- Exploratory Study of Dimensions of Health-related Quality of Life in the General Population of South Korea
-
Seon-Ha Kim, Min-Woo Jo, Minsu Ock, Sang-il Lee
-
J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50(6):361-368. Published online November 2, 2017
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.076
-
-
9,703
View
-
232
Download
-
13
Crossref
-
 Abstract
 PDF Supplementary Material
- Objectives
This study aimed to explore dimensions in addition to the 5 dimensions of the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) that could satisfactorily explain variation in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the general population of South Korea.
Methods
Domains related to HRQoL were searched through a review of existing HRQoL instruments. Among the 28 potential dimensions, the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L and 7 additional dimensions (vision, hearing, communication, cognitive function, social relationships, vitality, and sleep) were included. A representative sample of 600 subjects was selected for the survey, which was administered through face-to-face interviews. Subjects were asked to report problems in 12 health dimensions at 5 levels, as well as their self-rated health status using the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and a 5-point Likert scale. Among subjects who reported no problems for any of the parameters in the EQ-5D-5L, we analyzed the frequencies of problems in the additional dimensions. A linear regression model with the EQ-VAS as the dependent variable was performed to identify additional significant dimensions.
Results
Among respondents who reported full health on the EQ-5D-5L (n=365), 32% reported a problem for at least 1 additional dimension, and 14% reported worse than moderate self-rated health. Regression analysis revealed a R2 of 0.228 for the original EQ-5D-5L dimensions, 0.200 for the new dimensions, and 0.263 for the 12 dimensions together. Among the added dimensions, vitality and sleep were significantly associated with EQ-VAS scores.
Conclusions
This study identified significant dimensions for assessing self-rated health among members of the general public, in addition to the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L. These dimensions could be considered for inclusion in a new preference-based instrument or for developing a country-specific HRQoL instrument.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by  - Developing and testing culturally relevant bolt-on items for EQ-5D-5L in Chinese populations: a mixed-methods study protocol
Zhuxin Mao, Jingzhi Fan, Fanni Rencz, Zhihao Yang, Nan Luo, Pei Wang
BMJ Open.2024; 14(1): e081140. CrossRef - Population Norms for the EQ-5D-5L, PROPr and SF-6D in Hungary
Anna Nikl, Mathieu F. Janssen, Balázs Jenei, Valentin Brodszky, Fanni Rencz
PharmacoEconomics.2024; 42(5): 583. CrossRef - Testing the Psychometric Properties of 9 Bolt-Ons for the EQ-5D-5L in a General Population Sample
Fanni Rencz, Mathieu F. Janssen
Value in Health.2024; 27(7): 943. CrossRef - Exploring potential EQ-5D bolt-on dimensions with a qualitative approach: an interview study in Hong Kong SAR, China
Clement Cheuk Wai Ng, Annie Wai Ling Cheung, Eliza Lai Yi Wong
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Patient-reported burden of myasthenia gravis: baseline results of the international prospective, observational, longitudinal real-world digital study MyRealWorld-MG
Sarah Dewilde, Glenn Philips, Sandra Paci, Jon Beauchamp, Silvia Chiroli, Casey Quinn, Laura Day, Mark Larkin, Jacqueline Palace, Sonia Berrih-Aknin, Kristl G Claeys, Srikanth Muppidi, Renato Mantegazza, Francesco Saccà, Andreas Meisel, Guillaume Bassez,
BMJ Open.2023; 13(1): e066445. CrossRef - Influence of body shape on health-related quality of life in Korean adults: The mediating effect of self-rated health
Eun Sil Her, Jung Kyu Park, Yun Kyoung Oh, Hsin-Yen Yen
PLOS ONE.2023; 18(10): e0293286. CrossRef - A Review of the Types and Characteristics of Healthy Life Expectancy and Methodological Issues
Young-Eun Kim, Yoon-Sun Jung, Minsu Ock, Seok-Jun Yoon
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2022; 55(1): 1. CrossRef - Meaning and Status of Health-related Quality of Life Recognized by Medical Professionals: a Qualitative Study
Jeehee Pyo, Minsu Ock, Bohyun Park, Nam-eun Kim, Eun Jeong Choi, Hyesook Park, Hyeong Sik Ahn
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Methods Used to Identify, Test, and Assess Impact on Preferences of Bolt-Ons: A Systematic Review
Alexandra J.L.M. Geraerds, Gouke J. Bonsel, Mathieu F. Janssen, Aureliano Paolo Finch, Suzanne Polinder, Juanita A. Haagsma
Value in Health.2021; 24(6): 901. CrossRef - Patient-reported impact of myasthenia gravis in the real world: protocol for a digital observational study (MyRealWorld MG)
Sonia Berrih-Aknin, Kristl G Claeys, Nancy Law, Renato Mantegazza, Hiroyuki Murai, Francesco Saccà, Sarah Dewilde, Mathieu F Janssen, Emma Bagshaw, Hara Kousoulakou, Mark Larkin, Jon Beauchamp, Trevor Leighton, Sandra Paci
BMJ Open.2021; 11(7): e048198. CrossRef - The Association between Alcohol Drinking Patterns and Health-Related Quality of Life in the Korean Adult Population: Effects of Misclassification Error on Estimation of Association
Eun Sook Lee, Boyoung Kim
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(21): 7758. CrossRef - Quality of life in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention and optimal medical therapy in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Thao Thanh Nguyen, Quyen Gia To, Anh Do Nguyen, Tien The Nguyen, Van-Anh Ngoc Huynh, Kien Gia To
MedPharmRes.2020; 4(4): 1. CrossRef - A systematic review of the development and testing of additional dimensions for the EQ-5D descriptive system
Krittaphas Kangwanrattanakul, Wiraphol Phimarn
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research.2019; 19(4): 431. CrossRef
- Frequency, Expected Effects, Obstacles, and Facilitators of Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review
-
Minsu Ock, So Yun Lim, Min-Woo Jo, Sang-il Lee
-
J Prev Med Public Health. 2017;50(2):68-82. Published online January 26, 2017
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.105
-
-
13,735
View
-
371
Download
-
50
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- Objectives
We performed a systematic review to assess and aggregate the available evidence on the frequency, expected effects, obstacles, and facilitators of disclosure of patient safety incidents (DPSI).
Methods
We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for this systematic review and searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for English articles published between 1990 and 2014. Two authors independently conducted the title screening and abstract review. Ninety-nine articles were selected for full-text reviews. One author extracted the data and another verified them.
Results
There was considerable variation in the reported frequency of DPSI among medical professionals. The main expected effects of DPSI were decreased intention of the general public to file medical lawsuits and punish medical professionals, increased credibility of medical professionals, increased intention of patients to revisit and recommend physicians or hospitals, higher ratings of quality of care, and alleviation of feelings of guilt among medical professionals. The obstacles to DPSI were fear of medical lawsuits and punishment, fear of a damaged professional reputation among colleagues and patients, diminished patient trust, the complexity of the situation, and the absence of a patient safety culture. However, the factors facilitating DPSI included the creation of a safe environment for reporting patient safety incidents, as well as guidelines and education for DPSI.
Conclusions
The reported frequency of the experience of the general public with DPSI was somewhat lower than the reported frequency of DPSI among medical professionals. Although we identified various expected effects of DPSI, more empirical evidence from real cases is required.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Costly Lessons From the 2015 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Outbreak in Korea
-
Sang-il Lee
-
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(6):274-276. Published online November 25, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.15.064
-
-
16,308
View
-
172
Download
-
22
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Since the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in the Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea) began on May 11, 2015, a total of 186 persons have been infected by the MERS coronavirus, 38 of whom have died. With this number, Korea becomes second only to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the ranking of cumulative MERS cases. In this paper Korea’s unique experience of an outbreak of MERS will be summarized and discussed briefly.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Assessing Reliability of Medical Record Reviews for the Detection of Hospital Adverse Events
-
Minsu Ock, Sang-il Lee, Min-Woo Jo, Jin Yong Lee, Seon-Ha Kim
-
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(5):239-248. Published online September 11, 2015
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.14.049
-
-
9,951
View
-
113
Download
-
12
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDFSupplementary Material
- Objectives
The purpose of this study was to assess the inter-rater reliability and intra-rater reliability of medical record review for the detection of hospital adverse events.
Methods
We conducted two stages retrospective medical records review of a random sample of 96 patients from one acute-care general hospital. The first stage was an explicit patient record review by two nurses to detect the presence of 41 screening criteria (SC). The second stage was an implicit structured review by two physicians to identify the occurrence of adverse events from the positive cases on the SC. The inter-rater reliability of two nurses and that of two physicians were assessed. The intra-rater reliability was also evaluated by using test-retest method at approximately two weeks later.
Results
In 84.2% of the patient medical records, the nurses agreed as to the necessity for the second stage review (kappa, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.83). In 93.0% of the patient medical records screened by nurses, the physicians agreed about the absence or presence of adverse events (kappa, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.97). When assessing intra-rater reliability, the kappa indices of two nurses were 0.54 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.77) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.87), whereas those of two physicians were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.62 to 1.00) and 0.37 (95% CI, -0.16 to 0.89).
Conclusions
In this study, the medical record review for detecting adverse events showed intermediate to good level of inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Well organized training program for reviewers and clearly defining SC are required to get more reliable results in the hospital adverse event study.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by - The Korea National Patient Safety Incidents Inquiry Survey: Feasibility of Medical Record Review for Detecting Adverse Events in Regional Public Hospitals
Min Ji Kim, Hee Jung Seo, Hong Mo Koo, Minsu Ock, Jee-In Hwang, Sang-Il Lee
Journal of Patient Safety.2022; 18(5): 389. CrossRef - The Korea National Patient Safety Incidents Inquiry Survey: Characteristics of Adverse Events Identified Through Medical Records Review in Regional Public Hospitals
Min Ji Kim, Hee Jung Seo, Hong Mo Koo, Minsu Ock, Jee-In Hwang, Sang-Il Lee
Journal of Patient Safety.2022; 18(5): 382. CrossRef - Feasibility of Capturing Adverse Events From Insurance Claims Data Using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Codes Coupled to Present on Admission Indicators
Juyoung Kim, Eun Young Choi, Won Lee, Hae Mi Oh, Jeehee Pyo, Minsu Ock, So Yoon Kim, Sang-il Lee
Journal of Patient Safety.2022; 18(5): 404. CrossRef - Quality of end-of-life communication in 2 high-risk ICU cohorts: a retrospective cohort study
Tammy L. Pham, Allan Garland
CMAJ Open.2021; 9(2): E570. CrossRef - A Systematic Review of Methods for Medical Record Analysis to Detect Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients
Dorthe O. Klein, Roger J.M.W. Rennenberg, Richard P. Koopmans, Martin H. Prins
Journal of Patient Safety.2021; 17(8): e1234. CrossRef - Patient Safety Incidents Reported by the General Public in Korea: A Cross-Sectional Study
Minsu Ock, Min-Woo Jo, Eun Young Choi, Sang-Il Lee
Journal of Patient Safety.2020; 16(2): e90. CrossRef - Perceptions of Hospital Health Information Managers Regarding Present on Admission Indicators in Korea: A Qualitative Study
Jee-Hee Pyo, Eun-Young Choi, Hae-Mi Oh, Won Lee, Ju-Young Kim, Min-Su Ock, So-Yoon Kim, Sang-Il Lee
Quality Improvement in Health Care.2020; 26(1): 23. CrossRef - Variation between hospitals and reviewers in detection of adverse events identified through medical record review in Korea
Sukyeong Kim, Ho Gyun Shin, A E Jeong Jo, Ari Min, Minsu Ock, Jee-In Hwang, Youngjin Jeong, Moon Sung Park, Jong Bouk Lee, Tae I K Chang, Eunhyang Song, Heungseon Kim, Sang-Il Lee
International Journal for Quality in Health Care.2020; 32(8): 495. CrossRef - The Harvard medical practice study trigger system performance in deceased patients
Dorthe O. Klein, Roger J. M. W. Rennenberg, Richard P. Koopmans, Martin H. Prins
BMC Health Services Research.2019;[Epub] CrossRef - Optimising Hepatitis C care in an urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health care clinic
Prabha Lakhan, Deborah Askew, Noel Hayman, Leigh‐anne Pokino, Cheryl Sendall, Paul J. Clark
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.2019; 43(3): 228. CrossRef - Patient and hospital characteristics that influence incidence of adverse events in acute public hospitals in Portugal: a retrospective cohort study
Paulo Sousa, António Sousa Uva, Florentino Serranheira, Mafalda Sousa Uva, Carla Nunes
International Journal for Quality in Health Care.2018; 30(2): 132. CrossRef - Interpregnancy weight change and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Eugene Oteng-Ntim, Sofia Mononen, Olga Sawicki, Paul T Seed, Debra Bick, Lucilla Poston
BMJ Open.2018; 8(6): e018778. CrossRef
- Lessons From Healthcare Providers' Attitudes Toward Pay-for-performance: What Should Purchasers Consider in Designing and Implementing a Successful Program?
-
Jin Yong Lee, Sang-Il Lee, Min-Woo Jo
-
J Prev Med Public Health. 2012;45(3):137-147. Published online May 31, 2012
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.3.137
-
-
17,038
View
-
125
Download
-
24
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
We conducted a systematic review to summarize providers' attitudes toward pay-for-performance (P4P), focusing on their general attitudes, the effects of P4P, their favorable design and implementation methods, and concerns. An electronic search was performed in PubMed and Scopus using selected keywords including P4P. Two reviewers screened target articles using titles and abstract review and then read the full version of the screened articles for the final selections. In addition, one reference of screened articles and one unpublished report were also included. Therefore, 14 articles were included in this study. Healthcare providers' attitudes on P4P were summarized in two ways. First, we gathered their general attitudes and opinions regarding the effects of P4P. Second, we rearranged their opinions regarding desirable P4P design and implementation methods, as well as their concerns. This study showed the possibility that some healthcare providers still have a low level of awareness about P4P and might prefer voluntary participation in P4P. In addition, they felt that adequate quality indicators and additional support for implementation of P4P would be needed. Most healthcare providers also had serious concerns that P4P would induce unintended consequences. In order to conduct successful implementation of P4P, purchaser should make more efforts such as increasing providers' level of awareness about P4P, providing technical and educational support, reducing their burden, developing a cooperative relationship with providers, developing more accurate quality measures, and minimizing the unintended consequences. -
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by - Impact of reimbursement systems on patient care – a systematic review of systematic reviews
Eva Wagenschieber, Dominik Blunck
Health Economics Review.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Clinical Staff Perceptions of Pay-for-Performance Financial Incentives for HPV Vaccine Promotion
Vanessa Rodriguez, Kathryn Brignole, Tara Licciardello Queen, Justin G. Trogdon
American Journal of Medical Quality.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Pay-for-performance in healthcare provision: the role of discretion in policy implementation in Turkey
Puren Aktas, Jonathan Hammond, Liz Richardson
International Journal of Public Sector Management.2023; 36(6/7): 530. CrossRef - Value-based surgery physician compensation model: Review of the literature
Bethany J. Slater, Amelia T. Collings, Chase Corvin, Jessica J. Kandel
Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2022; 57(9): 118. CrossRef - Incentivizing performance in health care: a rapid review, typology and qualitative study of unintended consequences
Xinyu Li, Jenna M. Evans
BMC Health Services Research.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Guest editorial
Fabiana da Cunha Saddi, Lindsay J L Forbes, Stephen Peckham
Journal of Health Organization and Management.2021; 35(3): 245. CrossRef - Exploring frontliners' knowledge, participation and evaluation in the implementation of a pay-for-performance program (PMAQ) in primary health care in Brazil
Fabiana da Cunha Saddi, Matthew Harris, Fernanda Ramos Parreira, Raquel Abrantes Pêgo, Germano Araujo Coelho, Renata Batista Lozano, Pedro dos Santos Mundim, Stephen Peckham
Journal of Health Organization and Management.2021; 35(3): 327. CrossRef - Awareness of, attitude toward, and willingness to participate in pay for performance programs among family physicians: a cross-sectional study
Chyi-Feng Jan, Meng-Chih Lee, Ching-Ming Chiu, Cheng-Kuo Huang, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Che-Jui Chang, Tai-Yuan Chiu
BMC Family Practice.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Brazilian Payment for Performance (PMAQ) Seen From a Global Health and Public Policy Perspective
Fabiana C. Saddi, Stephen Peckham
Journal of Ambulatory Care Management.2018; 41(1): 25. CrossRef - The impact of pay-for-performance on the quality of care in ophthalmology: Empirical evidence from Germany
T. Herbst, J. Foerster, M. Emmert
Health Policy.2018; 122(6): 667. CrossRef - Hospital-Acquired Infections Under Pay-for-Performance Systems: an Administrative Perspective on Management and Change
Rebecca A. Vokes, Gonzalo Bearman, Gloria J. Bazzoli
Current Infectious Disease Reports.2018;[Epub] CrossRef - Perceptions and evaluations of front-line health workers regarding the Brazilian National Program for Improving Access and Quality to Primary Care (PMAQ): a mixed-method approach
Fabiana da Cunha Saddi, Matthew J. Harris, Germano Araújo Coelho, Raquel Abrantes Pêgo, Fernanda Parreira, Wellida Pereira, Ana Karoline C. Santos, Heloany R. Almeida, Douglas S. Costa
Cadernos de Saúde Pública.2018;[Epub] CrossRef - Physician attitudes toward participating in a financial incentive program for LDL reduction are associated with patient outcomes
Tianyu Liu, David A. Asch, Kevin G. Volpp, Jingsan Zhu, Wenli Wang, Andrea B. Troxel, Aderinola Adejare, Darra D. Finnerty, Karen Hoffer, Judy A. Shea
Healthcare.2017; 5(3): 119. CrossRef - Pay-for-performance reduces healthcare spending and improves quality of care: Analysis of target and non-target obstetrics and gynecology surgeries
Seung Ju Kim, Kyu-Tae Han, Sun Jung Kim, Eun-Cheol Park
International Journal for Quality in Health Care.2017; 29(2): 222. CrossRef - Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review
Tim Herbst, Martin Emmert
BMC Health Services Research.2017;[Epub] CrossRef - Would German physicians opt for pay-for-performance programs? A willingness-to-accept experiment in a large general practitioners’ sample
Christian Krauth, Sebastian Liersch, Sören Jensen, Volker Eric Amelung
Health Policy.2016; 120(2): 148. CrossRef - Does Pay-For-Performance Program Increase Providers Adherence to Guidelines for Managing Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Taiwan?
Huei-Ju Chen, Nicole Huang, Long-Sheng Chen, Yiing-Jenq Chou, Chung-Pin Li, Chen-Yi Wu, Yu-Chia Chang, Jason Grebely
PLOS ONE.2016; 11(8): e0161002. CrossRef - Pay-for-performance in resource-constrained settings: Lessons learned from Thailand’s Quality and Outcomes Framework
Roongnapa Khampang, Sripen Tantivess, Yot Teerawattananon, Sarocha Chootipongchaivat, Juntana Pattanapesaj, Rukmanee Butchon, Natthida Malathong, Francoise Cluzeau, Rachel Foskett-Tharby, Paramjit Gill
F1000Research.2016; 5: 2700. CrossRef - Pay-for-performance and efficiency in primary oral health care practices in Chile
Marco Cornejo-Ovalle, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Glòria Pérez
Revista Clínica de Periodoncia, Implantología y Rehabilitación Oral.2015; 8(1): 60. CrossRef - Pagamento por desempenho em sistemas e serviços de saúde: uma revisão das melhores evidências disponíveis
Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva.2015; 20(5): 1497. CrossRef - When incentives work too well: locally implemented pay for performance (P4P) and adverse sanctions towards home birth in Tanzania - a qualitative study
Victor Chimhutu, Ida Lindkvist, Siri Lange
BMC Health Services Research.2014;[Epub] CrossRef - A Qualitative Evaluation of the Performance-based Supplementary Payment System in Turkey
Ganime Esra Yuzden, Julide Yildirim
Journal of Health Management.2014; 16(2): 259. CrossRef - Challenges and a response strategy for the development of nursing in China: a descriptive and quantitative analysis
Yingqiang Wang, Shiyou Wei, Youping Li, Shaolin Deng, Qianqian Luo, Yan Li
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.2013; 6(1): 21. CrossRef - The Possibility of Expanding Pay-for-Performance Program as a Provider Payment System
Byongho Tchoe, Suehyung Lee
Health Policy and Management.2013; 23(1): 3. CrossRef
|
KSPM
