of the Literature
    Ramon Andrade de Mello, Giovanna Araujo Amaral, Nathália Moisés Neves, Estela Gudin Lippo, Fernanda Parini, Song Xu, Maria Tolia, Nikolaos Charalampakis, Hakaru Tadokoro, Pedro Castelo-Branco, Jinhui Zhu
    Future Oncology.2021; 17(25): 3383.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Cell Direct Bioprinting: A Focused Review
    David Angelats Lobo, Paola Ginestra, Elisabetta Ceretti, Teresa Puig Miquel, Joaquim Ciurana
    Micromachines.2021; 12(7): 764.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in the Diagnosis, Staging, Treatment, and Prognosis of Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Literature Review
    Zhi-da Chen, Peng-fei Zhang, Hong-qing Xi, Bo Wei, Lin Chen, Yun Tang
    Frontiers in Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Epstein–Barr Virus and Helicobacter Pylori Co-Infection in Non-Malignant Gastroduodenal Disorders
    Ramsés Dávila-Collado, Oscar Jarquín-Durán, Le Thanh Dong, J. Luis Espinoza
    Pathogens.2020; 9(2): 104.     CrossRef
  • Genomic Characterization of Non-Invasive Differentiated-Type Gastric Cancer in the Japanese Population
    Koki Nakamura, Yuji Urabe, Kenichi Kagemoto, Ryo Yuge, Ryohei Hayashi, Atsushi Ono, C. Nelson Hayes, Shiro Oka, Masanori Ito, Takashi Nishisaka, Kazuaki Tanabe, Koji Arihiro, Hideki Ohdan, Shinji Tanaka, Kazuaki Chayama
    Cancers.2020; 12(2): 510.     CrossRef
  • Association between Epstein-Barr virus infection and gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmad Tavakoli, Seyed Hamidreza Monavari, Farid Solaymani Mohammadi, Seyed Jalal Kiani, Saber Armat, Mohammad Farahmand
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Importance of investigating high-risk human papillomavirus in lymph node metastasis of esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Preeti Sharma, Shweta Dutta Gautam, Shanmugarajah Rajendra
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 26(21): 2729.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of EBV On the Epigenetics of Gastric Carcinoma
    Wen Liu, Bing Luo
    Future Virology.2020; 15(3): 183.     CrossRef
  • The Clinicopathological Features and Genetic Alterations in Epstein–Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer Patients after Curative Surgery
    Wen-Liang Fang, Ming-Huang Chen, Kuo-Hung Huang, Chien-Hsing Lin, Yee Chao, Su-Shun Lo, Anna Fen-Yau Li, Chew-Wun Wu, Yi-Ming Shyr
    Cancers.2020; 12(6): 1517.     CrossRef
  • Gastric cancer: a comprehensive review of current and future treatment strategies
    Rachel E. Sexton, Mohammed Najeeb Al Hallak, Maria Diab, Asfar S. Azmi
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.2020; 39(4): 1179.     CrossRef
  • Stage IV Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Early Gastric Cancer and Comparative Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Primary and Metastatic Tumors
    Hong Jun Kim, Chi Hoon Maeng, Ji-Youn Sung, Kiyong Na
    Journal of Nippon Medical School.2020; 87(6): 350.     CrossRef
  • EBV as a potential risk factor for hepatobiliary system cancer: A meta-analysis with 918 cases
    Zu-xuan Chen, Xiao-tong Peng, Lin Tan, Gao-qiang Zhai, Gang Chen, Ting-qing Gan, Jian-jun Li
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2019; 215(2): 278.     CrossRef
  • Distribution of the Epstein‐Barr virus in the normal stomach and gastric lesions in Thai population
    Supitcha Wanvimonsuk, Pichaya Thitiwanichpiwong, Somboon Keelawat, Apiwat Mutirangura, Nakarin Kitkumthorn
    Journal of Medical Virology.2019; 91(3): 444.     CrossRef
  • Epstein Barr virus antibody reactivity and gastric cancer: A population-based case-control study
    Nuria Aragonés, Nerea Fernández de Larrea, Roberto Pastor-Barriuso, Angelika Michel, Beatriz Romero, Michael Pawlita, Sara Mayorgas-Torralba, Vicente Martín, Victor Moreno, Delphine Casabonne, Jesús Castilla, Guillermo Fernandez-Tardón, Trinidad Dierssen-
    Cancer Epidemiology.2019; 61: 79.     CrossRef
  • Targeted therapies in metastatic gastric cancer: Current knowledge and future perspectives
    Antonio Pellino, Erika Riello, Floriana Nappo, Stefano Brignola, Sabina Murgioni, Selma Ahcene Djaballah, Sara Lonardi, Vittorina Zagonel, Massimo Rugge, Fotios Loupakis, Matteo Fassan
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(38): 5773.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals Aberrant Metabolism of Epstein–Barr-Virus-Associated Gastric Carcinoma
    Sang Jun Yoon, Jun Yeob Kim, Nguyen Phuoc Long, Jung Eun Min, Hyung Min Kim, Jae Hee Yoon, Nguyen Hoang Anh, Myung Chan Park, Sung Won Kwon, Suk Kyeong Lee
    Cells.2019; 8(10): 1220.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing Analysis of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
    Steven B. Maron, Leah M. Chase, Samantha Lomnicki, Sara Kochanny, Kelly L. Moore, Smita S. Joshi, Stacie Landron, Julie Johnson, Lesli A. Kiedrowski, Rebecca J. Nagy, Richard B. Lanman, Seung Tae Kim, Jeeyun Lee, Daniel V.T. Catenacci
    Clinical Cancer Research.2019; 25(23): 7098.     CrossRef
  • A viral map of gastrointestinal cancers
    Natália R. Costa, Rui M. Gil da Costa, Rui Medeiros
    Life Sciences.2018; 199: 188.     CrossRef
  • Novel Systemic Therapies for Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Hong Jun Kim, Sang Cheul Oh
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2018; 18(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Outlooks on Epstein-Barr virus associated gastric cancer
    Madiha Naseem, Afsaneh Barzi, Christine Brezden-Masley, Alberto Puccini, Martin D. Berger, Ryuma Tokunaga, Francesca Battaglin, Shivani Soni, Michelle McSkane, Wu Zhang, Heinz-Josef Lenz
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2018; 66: 15.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of multiple infections and the risk of gastric adenocarcinoma development at earlier age
    Sadegh Fattahi, Novin Nikbakhsh, Hassan Taheri, Elham Ghadami, Mohadeseh Kosari-Monfared, Galia Amirbozorgi, Mohsen Asouri, Maryam Pilehchian-Langroudi, Mohammad Ranaee, Ali Akbar Samadani, Mahdi Paryan, Haleh Akhavan-Niaki
    Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease.2018; 92(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • VEGF Upregulation in Viral Infections and Its Possible Therapeutic Implications
    Khaled R. Alkharsah
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2018; 19(6): 1642.     CrossRef
  • Researches of Epigenetic Epidemiology for Infections and Radiation as Carcinogen
    Jong-Myon Bae
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2018; 51(4): 169.     CrossRef
  • Detection of Gastric Cancer with Novel Methylated DNA Markers: Discovery, Tissue Validation, and Pilot Testing in Plasma
    Bradley W. Anderson, Yun-Suhk Suh, Boram Choi, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Tracy C. Yab, William R. Taylor, Brian A. Dukek, Calise K. Berger, Xiaoming Cao, Patrick H. Foote, Mary E. Devens, Lisa A. Boardman, John B. Kisiel, Douglas W. Mahoney, Seth W. Slettedahl, Hati
    Clinical Cancer Research.2018; 24(22): 5724.     CrossRef
  • Epstein–Barr Virus Infection in Adult Patients with Gastric Cancer in Northeast of Iran
    Sakineh Amoueian, Armin Attaranzadeh, Zeinab Gholamimoallem, Masoud Sadeghi, Seyed-Mehdi Hashemi, Abolghasem Allahyari
    Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology.2018; 39(02): 206.     CrossRef
  • Immunotherapy for gastric cancers: emerging role and future perspectives
    Marta Bonotto, Silvio Ken Garattini, Debora Basile, Elena Ongaro, Valentina Fanotto, Monica Cattaneo, Francesco Cortiula, Donatella Iacono, Giovanni Gerardo Cardellino, Nicoletta Pella, Gianpiero Fasola, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Nicola Silvestris, Giuseppe Apri
    Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology.2017; 10(6): 609.     CrossRef
  • Molecular classifications of gastric cancers: Novel insights and possible future applications
    Silvio Ken Garattini, Debora Basile, Monica Cattaneo, Valentina Fanotto, Elena Ongaro, Marta Bonotto, Francesca V Negri, Rosa Berenato, Paola Ermacora, Giovanni Gerardo Cardellino, Mariella Giovannoni, Nicoletta Pella, Mario Scartozzi, Lorenzo Antonuzzo,
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2017; 9(5): 194.     CrossRef
  • Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Risk of Breast Cancer: An Adaptive Meta-Analysis for Case-Control Studies
    Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
    Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Article
Diabetes Mellitus and Site-specific Colorectal Cancer Risk in Korea: A Case-control Study
Hyeongtaek Woo, Jeeyoo Lee, Jeonghee Lee, Ji Won Park, Sungchan Park, Jeongseon Kim, Jae Hwan Oh, Aesun Shin
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(1):45-52.   Published online December 22, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.15.029
  • 13,145 View
  • 164 Download
  • 13 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
Previous large-scale cohort studies conducted in Korea have found a positive association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and colorectal cancer (CRC) in men only, in contrast to studies of other populations that have found significant associations in both men and women.
Methods
A total of 1070 CRC cases and 2775 controls were recruited from the National Cancer Center, Korea between August 2010 and June 2013. Self-reported DM history and the duration of DM were compared between cases and controls. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by binary and polytomous logistic regression models.
Results
DM was associated with an elevated risk of CRC in both men (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.90) and women (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.98). This association remained when we controlled for age, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and physical activity level. In sub-site analyses, DM was associated with distal colon cancer risk in both men (multivariate OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.39 to 3.00) and women (multivariate ORs, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.05 to 3.79), while DM was only associated with rectal cancer risk in women (multivariate OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.10 to 3.82). No significant association was found between DM and proximal colon cancer risk in either men (multivariate OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.88 to 2.41) or women (multivariate OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.78 to 4.08).
Conclusions
Overall, DM was associated with an increased risk of CRC in Koreans. However, potential over-estimation of the ORs should be considered due to potential biases from the case-control design.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Relationship Between Aspirin Use and Site-Specific Colorectal Cancer Risk Among Individuals With Metabolic Comorbidity
    Seokyung An, Madhawa Gunathilake, Jeonghee Lee, Minji Kim, Jae Hwan Oh, Hee Jin Chang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Aesun Shin, Jeongseon Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The interaction between glycemic index, glycemic load, and the genetic variant ADIPOQ T45G (rs2241766) in the risk of colorectal cancer: a case–control study in a Korean population
    Y-Thanh Lu, Madhawa Gunathilake, Jeonghee Lee, Jae Hwan Oh, Hee Jin Chang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Aesun Shin, Jeongseon Kim
    European Journal of Nutrition.2022; 61(5): 2601.     CrossRef
  • Expression of long non-coding RNA H19 in colorectal cancer patients with type 2 diabetes
    Ming Zhao, Hantao Wang, Jingbo Chen, Yang Xi, Fuyan Wang, Cuilan Huo, Wenwen Li, Yudong Chu, Pengjie Xu, Qin Huang, Shizhong Bu
    Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry.2021; 127(3): 228.     CrossRef
  • Lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio combined with CA19‐9 for predicting postoperative recurrence of colorectal cancer in patients with diabetes
    Dan Yu, Guangyu An, Jiannan Yao
    Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex- and site-specific differences in colorectal cancer risk among people with type 2 diabetes
    Jetty A. Overbeek, Josephina G. Kuiper, Amber A. W. A. van der Heijden, Mariette Labots, Ulrike Haug, Ron M. C. Herings, Giel Nijpels
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(2): 269.     CrossRef
  • Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Case-Control Study
    Elham Davtalab Esmaeili, Khairollah Asadollahi, Ali Delpisheh, Kourosh Sayehmiri, Hosein Azizi
    International Journal of Cancer Management.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer Risks According to Sex Differences in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus: A Korean Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
    Ji Min Lee, Kang-Moon Lee, Dae Bum Kim, Seung-Hyun Ko, Yong Gyu Park
    Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.2019; 10(10): e00090.     CrossRef
  • The association between plasma C-peptide concentration and the risk of prostate cancer: a nested case–control study within a Japanese population-based prospective study
    Grace Y. Kiyabu, Norie Sawada, Motoki Iwasaki, Taiki Yamaji, Taichi Shimazu, Shizuka Sasazuki, Manami Inoue, Shoichiro Tsugane
    European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2018; 27(5): 461.     CrossRef
  • Association between Cardiovascular Risk and Diabetes with Colorectal Neoplasia: A Site-Specific Analysis
    David Niederseer, Isabelle Bracher, Andreas Stadlmayr, Ursula Huber-Schönauer, Martin Plöderl, Slayman Obeid, Christian Schmied, Sabrina Hammerl, Felix Stickel, Dieter Lederer, Wolfgang Patsch, Elmar Aigner, Christian Datz
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2018; 7(12): 484.     CrossRef
  • Optimal glycemic target level for colon cancer patients with diabetes
    Shin Jun Lee, Jae Hyun Kim, Seun Ja Park, So Young Ock, Su Kyoung Kwon, Young Sik Choi, Bu Kyung Kim
    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2017; 124: 66.     CrossRef
  • Impact of detection bias on the risk of gastrointestinal cancer and its subsites in type 2 diabetes mellitus
    R.G.P.J. de Jong, A.M. Burden, S. de Kort, M.P.P. van Herk-Sukel, P.A.J. Vissers, P.K.C. Janssen, H.R. Haak, A.A.M. Masclee, F. de Vries, M.L.G. Janssen-Heijnen
    European Journal of Cancer.2017; 79: 61.     CrossRef
  • Effects of interactions between common genetic variants and smoking on colorectal cancer
    Nan Song, Aesun Shin, Hye Soo Jung, Jae Hwan Oh, Jeongseon Kim
    BMC Cancer.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diabetes-induced mechanophysiological changes in the small intestine and colon
    Mirabella Zhao, Donghua Liao, Jingbo Zhao
    World Journal of Diabetes.2017; 8(6): 249.     CrossRef
Reviews
Hormonal Replacement Therapy and the Risk of Lung Cancer in Women: An Adaptive Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies
Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(6):280-286.   Published online November 9, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.15.054
  • 16,781 View
  • 131 Download
  • 27 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
Approximately 10% to 15% of lung cancer cases occur in never-smokers. Hormonal factors have been suggested to lead to an elevated risk of lung cancer in women. This systematic review (SR) aimed to investigate the association between hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) and the risk of lung cancer in women using cohort studies.
Methods
We first obtained previous SR articles on this topic. Based on these studies we made a list of refereed, cited, and related articles using the PubMed and Scopus databases. All cohort studies that evaluated the relative risk of HRT exposure on lung cancer occurrence in women were selected. Estimate of summary effect size (sES) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results
A total of 14 cohort studies were finally selected. A random effect model was applied due to heterogeneity (I-squared, 64.3%). The sES of the 14 articles evaluating the impact of HRT exposure on lung cancer occurrence in women indicated no statistically significant increase in lung cancer risk (sES, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.09).
Conclusions
These results showed that HRT history had no effect on the risk of lung cancer in women, even though the sES of case-control studies described in previous SR articles indicated that HRT had a protective effect against lung cancer. It is necessary to conduct a pooled analysis of cohort studies.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Elevated risk of lung cancer among Asian American women who have never smoked: an emerging cancer disparity
    Scarlett Lin Gomez, Mindy DeRouen, Moon S Chen Jr, Heather Wakelee, Jeffrey B Velotta, Lori C Sakoda, Salma Shariff-Marco, Peggy Reynolds, Iona Cheng
    JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute.2025; 117(6): 1104.     CrossRef
  • Reproductive factors and risk of lung cancer among 300,000 Chinese female never-smokers: evidence from the China Kadoorie Biobank study
    Marwa M. A. Elbasheer, Bastian Bohrmann, Yiping Chen, Jun Lv, Dianjianyi Sun, Xia Wu, Xiaoming Yang, Daniel Avery, Liming Li, Zhengming Chen, Christiana Kartsonaki, Ka Hung Chan, Ling Yang
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society

    Menopause.2022; 29(7): 767.     CrossRef
  • Protective effects of 17-β-oestradiol and phytoestrogen on age-induced oxidative stress and inhibition of surfactant synthesis in rat type II pneumocytes
    Lisa Rancan, Angela Puig, José M. Balibrea, Sergio D. Paredes, Cruz García, Luis Jiménez, Jesús A. Fernández-Tresguerres, Elena Vara
    International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition.2021; 72(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • The smoking estrogens – a potential synergy between estradiol and benzo(a)pyrene
    Bartosz Kazimierz Słowikowski, Maurycy Jankowski, Paweł Piotr Jagodziński
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2021; 139: 111658.     CrossRef
  • Hormone replacement therapy and cancer survival: a longitudinal cohort study: protocol paper
    Tom Alan Ranger, Judith Burchardt, Ashley Kieran Clift, Winnie Xue Mei, Carol Coupland, Pui San Tan, Sharon Dixon, Christopher Robert Cardwell, Julia Hippisley-Cox
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(8): e046701.     CrossRef
  • Associations between female lung cancer risk and sex steroid hormones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence on endogenous and exogenous sex steroid hormones
    Hui Zeng, Zhuoyu Yang, Jiang Li, Yan Wen, Zheng Wu, Yadi Zheng, Yiwen Yu, Yongjie Xu, Shugeng Gao, Fengwei Tan, Ni Li, Qi Xue, Jie He
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The influence of hormone replacement therapy on lung cancer incidence and mortality
    Ashley L. Titan, Hao He, Natalie Lui, Douglas Liou, Mark Berry, Joseph B. Shrager, Leah M. Backhus
    The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.2020; 159(4): 1546.     CrossRef
  • Lung cancer incidence and mortality in relationship to hormone replacement therapy use among women participating in the PLCO trial: a post hoc analysis
    Omar Abdel-Rahman
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 25(5): 885.     CrossRef
  • Female reproductive factors and the risk of lung cancer in postmenopausal women: a nationwide cohort study
    Keun Hye Jeon, Dong Wook Shin, Kyungdo Han, Dahye Kim, Jung Eun Yoo, Su-Min Jeong, Jong ho Cho
    British Journal of Cancer.2020; 122(9): 1417.     CrossRef
  • Frailty Is Inversely Related to Age at Menopause and Elevated in Women Who Have Had a Hysterectomy: An Analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
    Chris P Verschoor, Hala Tamim
    The Journals of Gerontology: Series A.2019; 74(5): 675.     CrossRef
  • We Need to Educate Young Lung Cancer Patients About Menopause Risk
    Fahad Faruqi, Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Kathryn J Ruddy
    Lung Cancer Management.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex steroid metabolism and actions in non-small cell lung carcinoma
    Teeranut Asavasupreechar, Monica S.M. Chan, Ryoko Saito, Yasuhiro Miki, Viroj Boonyaratanakornkit, Hironobu Sasano
    The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.2019; 193: 105440.     CrossRef
  • Hormone replacement therapy and lung cancer risk in women: a meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Chao Jin, Baoping Lang
    Medicine.2019; 98(51): e17532.     CrossRef
  • Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with HPV-Related Cancers in Indonesia
    Didik Setiawan, Arrum Dusafitri, Githa Fungie Galistiani, Antoinette D.I. van Asselt, Maarten J. Postma
    Value in Health Regional Issues.2018; 15: 63.     CrossRef
  • Biases Inherent in Studies of Coffee Consumption in Early Pregnancy and the Risks of Subsequent Events
    Alan Leviton
    Nutrients.2018; 10(9): 1152.     CrossRef
  • The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society

    Menopause.2018; 25(11): 1362.     CrossRef
  • Exploring estrogenic activity in lung cancer
    Bartosz Kazimierz Słowikowski, Margarita Lianeri, Paweł Piotr Jagodziński
    Molecular Biology Reports.2017; 44(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Hormone therapy and lung cancer mortality in women: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wentao Li, Xiaona Lin, Rui Wang, Feng Wang, Shaohua Xie, Lap Ah Tse
    Steroids.2017; 118: 47.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology of Second Primary Tumors in Women With Ovarian Cancer
    Tomi T. Kanninen, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Giovanni Sisti, Kevin Holcomb, Mariarosaria Di Tommaso, Susan Khalil, Anar Gojayev, Steven S. Witkin
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2017; 27(4): 659.     CrossRef
  • The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society

    Menopause.2017; 24(7): 728.     CrossRef
  • Citation Discovery Tools for Conducting Adaptive Meta-analyses to Update Systematic Reviews
    Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2016; 49(2): 129.     CrossRef
  • Osteoporosis: Modern Paradigms for Last Century’s Bones
    Marlena Kruger, Frances Wolber
    Nutrients.2016; 8(6): 376.     CrossRef
  • Menopausal hormone therapy in cancer survivors: A narrative review of the literature
    Carol L. Kuhle, Ekta Kapoor, Richa Sood, Jacqueline M. Thielen, Aminah Jatoi, Stephanie S. Faubion
    Maturitas.2016; 92: 86.     CrossRef
  • Dietary intakes of citrus fruit and risk of gastric cancer incidence: an adaptive meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
    Epidemiology and Health.2016; 38: e2016034.     CrossRef
  • Modifiable risk factors of lung cancer in “never-smoker” women
    Jong-Myon Bae
    Epidemiology and Health.2015; 37: e2015047.     CrossRef
  • Human papillomavirus infection and risk of lung cancer in never-smokers and women: an ‘adaptive’ meta-analysis
    Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
    Epidemiology and Health.2015; 37: e2015052.     CrossRef
Hormone Replacement Therapy and Risk of Breast Cancer in Korean Women: A Quantitative Systematic Review
Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(5):225-230.   Published online September 16, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.15.046
  • 16,710 View
  • 171 Download
  • 20 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
The epidemiological characteristics of breast cancer incidence by age group in Korean women are unique. This systematic review aimed to investigate the association between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and breast cancer risk in Korean women.
Methods
We searched electronic databases such as KoreaMed, KMbase, KISS, and RISS4U as well as PubMed for publications on Korean breast cancer patients. We also conducted manual searching based on references and citations in potential papers. All of the analytically epidemiologic studies that obtained individual data on HRT exposure and breast cancer occurrence in Korean women were selected. We restricted the inclusion of case-control studies to those that included age-matched controls. Estimates of summary odds ratio (SOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effect models.
Results
One cohort and five case-control studies were finally selected. Based on the heterogeneity that existed among the six studies (I-squared=70.2%), a random effect model was applied. The summary effect size of HRT history from the six articles indicated no statistical significance in breast cancer risk (SOR, 0.983; 95% CI, 0.620 to 1.556).
Conclusions
These facts support no significant effect of HRT history in the risk of breast cancer in Korean women. It is necessary to conduct a pooled analysis.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors for breast cancer: an umbrella review of observational cohort studies and causal relationship analysis
    Zhuo Wang, Lei Feng, Yuqing Xia, Zheming Zhu, Lina Wu, Song Gao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy: Insights into Phytochemical-Based Therapeutics
    Adil Farooq Wali, Siajunisa Talath, Mohamed El Tanani, Imran Rashid Rangraze, Rasha Babiker, Sadat Shafi, Ruby Bansal
    Nutrition and Cancer.2025; 77(9): 938.     CrossRef
  • Attitude, Practices, and Barriers to Menopausal Hormone Therapy Among Physicians in Saudi Arabia
    Rayan A Qutob, Abdullah Alaryni, Eysa N Alsolamy, Khalid Al Harbi, Yousef Alammari, Abdulrahman Alanazi, Mohanad Khalid Almaimani, Enad Alsolami, Osamah A Hakami, Asail Ahmed Alammar, Raghad Z Abuthyab, Lana Hesham Alabdulkarim, Razan Khaled Aldeham, Noor
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Causes and Risk Factors of Breast Cancer, What Do We Know for Sure? An Evidence Synthesis of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Borghild Løyland, Ida Hellum Sandbekken, Ellen Karine Grov, Inger Utne
    Cancers.2024; 16(8): 1583.     CrossRef
  • Menopoz-Sonrası Dönemde Meme Kanseri Gelişiminde Beslenme Alışkanlıkları ve Yaşam Kalitesi Etkili mi?
    Burçak ÇUBUKÇU, Fatma TAYHAN KARTAL, Gözde EDE
    Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi.2023; 12(3): 1301.     CrossRef
  • Expansion of chemical space based on a pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine core: Synthesis and its anticancer activity in prostate cancer and breast cancer cells
    Yohan Seo, Jeong Hwa Lee, So-hyeon Park, Wan Namkung, Ikyon Kim
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2020; 188: 111988.     CrossRef
  • Validating Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models in the Korean Cancer Prevention Study-II Biobank
    Yon Ho Jee, Chi Gao, Jihye Kim, Seho Park, Sun Ha Jee, Peter Kraft
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2020; 29(6): 1271.     CrossRef
  • Breast cancer risk factors in Iran: a systematic review & meta-analysis
    Amir Shamshirian, Keyvan Heydari, Zahra Shams, Amir Reza Aref, Danial Shamshirian, Omid Reza Tamtaji, Zatollah Asemi, Layla Shojaie, Hamed Mirzaei, Neda Mohammadi, Behdad Zibaee, Keyvan Karimifar, Bahman Zarandi, Akbar Hedayatizadeh-Omran, Reza Alizadeh-N
    Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Frailty Is Inversely Related to Age at Menopause and Elevated in Women Who Have Had a Hysterectomy: An Analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
    Chris P Verschoor, Hala Tamim
    The Journals of Gerontology: Series A.2019; 74(5): 675.     CrossRef
  • Hormone therapy as risk factor of breast cancer modulated by diagnostic and lifestyle risk factors in Taiwan-A National Cohort study
    Po-Huang Chiang, Feng-Hsiang Tang, Eing-Mei Tsai, Yen-Chen Chang, Chun-Yuh Yang
    The Breast Journal.2019; 25(3): 531.     CrossRef
  • Cimicifuga heracleifolia is therapeutically similar to black cohosh in relieving menopausal symptoms: evidence from pharmacological and metabolomics studies
    Lan-Yun MIAO, Thi Thanh Huyen CHU, Ping LI, Yan JIANG, Hui-Jun LI
    Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines.2019; 17(6): 435.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiological characteristics of breast cancer in Koreans
    Sue K. Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2019; 62(8): 424.     CrossRef
  • Screening breast magnetic resonance imaging in women with hormone replacement therapy
    Feng Zhang, Qingjing Feng, Zhiyong Zhang, Yanjun Hu, Zhifeng Zhang
    European Journal of Medical Research.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Menopause as a potential cause for higher prevalence of low back pain in women than in age-matched men
    Yi Xiang J. Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Translation.2017; 8: 1.     CrossRef
  • Bsm1 Gene polymorphism of the vitamin D receptor in breast cancer patients: influence of obesity and relevant drugs
    Noha Mohammed Ali Haikal, Mona Abo-Bakr El-Hussiny, Omar Farouk, Ekbal Mohammed Abo Hashem
    Comparative Clinical Pathology.2017; 26(1): 127.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Status in Iran: Statistical Analysis of 3010 Cases between 1998 and 2014
    Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari, Soheila Sayad, Saed Sayad, Maryam Khayamzadeh, Leila Shojaee, Zeynab Shormeji, Mojtaba Amiri
    International Journal of Breast Cancer.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Age-associated prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patients with breast cancer
    Markéta Kolečková, Zdeněk Kolář, Jiří Ehrmann, Gabriela Kořínková, Radek Trojanec
    Oncology Letters.2017; 13(6): 4201.     CrossRef
  • Epstein-Barr Virus and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis With Meta-regression of Case-control Studies
    Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2016; 49(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Helicobacter pylori Infection and Risk of Gastric Cancer in Korea: A Quantitative Systematic Review
    Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2016; 49(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • The Risk of Breast Cancer in Women Using Menopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy in Taiwan
    Jui-Yao Liu, Tzeng-Ji Chen, Shinn-Jang Hwang
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2016; 13(5): 482.     CrossRef
Alcohol as a Risk Factor for Cancer: Existing Evidence in a Global Perspective
Nina Roswall, Elisabete Weiderpass
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(1):1-9.   Published online January 27, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.14.052
  • 21,587 View
  • 318 Download
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
The purpose of the present review is to give an overview of the association between alcohol intake and the risk of developing cancer. Two large-scale expert reports; the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute of Cancer Research (AICR) report from 2007, including its continuous update project, and the International Agency for Research of Cancer (IARC) monograph from 2012 have extensively reviewed this association in the last decade. We summarize and compare their findings, as well as relate these to the public health impact, with a particular focus on region-specific drinking patterns and disease tendencies. Our findings show that alcohol intake is strongly linked to the risk of developing cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, oesophagus, colorectum (in men), and female breast. The two expert reports diverge on the evidence for an association with liver cancer and colorectal cancer in women, which the IARC grades as convincing, but the WCRF/AICR as probable. Despite these discrepancies, there does, however, not seem to be any doubt, that the Population Attributable Fraction of alcohol in relation to cancer is large. As alcohol intake varies largely worldwide, so does, however, also the Population Attributable Fractions, ranging from 10% in Europe to almost 0% in countries where alcohol use is banned. Given the World Health Organization’s prediction, that alcohol intake is increasing, especially in low- and middle-income countries, and steadily high in high-income countries, the need for preventive efforts to curb the number of alcohol-related cancers seems growing, as well as the need for taking a region- and gender-specific approach in both future campaigns as well as future research. The review acknowledges the potential beneficial effects of small doses of alcohol in relation to ischaemic heart disease, but a discussion of this lies without the scope of the present study.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Significant risk factors for oral mucosa cancer in the Altai Krai population
    Yu. V. Lunitsyna, A. O. Shevyakina, S. I. Tokmakova, O. V. Bondarenko
    Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis.2025; 24(4): 331.     CrossRef
  • Cancer prevention through lifestyle modification
    Devi Nandakumar, Ruhi Dixit, Manoj Pandey
    The Indian Journal of Medical Research.2025; 161: 109.     CrossRef
  • A longitudinal analysis on alcohol consumption in patients with cancer undergoing psycho-oncological treatment
    Paulina Kiefer, Lisa Lebherz, Janina Freitag, Holger Schulz, Christiane Bleich, Carsten Bokemeyer, Frederike Bokemeyer
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Alcohol and Periodontal Disease: A Narrative Review
    Utsav H Gandhi, Amit Benjamin, Shreya Gajjar, Tanvi Hirani, Khushboo Desai, Bansariben B Suhagia, Rahnuma Ahmad, Susmita Sinha, Mainul Haque, Santosh Kumar
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biosynthesis of anticancer phytochemical compounds and their chemistry
    Amandeep Dogra, Jitender Kumar
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association of Healthy Diet and Physical Activity With Breast Cancer: Lifestyle Interventions and Oncology Education
    Tiantian Jia, Yufeng Liu, Yuanyuan Fan, Lintao Wang, Enshe Jiang
    Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Respiratory Tract Cancer Incidences across Industry Groups: A Nationwide Cohort Study with More Than 70 Million Person-Years of Follow-Up
    Seong-Uk Baek, Woo-Ri Lee, Ki-Bong Yoo, Jun-Hyeok Choi, Kyung-Eun Lee, Wanhyung Lee, Jin-Ha Yoon
    Cancers.2022; 14(21): 5219.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Incidence and Risk of Multiple Cancers after Environmental Asbestos Exposure in Childhood—A Long-Term Register-Based Cohort Study
    Sofie Bünemann Dalsgaard, Else Toft Würtz, Johnni Hansen, Oluf Dimitri Røe, Øyvind Omland
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 19(1): 268.     CrossRef
  • The Sober Professor: Reflections on the Sober Paradox, Sober Phobia, and Disclosing an Alcohol Recovery Identity in Academia
    Victoria F. Burns
    Contemporary Drug Problems.2021; 48(3): 223.     CrossRef
  • Combining population projections with quasi-likelihood models: A new way to predict cancer incidence and cancer mortality in Austria up to 2030
    Johannes Klotz, Monika Hackl, Markus Schwab, Alexander Hanika, Daniela Haluza
    Demographic Research.2019; 40: 503.     CrossRef
  • Psychosocial Motivators for Moderate Drinking among Young Asian Flushers in Singapore
    Hye Kyung Kim, Rachel Lim Si En, Dorothy Wong Kang Min
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(11): 1897.     CrossRef
  • My own personal hell: approaching and exceeding thresholds of too much alcohol
    Mark Burgess, Richard Cooke, Emma L. Davies
    Psychology & Health.2019; 34(12): 1451.     CrossRef
  • Nutrition and Breast Cancer: A Literature Review on Prevention, Treatment and Recurrence
    Paola De Cicco, Maria Valeria Catani, Valeria Gasperi, Matteo Sibilano, Maria Quaglietta, Isabella Savini
    Nutrients.2019; 11(7): 1514.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) Seed Extract on Human Cancer Cell Lines Delivered in Its Native Form and Loaded in Polymeric Micelles
    Watcharaphong Chaemsawang, Weerapong Prasongchean, Konstantinos I. Papadopoulos, Garnpimol Ritthidej, Suchada Sukrong, Phanphen Wattanaarsakit
    International Journal of Biomaterials.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer and Alcohol Consumption—Populations to Molecules
    Marco Rossi, Ahmad Usman, Ali Keshavarzian, Faraz Bishehsari
    Cancers.2018; 10(2): 38.     CrossRef
  • Differential Expression of Prostaglandin I2 Synthase Associated with Arachidonic Acid Pathway in the Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Anelise Russo, Patrícia M. Biselli-Chicote, Rosa S. Kawasaki-Oyama, Márcia M. U. Castanhole-Nunes, José V. Maniglia, Dalísio de Santi Neto, Érika C. Pavarino, Eny M. Goloni-Bertollo
    Journal of Oncology.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Rates of Change to a Positive Result in Subsequent Screening Mammography in Korean Women: A Retrospective Observational Study
Jong-Myon Bae, Sang Yop Shin, Eun Hee Kim, Yoon-Nam Kim, Chung Mo Nam
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(1):48-52.   Published online December 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.14.042
  • 11,672 View
  • 82 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
This retrospective cohort study aimed at calculating some parameters of changes in the findings of the subsequent screening mammography (SSM) in female Korean volunteers.
Methods
The study included screenees aged 30 to 79 years who underwent SSM voluntarily after testing negative in the baseline screenings performed between January 2007 and December 2011. A change to a positive result was defined as category 4 or 5 by using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. The proportion of results that had changed to positive (CP, %) was calculated by dividing the number of cases with results that were positive in the SSM by the total number of study participants. The rate of results that had changed to positive (CR, cases per 100 000 screenee-months) was calculated by dividing the number of cases with results that were positive in the SSM by the total number of months of the follow-up period.
Results
The overall CP and CR in all age groups (n=77 908) were 2.26% and 93.94 cases per 100 000 screenee-months, respectively. The median CP interval in the subjects who had positive SSM results was 30 to 36 months, while that in the age group of 30 to 39 years was shorter.
Conclusions
Different screening intervals should be considered among women aged between 30 and 59 years. In addition, a strategy for a screening program should be developed for the age group of 30 to 39 years, in particular.
Summary
Differences in the Levels of Gastric Cancer Risk Factors Between Nanjing and Minqing Counties, China
Xiang-Quan Xie, Kui-Cheng Zheng, Bing-Shan Wu, Tie-Hui Chen, Shan-Rong Lai, Zai-Sheng Lin, Kazuo Aoki
J Prev Med Public Health. 2014;47(5):281-287.   Published online September 12, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.14.018
  • 13,522 View
  • 86 Download
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
In Fujian Province, China, gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality among all malignant tumors. Nanjing county and Minqing county are located in inland Fujian and have similar general demographics. However, the adjusted mortality rate of gastric cancer in Minqing was found to be much higher than that in Nanjing. We sought to explore factors associated with this increased risk of gastric cancer between the two counties. Methods: We recruited 231 and 224 residents from Nanjing and Minqing, respectively, and analyzed differences between their dietary habits, Helicobacter pylori infection rates, and concentrations of serum pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, gastrin-17, and ratio of pepsinogen I:II. Results: Subjects in Minqing had more first-degree relatives who had been diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal tumor, more unhealthy dietary habits, a higher Helicobacter pylori positive rate, and greater proportion of abnormal serum gastrin-17 than those in Nanjing did. Conclusions: The factors that differed between these two counties might indicate that residents in Minqing have a higher risk for developing gastric cancer than those in Nanjing do.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Changing trends of clinicopathologic features and survival duration after surgery for gastric cancer in Northeast China
    Zhao Zhai, Zi-Yu Zhu, Xi-Liang Cong, Bang-Ling Han, Jia-Liang Gao, Xin Yin, Yu Zhang, Sheng-Han Lou, Tian-Yi Fang, Yi-Min Wang, Chun-Feng Li, Xue-Feng Yu, Yan Ma, Ying-Wei Xue
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2020; 12(10): 1119.     CrossRef
  • Poor expression of microRNA‐135b results in the inhibition of cisplatin resistance and proliferation and induces the apoptosis of gastric cancer cells through MST1‐mediated MAPK signaling pathway
    Jie Zhou, Qing Chen
    The FASEB Journal.2019; 33(3): 3420.     CrossRef
  • HLA‐DQB1*03 genotype and perioperative blood transfusion are not conducive to the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer
    Shen‐Kang Zhou, Lei‐Lei Yang, Rui Chen, Yong Lu, Yong‐Hua Zheng
    Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
Mean Sojourn Time of Preclinical Gastric Cancer in Korean Men: A Retrospective Observational Study
Jong-Myon Bae, Sang Yop Shin, Eun Hee Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2014;47(4):201-205.   Published online July 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2014.47.4.201
  • 15,890 View
  • 105 Download
  • 15 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
This retrospective cohort study aimed to estimate the mean sojourn time (MST) of preclinical gastric cancer in Korean men.
Methods
The subjects consisted of voluntary male screenees aged 40 to 69 years who underwent subsequent screening gastroscopies after testing negative at a baseline screening performed between January 2007 and December 2011. A new case was defined if gastric cancer cells were present in the biopsy specimens obtained from gastroscopy. The follow-up period was calculated as the number of person-years between the date of baseline screening gastroscopy and positive findings at a subsequent screening. The MST was calculated using transition rates of gastric cancer to determine the best screening interval.
Results
Of the 171 979 voluntary male screenees, 61 688 (36%) underwent subsequent screening gastroscopies between January 2007 and December 2011. A total of 91 incident cases were found during 19 598 598 person-years of follow-up. The MST of gastric cancer was 2.37 years (95% confidence intervals, 1.92 to 2.96), and those aged 40 to 49 years had a shorter MST than those 50 to 69 years did.
Conclusions
These findings support the 2-year interval of screening recommended by the nationwide gastric cancer screening program in Korea. Further studies for the age-specific MST among women are needed.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer: Emerging data and opportunities to improve early detection
    Mie Thu Ko, Adriel Fung, Anjana Kumar, Alistair McArdle, Leo Alexandre
    Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2025; 75: 102003.     CrossRef
  • The Optimal Age of Helicobacter pylori Screen‐and‐Treat for Gastric Cancer Prevention in the United States
    Duco T. Mülder, James F. O'Mahony, Dianqin Sun, Luuk A. van Duuren, Rosita van den Puttelaar, Matthias Harlass, Weiran Han, Robert J. Huang, Manon C. W. Spaander, Uri Ladabaum, Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar
    Helicobacter.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Prior Upper Endoscopy on Gastric Cancer Stage and Survival in Older Adults
    Sophie Wagner, Josephine Soddano, Ji Yoon Yoon, Jeong Yun Yang, Sheila D. Rustgi, Haley M. Zylberberg, Ling Chen, Yongmei Huang, Chin Hur, Jennifer S. Ferris
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Increased risk of early-onset gastric cancer among young adults age 20–49 years with diabetes: a nationwide cohort study
    Tae-Se Kim, Kyungdo Han, Yang Won Min, Hyuk Lee, Jun Haeng Lee, Poong-Lyul Rhee, Jae J. Kim, Byung-Hoon Min
    eClinicalMedicine.2025; 90: 103637.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance of Incidentally Detected Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: A Microsimulation Analysis
    Nikhil R. Thiruvengadam, Shashank Gupta, Seth Buller, Imad Awad, Devika Gandhi, Allison Ibarra, Gonzalo Latorre, Arnoldo Riquelme, Michael L. Kochman, Gregory Cote, Shailja C. Shah, Monica Saumoy
    Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 22(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Adenoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study
    Jae Myung Park, Songhee Cho, Ga-Yeong Shin, Jayoun Lee, Minjee Kim, Hyeon Woo Yim
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(12): 2166.     CrossRef
  • Effect and cost-effectiveness of national gastric cancer screening in Japan: a microsimulation modeling study
    Hsi-Lan Huang, Chi Yan Leung, Eiko Saito, Kota Katanoda, Chin Hur, Chung Yin Kong, Shuhei Nomura, Kenji Shibuya
    BMC Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Potential of non-invasive breath tests for preselecting individuals for invasive gastric cancer screening endoscopy
    Agne Krilaviciute, Christian Stock, Marcis Leja, Hermann Brenner
    Journal of Breath Research.2018; 12(3): 036009.     CrossRef
  • Screening Upper Endoscopy for Early Detection of Gastric Cancer
    Jeong Seop Moon
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Occurrence of gastric cancer in patients with atrophic gastritis during long-term follow-up
    Liming Zhang, Yulan Liu, Peng You, Guijian Feng
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 53(7): 843.     CrossRef
  • Ischemic Gastritis Improved by Supportive Care
    Yun Sun Choi, Chan Soo So, Dong Hee Koh, Min Ho Choi, Hyun Joo Jang, Sea Hyub Kae, Jin Lee, Young Hee Choi
    The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research.2017; 17(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Interval for Repeated Gastric Cancer Screening in Normal-Risk Healthy Korean Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jong-Myon Bae, Sang Yop Shin, Eun Hee Kim
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2015; 47(4): 564.     CrossRef
  • Methodological issues for determining intervals of subsequent cancer screening
    Jong-Myon Bae
    Epidemiology and Health.2014; 36: e2014010.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Gastric Cancer Screening and Surveillance in High-Risk Groups
    Il Ju Choi
    Clinical Endoscopy.2014; 47(6): 497.     CrossRef
  • Distribution of Dense Breasts using Screening Mammography in Korean Women: a Retrospecitive Observational Study
    Jong-Myon Bae, Sang Yop Shin, Eun Hee Kim, Yoon-Nma Kim, Chung Mo Nam
    Epidemiology and Health.2014; : e2014027.     CrossRef
Economic Burden of Colorectal Cancer in Korea
Ju-Young Byun, Seok-Jun Yoon, In-Hwan Oh, Young Ae Kim, Hye-Young Seo, Yo-Han Lee
J Prev Med Public Health. 2014;47(2):84-93.   Published online March 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2014.47.2.84
  • 21,792 View
  • 158 Download
  • 19 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

The incidence and survival rate of colorectal cancer in Korea are increasing because of improved screening, treatment technologies, and lifestyle changes. In this aging population, increases in economic cost result. This study was conducted to estimate the economic burden of colorectal cancer utilizing claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service.

Methods

Economic burdens of colorectal cancer were estimated using prevalence data and patients were defined as those who received ambulatory treatment from medical institutions or who had been hospitalized due to colorectal cancer under the International Classification of Disease 10th revision codes from C18-C21. The economic burdens of colorectal cancer were calculated as direct costs and indirect costs.

Results

The prevalence rate (per 100 000 people) of those who were treated for colorectal cancer during 2010 was 165.48. The economic burdens of colorectal cancer in 2010 were 3 trillion and 100 billion Korean won (KRW), respectively. Direct costs included 1 trillion and 960 billion KRW (62.85%), respectively and indirect costs were 1 trillion and 160 billion (37.15%), respectively.

Conclusions

Colorectal cancer has a large economic burden. Efforts should be made to reduce the economic burden of the disease through primary and secondary prevention.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Analysis of the Direct Medical Costs of Colorectal Cancer in Antigua and Barbuda: A Prevalence-Based Cost-of-Illness Study
    Andre A. N. Bovell, Jabulani Ncayiyana, Themba G. Ginindza
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2025; 22(4): 552.     CrossRef
  • Estimating the economic burden of colorectal cancer in China, 2019–2030: A population‐level prevalence‐based analysis
    Hong Wang, Yan‐Jie Li, Lin Lei, Cheng‐Cheng Liu, Wan‐Qing Chen, Min Dai, Xin Wang, Jie‐Bin Lew, Ju‐Fang Shi, Ni Li, Jie He
    Cancer Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relationship Between Aspirin Use and Site-Specific Colorectal Cancer Risk Among Individuals With Metabolic Comorbidity
    Seokyung An, Madhawa Gunathilake, Jeonghee Lee, Minji Kim, Jae Hwan Oh, Hee Jin Chang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Aesun Shin, Jeongseon Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cost of illness for colorectal cancer in Japan - a time trend and future projections (1996–2035) based on governmental statistics
    Kunichika Matsumoto, Yosuke Hatakeyama, Kanako Seto, Ryo Onishi, Koki Hirata, Yinghui Wu, Tomonori Hasegawa
    BMC Health Services Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer-related resource utilization and healthcare costs in Saudi Arabia
    Bander Balkhi, Ahmed Alghamdi, Saeed Alqahtani, Marwan Al Najjar, Abdullah Al Harbi, Thamer Bin Traiki
    Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal.2023; 31(11): 101822.     CrossRef
  • A performance measurement framework for socially sustainable and resilient supply chains using environmental goods valuation methods
    Aref A. Hervani, Santosh Nandi, Marilyn M. Helms, Joseph Sarkis
    Sustainable Production and Consumption.2022; 30: 31.     CrossRef
  • Direct medical costs of young-onset colorectal cancer: a worldwide systematic review
    Ria Garg, Vicki Cheng, Ursula Ellis, Vanay Verma, Helen McTaggart-Cowan, Stuart Peacock, Jonathan M. Loree, Mohsen Sadatsafavi, Mary A. De Vera
    BMC Health Services Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Economic Burden of Colorectal Cancer: A Case of Fars, Iran
    Abdosaleh Jafari, Peyman Mehdi Alamdarloo, Mehdi Dehghani, Peivand Bastani, Ramin Ravangard
    Cancer Control.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quality of life and costs of patients prior to colorectal surgery
    M. Pattamatta, B. J. J. Smeets, S. M. A. A. Evers, E. G. Peters, M. D. P. Luyer, M. Hiligsmann
    Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research.2020; 20(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • Socioeconomic Burden of Cancer in Korea from 2011 to 2015
    Young Ae Kim, Ye-Rin Lee, Jeongjoo Park, In-Hwan Oh, Hoseob Kim, Seok-Jun Yoon, Keeho Park
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 896.     CrossRef
  • The Direct and Indirect Costs of Colorectal Cancer in Vietnam: An Economic Analysis from a Social Perspective
    Binh Thang Tran, Kui Son Choi, Thanh Xuan Nguyen, Dae Kyung Sohn, Sun-Young Kim, Jae Kyung Suh, Van Sang Phan, Huu Tri Pham, Minh Hanh Nguyen, Thanh Binh Nguyen, Huu Khoi Hoang, Thi Thanh Binh Nguyen, Minh Tu Nguyen, Jin-Kyoung Oh
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 18(1): 12.     CrossRef
  • Emerging hazard effects of proton pump inhibitor on the risk of colorectal cancer in low-risk populations: A Korean nationwide prospective cohort study
    In Cheol Hwang, Jooyoung Chang, Sang Min Park, Suminori Akiba
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(12): e0189114.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Productivity Costs in Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Jordi Gol-Montserrat, María Luisa M. del Burgo, Luis Quecedo, Juan E. del Llano
    Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment: Italian; Northern Europe and Spanish.2017; 4(1): grhta.5000262.     CrossRef
  • The Economic Burden of Hepatitis A, B, and C in South Korea
    Changwoo Shon, Hyung-Yun Choi, Jae-Jun Shim, So-Youn Park, Kyung Suk Lee, Seok-Jun Yoon, In-Hwan Oh
    Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases.2016; 69(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Dehydroglyasperin D Inhibits the Proliferation of HT-29 Human Colorectal Cancer Cells Through Direct Interaction With Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
    Sung Keun Jung, Chul-Ho Jeong
    Journal of Cancer Prevention.2016; 21(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • The Economic Burden of Cancer in Korea in 2009
    So Young Kim, Jong-Hyock Park, Kyoung Hee Kang, Inuk Hwang, Hyung Kook Yang, Young-Joo Won, Hong-Gwan Seo, Dukhyoung Lee, Seok-Jun Yoon
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 16(3): 1295.     CrossRef
  • The Economic Burden of Cancers Attributable to Metabolic Syndrome in Korea
    Dongwoo Kim, Seok-Jun Yoon, Young-Hoon Gong, Young Ae Kim, Hye-Young Seo, Jihyun Yoon, A-Rim Kim
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2015; 48(4): 180.     CrossRef
  • Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Daejeon and Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea (2000-2012)
    Soon-Young Kim, In-Sun Kweon, Jung-A Kim, Tae-Yong Lee, Hae-Sung Nam
    Journal of agricultural medicine and community health.2015; 40(3): 115.     CrossRef
  • FOXM1-mediated downregulation of uPA and MMP9 by 3,3′-diindolylmethane inhibits migration and invasion of human colorectal cancer cells
    HUA JIN, XIU JUAN LI, MAN HEE PARK, SOO MI KIM
    Oncology Reports.2015; 33(6): 3171.     CrossRef
Association of Selected Medical Conditions With Breast Cancer Risk in Korea
Sun Jae Jung, Minkyo Song, Ji-Yeob Choi, Nan Song, Sue Kyung Park, Keun-Young Yoo, Daehee Kang
J Prev Med Public Health. 2013;46(6):346-352.   Published online November 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.6.346
  • 12,913 View
  • 94 Download
  • 14 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

To estimate the effect of medical conditions in the population of Korea on breast cancer risk in a case-control study.

Methods

The cases were 3242 women with incident, histologically confirmed breast cancer in two major hospitals interviewed between 2001 and 2007. The controls were 1818 women each admitted to either of those two hospitals for a variety of non-neoplastic conditions. Information on each disease was obtained from a standardized questionnaire by trained personnel. Odds ratios (ORs) for each disease were derived from multiple logistic regression adjusted for age, age of menarche, pregnancy, age of first pregnancy, and family history of breast cancer.

Results

Among all of the incident breast cancer patients, pre-existing diabetes (OR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.78), hypertension (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.83), thyroid diseases (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.58), and ovarian diseases (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.23 to 2.35) were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer when other factors were adjusted for. In a stratified analysis by menopausal status, pre-existing hypertension (pre-menopause OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.34 vs. post-menopause OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.43; p-heterogeneity <0.01) and ovarian disease (pre-menopause OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 1.91 to 9.24 vs. post-menopause OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.91; p-heterogeneity 0.01) showed significantly different risks of breast cancer.

Conclusions

Our results suggest the possibility that medical conditions such as hypertension affect breast cancer development, and that this can differ by menopausal status. Our study also indicates a possible correlation between ovarian diseases and breast cancer risk.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hypertension and Ovarian Cancer Risk: a Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies with 2,497,898 participants
    Agnieszka Drab, Krystian Wdowiak, Wiesław Kanadys, Maria Malm, Joanna Dolar-Szczasny, Urszula Religioni
    Archives of Medical Science.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diabetes and incidence of breast cancer and its molecular subtypes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Fanxiu Xiong, Qichen Dai, Sihan Zhang, Stephen Bent, Peggy Tahir, Erin L. Van Blarigan, Stacey A. Kenfield, June M. Chan, Gabriela Schmajuk, Rebecca E. Graff
    Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The relationship between demographic factors and known risk factors with breast cancer in women aged 30–69
    Mohammad-Ali Jahani, Behnaz Ghasemi, Seyed Amir Soltani, Malihe Naderi, Hossein-Ali Nikbakht, Seyedeh Nikoo Hashemi, Jamshid Yazdani Charati, Ghahraman Mahmoudi
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(7): 3945.     CrossRef
  • Reverse Onco-Cardiology: What Is the Evidence for Breast Cancer? A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Ioannis Boutas, Adamantia Kontogeorgi, Sophia N. Kalantaridou, Constantine Dimitrakakis, Panagiotis Patsios, Maria Kalantzi, Theodoros Xanthos
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(22): 16500.     CrossRef
  • Association of Hypertension and Organ-Specific Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Morgan Connaughton, Mahsa Dabagh
    Healthcare.2022; 10(6): 1074.     CrossRef
  • Association between blood pressure and risk of cancer development: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Aristeidis Seretis, Sofia Cividini, Georgios Markozannes, Xanthippi Tseretopoulou, David S. Lopez, Evangelia E. Ntzani, Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
    Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of breast cancer among women with benign ovarian tumors: a Danish nationwide cohort study
    Mathilde Gottschau, Allan Jensen, Kristian Reinholdt, Sonia Guleria, Christian Munk, Lene Mellemkjær, Susanne K. Kjær
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 178(1): 199.     CrossRef
  • Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in tumors from Rwandese breast cancer patients
    Thierry Habyarimana, Mohammed Attaleb, Jean Baptiste Mazarati, Youssef Bakri, Mohammed El Mzibri
    Breast Cancer.2018; 25(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Association between glutathione peroxidase 1 codon 198 variant and the occurrence of breast cancer in Rwanda
    Thierry Habyarimana, Youssef Bakri, Pacifique Mugenzi, Jean Baptiste Mazarati, Mohammed Attaleb, Mohammed El Mzibri
    Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine.2018; 6(2): 268.     CrossRef
  • Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hedong Han, Wei Guo, Wentao Shi, Yamei Yu, Yunshuo Zhang, Xiaofei Ye, Jia He
    Scientific Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer du sein et diabète de type 2 : des interactions complexes
    L. Bernard, N. Reix, J.-C. Benabu, V. Gabriele, C. Mathelin
    Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité.2016; 44(12): 701.     CrossRef
  • Associations between Medical Conditions and Breast Cancer Risk in Asians: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan
    Shu-Chun Chuang, Guo-Jie Wu, Yen-Shen Lu, Ching-Hung Lin, Chao Agnes Hsiung, Pei-Yi Chu
    PLOS ONE.2015; 10(11): e0143410.     CrossRef
  • Detection of MMTV-Like sequences in Moroccan breast cancer cases
    Meriem Slaoui, Mohammed El Mzibri, Rachid Razine, Zineb Qmichou, Mohammed Attaleb, Mariam Amrani
    Infectious Agents and Cancer.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Insulin therapy and colorectal cancer risk among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Shinan Yin, Hua Bai, Danqing Jing
    Diagnostic Pathology.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
Cancer Incidence in Korean Vietnam Veterans During 1992-2003: The Korean Veterans Health Study
Sang-Wook Yi
J Prev Med Public Health. 2013;46(6):309-318.   Published online November 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.6.309
  • 24,551 View
  • 152 Download
  • 23 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between Vietnam experience including exposure to military herbicides and cancer incidence in Korean Vietnam War veterans.

Methods

The cancer cases of 185 265 Vietnam veterans from January 1, 1992 to December 31, 2003 were confirmed from the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database. The age-adjusted incidence and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated using the male population during 1992 to 2003 as a standard population.

Results

The age-adjusted overall cancer incidence per 100 000 person-years was 455.3 in Vietnam veterans. The overall cancer incidence was slightly yet significantly lower in veterans (SIR, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 0.99) than in the general population. The overall cancer incidence in enlisted soldiers was not lower (SIR, 1.00), whereas that in officers was significantly lower (SIR, 0.87) than in the general population. The incidences of prostate cancer and T-cell lymphoma in all veterans, and lung cancer and bladder cancer in enlisted soldiers, and colon cancer and kidney cancer in non-commissioned officers, and colon cancer, kidney cancer, and prostate cancer in officers, were higher than in the general population. The SIR for overall cancer among Vietnam veterans rose from 0.92 for 1992-1997 to 0.99 for 1998-2003.

Conclusions

The overall cancer incidence in Vietnam veterans was not higher than in the general male population. Vietnam veterans and military rank subcohorts experienced a higher incidence of several cancers, including prostate cancer, T-cell lymphoma, lung cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer, and colon cancer than the general population. The SIR for overall cancer increased over time in Vietnam veterans.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Firefighting, other protective service occupations and prostate cancer risk: a pooled analysis of three case-control studies
    Wendy Bijoux, Marie-Élise Parent, Hugues Richard, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Marina Pollán, Manolis Kogevinas, Kurt Straif, Florence Menegaux
    Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lung Cancer Diagnoses and Outcomes During the Syrian War, 2011-2018
    Ibrahem Hanafi, Dana Abo Samra, Rama Alsaqqa, Ahmad Naeem, Baraa Shebli, Ghassan Ajlyakin
    JAMA Network Open.2024; 7(3): e242091.     CrossRef
  • Military environmental exposures and risk of breast cancer in active-duty personnel and veterans: a scoping review
    Dylan J. Jester, Mehret T. Assefa, Daya K. Grewal, Abou M. Ibrahim-Biangoro, Jennifer S. Jennings, Maheen M. Adamson
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exposures and Bladder Cancer Risk Among Military Veterans: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shane Kronstedt, Jackson Cathey, Cedrick B. Chiu, Gal Saffati, David E. Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Nikola Rakic, Sagar R. Patel, Gabrielle Lyon, Neel Srikishen, Jennifer M. Taylor, Jeremy Slawin, Jeffrey A. Jones
    Urology.2024; 194: 270.     CrossRef
  • Older veterans associated with reduced risk of cancer: Retrospective nationwide matched cohort study in Taiwan
    Li-Fei Pan, Renin Chang, Chung Y. Hsu, Kuan-Hao Tsui
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer risk in Vietnam war veterans from the Korean Vietnam war veterans’ health study cohort
    Wanhyung Lee, Soyoung Park, Seong-Kyu Kang, Seunghon Ham, Jin-Ha Yoon, Won-Jun Choi
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational exposures and risk of follicular lymphoma
    Michael K. Odutola, Geza Benke, Lin Fritschi, Graham G. Giles, Marina T. van Leeuwen, Claire M. Vajdic
    Environmental Research.2021; 197: 110887.     CrossRef
  • Association between pesticide exposure and colorectal cancer risk and incidence: A systematic review
    Eryn K. Matich, Jonathan A. Laryea, Kathryn A. Seely, Shelbie Stahr, L. Joseph Su, Ping-Ching Hsu
    Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.2021; 219: 112327.     CrossRef
  • Pesticides as risk factors for head and neck cancer: A review
    Veruska Lima Moura Brasil, Mariana Bitu Ramos Pinto, Roberta Ferreti Bonan, Luiz Paulo Kowalski, Danyel Elias da Cruz Perez
    Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine.2018; 47(7): 641.     CrossRef
  • Increased exposure to pesticides and colon cancer: Early evidence in Brazil
    Francis L. Martin, Edson Z. Martinez, Helga Stopper, Sergio Britto Garcia, Sergio Akira Uyemura, Vinicius Kannen
    Chemosphere.2018; 209: 623.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Incidence of Korean Veterans
    Un Je Park, So Hee Park
    Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2018; 43(2): 119.     CrossRef
  • A critical discussion on diet, genomic mutations and repair mechanisms in colon carcinogenesis
    Juliana Yumi Sakita, Bianca Gasparotto, Sergio Britto Garcia, Sergio Akira Uyemura, Vinicius Kannen
    Toxicology Letters.2017; 265: 106.     CrossRef
  • Inhibitory effect of 2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid on ROS, autophagy formation, and mRNA replication for influenza virus infection
    Gansukh Enkhtaivan, Pandurangan Muthuraman, Doo Hwan Kim
    Journal of Molecular Recognition.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A review of Agent Orange and its associated oncologic risk of genitourinary cancers
    Chrystal Chang, Michael Benson, Mina M. Fam
    Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.2017; 35(11): 633.     CrossRef
  • A Perspective Discussion on Rising Pesticide Levels and Colon Cancer Burden in Brazil
    Sergio Akira Uyemura, Helga Stopper, Francis L. Martin, Vinicius Kannen
    Frontiers in Public Health.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prostate cancer in firefighting and police work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
    Jeavana Sritharan, Manisha Pahwa, Paul A. Demers, Shelley A. Harris, Donald C. Cole, Marie-Elise Parent
    Environmental Health.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Authors' response to: ME Ginevan et al. Exposure estimates in epidemiological studies of Korean veterans of the Vietnam War
    S.-W. Yi, S.-Y. Ryu
    International Journal of Epidemiology.2015; 44(1): 359.     CrossRef
  • A critical review of the epidemiology of Agent Orange or 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and lymphoid malignancies
    Ellen T. Chang, Paolo Boffetta, Hans-Olov Adami, Jack S. Mandel
    Annals of Epidemiology.2015; 25(4): 275.     CrossRef
  • Prospective Analysis of Health and Mortality Risk in Veteran and Non-Veteran Participants in the Women's Health Initiative
    Julie C. Weitlauf, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Chloe E. Bird, Nancy F. Woods, Donna L. Washington, Jodie G. Katon, Michael J. LaMonte, Mary K. Goldstein, Shari S. Bassuk, Gloria E. Sarto, Marcia L. Stefanick
    Women's Health Issues.2015; 25(6): 649.     CrossRef
  • A critical review of the epidemiology of Agent Orange/TCDD and prostate cancer
    Ellen T. Chang, Paolo Boffetta, Hans-Olov Adami, Philip Cole, Jack S. Mandel
    European Journal of Epidemiology.2014; 29(10): 667.     CrossRef
  • Urinary Bladder Cancer in Dogs, a Naturally Occurring Model for Cancer Biology and Drug Development
    D. W. Knapp, J. A. Ramos-Vara, G. E. Moore, D. Dhawan, P. L. Bonney, K. E. Young
    ILAR Journal.2014; 55(1): 100.     CrossRef
  • Challenges in investigating the association between Agent Orange and cancer: Site‐specific cancer risk and accuracy of exposure assessment
    Thomas H. Sinks
    Cancer.2014; 120(23): 3595.     CrossRef
  • Agent Orange exposure and cancer incidence in Korean Vietnam veterans: A prospective cohort study
    Sang‐Wook Yi, Heechoul Ohrr
    Cancer.2014; 120(23): 3699.     CrossRef
Improving the Performance of Risk-adjusted Mortality Modeling for Colorectal Cancer Surgery by Combining Claims Data and Clinical Data
Won Mo Jang, Jae-Hyun Park, Jong-Hyock Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Yoon Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2013;46(2):74-81.   Published online March 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.2.74
  • 12,356 View
  • 75 Download
  • 6 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of risk-adjusted mortality models for colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

We investigated patients (n=652) who had undergone colorectal cancer surgery (colectomy, colectomy of the rectum and sigmoid colon, total colectomy, total proctectomy) at five teaching hospitals during 2008. Mortality was defined as 30-day or in-hospital surgical mortality. Risk-adjusted mortality models were constructed using claims data (basic model) with the addition of TNM staging (TNM model), physiological data (physiological model), surgical data (surgical model), or all clinical data (composite model). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to develop the risk-adjustment models. To compare the performance of the models, both c-statistics using Hanley-McNeil pair-wise testing and the ratio of the observed to the expected mortality within quartiles of mortality risk were evaluated to assess the abilities of discrimination and calibration.

Results

The physiological model (c=0.92), surgical model (c=0.92), and composite model (c=0.93) displayed a similar improvement in discrimination, whereas the TNM model (c=0.87) displayed little improvement over the basic model (c=0.86). The discriminatory power of the models did not differ by the Hanley-McNeil test (p>0.05). Within each quartile of mortality, the composite and surgical models displayed an expected mortality ratio close to 1.

Conclusions

The addition of clinical data to claims data efficiently enhances the performance of the risk-adjusted postoperative mortality models in colorectal cancer surgery. We recommended that the performance of models should be evaluated through both discrimination and calibration.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Estimating postoperative mortality in colorectal surgery- a systematic review of risk prediction models
    Alexios Dosis, Jack Helliwell, Aron Syversen, Jim Tiernan, Zhiqiang Zhang, David Jayne
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modified Tumor Budding as a Better Predictor of Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer: Possible Real-World Applications
    Kwangil Yim, Won Mo Jang, Sung Hak Lee
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3405.     CrossRef
  • Investigación epidemiológica en cáncer colorrectal: perspectiva, prospectiva y retos bajo la óptica de explotación del Big-Data
    J.M. García Torrecillas, M. Ferrer Márquez, Á. Reina Duarte, F. Rubio-Gil
    SEMERGEN - Medicina de Familia.2016; 42(8): 509.     CrossRef
  • Variation between Hospitals with Regard to Diagnostic Practice, Coding Accuracy, and Case-Mix. A Retrospective Validation Study of Administrative Data versus Medical Records for Estimating 30-Day Mortality after Hip Fracture
    Jon Helgeland, Doris Tove Kristoffersen, Katrine Damgaard Skyrud, Anja Schou Lindman, Alanna M Chamberlain
    PLOS ONE.2016; 11(5): e0156075.     CrossRef
  • Model for risk adjustment of postoperative mortality in patients with colorectal cancer
    K Walker, P J Finan, J H van der Meulen
    Journal of British Surgery.2015; 102(3): 269.     CrossRef
  • Problems With Public Reporting of Cancer Quality Outcomes Data
    Paul Goldberg, Rena M. Conti
    Journal of Oncology Practice.2014; 10(3): 215.     CrossRef
Quantitative Analysis of Cancer-associated Gene Methylation Connected to Risk Factors in Korean Colorectal Cancer Patients
Ho-Jin Kang, Eun-Jeong Kim, Byoung-Gwon Kim, Chang-Hun You, Sang-Yong Lee, Dong-Il Kim, Young-Seoub Hong
J Prev Med Public Health. 2012;45(4):251-258.   Published online July 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.4.251
Correction in: J Prev Med Public Health 2012;45(5):333
  • 12,183 View
  • 70 Download
  • 11 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

The purpose of this paper was to elucidate the potential methylation levels of adjacent normal and cancer tissues by comparing them with normal colorectal tissues, and to describe the correlations between the methylation and clinical parameters in Korean colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

Methods

Hypermethylation profiles of nine genes (RASSF1, APC, p16INK4a, Twist1, E-cadherin, TIMP3, Smad4, COX2, and ABCB1) were examined with 100 sets of cancer tissues and 14 normal colorectal tissues. We determined the hypermethylation at a given level by a percent of methylation ratio value of 10 using quantitative methylation real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Nine genes' hypermethylation levels in Korean CRC patient tissues were increased more higher than normal colorectal tissues. However, the amounts of p16INK4a and E-cadherin gene hypermethylation in normal and CRC tissues were not significantly different nor did TIMP3 gene hypermethylation in adjacent normal and cancer tissues differ significantly. The hypermethylation of TIMP3, E-cadherin, ABCB1, and COX2 genes among other genes were abundantly found in normal colorectal tissues. The hypermethylation of nine genes' methylation in cancer tissues was not significantly associated with any clinical parameters. In Cohen's kappa test, it was moderately observed that RASSF1 was related with E-cadherin, and Smad4 with ABCB1 and COX2.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence for different hypermethylation patterns of cancer-associated genes in normal and CRC tissues, which may serve as useful information on CRC cancer progression.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Relevance of gene mutations and methylation to the growth of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms based on pyrosequencing
    Go Asano, Katsuyuki Miyabe, Hiroyuki Kato, Michihiro Yoshida, Takeshi Sawada, Yasuyuki Okamoto, Hidenori Sahashi, Naoki Atsuta, Kenta Kachi, Akihisa Kato, Naruomi Jinno, Makoto Natsume, Yasuki Hori, Itaru Naitoh, Kazuki Hayashi, Yoichi Matsuo, Satoru Taka
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Potential of RASSF1A promoter methylation as a biomarker for colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis and TCGA analysis
    Fei Hu, Li Chen, Ming-Yu Bi, Ling Zheng, Ji-Xiang He, Ying-Ze Huang, Yu Zhang, Xue-Lian Zhang, Qiang Guo, Ying Luo, Wen-Ru Tang, Miao-Miao Sheng
    Pathology - Research and Practice.2020; 216(8): 153009.     CrossRef
  • KLHL22 Regulates the EMT and Proliferation in Colorectal Cancer Cells in Part via the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway


    Yi Song, Huiping Yuan, Jia Wang, Yuhe Wu, Yuhong Xiao, Shengxun Mao
    Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 3981.     CrossRef
  • RHBDF1 regulates APC-mediated stimulation of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and proliferation of colorectal cancer cells in part via the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway
    Huiping Yuan, Ran Wei, Yuhong Xiao, Yi Song, Jia Wang, Huihuan Yu, Ting Fang, Wei Xu, Shengxun Mao
    Experimental Cell Research.2018; 368(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Smoking induces coordinated DNA methylation and gene expression changes in adipose tissue with consequences for metabolic health
    Pei-Chien Tsai, Craig A. Glastonbury, Melissa N. Eliot, Sailalitha Bollepalli, Idil Yet, Juan E. Castillo-Fernandez, Elena Carnero-Montoro, Thomas Hardiman, Tiphaine C. Martin, Alice Vickers, Massimo Mangino, Kirsten Ward, Kirsi H. Pietiläinen, Panos Delo
    Clinical Epigenetics.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel Discriminating Colorectal Cancer Model for Differentiating Normal and Tumor Tissues
    Xiaohui Sun, Yiping Tian, Qianqian Zheng, Ruizhi Zheng, Aifen Lin, Tianhui Chen, Yimin Zhu, Maode Lai
    Epigenomics.2018; 10(11): 1463.     CrossRef
  • APC hypermethylation for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and literature review
    Tie-Jun Liang, Hong-Xu Wang, Yan-Yan Zheng, Ying-Qing Cao, Xiaoyu Wu, Xin Zhou, Shu-Xiao Dong
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(28): 46468.     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: Aberrant promoter methylation of RASSF1A gene may be correlated with colorectal carcinogenesis: a meta-analysis
    He-Ling Wang, Yu Zhang, Peng Liu, Ping-Yi Zhou
    Molecular Biology Reports.2014; 41(6): 3991.     CrossRef
  • Role of CDH1 Promoter Methylation in Colorectal Carcinogenesis: A Meta-Analysis
    Yu-Xi Li, Yao Lu, Chun-Yu Li, Peng Yuan, Shu-Sen Lin
    DNA and Cell Biology.2014; 33(7): 455.     CrossRef
  • Retracted: Promoter Methylation of theRASSF1AGene may Contribute to Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies
    He-Ling Wang, Peng Liu, Ping-Yi Zhou, Yu Zhang
    Annals of Human Genetics.2014; 78(3): 208.     CrossRef
  • Hypermethylation ofTWIST1andNID2in Tumor Tissues and Voided Urine in Urinary Bladder Cancer Patients
    Zeynep Yegin, Sezgin Gunes, Recep Buyukalpelli
    DNA and Cell Biology.2013; 32(7): 386.     CrossRef
Associations of Serum Ferritin and Transferrin % Saturation With All-cause, Cancer, and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Follow-up Study
Ki-Su Kim, Hye-Gyeong Son, Nam-Soo Hong, Duk-Hee Lee
J Prev Med Public Health. 2012;45(3):196-203.   Published online May 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.3.196
  • 15,804 View
  • 98 Download
  • 32 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

Even though experimental studies have suggested that iron can be involved in generating oxidative stress, epidemiologic studies on the association of markers of body iron stores with cardiovascular disease or cancer remain controversial. This study was performed to examine the association of serum ferritin and transferrin saturation (%TS) with all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality.

Methods

The study subjects were men aged 50 years or older and postmenopausal women of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1988-1994. Participants were followed-up for mortality through December 31, 2006.

Results

Serum ferritin was not associated with all-cause, cancer, or cardiovascular mortality for either men or postmenopausal women. However, all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality were inversely associated with %TS in men. Compared with men in the lowest quintile, adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality were 0.85, 0.86, 0.76, and 0.74 (p for trend < 0.01), 0.82, 0.73, 0.75, and 0.63 (p for trend < 0.01), and 0.86, 0.81, 0.72, and 0.76 (p for trend < 0.01), respectively. For postmenopausal women, inverse associations were also observed for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, but cancer mortality showed the significantly lower mortality only in the 2nd quintile of %TS compared with that of the 1st quintile.

Conclusions

Unlike speculation on the role of iron from experimental studies, %TS was inversely associated with all-cause, cancer and cardiovascular mortality in men and postmenopausal women. On the other hand, serum ferritin was not associated with all-cause, cancer, or cardiovascular mortality.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Relationship Between Hemoglobin Concentration and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in a 25-Year Follow-up Study of a Japanese General Population ― NIPPON DATA90 ―
    Megumi Kawashima, Takashi Hisamatsu, Akiko Harada, Aya Kadota, Keiko Kondo, Yukiko Okami, Takehito Hayakawa, Yoshikuni Kita, Akira Okayama, Hirotsugu Ueshima, Tomonori Okamura, Katsuyuki Miura
    Circulation Journal.2024; 88(5): 742.     CrossRef
  • Iron Metabolic Biomarkers and the Mortality Risk in the General Population: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
    Yuanyuan Sun, Wenyao Peng, Siqi Lin, Jingjing Cui, Jiapeng Lu
    Journal of the Endocrine Society.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advancing Patient Blood Management: Evaluation of Ferric Derisomaltose in a Tertiary Hospital
    Mohd Muhaimin Kambali, Engku Hamidah Engku Muhammad Azmi
    Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine.2024; 9(1): 65.     CrossRef
  • Investigating the potential association between micronutrient levels and non-dipper hypertension patterns in the elderly population: A retrospective analysis
    Ayşenur Uçar, Aynur Doğrusöz
    Medicine.2024; 103(36): e38741.     CrossRef
  • Iron metabolism and atherosclerosis
    Qian Guo, Christopher Qian, Zhong-Ming Qian
    Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.2023; 34(7): 404.     CrossRef
  • Transferrin predicts trimethylamine-N-oxide levels and is a potential biomarker of cardiovascular disease
    Lamuel D. Bean, Jeffrey J. Wing, Randall E. Harris, Suzanne M. Smart, Subha V. Raman, M. Wesley Milks
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Iron overload, oxidative stress and vascular dysfunction: Evidences from clinical studies and animal models
    Leonardo dos Santos, Sabrina Rodrigues Bertoli, Renata Andrade Ávila, Vinícius Bermond Marques
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects.2022; 1866(9): 130172.     CrossRef
  • Association of ferritin and transferrin saturation with all-cause mortality, and the effect of concurrent inflammation: a danish cohort study
    Nikki H. Mitchell, Henrik L. Jørgensen, Fie J. Vojdeman, Henriette P. Sennels, Christen L. Andersen, Margit Kriegbaum, Mia K. Grand, Christine W. Bang, Bent S. Lind
    Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation.2022; 82(7-8): 525.     CrossRef
  • Iron Restriction Alleviates Atherosclerosis in ApoE KO Mice: An iTRAQ Proteomic Analysis
    Gang Luo, Lu Xiang, Lin Xiao
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 15915.     CrossRef
  • Nano‐sensing and nano‐therapy targeting central players in iron homeostasis
    Linyuan Wu, Yan Li, Ning Gu
    WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dietary iron overload mitigates atherosclerosis in high-fat diet-fed apolipoprotein E knockout mice: Role of dysregulated hepatic fatty acid metabolism
    Lin Xiao, Gang Luo, Hongxia Li, Ping Yao, Yuhan Tang
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids.2021; 1866(10): 159004.     CrossRef
  • The role of hepcidin and iron homeostasis in atherosclerosis
    Florian Wunderer, Lisa Traeger, Haakon H. Sigurslid, Patrick Meybohm, Donald B. Bloch, Rajeev Malhotra
    Pharmacological Research.2020; 153: 104664.     CrossRef
  • Iron loading, alcohol and mortality: A prospective study
    Rudolph Schutte, Hugo Huisman, Catharina M.C. Mels, Shani Botha, Ruan Kruger, Wayne Smith, Iolanthé M. Kruger, Michelle Hawkins, Lee Smith, Yolandi Breet, Aletta E. Schutte
    Clinical Nutrition.2019; 38(3): 1262.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic implications of low transferrin saturation in patients with primary myelofibrosis
    Marko Lucijanic, Zeljko Prka, Vlatko Pejsa, Tajana Stoos-Veic, Jelena Lucijanic, Rajko Kusec
    Leukemia Research.2018; 66: 89.     CrossRef
  • Iron status in relation to cancer risk and mortality: Findings from a population‐based prospective study
    Daniel A. Quintana Pacheco, Disorn Sookthai, Mirja E. Graf, Ruth Schübel, Theron Johnson, Verena A. Katzke, Rudolf Kaaks, Tilman Kühn
    International Journal of Cancer.2018; 143(3): 561.     CrossRef
  • Targeting iron metabolism in drug discovery and delivery
    Bart J. Crielaard, Twan Lammers, Stefano Rivella
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.2017; 16(6): 400.     CrossRef
  • The association of ferritin with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in community-dwellers: The English longitudinal study of ageing
    Nikolaos P. E. Kadoglou, Jane P. Biddulph, Snorri B. Rafnsson, Marialena Trivella, Petros Nihoyannopoulos, Panayotes Demakakos, Abelardo I Aguilera
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(6): e0178994.     CrossRef
  • Management of iron overload in hemoglobinopathies: what is the appropriate target iron level?
    Thomas D. Coates, Susan Carson, John C. Wood, Vasilios Berdoukas
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2016; 1368(1): 95.     CrossRef
  • Quantitative data on the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response and its relationship with serum measures of iron status
    Stephen T. McSorley, Iain Jones, Donald C. McMillan, Dinesh Talwar
    Translational Research.2016; 176: 119.     CrossRef
  • High serum levels of ferritin at baseline are not associated with an increased risk of mortality in oldest old community‐dwelling adults: The OCTABAIX study
    Francesc Formiga, Assumpta Ferrer, Gloria Padros, Carme Gimenez‐Argente, Rosa López Pisa, Xavier Corbella
    Geriatrics & Gerontology International.2016; 16(2): 284.     CrossRef
  • Iron toxicity and its possible association with treatment of Cancer: Lessons from hemoglobinopathies and rare, transfusion-dependent anemias
    Mammen Puliyel, Arch G Mainous, Vasilios Berdoukas, Thomas D Coates
    Free Radical Biology and Medicine.2015; 79: 343.     CrossRef
  • Parameters influencing in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized in intensive cardiac care unit: is there an influence of anemia and iron deficiency?
    Ewa Uscinska, Bozena Sobkowicz, Robert Sawicki, Izabela Kiluk, Malgorzata Baranicz, Tomasz Stepek, Milena Dabrowska, Maciej Szmitkowski, Wlodzimierz J. Musial, Agnieszka M. Tycinska
    Internal and Emergency Medicine.2015; 10(3): 337.     CrossRef
  • Low transferrin saturation is associated with impaired fasting glucose and insulin resistance in the South Korean adults: the 2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    R. J. Park, J. D. Moon
    Diabetic Medicine.2015; 32(5): 673.     CrossRef
  • Helicobacter pylori Seropositivity’s Association with Markers of Iron, 1-Carbon Metabolism, and Antioxidant Status among US Adults: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach
    May A. Beydoun, Greg A. Dore, Jose A. Canas, Hind A. Beydoun, Alan B. Zonderman, Bradford D. Gessner
    PLOS ONE.2015; 10(3): e0121390.     CrossRef
  • Transferrin Saturation Ratio: A Method to Estimate Risk of Cardiovascular Mortality in the General Population?
    Austin G Stack, Waleed Mohamed, Mohamed Elsayed
    Biomarkers in Medicine.2014; 8(7): 913.     CrossRef
  • Prediabetes, elevated iron and all-cause mortality: a cohort study
    Arch G Mainous, Rebecca J Tanner, Thomas D Coates, Richard Baker
    BMJ Open.2014; 4(12): e006491.     CrossRef
  • Dietary Iron Intake and Body Iron Stores Are Associated with Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in a Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
    Jacob Hunnicutt, Ka He, Pengcheng Xun
    The Journal of Nutrition.2014; 144(3): 359.     CrossRef
  • Iron: Protector or Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease? Still Controversial
    Carlos Muñoz-Bravo, Mario Gutiérrez-Bedmar, Jorge Gómez-Aracena, Antonio García-Rodríguez, Joaquín Navajas
    Nutrients.2013; 5(7): 2384.     CrossRef
  • Non-Hfe Iron Overload: Is Phlebotomy the Answer?
    Simon Hazeldine, Debbie Trinder, John K. Olynyk
    Current Hepatitis Reports.2013; 12(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Iron Deficiency and Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Review of the Evidence
    Emanuela Lapice, Maria Masulli, Olga Vaccaro
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Iron Status and Survival in Diabetic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
    Beata Ponikowska, Tomasz Suchocki, Bartłomiej Paleczny, Martyna Olesinska, Slawomir Powierza, Ludmila Borodulin-Nadzieja, Krzysztof Reczuch, Stephan von Haehling, Wolfram Doehner, Stefan D. Anker, John G.F. Cleland, Ewa A. Jankowska
    Diabetes Care.2013; 36(12): 4147.     CrossRef
  • Presence in the Pre-Surgical Fine-Needle Aspiration of Potential Thyroid Biomarkers Previously Identified in the Post-Surgical One
    Federica Ciregia, Laura Giusti, Angelo Molinaro, Filippo Niccolai, Patrizia Agretti, Teresa Rago, Giancarlo Di Coscio, Paolo Vitti, Fulvio Basolo, Pietro Iacconi, Massimo Tonacchera, Antonio Lucacchini, Alfredo Fusco
    PLoS ONE.2013; 8(9): e72911.     CrossRef
English Abstract
Analysis of the Factors Related to the Needs of Patients with Cancer.
Jung A Lee, Sun Hee Lee, Jong Hyock Park, Jae Hyun Park, Sung Gyeong Kim, Ju Hyun Seo
J Prev Med Public Health. 2010;43(3):222-234.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.3.222
  • 6,828 View
  • 105 Download
  • 10 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
Limited research has investigated the specific needs of patients with cancer. This study was performed to explore patients needs and the related factors. METHODS: The data were collected by 1 National Cancer Center and 9 regional cancer centers in Korea. An interview survey was performed with using a structured questionnaire for the subjects(2661 patients who gave written informed consent to particiate) survey 4 months after diagnosis and review of medical records. Data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: When comparing the relating factors related with patient needs to the sociodemographic characteristics, the female group showed a higher level of recognition for physical symptoms, social support needs. The younger group showed a significantly higher level of recognition for health care staff, psychological problems, information and education, social support, hospital services needs. In addition, the higher educated group showed a higher level of recognition for health care staff, physical symptoms, social support needs. The higher income and office workers group showed a higher level of recognition for hospital services needs. When comparing the relating factors related with patient needs to the cancer, the breast cancer group showed a higher level of recognition for all needs excluding physical symptoms, accessibility and financial support needs. The combined radiotherapy with surgery and chemotherapy group showed a higher level of recognition for psychological problems, information and education, social support needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that needs on patient with cancer was significantly influenced by female, higher educagion, lower income, having religion, office worker, liver cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, chemotherapy, and combined therapy.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Analysis of Educational Needs Related to Chemotherapy among Patients with Solid Tumors
    Se-Na Lee
    Asian Oncology Nursing.2025; 25(2): 89.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Group Education Reflecting Unmet Needs on Knowledge of Chemotherapy for Patients and Their Families Undergoing Chemotherapy: A One Group Pre-Post Design
    Seyoung Lee, Hoyoung Kim, Nayeon Kim, Misun Yi, Ayoung Lee, Seonmi Cho, Minsun Nam, Juhee Cho
    Asian Oncology Nursing.2024; 24(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • A bibliometric analysis of publication of funded studies in nursing research from Web of Science, 2008–2018
    Ruifang Zhu, Mengyue Liu, Yanbing Su, Xin Meng, Shifan Han, Zhiguang Duan
    Journal of Advanced Nursing.2021; 77(1): 176.     CrossRef
  • Unmet Needs and Sexual Distress of Gynecological Cancer Patients according to the Period after Initial Treatment
    Yeon Hee Bae, Jeong Sook Park
    Asian Oncology Nursing.2021; 21(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing supportive care needs of multiple myeloma patients treated with chemotherapy
    Yoo-Rin Cho, Yang-Sook Yoo
    Supportive Care in Cancer.2020; 28(4): 1783.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of comprehensive traditional Korean Medicine treatment on quality of life, anorexia and cachexia of cancer patients: Retrospective chart review
    Wonju Han, Eunji Lee, Gajin Han, Sang-hoon Yoon, Gajin Han, Jungtae Leem
    Journal of Korean Medicine.2019; 40(2): 119.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of a Standardized Preoperative Education Program on Stomach Cancer Patients undergoing Gastrectomy
    Min Ah Yun, So Sun Kim, SangHee Kim, Sung Hoon Noh
    Asian Oncology Nursing.2016; 16(2): 85.     CrossRef
  • Factors that Influence Korean Breast Cancer Patients to Undergo Cancer Rehabilitation Therapy
    Hui-jeong Park, Kyunghee Kim, Ji-su Kim
    Asian Oncology Nursing.2015; 15(2): 106.     CrossRef
  • The Association Between Perceived Social Support and Continued Smoking in Cancer Survivors
    H.-K. Yang, D.-W. Shin, J.-H. Park, S.-Y. Kim, C.-S. Eom, S. Kam, J.-H. Choi, B.-L. Cho, H.-G. Seo
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013; 43(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Psychosocial needs of cancer patients and related factors: a multi‐center, cross‐sectional study in Korea
    Kyung‐Hyun Choi, Jae‐Hyun Park, Jong‐Hyock Park, Joo‐Sung Park
    Psycho-Oncology.2013; 22(5): 1073.     CrossRef
Validation Studies
A Validation of Estimating the National Cancer Incidence in Korea using the Databases of 7 Population-based Regional Cancer Registries except Seoul.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009;42(2):130-134.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.130
  • 5,687 View
  • 42 Download
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
A method of estimation using 8 population-based cancer registries databases in Korea (KRCR DB) has been introduced as another strategy for validly estimating the national cancer incidence (NCI) in Korea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of this method with using the 7 KRCR DBs, excluding Seoul covering 21% of the total population of Korea. METHODS: We designed the study method (NCSE_7) as same as the estimating method with using 8 KRCR DBs (NCSE_8) in order to ensure maximal comparability. We defined the expected number of cancer cases in each registry as the number of observed cases and then we added the weighted observed cases according to gender, age and the proportion of the population covered by each registry for the population of the seven regions and the population of all areas, with excluding these seven regions. From the expected number of total cancer incidents, the estimated NCI was calculated by dividing the expected number of cancer cases by the number of the total population. The standard error (SE) of the estimated incidence was also taken from the expected number of total cancer incidents. RESULTS: Compared with the results of the NCSE_8, the overall age-standardized rates (ASR) in men and women became over-estimated and under-estimated, respectively. Primary sites that showed statistically significant differences were the colo-rectum, prostate, breast and thyroid. The index of death certificate only (DCO)and microscopically verified (MV)% indicating levels of data quality were decreased, especially for the brain in DCO% and kidney in the MV%. CONCLUSIONS: The database of Seoul regional cancer registry has a key role for the method to estimate the valid nationwide cancer statistics in Korea with using the population-based cancer registries' databases.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Overview of Cancer Registration Research in the Asian Pacific from 2008-2013
    Malcolm A. Moore
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013; 14(8): 4461.     CrossRef
  • Construction and Validation of Hospital-Based Cancer Registry Using Various Health Records to Detect Patients with Newly Diagnosed Cancer: Experience at Asan Medical Center
    Hwa Jung Kim, Jin Hee Cho, Yongman Lyu, Sun Hye Lee, Kyeong Ha Hwang, Moo-Song Lee
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2010; 43(3): 257.     CrossRef
English Abstracts
Prognostic Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index Obtained from Medical Records and Claims Data on 1-year Mortality and Length of Stay in Gastric Cancer Patients.
Min Ho Kyung, Seok Jun Yoon, Hyeong Sik Ahn, Se min Hwang, Hyun Ju Seo, Kyoung Hoon Kim, Hyeung Keun Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2009;42(2):117-122.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2009.42.2.117
  • 7,267 View
  • 122 Download
  • 13 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
We tried to evaluate the agreement of the Charlson comorbidity index values (CCI) obtained from different sources (medical records and National Health Insurance claims data) for gastric cancer patients. We also attempted to assess the prognostic value of these data for predicting 1-year mortality and length of the hospital stay (length of stay). METHODS: Medical records of 284 gastric cancer patients were reviewed, and their National Health Insurance claims data and death certificates were also investigated. To evaluate agreement, the kappa coefficient was tested. Multiple logistic regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to evaluate and compare the prognostic power for predicting 1 year mortality and length of stay. RESULTS: The CCI values for each comorbid condition obtained from 2 different data sources appeared to poorly agree (kappa: 0.00-0.59). It was appeared that the CCI values based on both sources were not valid prognostic indicators of 1-year mortality. Only medical record-based CCI was a valid prognostic indicator of length of stay, even after adjustment of covariables (beta = 0.112, 95% CI = [0.017-1.267]). CONCLUSIONS: There was a discrepancy between the data sources with regard to the value of CCI both for the prognostic power and its direction. Therefore, assuming that medical records are the gold standard for the source for CCI measurement, claims data is not an appropriate source for determining the CCI, at least for gastric cancer.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic factors in gastric cancer survivors comparing Cox proportional hazards and machine learning using a Korean National cohort
    Joonki Lee, Aesun Shin
    Discover Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated with Hospital Length of Stay among Women’s Cancer Patients: Based on the In-depth Injury Patient Surveillance System Data
    Yoonjung Kang, Hyewon Lee
    Journal of Health Informatics and Statistics.2022; 47(2): 148.     CrossRef
  • The impact of global budgeting in Taiwan on inpatients with unexplained fever
    Keh-Sen Liu, Tsung-Fu Yu, Hsing-Ju Wu, Chun-Yi Lin
    Medicine.2019; 98(37): e17131.     CrossRef
  • What happened to health service utilization, health care expenditures, and quality of care in patients with acute pancreatitis after implementation of global budgeting in Taiwan?
    Ya-Lin Ko, Jyun-Wei Wang, Hui-Mei Hsu, Chia-Hung Kao, Chun-Yi Lin
    Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12620.     CrossRef
  • The impact of global budgeting on health service utilization, health care expenditures, and quality of care among patients with pneumonia in Taiwan
    C.-Y. Lin, T. Ma, C.-C. Lin, C.-H. Kao
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.2016; 35(2): 219.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio Using National Hospital Discharge Injury Data
    Jong-Ho Park, Yoo-Mi Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Won-Joong Kim, Sung-Hong Kang
    Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2012; 13(4): 1739.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Ability of Charlson Comorbidity Index on Outcomes From Lung Cancer
    Apar Kishor Ganti, Emily Siedlik, Alissa S. Marr, Fausto R. Loberiza, Anne Kessinger
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2011; 34(6): 593.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Study on Three Algorithms of the ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index with Myocardial Infarction Patients
    Kyoung Hoon Kim
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2010; 43(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Medicaid Expansion to include population with low income on the preventable hospitalizations
    Hyun-Chul Shin, Se-Ra Kim
    Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration.2010; 20(1): 87.     CrossRef
  • Charlson Comorbidity Index as a Predictor of Long-Term Survival after Surgery for Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in South Korea
    Hye Kyung Woo, Jong Hyock Park, Han Sung Kang, So Young Kim, Sang Il Lee, Hyung Ho Nam
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2010; 13(4): 409.     CrossRef
  • A comparison of the Charlson comorbidity index derived from medical records and claims data from patients undergoing lung cancer surgery in Korea: a population-based investigation
    Hyun-Ju Seo, Seok-Jun Yoon, Sang-Il Lee, Kun Sei Lee, Young Ho Yun, Eun-Jung Kim, In-Hwan Oh
    BMC Health Services Research.2010;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Health Outcome Prediction Using the Charlson Comorbidity Index In Lung Cancer Patients
    Se-Won Kim, Seok-Jun Yoon, Min-Ho Kyung, Young-Ho Yun, Young-Ae Kim, Eun-Jung Kim
    Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration.2009; 19(4): 18.     CrossRef
  • Factors Affecting Health of the Rural Residents
    Dong-Koog Son, Kyu-Sik Lee, Jong-Ku Park, Sang-Baek Koh, Ki-Nam Jin, Eun-Woo Nam, Hae-Jong Lee
    Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration.2009; 19(4): 1.     CrossRef
An Estimation of the National Cancer Incidence in Korea for 2000-2002 Using the Databases of 8 Population-based Regional Cancer Registries.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(6):380-386.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.6.380
  • 5,947 View
  • 40 Download
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
Valid data on the national cancer incidence (NCI) is the data should be needed to plan, monitor and evaluate the national cancer control programs. The purpose of this study was to estimate the NCI for 2000-2002 from 8 population-based cancer registries database in Korea (KRCR DB). METHODS: We defined the expected number of cancer cases in each registry as the number of observed cases and then adding to the weighted observed cases, according to sex, age groups, and the proportion of the population covered by each registry for the population of the eight regions and the population of all areas with excluding the 8 regions. From the expected number of total cancer incidents, the estimated NCI was calculated by dividing the expected number of cancer cases by the number of the total population. The standard error (SE) of the estimated incidence was also taken from the expected number of total cancer incidents. RESULTS: The overall estimated crude rates in 2000-2002 were 267.1 and 219.0 per 100,000 for men and women, respectively. The overall age-standardized rates (ASR) were 290.1 and 180.7 per 100,000, respectively. Compared with the ASRs obtained from Korea National Cancer Incidence database (KNCI DB), the estimated ASRs from the KRCR DB did not show statistically significant differences except for some cancers in women. For the aspect of the SE, index of DCO(death certificate only) and of MV(microscopically verified), the estimated ASRs from the KRCR DB are more accurate and they have higher quality rather than the calculated ASRs from the KNCI DB. CONCLUSIONS: We found that this developed method using the KRCR DB is valid and it could be another strategy for estimating the NCI in Korea.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Citrus Fruit Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: A Quantitative Systematic Review
    Jung-Kook Song, Jong-Myon Bae
    Journal of Breast Cancer.2013; 16(1): 72.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Usefulness of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Surgical Treatment of Malignant Melanoma
    Sung Mo Hur, Sung Hoon Kim, Se Kyung Lee, Wan Wook Kim, Jae Hyuck Choi, Sangmin Kim, So Young Lim, Jai Kyung Pyon, Goo Hyun Mun, Jun-Ho Choe, Jeong Eon Lee, Jee Soo Kim, Seok-Jin Nam, Jung-Hyun Yang, Jung-Han Kim
    Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2010; 79(3): 163.     CrossRef
  • Construction and Validation of Hospital-Based Cancer Registry Using Various Health Records to Detect Patients with Newly Diagnosed Cancer: Experience at Asan Medical Center
    Hwa Jung Kim, Jin Hee Cho, Yongman Lyu, Sun Hye Lee, Kyeong Ha Hwang, Moo-Song Lee
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2010; 43(3): 257.     CrossRef
  • A Validation of Estimating the National Cancer Incidence in Korea using the Databases of 7 Population-based Regional Cancer Registries except Seoul

    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2009; 42(2): 130.     CrossRef
  • Explaining Cancer Incidence in the Jejudo Population
    Jong-Myon Bae
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2009; 42(1): 67.     CrossRef
Cohort Study on the Association between Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the Korean Elderly.
Hoi Jeong Lim, Byung Joo Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(1):23-29.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.1.23
  • 7,283 View
  • 73 Download
  • 12 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
We examined the association between alcohol consumption and incidence of colorectal cancer in elderly Koreans. METHODS: The cohort members (n=14,304) consisted of 4,834 males and 9,470 females derived from the Korea Elderly Pharmacoepidemiologic Cohort (KEPEC), a population-based dynamic cohort. They were aged 65 years old or older and lived in Busan between 1993-1998; they were beneficiaries of the Korean Medical Insurance Corporation (KMIC). Baseline information was surveyed by a self-administered, mailed questionnaire. This study population was restricted to 14,304 participants who reported alcohol drinking habits on the questionnaire and had not been diagnosed with colorectal cancer at baseline. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of status, type, frequency and daily average amount of alcohol consumption were computed with Cox's proportional hazard model, with the never-drinkers as a reference group and controlling for age and gender. RESULTS: After 4.82 person-years of mean follow-up 112 cases of colorectal cancer occurred. The incidence densities of colorectal cancer were 161 (95% CI=123-200) for never-drinkers, 219 (95% CI=125-339) for ex-drinkers, and 137 (95% CI=84-189) for current-drinkers per 100,000 person-year. The status, type, frequency, and daily average amount of alcohol consumption were not significantly related to the incidence of colorectal cancer after controlling for age and gender. CONCLSIONS: There was no significant association between alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer among elderly people after controlling for age and gender.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Sex difference in alcohol consumption associated with colorectal cancer risk in Quzhou, China: A nested case-control study
    Shi-Ming Lai, Hong-Hong Zhu, Zhi-Juan Gan, Bi-Yun Zheng, Zhao-Hui Xu, Zhi-Cheng Wang, Xiao-Fang Liao
    Preventive Medicine Reports.2024; 44: 102807.     CrossRef
  • Wine consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies
    Weisong Xu, Hui Fan, Zhijuan Han, Yufeng Liu, Yiping Wang, Zhenming Ge
    European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2019; 28(3): 151.     CrossRef
  • Marital status and education as risk factors for colorectal cancer
    A. Ruseva, D. Tochev, Z. Boneva, Y. Assyov, L. Georgieva, D. Nikolovska
    Trakia Journal of Sciences.2019; 17(3): 224.     CrossRef
  • Consumption of beer and colorectal cancer incidence: a meta-analysis of observational studies
    Cheng Zhang, Min Zhong
    Cancer Causes & Control.2015; 26(4): 549.     CrossRef
  • Alcohol Drinking, Cigarette Smoking and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort
    Sooyoung Cho, Aesun Shin, Sue K. Park, Hai-Rim Shin, Soung-Hoon Chang, Keun-Young Yoo
    Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 20(2): 147.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between mild alcohol consumption and mortality in Koreans: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ji-Eun Park, Tae-young Choi, Yeonhee Ryu, Sung-Il Cho
    BMC Public Health.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Attributable fraction of alcohol consumption on cancer using population-based nationwide cancer incidence and mortality data in the Republic of Korea
    Sohee Park, Hai-Rim Shin, Boram Lee, Aesun Shin, Kyu-Won Jung, Duk-Hee Lee, Sun Ha Jee, Sung-Il Cho, Sue Kyung Park, Mathieu Boniol, Paolo Boffetta, Elisabete Weiderpass
    BMC Cancer.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Alcohol drinking and colorectal cancer risk: an overall and dose–response meta-analysis of published studies
    V. Fedirko, I. Tramacere, V. Bagnardi, M. Rota, L. Scotti, F. Islami, E. Negri, K. Straif, I. Romieu, C. La Vecchia, P. Boffetta, M. Jenab
    Annals of Oncology.2011; 22(9): 1958.     CrossRef
  • Alcohol intake and risk of colorectal cancer: Results from the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium
    J Y Park, C C Dahm, R H Keogh, P N Mitrou, B J Cairns, D C Greenwood, E A Spencer, I S Fentiman, M J Shipley, E J Brunner, J E Cade, V J Burley, G D Mishra, D Kuh, A M Stephen, I R White, R N Luben, A A Mulligan, K-T Khaw, S A Rodwell
    British Journal of Cancer.2010; 103(5): 747.     CrossRef
  • Alcohol Consumption and Digestive Cancer Mortality in Koreans: The Kangwha Cohort Study
    Sang-Wook Yi, Jae Woong Sull, John Alderman Linton, Chung Mo Nam, Heechoul Ohrr
    Journal of Epidemiology.2010; 20(3): 204.     CrossRef
  • Baseline alcohol consumption, type of alcoholic beverage and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk study
    Jin Young Park, Panagiota N. Mitrou, Christina C. Dahm, Robert N. Luben, Nicholas J. Wareham, Kay-Tee Khaw, Sheila A. Rodwell
    Cancer Epidemiology.2009; 33(5): 347.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Polymorphism rs1329149 of CYP2E1 and a Known Polymorphism rs671 of ALDH2 of Alcohol Metabolizing Enzymes Are Associated with Colorectal Cancer in a Southwestern Chinese Population
    Huan Yang, Yanhong Zhou, Ziyuan Zhou, Jinyi Liu, Xiaoyan Yuan, Ketaro Matsuo, Toshiro Takezaki, Kazuo Tajima, Jia Cao
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2009; 18(9): 2522.     CrossRef
Comparative Study
Comparison of Cancer Survival by Age Group for 1997 and for 2002: Application of Period Analysis using the National Cancer Incidence Database.
Seon Hee Yim, Kyu Won Jung, Young Joo Won, Hyun Joo Kong, Hai Rim Shin
J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(1):17-22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.1.17
  • 5,852 View
  • 36 Download
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
Period analysis estimates up-to-date survival rates of cancer patients. In this approach, analysis is restricted to recent time period by left-truncating all observations at the beginning of the period and rightcensoring at its end. Here, we applied period analysis to examine changes in 5-year relative survival (RS) by age group for 1997 and for 2002. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Incidence Database, 5-year RS was estimated for 1997 and 2002 in four age groups (15-54, 55-64, 65-74, and 75 years old and over) using period analysis. After excluding death certificate-only cases, patients with an unknown date of diagnosis or follow-up length, a total of 813,889 patients diagnosed with a first primary invasive cancer during 1992-2002 were included for analysis. Followup for vital status was included until 31 December 2002. RESULTS: Five-year RS increased from 41.7% for 1997 to 46.7% for 2002. Increases in survival occurred in all age groups except in the 75 and over group. CONCLSIONS: The age gradient in cancer prognosis seems to have widened between 1997 and 2002, a finding that requires further study of prognostic factors, including stage at diagnosis. Period analysis accurately estimates survival rates, especially for cancers with better prognosis.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Advanced Detection of Recent Changing Trends in Gastric Cancer Survival: Up-to-date Comparison by Period Analysis
    H. S. Kim, H. Lee, H. C. Jeung, S. H. Noh, H. C. Chung, J. K. Roh, C. M. Nam, S. Y. Rha
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2011; 41(12): 1344.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of Comorbidity Indices in Operative Gastric Cancer Cases
    Se-Min Hwang, Seok-Jun Yoon, Hyeong-Sik Ahn, Hyong-Gin An, Sang-Hoo Kim, Min-Ho Kyeong, Eun-Kyoung Lee
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2009; 42(1): 49.     CrossRef
Multicenter Study
Cigarette Smoking and Gastric Cancer Risk in a Community-based Cohort Study in Korea.
Yeonju Kim, Aesun Shin, Jin Gwack, Jae Kwan Jun, Sue Kyung Park, Daehee Kang, Hai Rim Shin, Soung Hoon Chang, Keun Young Yoo
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(6):467-474.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.6.467
  • 8,165 View
  • 107 Download
  • 12 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
Gastric cancer is the most common incident cancer in Korea. Although Helicobacter pylori infection is the most important risk factor for the development of gastric cancer, cigarette smoking has also been suggested to play an important role in the development of gastric cancer. The objective of this study is to evaluate the relationship between cigarette smoking and gastric cancer risk in a Korean population. METHODS: The study population consisted of 13,785 subjects who had been enrolled in the Korean Multi-Center Cancer Cohort between 1993 and 2002. As of December 2002, 139 incident gastric cancer cases were ascertained through the Korea Central Cancer Registry and the National Death Certificate Database. Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for gastric cancer were estimated using CoxZs proportional hazard model adjusted for age, education, alcohol drinking status and history of gastritis or ulcer. RESULTS: Significant dose-response relationships were observed between the duration of smoking and the risk of gastric cancer among the male subjects in comparison to non-smokers: men who smoked for 20-39 years had a 2.09- fold (95% CI 1.00-4.38) increase, and those who smoked for more than 40 years had a 3.13-fold (95% CI 1.59-6.17) increase in the risk of gastric cancer (Ptrend<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a longer duration of cigarette smoking may increase the risk of gastric cancer development in a dose-response manner in Korean men. The association between smoking and gastric cancer risk in women should be verified in future studies with a larger number of cases.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recommendations for Gastric Cancer Screening in Korean Americans
    Asher Lippe, Scott Lippe
    Physician's Journal of Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cigarette smoking and gastric cancer in the Stomach Cancer Pooling (StoP) Project
    Delphine Praud, Matteo Rota, Claudio Pelucchi, Paola Bertuccio, Tiziana Rosso, Carlotta Galeone, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Keitaro Matsuo, Hidemi Ito, Jinfu Hu, Kenneth C. Johnson, Guo-Pei Yu, Domenico Palli, Monica Ferraroni, Joshua Muscat, Nuno Lunet, Bárbara Pel
    European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2018; 27(2): 124.     CrossRef
  • Gender-related difference in the relationship between smoking status and periodontal diseases: the propensity score matching approach
    Eun-Sil Choi, Hae-Young Kim
    Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health.2017; 41(2): 122.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology and screening of gastric cancer in Korea
    Minkyo Song, Hwi-Won Lee, Daehee Kang
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2015; 58(3): 183.     CrossRef
  • Cigarette smokers develop structurally modified hemoglobin: a possible way of increasing oxidative stress
    Amartya Roy, Jyotirmoy Sikdar, Paromita Seal, Rajen Haldar
    Inhalation Toxicology.2015; 27(6): 300.     CrossRef
  • Pathologic Discordance of Differentiation Between Endoscopic Biopsy and Postoperative Specimen in Mucosal Gastric Adenocarcinomas
    In-Seob Lee, Young-Soo Park, Jeong Hoon Lee, Ji Young Park, Hee-Sung Kim, Beom-Su Kim, Jeong-Hwan Yook, Sung-Tae Oh, Byung-Sik Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2013; 20(13): 4231.     CrossRef
  • Associations of lifestyle‐related factors, hsa‐miR‐149 and hsa‐miR‐605 gene polymorphisms with gastrointestinal cancer risk
    Zhang MW, Jin MJ, Yu YX, Zhang SC, Liu B, Jiang X, Pan YF, Li QL, Ma XY, Chen K
    Molecular Carcinogenesis.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gastric Cancer Epidemiology in Korea
    Aesun Shin, Jeongseon Kim, Sohee Park
    Journal of Gastric Cancer.2011; 11(3): 135.     CrossRef
  • Effect of chronic smoking on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in gastric carcinoma patients
    Palanisamy Pasupathi, Ganesan Saravanan, Palanisamy Chinnaswamy, Govindaswamy Bakthavathsalam
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2009; 28(2): 65.     CrossRef
  • The role of TNFgenetic variants and the interaction with cigarette smoking for gastric cancer risk: a nested case-control study
    Jae Jeong Yang, Kwang-Pil Ko, Lisa Y Cho, Aesun Shin, Jin Gwack, Soung-Hoon Chang, Hai-Rim Shin, Keun-Young Yoo, Daehee Kang, Sue K Park
    BMC Cancer.2009;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Soybean Product Intake Modifies the Association between Interleukin-10 Genetic Polymorphisms and Gastric Cancer Risk
    Kwang-Pil Ko, Sue K. Park, Lisa Y. Cho, Jin Gwack, Jae Jeong Yang, Aesun Shin, Cheong Sik Kim, Yeonju Kim, Daehee Kang, Soung-Hoon Chang, Hai-Rim Shin, Keun-Young Yoo
    The Journal of Nutrition.2009; 139(5): 1008.     CrossRef
  • Glutathione, glutathione-dependent enzymes and antioxidant status in gastric carcinoma patients
    Palanisamy Pasupathi, Ganesan Saravanan, Palanisamy Chinnaswamy, Govindaswamy Bakthavathsalam
    Journal of Applied Biomedicine.2009; 7(2): 101.     CrossRef
English Abstract
Effects of Private Health Insurance on Health Care Utilization and Expenditures in Korean Cancer Patients: Focused on 5 Major Cancers in One Cancer Center.
Jin Hwa Lim, Kui Son Choi, Sung Gyeong Kim, Eun Cheol Park, Jae Hyun Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(4):329-335.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.4.329
  • 6,349 View
  • 64 Download
  • 10 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
To identify the effects of supplemental private health insurance on health care utilization and expenditure under the mandatory National Health Insurance(NHI) system in Korea. METHODS: The data were collected by the National Cancer Center in Korea. Cancer patients who were newly diagnosed with stomach (ICD code, C16), lung(C33-C34), liver (C22), colorectal cancer(C18-C20) or breast(C50) cancer were included as study subjects. Data were gathered using a structured questionnaire from face-to-face interviews, the hospital Order Communication System (OCS) and medical records. Clinical, socio-demographic and private health insurance related factors were also gathered. The differences of health care utilization and expenditure were compared between those who have private health insurance and those who do not using t-test and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Individuals with private health insurance spent larger inpatient costs than those without, but no differences were found in utilization in other service such as hospital admissions, hospital days and physician visits. CONCLUSIONS: We found that private health insurance exerts a significant effect on the health care expenditure in inpatient service. These study results can provide a rational basis to plan a national health policy regarding private health insurance. Further studies are needed to investigate the impacts of private health insurance on cancer patients' outcomes and survival rates.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Treatment interruption during radiation therapy: Experience at a single institution in the Republic of Korea
    Jung Ae Lee, Nam Kwon Lee, Won Sup Yoon, Dae Sik Yang, Chul Yong Kim, Se Ryun Lee, Hwa Jeong Seong
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer Treatment near the End-of-Life Becomes More Aggressive: Changes in Trend during 10 Years at a Single Institute
    Younak Choi, Bhumsuk Keam, Tae Min Kim, Se-Hoon Lee, Dong-Wan Kim, Dae Seog Heo
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2015; 47(4): 555.     CrossRef
  • Ubiquitous Environment with Private Health Insurance and the Relevance of Length of Stay
    Dong-Ruyl Jang, Seong-Woo Choi, Bu-Yeon Park, Sung-Gil Kim
    The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences.2014; 9(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of factors affecting the life quality of the patients with late stomach cancer
    Yan‐Mei Ma, Cai‐Feng Ba, Yu‐Bin Wang
    Journal of Clinical Nursing.2014; 23(9-10): 1257.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Private Health Insurance on Health Care Utilization: Evidence from Korea Health Panel (2008~2010)
    Chang-Hoon You, Sung-Wook Kang, Ji-Heon Choi, Eun-Hwan Oh, Young-Dae Kwon
    The Korean Journal of Health Service Management.2014; 8(2): 101.     CrossRef
  • An Association between Private Health Insurance and Use of Endoscopy, An Association between Private Health Insurance and Use of Endoscopy,
    Chang-Hoon You, Young-Dae Kwon, Ji-Heon Choi, Sung-Wook Kang
    The Korean Journal of Health Service Management.2014; 8(4): 25.     CrossRef
  • The Influence of Private Health Insurance on Admission among Some Patients with Cervical or Lumbar Sprain
    Dong-Ryul Jang, Myung-Geun Kang
    Journal of agricultural medicine and community health.2012; 37(2): 84.     CrossRef
  • Private health insurance in South Korea: An international comparison
    Jaeun Shin
    Health Policy.2012; 108(1): 76.     CrossRef
  • Sociodemographic gradients in breast and cervical cancer screening in Korea: the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS) 2005-2009
    Mi Jin Park, Eun-Cheol Park, Kui Son Choi, Jae Kwan Jun, Hoo-Yeon Lee
    BMC Cancer.2011;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of hospital charge prediction models for gastric cancer patients: neural network vs. decision tree models
    Jing Wang, Man Li, Yun-tao Hu, Yu Zhu
    BMC Health Services Research.2009;[Epub]     CrossRef
Multicenter Study
Cigarette Smoking, Alcohol Consumption, Tuberculosis and Risk of Lung Cancer: The Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort Study.
Jisuk Bae, Jin Gwack, Sue Kyung Park, Hai Rim Shin, Soung Hoon Chang, Keun Young Yoo
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(4):321-328.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.4.321
  • 7,816 View
  • 134 Download
  • 12 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to evaluate the roles of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, tuberculosis, and their interactions in the risk of lung cancer in a Korean cohort. METHODS: The study subjects comprised 13,150 males and females aged above 20 years old. During the follow up period from 1993 to 2002, 79 lung cancer cases were identified by the central cancer registry and the national death certificate database. Information on cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and the history of physiciandiagnosed tuberculosis was obtained by interview. Indirect chest X-ray findings were also evaluated to ascertain tuberculosis cases. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) after adjusting for age and gender. RESULTS: Cigarette smoking was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer [for current smokers, RR = 2.33 (95% CI = 1.23 - 4.42) compared to non-smokers]. After further adjustment for cigarette smoking, both alcohol consumption and tuberculosis showed no statistically significant association with the risk of lung cancer [for current drinkers, RR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.48 - 1.33) compared to non-drinkers] [for tuberculosis cases, RR = 1.17 (95% CI = 0.58 - 2.36) compared to noncases]. There was no statistically significant interaction between cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption (pinteraction = 0.38), or cigarette smoking and tuberculosis (p-interaction = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Although cigarette smoking was confirmed as a risk factor of lung cancer in this cohort study, this study suggests that alcohol consumption and tuberculosis may not be associated with the risk of lung cancer.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Wine Consumption and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Carlotta Bertola, Camilla Gobbetti, Gaia Baccarini, Roberto Fabiani
    Nutrients.2025; 17(8): 1322.     CrossRef
  • A Case–Control Study of Lung Cancer at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Western Maharashtra, India
    Anita Maurya, Raj Kumar, Anurag Khera, Rajeev Kumar, Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Puja Dudeja
    Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth.2023; 16(3): 336.     CrossRef
  • Study on changes in Ryodoraku test according to carbon monoxide concentration in exhaled breath
    Jin Suk Koo
    Journal of Korean Medicine.2020; 41(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Effect of COPD on symptoms, quality of life and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Young-Soo Yi, Woo Ho Ban, Kyeong-Yae Sohng
    BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • SmokeHaz
    Leah Jayes, Patricia L. Haslam, Christina G. Gratziou, Pippa Powell, John Britton, Constantine Vardavas, Carlos Jimenez-Ruiz, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Bertrand Dautzenberg, Bo Lundbäck, Monica Fletcher, Archie Turnbull, Paraskevi Katsaounou, Dick Heederik, Dan Sm
    Chest.2016; 150(1): 164.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules
    Chunxue Bai, Chang-Min Choi, Chung Ming Chu, Devanand Anantham, James Chung-man Ho, Ali Zamir Khan, Jang-Ming Lee, Shi Yue Li, Sawang Saenghirunvattana, Anthony Yim
    Chest.2016; 150(4): 877.     CrossRef
  • Completeness of Cancer Case Ascertainment in Korea Radiation Effect and Epidemiology Cohort Study
    Minkyo Song, In-Seong Cho, Zhong Min Li, Yoon-Ok Ahn
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2012; 27(5): 489.     CrossRef
  • Prior lung disease and lung cancer risk in an occupational-based cohort in Yunnan, China
    Ya-Guang Fan, Yong Jiang, Run-Sheng Chang, Shu-Xiang Yao, Ping Jin, Wendy Wang, Jie He, Qing-hua Zhou, Philip Prorok, You-Lin Qiao, Ping Hu
    Lung Cancer.2011; 72(2): 258.     CrossRef
  • Increased Lung Cancer Risk among Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Population Cohort Study
    Yang-Hao Yu, Chien-Chang Liao, Wu-Huei Hsu, Hung-Jen Chen, Wei-Chih Liao, Chih-Hsin Muo, Fung-Chang Sung, Chih-Yi Chen
    Journal of Thoracic Oncology.2011; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Lung cancer risk and cigarette smoking, lung tuberculosis according to histologic type and gender in a population based case–control study
    Sue K. Park, Lisa Y. Cho, Jae Jeong Yang, Boyoung Park, Soung Hoon Chang, Kun-Sei Lee, Hyeongsu Kim, Keun-Young Yoo, Choon-Taek Lee
    Lung Cancer.2010; 68(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Facts and fiction of the relationship between preexisting tuberculosis and lung cancer risk: A systematic review
    Hui‐Ying Liang, Xue‐Lian Li, Xiao‐Song Yu, Peng Guan, Zhi‐Hua Yin, Qin‐Cheng He, Bao‐Sen Zhou
    International Journal of Cancer.2009; 125(12): 2936.     CrossRef
  • Irinotecan and oxaliplatin combination as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Myung Hee Chang, Kyoung Ha Kim, Hyun Jung Jun, Hyo Song Kim, Seong Yoon Yi, Ji Eun Uhm, Min Jae Park, Do Hyoung Lim, Sang Hoon Ji, In Gyu Hwang, Jeeyun Lee, Yeon Hee Park, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-ju Ahn, Keunchil Park
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.2009; 64(5): 917.     CrossRef
English Abstracts
Spatial Analysis of Air Pollution and Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality in 7 Metropolitan Cities in Korea. .
Seung Sik Hwang, Jin Hee Lee, Gyu Won Jung, Jeong Hun Lim, Ho Jang Kwon
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(3):233-238.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.3.233
  • 6,935 View
  • 151 Download
  • 9 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to assess the relationship between long-term exposure to air pollution and lung cancer in the Republic of Korea. METHODS: Using the Annual Report of Ambient Air Quality in Korea, Annual Report of National Cancer Registration, and Annual Report on the Cause of Death Statistics, we calculated the standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of lung cancer for both sexes in 74 areas from 7 Korean metropolitan cities. We performed random intercept, Poisson regression using empirical Bayes method. RESULTS: Both SMRs and SIRs in the 7 metropolitan cities were higher in women than in men. Mean SIRs were 99.0 for males and 107.0 for females. The association between PM(10) and lung cancer risk differed according to gender. PM(10) was not associated with the risk of lung cancer in males, but both incidence and mortality of lung cancer were positively associated with PM(10) in females. The estimated percentage increases in the rate of female lung cancer mortality and incidence were 27% and 65% at the highest PM(10) category (> or = 70 microgram/m(3)), compared to the referent category (<50 microgram/m(3)). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term exposure to PM(10) was significantly associated with female lung cancer incidence in 7 Korean metropolitan cities. Further study is undergoing to estimate the relative risk of PM(10) using multi-level analysis for controlling individual and regional confounders such as smoking and socioeconomic position.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Lung Cancer in Women: The Past, Present, and Future
    Narjust Florez, Lauren Kiel, Ivy Riano, Shruti Patel, Kathryn DeCarli, Natasha Dhawan, Ivy Franco, Ashley Odai-Afotey, Kelly Meza, Nishwant Swami, Jyoti Patel, Lecia V. Sequist
    Clinical Lung Cancer.2024; 25(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Experimental investigation for the decisive role of vehicles in the air pollution of arak city in Iran and presenting the related solutions to reduce the air pollution
    Seyyed Alireza MOSTAFAVI, Hamed SAFIKHANI, Hasan KÖTEN, Yasin KARAGOZ
    Journal of Thermal Engineering.2023; 9(5): 1208.     CrossRef
  • Review of Epidemiological Research and Perspectives for Future Environmental Health Progress in Korea
    Kyoung-Mu Lee, Moon-Young Park
    Journal of Environmental Health Sciences.2022; 48(3): 138.     CrossRef
  • The association between outdoor air pollution and lung cancer risk in seven eastern metropolises of China: Trends in 2006-2014 and sex differences
    Wei Wang, Liu Meng, Zheyu Hu, Xia Yuan, Weisi Zeng, Kunlun Li, Hanjia Luo, Min Tang, Xiao Zhou, Xiaoqiong Tian, Chenhui Luo, Yi He, Shuo Yang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Experimental investigation for the decisive role of vehicles in the air pollution of arak city in Iran and presenting the related solutions to reduce the air pollution
    Seyyed Alireza AHMADİ, Hamed SAFIKHANI, Hasan KÖTEN, Yasin KARAGÖZ
    Journal of Thermal Engineering.2021; : 1208.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiology of Lung Cancer in Korea: Recent Trends
    Ji Young Park, Seung Hun Jang
    Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2016; 79(2): 58.     CrossRef
  • The Difference in Clinical Presentations between Healthcare-Associated and Community-Acquired Pneumonia in University-Affiliated Hospital in Korea
    Eun Ju Jeon, Sung-Gun Cho, Jong Wook Shin, Jae Yeol Kim, In Won Park, Byoung Whui Choi, Jae Chol Choi
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2011; 52(2): 282.     CrossRef
  • Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) linkage with residence near heavy roads—A case study from Haifa Bay, Israel
    Shlomit Paz, Shai Linn, Boris A. Portnov, Amir Lazimi, Boris Futerman, Micha Barchana
    Health & Place.2009; 15(2): 636.     CrossRef
  • Histopathologic Effects of Sulfur Dioxide in Mouse Liver Following the Chronic and Acute Exposure
    F. Rajaii, A.A. Khaki, A. Khaki, F. Khorshid, N. Borhani, H. Jfraii, H. Haghdust, N. Gheibi
    Journal of Biological Sciences.2008; 8(7): 1241.     CrossRef
Factors Influencing the Intention to have Stomach Cancer Screening.
Myung Il Hahm, Kui Son Choi, Su Yeon Kye, Min Son Kwak, Eun Cheol Park
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(3):205-212.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.3.205
  • 6,654 View
  • 66 Download
  • 9 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing the intention to have stomach cancer screening using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in Korea. METHODS: For this population-based study, 1,535 adult respondents (aged 40 to 70 years) were recruited using multi-stratified random sampling and a face-to-face administered questionnaire. This study was based on Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Intentions were divided into three scenarios for fee payment in the next two years: (1) free of charge, (2) co-payment, and (3) full charge. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the factors influencing the intention to have stomach cancer screening. RESULTS: Perceived behavioral control and attitude toward stomach cancer screening were significant predictors of the intention to have stomach cancer screening. However, subjective norm only influenced the intention to have stomach cancer screening with full charge in the next two years. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that attitude and perceived behavioral control are likely to contribute toward increasing the intention to have stomach cancer screening. Especially, perceived behavioral control is a good predictor. Because the study subjects were nation wide residents, the study results can be generalized.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The impact of educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on preventive behaviors for gastric cancer in obese and smoking individuals
    Siamak Najafi, Fatemeh Mohammadkhah, Saina Alempour Salemi, Amirhossein Kamyab, Ali Khani Jeihooni
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Structural Equation Modeling of Prostate Cancer Screening Intention
    Ji Hye Jeong, Nam Hee Park
    Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing.2019; 30(4): 471.     CrossRef
  • Factors Influencing the of Middle-Aged Men the NCSP(National Cancer Screening Program)
    Geum-Ja Park, Kyoung-Min Lim, Sook-Nam Kim
    The Korean Journal of Health Service Management.2016; 10(3): 51.     CrossRef
  • Quels sont les facteurs psychosociaux déterminant la participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal ? Intérêt de la théorie du comportement planifié et du concept de coping
    A. Le Bonniec, K. Djoufelkit, F. Cousson-Gélie
    Psycho-Oncologie.2015; 9(2): 108.     CrossRef
  • Barriers to Cancer Screening among Medical Aid Program Recipients in the Republic of Korea: A Qualitative Study
    Yoon Young Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, BoYoung Park, Yeol Kim, Kui Son Choi
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2014; 15(2): 589.     CrossRef
  • Factors Affecting Cancer Screening Intention and Behavior of the Korean Elderly
    Hee-Jung Kim, Hyun-Woo Yim, Nam-Cho Kim
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2014; 15(19): 8461.     CrossRef
  • Regional Factors Associated with Participation in the National Health Screening Program: A Multilevel Analysis Using National Data
    Hyung-Kook Yang, Dong-Wook Shin, Seung-Sik Hwang, Juwhan Oh, Be-Long Cho
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2013; 28(3): 348.     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated with Cancer Screening Intention in Eligible Persons for National Cancer Screening Program
    Rock-Bum Kim, Ki-Soo Park, Dae-Yong Hong, Cheol-Heon Lee, Jang-Rak Kim
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2010; 43(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated with Gastric Cancer Screening of Koreans Based on a Socio-ecological Model
    Sang Soo Bae, Heui Sug Jo, Dong-Hyun Kim, Yong-Jun Choi, Hun Jae Lee, Tae Jin Lee, Hye Jean Lee
    Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2008; 41(2): 100.     CrossRef
Fasting Serum Glucose and Subsequent Liver Cancer Risk in a Korean Prospective Cohort.
Jin Gwack, Seung Sik Hwang, Kwang Pil Ko, Jae Kwan Jun, Sue Kyung Park, Soung Hoon Chang, Hai Rim Shin, Keun Young Yoo
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(1):23-28.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.1.23
  • 7,358 View
  • 92 Download
  • 16 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
Chronic infections with hepatitis B or C and alcoholic cirrhosis are three well-known major risk factors for liver cancer. Diabetes has also been suggested as a potential risk factor. However, the findings of previous studies have been controversial in terms of the causal association. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between serum glucose levels and liver cancer development in a Korean cohort. METHODS: Thirty-six liver cancer cases were identified in the Korean Multi-Center Cancer Cohort (KMCC). Baseline information on lifestyle characteristics was obtained via questionnaire. Serum glucose levels were measured at the study's enrollment. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. The adjusting variables included age, gender, smoking history, alcohol consumption, body mass index, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity. RESULTS: The RRs of serum glucose for liver caner were 1.20 (95% CI=0.48-2.99) for the category of 100 to 125 mg/dL of serum glucose and 2.77 (95% CI=1.24-6.18) for the >126 mg/dL serum glucose category (both compared to the <100 mg/dL category). In a subgroup analysis, the RR of serum glucose among those who were both HBsAg seronegative and non-drinkers was 4.46 (95% CI=1.09-18.28) for those with glucose levels >100 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that a high level of serum glucose can increase liver cancer risk independently of hepatitis infection and drinking history in Koreans. This study implies that glucose intolerance may be an independent risk factor for liver cancer.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association Between Prediabetes and Risk, Mortality of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Xin Ding, Li Deng, Chuan Cen, Yuyu Yang
    Endocrine Research.2024; 49(4): 186.     CrossRef
  • Associations between serum glucose, insulin, insulin resistance and the risk of incident primary liver cancer or chronic liver disease mortality: a nested case–control study
    Jian Yin, Neal D. Freedman, Yiwei Liu, Sanford M. Dawsey, Huan Yang, Philip R. Taylor, Liangyu Yin, Bin Liu, Jianfeng Cui, Jinhu Fan, Wen Chen, Youlin Qiao, Christian C. Abnet
    British Journal of Cancer.2023; 128(2): 275.     CrossRef
  • Environmental contributions to gastrointestinal and liver cancer in the Asia–Pacific region
    Kwang‐Pil Ko, Aesun Shin, Sooyoung Cho, Sue K Park, Keun‐Young Yoo
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2018; 33(1): 111.     CrossRef
  • Recognition criteria for occupational cancers in relation to hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus in Korea
    Hogil Kim, Yun Kyung Chung, Inah Kim
    Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The association between fasting blood glucose and the risk of primary liver cancer in Chinese males: a population-based prospective study
    Xiaoshuang Feng, Gang Wang, Ni Li, Zhangyan Lyu, Shuohua Chen, Luopei Wei, Yuheng Chen, Shuanghua Xie, Wenjing Yang, Jian Yin, Hong Cui, Hongda Chen, Jiansong Ren, Jufang Shi, Shouling Wu, Min Dai, Jie He
    British Journal of Cancer.2017; 117(9): 1405.     CrossRef
  • Fasting glucose and risk of colorectal cancer in the Korean Multi-center Cancer Cohort
    Hyeree Park, Sooyoung Cho, Hyeongtaek Woo, Sue K. Park, Hai-Rim Shin, Soung-Hoon Chang, Keun-Young Yoo, Aesun Shin, Cheng Hu
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(11): e0188465.     CrossRef
  • Blood glucose concentration and risk of liver cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
    Hedong Han, Tianyi Zhang, Zhichao Jin, Honglei Guo, Xin Wei, Yuzhou Liu, Qi Chen, Jia He
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(30): 50164.     CrossRef
  • European Code against Cancer 4th Edition: Alcohol drinking and cancer
    Chiara Scoccianti, Michele Cecchini, Annie S. Anderson, Franco Berrino, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Carolina Espina, Timothy J. Key, Michael Leitzmann, Teresa Norat, Hilary Powers, Martin Wiseman, Isabelle Romieu
    Cancer Epidemiology.2016; 45: 181.     CrossRef
  • European Code against Cancer 4th Edition: Alcohol drinking and cancer
    Chiara Scoccianti, Michele Cecchini, Annie S. Anderson, Franco Berrino, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Carolina Espina, Timothy J. Key, Michael Leitzmann, Teresa Norat, Hilary Powers, Martin Wiseman, Isabelle Romieu
    Cancer Epidemiology.2015; 39: S67.     CrossRef
  • Cohort Profile: Community-based prospective cohort from the National Cancer Center, Korea
    Jin-Kyoung Oh, Min Kyung Lim, E Hwa Yun, Min-Ho Choi, Sung-Tae Hong, Soung-Hoon Chang, Sue Kyung Park, Sung-Il Cho, Dong-Hyun Kim, Keun-Young Yoo, Hai-Rim Shin
    International Journal of Epidemiology.2015; : dyv302.     CrossRef
  • Attributable fraction of alcohol consumption on cancer using population-based nationwide cancer incidence and mortality data in the Republic of Korea
    Sohee Park, Hai-Rim Shin, Boram Lee, Aesun Shin, Kyu-Won Jung, Duk-Hee Lee, Sun Ha Jee, Sung-Il Cho, Sue Kyung Park, Mathieu Boniol, Paolo Boffetta, Elisabete Weiderpass
    BMC Cancer.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediabetes and the risk of cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yi Huang, Xiaoyan Cai, Miaozhen Qiu, Peisong Chen, Hongfeng Tang, Yunzhao Hu, Yuli Huang
    Diabetologia.2014; 57(11): 2261.     CrossRef
  • Serum glucose and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis
    Danielle J Crawley, Lars Holmberg, Jennifer C Melvin, Massimo Loda, Simon Chowdhury, Sarah M Rudman, Mieke Van Hemelrijck
    BMC Cancer.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Evidence on Alcohol and Cancer Epidemiology
    Chiara Scoccianti, Kurt Straif, Isabelle Romieu
    Future Oncology.2013; 9(9): 1315.     CrossRef
  • Multiplicative synergistic risk of hepatocellular carcinoma development among hepatitis B and C co-infected subjects in HBV endemic area: a community-based cohort study
    Jin-Kyoung Oh, Hai-Rim Shin, Min Kyung Lim, Heeyoun Cho, Dong-Il Kim, Youngmee Jee, Haesun Yun, Keun-Young Yoo
    BMC Cancer.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Coinfection of hepatitis B and C viruses and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Lisa Y. Cho, Jae Jeong Yang, Kwang‐Pil Ko, Boyoung Park, Aesun Shin, Min Kyung Lim, Jin‐Kyoung Oh, Sohee Park, Yoon Jun Kim, Hai‐Rim Shin, Keun‐Young Yoo, Sue K. Park
    International Journal of Cancer.2011; 128(1): 176.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Estimation of Joint Risks for Developing Uterine Cervix Cancer in Korea.
Hachung Yoon, Aesun Shin, Sue Kyung Park, Myung Jin Jang, Keun Young Yoo
Korean J Prev Med. 2002;35(3):263-268.
  • 11,959 View
  • 22 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVE
This study was aiming at estimating the joint effects of various risk factors associated with uterine cervix cancer in Korea. METHODS: Data obtained from a case-control study were analyzed with a multiplicative model. RESULTS: After adjustment for age and husband's educational attainments, the family history of cervical cancer (OR=2.1, 95% CI=1.2-3.9), unstable marital status due to separation, by death or divorce, etc. (OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.7-4.6), and a large number of deliveries (> or = 3 vs. nulliparous OR=6.5, 95% CI=1.4-29.9) increased the risk of uterine cervix cancer. Conversely, first sexual intercourse at an older age (> or = 25 years vs. <19 years OR=0.4, 95% CI=0.2-0.6) and husband's circumcision (OR=0.7, 95% CI=0.5-1.0) decreased the risk. In the multiplicative model, the highest joint risk (OR=39.2, 95% CI 5.9-258.9) was observed in women with a family history of uterine cervical cancer, an unstable marital status, where the ex-husband was not circumcised, with 3 or more delivery experiences, and having her first sexual intercourse when younger than 19 years of age. However, women without a family history of uterine cervix cancer, married to a circumcised husband, having had her first sexual intercourse at 25 years or older, and nulliparous, showed the lowest joint effect (OR=0.3, 95% CI=0.1-0.5). CONCLUSION: As carcinogenesis is a complex action involving various factors, we consider a joint effects approach to be appropriate in an epidemiological study on risk factors for uterine cervix neoplasms.cervix neoplasm.
Summary
A Case-Control Study on the Relationship between Obesity and Female Colorectal Cancer.
Aesun Shin, Hachung Yoon, Keun Young Yoo
Korean J Prev Med. 2002;35(2):147-152.
  • 3,002 View
  • 72 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
A hospital-based case-control study was conducted to evaluate the role of obesity in the development of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty four histologically confirmed female colorectal cancer cases and 26,998 non-cancer controls were selected from patients invited to the Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan between 1989 and 1995. Information concerning demographic factors, medical history, family medical history, reproductive factors and dietary factors were obtained from self-administered questionnaires and medical records. The effects of weight and body mass index to colorectal cancer were examined using multiple logistic regression to control for other risk factors. RESULTS: There was no significant association between female colorectal cancer and obesity. Heavier weight adjusted for height or body mass index did not increase the risk of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that there is no associa-tion between colorectal cancer risk and obesity in women.
Summary
Cigarette Smoking, Alcohol and Cancer Mortality in Men: The Kangwha Cohort Study.
Sang Gyu Lee, Chung Mo Nam, Sang Wook Yi, Hee Chul Ohrr
Korean J Prev Med. 2002;35(2):123-128.
  • 3,638 View
  • 35 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVE
To examine the relationship between cigarette smoking, alcohol and cancer mortality in men in the Kangwha cohort after 12 years and 10 months of follow up. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 2,681 men in the Kangwha cohort aged over 55 in 1985. Number of deaths and the time to death from all cancers and other cause were measured and the data for the smoking and drinking habits were obtained from the baseline survey data in 1985. All subjects were categorized into four groups according to their smoking habits: non-smokers, ex-smokers, moderate-smokers (1-19 cigarettes per day), heavy-smokers (> or =20 cigarettes per day). In addition, they were also categorized according to their drinking habits: non-drinkers, light-drinkers (< or =1 drink per week), moderate-drinkers (<3 drinks per day), heavy-drinkers (> or =3 drinks per day). The cancer specific death rates were calculated according to their smoking and drinking status. The adjusted risk ratio for all cancer deaths according to their smoking and drinking status were estimated using the Cox's proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Using nonsmokers as the reference category, the adjusted risk ratio for all cancer deaths were 1.573(95% CI=1.003-2.468) for heavy-smokers. For lung cancer deaths, the adjusted risk ratios were 3.540(95% CI=1.251-10.018) for moderate-smoker and 4.114(95% CI=1.275-13.271) for heavy-smokers. Compared to non-drinkers, the adjusted risk ratio for stomach cancer was 2.204(95% CI=1.114-4.361) for light-drinkers. CONCLUSION: Smoking is the most significant risk factor for cancer deaths particularly lung cancer.
Summary
Measuring the Burden of Major Cancers in Korea Using Healthy Life-Year (HeaLY).
Yong Jun Choi, Seok Jun Yoon, Chang Yup Kim, Youngsoo Shin
Korean J Prev Med. 2001;34(4):372-378.
  • 2,948 View
  • 39 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
OBJECTIVES
This study introduced the healthy life-year(HeaLY), a composite indicator of disease burden, and used it to estimate the burden of major cancers in Korea. METHODS: We collected data from the national death certificate database, the national health insurance claims database and the abridged life table. This data was used to create a spreadsheet and estimate the burden of major cancers by sex in terms of HeaLYs. RESULTS: The burden of 10 major cancers for males was 2,248.97 person-year in terms of HeaLYs. Stomach cancer, liver cancer, and lung cancer were responsible for 75.2% of the burden of 10 major cancers The disease burden of 10 major cancers for females was estimated to be 1,567.58 person-years. About two thirds of HeaLYs lost were from stomach cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer. The rankings among 10 major cancers were somewhat different in terms of both HeaLYs and deaths as the HeaLY method considers both mortality and morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of the data sources, we conclude that HeaLY can aid in setting policy priorities concerning major cancers by estimating the disease burden of these cancers. Time-series analysis of the disease burden using HeaLY and DALY will elucidate the strengths and weaknesses of both methods.
Summary

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
TOP