INTRODUCTION

Exposure to harmful elements poses unique situations and characteristics for each nation and geographical area, which increases the need to measure physiological variables that reflect the characteristics of the population to make reliable exposure assessment [1,2]. General exposure factors including life expectancy, body weight, body surface area, inhalation rate, intake of drinking water, and soil ingestion are the most essential and most frequently used variables in exposure or risk assessment [3,4]. Life expectancy is an important factor in the evaluation of the lifelong effects of exposure, such as cancer risk. Life expectancy refers to the remaining years of life calculated for an individual at a certain age, which estimates how long a person is expected to live. The life expectancy for a certain year is the statistical life expectancy at birth in the same year. Body weight affects inhalation rate, food intake, and body surface area. Although an exposure may be the same, it can have different effects on individuals of different weights. In general, average daily exposure to contaminants is standardized and based on mean body weights for assessment, and since body weight is an important exposure factor [5].

The body surface areas in contact with contaminants should be obtained to assess exposure through skin absorption. Absorption can occur through the entire body surface in such situations such as swimming and bathing. On the other hand, skin exposure to chemicals may only happen to parts of the body. Both the entire body surface area and body part surface area are thus needed to estimate exposure through skin absorption accurately.

The amount of contaminants absorbed through inhalation are influenced by inhalation rate, therefore, data of standard inhalation rates are essential for the risk assessment of contaminants in the air. Inhalation rate varies according to gender, age, and physiological conditions. It can also vary within the individual depending on the intensity of physical activity. It is a very demanding task to perform first-hand measurements and calculations of average inhalation rates, and estimate inhalation rates for activity levels of the general population. This explains the preference for indirect measurements, such as heart rate and the use of accelerometers instead of inhalation rates [6,7].

The intake of drinking water can be a major exposure path for ingesting contaminants orally. There needs to be information about the consumption of drinking water to assess exposure to toxins through drinking water [8]. There are two definitions of drinking water intake: in the first definition, drinking water is defined as total tap water, whereas the second definition includes total fluid including such liquids as milk, non-alcoholic drinks, liquor, and water content in food materials. Total fluid has the potential for the over-reporting exposure to harmful materials through drinking water. It is common to use total tap water in exposure assessment. Total tap water includes all water used in daily life that is supplied through the water system, including drinking water, beverage, tap water used in dishes, underground water, and town waterworks.

In daily life, people can be exposed to contaminants by ingesting food containing soil particles or by putting a finger with soil on it into the mouth. Soil ingestion is thus another potential path of exposure to contaminants. Children especially, have greater exposure to contaminants through soil ingestion than adults do. Estimating the amount of soil ingested by humans as needed for exposure and risk assessment of contaminants through soil is required [9,10].

The factors related to somatological variables are important elements of risk assessments and the management of harmful substances. This review investigates the general exposure factors including life expectancy, weight, body surface area, inhalation rate, intake of drinking water, and soil ingestion by the Korean population. The review summarizes the processes of making estimations as part of the research underlying the development of the Korean Exposure Factors Handbook in 2007.

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

Life Expectancy

The Life Table, an annual publication of the National Statistical Office, was used to calculate recommended levels for life expectancy [11]. The Life Table of Korea was selected because the latest version of it was available in 2005, when research on the Korean Exposure Factors Handbook was in progress. The Life Table offers data on a closed population without immigration and international migration, and is based on the resident registration and death reports from the previous the year.

Body Weight

The data on body weight and height came from the 5th Body Measurement Project for Korean People that was conducted by the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy [12]. It was conducted at the city and county (gun) level across the nation in 2003 and 2004, directly measuring 16 217 Korean people aged 0 to 90. The present study divided the population into the age groups of 18 to 24 and 25 to 34 for the ease of comparison with foreign data.

Body Surface Area

Body surface area was obtained by applying a conversion equation to measure body weight and height data. The findings of Lee et al. [13] were used for the conversion equation and the ratio of the entire body surface area to body-part surface area. Lee et al. [13]'s research on the body surface areas of male and female adults in Korea was the largest and most recent study on the calculation of body surface area in the nation. It measured the entire body and body-part surface areas of 65 male and female adults (34 males, 31 females) in Korea using the alginate method, and it developed an equation to calculate body surface area based on the results.

The equation to convert body weight and height into the entire body surface area is presented below. The average ratio of body-part surface area in relation to the entire body surface area was 7.6% for the head, 37.4% for the torso, 14.8% for the arms, 4.8% for the hands, 28.9% for the legs, and 6.5% for the feet [13].

Body surface area=73.15×body wieght^0.425×height^0.725

The equation and ratio were applied to the body weight and height data from the 5th Body Measurement Project to calculate the distribution of values of the entire body and body-part surface area among the participants.

Inhalation Rate

At the time of the study, there were no data available to calculate the recommended levels for inhalation rate. Thus, the present study performed a direct measurement and data analysis. Inhalation rate was classified into short-term inhalation rate to assess short-term exposure, and long-term inhalation rate to assess long-term exposure in daily life. For the survey of short-term inhalation rate, 193 subjects, aged between 10 and 49 years, were asked to perform an exercise stress session at various levels of intensity in the laboratory to measure their inhalation rate. Exercise stress involved resting, slow walking, fast walking, slow running, and fast running. The inhalation rate was used to obtain a weighted mean, by gender, age, and additionally, short-term inhalation rate (m³/h) was produced applying activity levels.

Heartbeats were measured during the experiment of short-term inhalation rate to construct an optimal regression model that predicted inhalation rate from heartbeats, controlling for gender, age, and activity level. The average inhalation rate in daily life, according to the activity types, was obtained by investigating heartbeats and time activity patterns of 188 male and female adults for three days, including a weekday and weekend. The subjects had a heartbeat meter attached to the body, which automatically measured heartbeats every 15 seconds. Activity patterns were recorded every ten minutes. Heartbeats were automatically measured with a heartbeat meter (S610; Polar, Kempele, Finland), which received the electromagnetic waves of electrocardiography.

Real-time heartbeat data were combined with the physical activity types recorded in the physical activity log at each point in time. Timed activity patterns were grouped into 99 categories. The distribution of heartbeats by activity patterns were obtained from the accumulated data of all subjects on each activity. The data were converted into inhalation rate for each activity pattern by inserting the number of heartbeats into the regression equation for average inhalation rate.

The inhalation rate by activity pattern was applied to the data of the Time Use Survey of 2004 of the National Statistical Office [14] to build a inhalation rate database for 32 000 Korean people. The database was statistically analyzed to obtain long-term inhalation rates by gender, age, and activity level of Korean people [15].

Drinking Water Intake

Although there are previous studies on the intake of drinking water in Korea, it is difficult to use the findings to estimate recommended values because of their limitations. These studies had extremely small group samples that were not representative of the population, or investigated only some aspects of drinking water. The present study used a sample that was proportional to the gender and age of 16 metropolitan cities and provinces across the nation. The sample was based on the population of autumn 2006 and consisted of subjects aged 20 or older from the online panel developed for polling surveys. The survey took place in May, the month in which the temperature reflects the average annual temperature of Korea and in August to track changes in drinking water intake by temperature. The survey conducted in May had 1092 respondents, while the survey in August had 58.8% of respondents in May and additional respondents for a total of 1148 respondents [15].

One day before the questionnaire was to be completed, the respondents received a document describing the survey. On the survey day, the participants listed the types of drinking water they had on that day, the amount of water, and the time they drank it. When it was common water, they had to state whether they drank it fresh or after boiling it. Pictures of various types of glasses were provided to help participants record the types of glasses they used and the amount of water they drank.

The US considers bottled water a type of beverage and categorizes it as total fluid but not total tap water. This classification reflects the minimal reflection of local environments across its vast territory. Korea, a relatively smaller country, consumes a smaller amount of bottled water imported from other countries. Based on the assumption that bottled water reflects the local environments to a great degree, it is included in the category of total tap water. The statistical values for the intake of only bottled water were also offered, so that researchers could use the data after leaving out the category, intake of bottled water, if necessary [15].

Soil Ingestion

Soil ingestion is a particularly significant exposure factor for children because their body weight is lower but their intake amount is greater than adults are. This issue is attributable to the harmful behaviors associated with habits of children's oral period habit and other causes.

Previous studies had not been performed to estimate soil ingestion in Korea. The present study, therefore, investigated the soil intake of children, and calculated recommended levels based on the results.

A total of 63 children, aged 0 to 7 years, participated in the investigation. The children were from kindergartens at three locations in Seoul and three locations in Gyeonggi, Gangwon, and Chungnam. Excrement samples were collected for 4 consecutive days and the body weight of all children were measured. Indoor and outdoor spaces where children spent the most time were selected at home and the kindergarten, based on the questionnaire and time-activity logs. A quadrant was set to accurately represent each area and collect soil and dirt samples. Of the total number of children, five formed the control group that engaged in no outdoor activities, to compensate for exposure to factors other than soil.

Based on the literature, hosts of tracers were selected to estimate soil intake including aluminum, barium, manganese, silicon, titanium, vanadium, yittrium, and zirconium. They were also used to conduct content analysis in excrement, soil, and dirt samples. We used the limiting tracer method, which considers a tracer of the lowest value in the soil intake to estimate various metals, to assess the smallest influences from the factors other than soil. As a result, soil intakes were calculated with aluminum-based estimations [10].

RECOMMENDED VALUES

In Korea, the average life expectancy of the population was 78.6 years in 2005 and it has been on the rise since that time. The average life expectancy between 1975 (63.82 years) and 2005 (78.63 years) showed an approximately 15-year increase, or about 0.5 years per year. The previous age gap between men and women (of about eight years) began to decrease in the mid-1990s, and the gap was 6.75 years in 2005 (Supplemental Table 1).

Table 1 shows the average body weight and percentage distribution of body weight for male and female adults by age. The average body weight of Korean adults was 62.8 kg, with adult males weighing 69.2 kg and adult females, 56.4 kg.

The average total body surface area of the population aged 18 to 74 years was 17 804 cm². The average body-part surface area was 1281 in the head and 6372 in the torso. The total body-surface-area of men was 18 318 on an average, with the surface areas of the head and torso measuring 1374 and 16 833, respectively. The total body surface-area of women was 15 853 on an average, with the head and torso measuring 1237 and 5945, respectively (Table 2, Supplemental Table 2).

Table 3 shows the recommended levels for the short- and long-term inhalation rates of adults. Men and women reported short-term inhalation rates respectively as follows: 1) 0.48/h and 0.40/h during a break (resting), 2) 1.04/h and 0.79/h during slow walking (light exercise), 3) 1.27/h and 0.94/h during fast walking (medium exercise), 4) 2.08/h and 1.57/h during slow running (heavy exercise), and 5) 2.57/h and 1.97/h during fast running (very heavy exercise). The average long-term inhalation rate was 15.7/d for men and 12.8/d for women, reflecting the life-activity patterns of about 32 000 people.

The average daily intake of drinking water was 1660 mL for men and 1346 mL for women (Table 4). The 35 to 44 age-group reported the highest intake (1552 mL), followed by the 45 to 54 age group (1519 mL) and the 25 to 34 age-group (1498 mL). The 65 or older age group reported the lowest intake (1417 mL). The average daily drinking water intake in summer was 1714 mL, overall; 1887 mL for men and 1541 mL for women. The 35 to 44 age groups reported the highest intake (1838 mL), followed by the 45 to 54 age group (1777 mL), and the 25 to 34 age group (1642 mL). The 55 to 64 age group reported the lowest intake (1611 mL). In the regional classification, town (eup) and township (myeon) recorded the highest intake (1777 mL), followed by medium and small towns (1708 mL), and metropolitan cities (1703 mL).

The average intake of tap water was 947.7 mL, Unknown water added to tea or juice was 319.2 mL, bottled water was 169.1 mL, and underground water and mineral water was 66.3 mL [15]. The intake of drinking water increased across the board in the summer compared to spring, except for "unknown water added to tea or juice" (Supplemental Table 3).

Table 5 presents the average daily soil intake of children in Korea. The mean was 118.3 mg/d, and the geometric mean was 29.3 mg/d. The children in the top 10% were found to have a soil intake of 286.2 mg/d.

CONCLUSION

In 2005, the recorded life expectancy in Korea was 78.6 years (males, 75.1; females, 81.9), which was higher than the expected age of 75.0 years of the US, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [4]. The US EPA handbook reports that the country's life expectancy has been maintained at 75 since 1982, and issued a recommended value of 75 for the general population. In risk assessment, one sometimes assumes the life expectancy of the general population is 70 instead of 75. In Korea, the average life expectancy of the population has been rapidly rising, which can lead to increased lifelong exposure and the emergence of adverse effects. These aspects should be considered in risk assessment.

The average body weight of Korean adults was 62.8 kg, which was about 9 kg lower than that of American adults (71.8 kg) [4]. Korean men and women reported 69.2 kg and 56.4 kg, respectively, which were higher by 5.6 kg and 3.9 kg than the body weights of Japanese men (63.6 kg) and women (52.5 kg). If the recommended US value is applied to risk assessment and the exposure to contaminants is the same, the risk for Korean or Japanese people may be underestimated [4,16].

Since the development of The Korean Exposure Factors Handbook, the result of the 6th Size Survey (Korean human body measurement survey) reported that the height of males and females reached a plateau in height growth since 2003.

The US EPA reports the body surface area as a median rather than a mean; 1.94 m² for males and 1.69 m² for females [4,17]. Based on these data, US EPA set a recommended value for body surface area in contact with water as 2.0 m². Japanese men and women reported a mean of 1.69 m² and 1.51 m², respectively, which were lower than those of their Korean counterparts were. Their small body surface area can be explained by low body weight and small height [16]. The calculation of body weight and body surface area in the study used data from the Body Measurement Project for Koreans conducted by the Korean Agency for Technology and Standards under the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy. Since they claim their sample was highly representative of population groups, which include the latest updates of raw data, their recommended values based on them also seem to have high reliability [12].

The equation for calculating the body surface area for Korean people is similar to those used internationally, so it should be reliable. In contrast, the body part surface-area estimate, which uses the ratio from the same study, has its limitations because of the absence of other studies to compare and test it, and the shortage of methods to test its reliability [13].

The short-term inhalation rate calculated in the present study is somewhat different from the activity intensity reported in foreign studies, so it is difficult to make direct comparisons. Even though the experimental results used to calculate short-term inhalation rates were not introduced in the study, they clearly show that the average inhalation rate of Korean men during fast running was 3.16 m³/h, which is similar to the 3.2/h rate recommended for intense exercise by the US EPA Exposure Factors Handbook [4]. The rates were 0.49/h for men and 0.41/h for women in Korea when they were sitting and taking a rest, and these are similar to 0.4/h recommended resting rates of by the US EPA Exposure Factors Handbook. There seems to be a similar level of inhalation rate for similar activity intensity in the two nations. The long-term inhalation rate recommended for Korean men and women was 15.7/d and 12.8/d, respectively, which were slightly higher than 15.1/d and 11.7/d recommended for American men and women, by EPA [4].

The long-term inhalation rate in the study seems to have high reliability because it was obtained through a direct estimation method that was based on heartbeat measurements and the life activity patterns of a large population sample, unlike the indirect method based on metabolism that was used in the US and Japan [4,15,16].

Since intake of drinking water can vary across seasons, the recommended levels of the study were based on the average daily intake of drinking water in spring, to reflect the average temperature conditions of the nation. The results of the analysis reveal that the average daily intake of drinking water was 1502 mL, 1660 mL for men and 1346 mL for women. The 95th percentile was 3050 mL. In the US, the recommended level for average daily intake of drinking water was 1.4 L [8]. While the intake of drinking water in Korea included bottled water, its American counterparts included water used in cooking instead of bottled water, which highlights methodological differences between the two countries. The present study also measured the intake of drinking water in summer, when intake is expected to rise. As expected, the average daily intake of drinking water increased by approximately 14% to 1714 mL in summer than in spring [15].

Assessment of soil intake is a rare research area worldwide. It is realistically very difficult to measure excrements accurately, and previous studies based on the US EPA Exposure Factors Handbook made assumptions about the actual level instead of making an actual measurement, thus increasing uncertainty [4]. The present study, on the other hand, collected all the excrement samples from the children and measured their dry body weight, thus, strengthening the quality of the assessment. Another strength of the study is its research design that included a control group to control for the absorption of index metals derived from foods and other factors in addition to soil [15].

The study has a limitation in that no long-term investigation was conducted on a large number of subjects due to the inherent characteristics and various physiological uncertainties, but those limitations are common among the previous international studies. The recommended level for the average soil intake of children presented in the study was 118 mg/d, which is 18% higher than 100 mg/d recommended by US EPA [3,4].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Notes

The authors have no conflicts of interest with the material presented in this paper.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

REFERENCES

• 1. Phillips L, Moya J. The evolution of EPA's Exposure Factors Handbook and its future as an exposure assessment resource. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2013;23(1):13-21. 22805985ArticlePubMed
• 2. Moya J, Phillips L. Overview of the use of the U.S. EPA Exposure Factors Handbook. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2002;205(1-2):155-159. 12018010ArticlePubMed
• 3. Vuori V, Zaleski RT, Jantunen MJ. ExpoFacts: an overview of European exposure factors data. Risk Anal 2006;26(3):831-843. 16834637ArticlePubMed
• 4. US Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 1997. p. 103-481
• 5. World Health Organization. Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment. 1999. cited 2013 Dec 30. Available from: http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/micro/cac1999/en/
• 6. Hayes SR. Estimating the effect of being indoors on total personal exposure to outdoor air pollution. JAPCA 1989;39(11):1453-1461. 2607362ArticlePubMed
• 7. Leech JA, Wilby K, McMullen E, Laporte K. The Canadian Human Activity Pattern Survey: report of methods and population surveyed. Chronic Dis Can 1996;17(3-4):118-123. 9097012PubMed
• 8. Ershow AG, Brown LM, Cantor KP. Intake of tapwater and total water by pregnant and lactating women. Am J Public Health 1991;81(3):328-334. 1994741ArticlePubMedPMC
• 9. Clausing P, Brunekreef B, van Wijnen JH. A method for estimating soil ingestion by children. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1987;59(1):73-82. 3793247ArticlePubMed
• 10. Binder S, Sokal D, Maughan D. Estimating soil ingestion: the use of tracer elements in estimating the amount of soil ingested by young children. Arch Environ Health 1986;41(6):341-345. 3619490ArticlePubMed
• 11. National Statistical Office. Life Table 2005. cited 2014 Jan 10. Available from: http://kosis.kr/common/meta_onedepth.jsp?vwcd=MT_CTITLE&listid=MT_CTITLE_G (Korean)
• 12. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards. Report of the 5th anthropometry of size Korea. Gwacheon: Korean Agency for Technology and Standards; 2004. p. 94-101 (Korean)
• 13. Lee JY, Choi JW, Kim H. Determination of body surface area and formulas to estimate body surface area using the alginate method. J Physiol Anthropol 2008;27(2):71-82. 18379164ArticlePubMed
• 14. National Statistical Office. Time Use Survey. cited 2014 Jan 10. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/survey/lifestyle/ls_dl/1/2/index.board?bmode=read&bSeq=&aSeq=151449&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt= (Korean)
• 15. Jang JY, Jo SN, Kim SJ, Yoon MJ, Cheong HK, Kim S, et al. Development and application of Korean exposure factors. Ministry of Environment; 2007. p. 122-288 (Korean)
• 16. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. Japanese exposure factors handbook. cited 2013 Dec 30. Available from: http://unit.aist.go.jp/riss/crm/exposurefactors/english_summary.html
• 17. Murray DM, Burmaster DE. Estimated distributions for total body surface area of men and women in the United States. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 1992;2(4):451-461. 1483029PubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Determination of organophosphate flame retardants in bottled drinking water via solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
  Minh Kim Nguyen, Jeongjun Ahn, Taek Gu Han, Ninh Khac Thanh Tung, Ji-Ye Lee, Jong Seong Kang, Hyung Min Kim
  Journal of Food Composition and Analysis.2025; 141: 107322.     CrossRef
• Assessment of health risks due to the inhalation of respiratory particulate matter generated in the community kitchens
  K. Sudeep Kumara, N. Karunakara, Y. S. Mayya, Pratim Biswas
  Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Identification of persistent mobile chemicals and ultrashort chain perfluoroalkyl substances in full-scale drinking water treatment plants by target and suspect screening analysis
  Kimberly Etombi Muambo, Jeong-Eun Oh
  Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering.2025; 13(6): 119210.     CrossRef
• Non-targeted screening of organic micropollutants in drinking water: Evidence of contamination from purification systems and plastic materials
  Kailin Shen, Daeho Kang, Heewon Jang, Junho Jeon
  Environment International.2025; 202: 109685.     CrossRef
• Estimation of microbial inhalation exposure and prediction of microbial concentrations in rail transportation facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic
  Bong Gu Lee, Yea Joon Kim, Joo Eun Shim, Hyesoo Lee, Min-Kyeong Yeo
  Aerosol Science and Technology.2024; 58(3): 309.     CrossRef
• Pharmaceuticals in raw and treated water from drinking water treatment plants nationwide: Insights into their sources and exposure risk assessment
  Kimberly Etombi Muambo, Min-Gyeong Kim, Da-Hye Kim, Sangmin Park, Jeong-Eun Oh
  Water Research X.2024; 24: 100256.     CrossRef
• Occurrence, time trends, and human exposure of siloxanes and synthetic musk compounds in indoor dust from Korean homes
  Wenming Chen, Jin-Su Oh, Jae-Eun Lim, Hyo-Bang Moon
  Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.2023; 266: 115538.     CrossRef
• Updated general exposure factors for risk assessment in the Korean population
  Hyojung Yoon, Jungkwan Seo, Sun-Kyoung Yoo, Pil-Je Kim, Jinhyeon Park, Youngtae Choe, Wonho Yang
  Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology.2023; 33(6): 1013.     CrossRef
• Occurrence and Exposure Assessment of Bisphenol Analogues Through Different Types of Drinking Water in Korea
  Jae-Eun Lim, Chunyang Liao, Hyo-Bang Moon
  Exposure and Health.2023; 15(1): 185.     CrossRef
• Occurrence and removal of benzotriazole and benzothiazole in drinking water treatment plants
  Wenting Wang, Sangmin Park, Byeong-gyu Choi, Jeong-Eun Oh
  Environmental Pollution.2023; 316: 120563.     CrossRef
• Assessing Dust Emissions, Health Impacts, and Accident Risks in Prefabricated and Conventional Construction: A Comprehensive Comparative Study
  Louis Kumi, Jaewook Jeong, Jaemin Jeong
  Buildings.2023; 13(9): 2305.     CrossRef
• Estimation of Children’s Soil and Dust Ingestion Rates and Health Risk at E-Waste Dismantling Area
  Yan Yang, Mengdi Zhang, Haojia Chen, Zenghua Qi, Chengcheng Liu, Qiang Chen, Tao Long
  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(12): 7332.     CrossRef
• Empirical Analysis of Dust Health Impacts on Construction Workers Considering Work Types
  Louis Kumi, Jaewook Jeong, Jaemin Jeong, Jaehyun Lee
  Buildings.2022; 12(8): 1137.     CrossRef
• Occurrence and Removal of Benzotriazole and Benzothiazole in Drinking Water Treatment Plants
  Wenting Wang, Sangmin Park, Byeong-gyu Choi, Jeong-Eun Oh
  SSRN Electronic Journal .2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
• The occurrence and distributions of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in groundwater after a PFAS leakage incident in 2018
  Zhi Yuan Yong, Ki Yong Kim, Jeong-Eun Oh
  Environmental Pollution.2021; 268: 115395.     CrossRef
• Development of a Method for Simultaneous Analysis of Allergenic Flavoring Agents in Cigarettes and Quantitative Risk Assessment for Consumer Safety
  Dae Yong Jang, Hyung Soo Kim, Eun Chul Pack, Ye Ji Koo, Kyung Min Lim, Dal Woong Choi
  Toxics.2021; 9(4): 87.     CrossRef
• Concentrations and distributions of neonicotinoids in drinking water treatment plants in South Korea
  Jiwon Kim, Wenting Wang, Soohyung Lee, Ju-Hyun Park, Jeong-Eun Oh
  Environmental Pollution.2021; 288: 117767.     CrossRef
• Development of General Exposure Factors for Risk Assessment in Korean Children
  Hyojung Yoon, Sun-Kyoung Yoo, Jungkwan Seo, Taksoo Kim, Pyeongsoon Kim, Pil-Je Kim, Jinhyeon Park, Jung Heo, Wonho Yang
  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(6): 1988.     CrossRef
• Seasonal occurrence and removal of organophosphate esters in conventional and advanced drinking water treatment plants
  Gyojin Choo, Jeong-Eun Oh
  Water Research.2020; 186: 116359.     CrossRef
• Health risk assessment of trihalomethanes in water treatment plants in Jiangsu Province, China
  Yumin Wang, Guangcan Zhu, Bernard Engel
  Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.2019; 170: 346.     CrossRef
• Stabilization of fluorine in soil using calcium hydroxide and its potential human health risk
  Seulki Jeong, Doyoung Kim, Hye-On Yoon
  Environmental Engineering Research.2019; 24(4): 654.     CrossRef
• Tối ưu quá trình nuôi cấy nấm mốc Aspergillus niger thu nhận enzyme lipase và ứng dụng trong tiền xử lý nước thải sữa tổng hợp
  Đào Thị Mỹ Linh, Nguyễn Thị Quỳnh Mai, Trần Thị Mỹ Thảo, Lý Thị Diễm Trang, Lê Thị Mỹ Trinh, Võ Thị Thúy Vân
  Can Tho University Journal of Science.2019; 55(Công ng: 277.     CrossRef
• Mixture risk assessment of selected mainstream cigarette smoke constituents generated from low-yield cigarettes in South Korean smokers
  Eun Chul Pack, Dae Yong Jang, Hyung Soo Kim, Seung Ha Lee, Hae Young Kim, Seok Ho Song, Hoon Sik Cho, Kyeng Hee Kwon, Kun Ho Park, Kyung Min Lim, Dal Woong Choi
  Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.2018; 94: 152.     CrossRef
• Measurement of Particulate Matter (PM2.5) and Health Risk Assessment of Cooking-Generated Particles in the Kitchen and Living Rooms of Apartment Houses
  Hyungkeun Kim, Kyungmo Kang, Taeyeon Kim
  Sustainability.2018; 10(3): 843.     CrossRef
• Evaluation of the current contamination status of PFASs and OPFRs in South Korean tap water associated with its origin
  Heejeong Park, Gyojin Choo, Hyerin Kim, Jeong-Eun Oh
  Science of The Total Environment.2018; 634: 1505.     CrossRef
• Health risk assessment by CRPS and the numerical model for toluene in residential buildings
  Haneul Choi, Hyungkeun Kim, Taeyeon Kim
  KIEAE Journal.2017; 17(5): 33.     CrossRef
• Health risk assessment of occupants through exposure scenarios of daily indoor air pollutants
  Himchan Kim, Hooseung Na, Hyungkeun Kim, Taeyeon Kim
  KIEAE Journal.2017; 17(6): 279.     CrossRef
• Species-specific accumulation of methyl and total mercury in sharks from offshore and coastal waters of Korea
  Sang-Jo Kim, Hyun-Kyung Lee, Abimbola C. Badejo, Won-Chan Lee, Hyo-Bang Moon
  Marine Pollution Bulletin.2016; 102(1): 210.     CrossRef
• Occurrence and exposure assessment of organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) through the consumption of drinking water in Korea
  Sunggyu Lee, Woochang Jeong, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Hyo-Bang Moon
  Water Research.2016; 103: 182.     CrossRef
• Exploring Global Exposure Factors Resources for Use in Consumer Exposure Assessments
  Rosemary Zaleski, Peter Egeghy, Pertti Hakkinen
  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2016; 13(7): 744.     CrossRef
• Indoor inhalation intake fractions of fine particulate matter: review of influencing factors
  N. Hodas, M. Loh, H.‐M. Shin, D. Li, D. Bennett, T. E. McKone, O. Jolliet, C. J. Weschler, M. Jantunen, P. Lioy, P. Fantke
  Indoor Air.2016; 26(6): 836.     CrossRef