Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Original Article

Spatial Inequalities in the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer and Associated Factors in the Neighborhoods of Tehran, Iran: Bayesian Spatial Models: Kamyar Mansori, Masoud Solaymani-Dodaran, Alireza Mosavi-Jarrahi, Ali Ganbary Motlagh, Masoud Salehi, Alireza Delavari, Mohsen Asadi-Lari; J Prev Med Public Health. 2018;51(1):33-40. Published online January 2, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.17.167

6,468 View
237 Download
7 Crossref

Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with the spatial distribution of the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the neighborhoods of Tehran, Iran using Bayesian spatial models.
Methods
This ecological study was implemented in Tehran on the neighborhood level. Socioeconomic variables, risk factors, and health costs were extracted from the Equity Assessment Study conducted in Tehran. The data on CRC incidence were extracted from the Iranian population-based cancer registry. The Besag-York-Mollié (BYM) model was used to identify factors associated with the spatial distribution of CRC incidence. The software programs OpenBUGS version 3.2.3, ArcGIS 10.3, and GeoDa were used for the analysis.
Results
The Moran index was statistically significant for all the variables studied (p<0.05). The BYM model showed that having a women head of household (median standardized incidence ratio [SIR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 2.53), living in a rental house (median SIR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96), not consuming milk daily (median SIR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94) and having greater household health expenditures (median SIR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.68) were associated with a statistically significant elevation in the SIR of CRC. The median (interquartile range) and mean (standard deviation) values of the SIR of CRC, with the inclusion of all the variables studied in the model, were 0.57 (1.01) and 1.05 (1.31), respectively.
Conclusions
Inequality was found in the spatial distribution of CRC incidence in Tehran on the neighborhood level. Paying attention to this inequality and the factors associated with it may be useful for resource allocation and developing preventive strategies in atrisk areas.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Colorectal cancer spatial pattern in the northeast region of São Paulo, Brazil
Adeylson Guimarães Ribeiro, Allini Mafra da Costa, Talita Fernanda Pereira, Denise Peixoto Guimarães, José Humberto Tavares Guerreiro Fregnani
Global Epidemiology.2023; 5: 100097. CrossRef
Impacts of some clinicopathodemography and colorectal tissues key cell cycle and mucin stabilizing molecules on the metastasis trend in colorectal cancer patients
Ali Ghorbani Ranjbary, Jalil Mehrzad, Nasrollah Rahbar, Hesam Dehghani
Molecular Biology Reports.2023; 50(10): 8589. CrossRef
Mapping the prevalence of cancer risk factors at the small area level in Australia
James Hogg, Jessica Cameron, Susanna Cramb, Peter Baade, Kerrie Mengersen
International Journal of Health Geographics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Area-Level Determinants in Colorectal Cancer Spatial Clustering Studies: A Systematic Review
Sharifah Saffinas Syed Soffian, Azmawati Mohammed Nawi, Rozita Hod, Huan-Keat Chan, Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(19): 10486. CrossRef
Favorable colorectal cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios in countries with high expenditures on health and development index
Chi-Chih Wang, Wen-Wei Sung, Pei-Yi Yan, Po-Yun Ko, Ming-Chang Tsai
Medicine.2021; 100(41): e27414. CrossRef
Spatial autocorrelation of breast cancer mortality in the Metropolitan Region, Chile: an ecological study
Doris Durán, María José Monsalves
Medwave.2020; 20(01): e7766. CrossRef
Premature mortality of gastrointestinal cancer in Iran: trends and projections 2001–2030
Fatemeh Khosravi Shadmani, Farshad Farzadfar, Moein Yoosefi, Kamyar Mansori, Reza Khosravi Shadman, Aliakbar Haghdoost
BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub] CrossRef

Special Article

Cost Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial: Swati Misra, David R. Lairson, Wenyaw Chan, Yu-Chia Chang, L. Kay Bartholomew, Anthony Greisinger, Amy McQueen, Sally W. Vernon; J Prev Med Public Health. 2011;44(3):101-110. Published online May 17, 2010; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101

12,721 View
98 Download
15 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Objectives

Screening for colorectal cancer is considered cost effective, but is underutilized in the U.S. Information on the efficiency of "tailored interventions" to promote colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings is limited. The paper reports the results of a cost effectiveness analysis that compared a survey-only control group to a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) web-based intervention (screen for life) and to a tailored interactive computer-based intervention.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial of people 50 and over, was conducted to test the interventions. The sample was 1224 partcipants 50-70 years of age, recruited from Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, a large multi-specialty clinic in Houston, Texas. Screening status was obtained by medical chart review after a 12-month follow-up period. An "intention to treat" analysis and micro costing from the patient and provider perspectives were used to estimate the costs and effects. Analysis of statistical uncertainty was conducted using nonparametric bootstrapping.

Results

The estimated cost of implementing the web-based intervention was $40 per person and the cost of the tailored intervention was $45 per person. The additional cost per person screened for the web-based intervention compared to no intervention was $2602 and the tailored intervention was no more effective than the web-based strategy.

Conclusions

The tailored intervention was less cost-effective than the web-based intervention for colorectal cancer screening promotion. The web-based intervention was less cost-effective than previous studies of in-reach colorectal cancer screening promotion. Researchers need to continue developing and evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Extending analytic methods for economic evaluation in implementation science
Meghan C. O’Leary, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Leah Frerichs, Jennifer Leeman, Daniel S. Reuland, Stephanie B. Wheeler
Implementation Science.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Charles R. Rogers, Phung Matthews, Lei Xu, Kenneth Boucher, Colin Riley, Matthew Huntington, Nathan Le Duc, Kola S. Okuyemi, Margaret J. Foster, Joseph Telfair
PLOS ONE.2020; 15(9): e0238354. CrossRef
Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women
David R. Lairson, Tong Han Chung, Danmeng Huang, Timothy E. Stump, Patrick O. Monahan, Shannon M. Christy, Susan M. Rawl, Victoria L. Champion
Cancer Prevention Research.2020; 13(3): 309. CrossRef
Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review
Giridhar Mohan, Sajal K. Chattopadhyay, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Susan A. Sabatino, Devon L. Okasako-Schmucker, Yinan Peng, Shawna L. Mercer, Anilkrishna B. Thota
American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2019; 57(4): 557. CrossRef
Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost‐effectiveness
Christen L. Lara, Kelly L. Means, Krystal D. Morwood, Westley R. Lighthall, Sonja Hoover, Florence K.L. Tangka, Cynthia French, Krystal D. Gayle, Amy DeGroff, Sujha Subramanian
Cancer.2018; 124(21): 4130. CrossRef
The cost of implementing two small media interventions to promote HPV vaccination
Siddharth S. Karanth, David R. Lairson, Danmeng Huang, Lara S. Savas, Sally W. Vernon, María E. Fernández
Preventive Medicine.2017; 99: 277. CrossRef
An Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice
Richard T. Meenan, Melissa L. Anderson, Jessica Chubak, Sally W. Vernon, Sharon Fuller, Ching-Yun Wang, Beverly B. Green
American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2015; 48(6): 714. CrossRef
Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review
Carlo Senore, John Inadomi, Nereo Segnan, Cristina Bellisario, Cesare Hassan
Gut.2015; 64(7): 1158. CrossRef
Get Screened: A Randomized Trial of the Incremental Benefits of Reminders, Recall, and Outreach on Cancer Screening
Robert J. Fortuna, Amna Idris, Paul Winters, Sharon G. Humiston, Steven Scofield, Samantha Hendren, Patricia Ford, Shirley X. L. Li, Kevin Fiscella
Journal of General Internal Medicine.2014; 29(1): 90. CrossRef
Public Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interventions for Increasing Screening Uptake
Antonio Z. Gimeno Garcia, Noemi Hernandez Alvarez Buylla, David Nicolas-Perez, Enrique Quintero
ISRN Oncology.2014; 2014: 1. CrossRef
Cost‐effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care
David R. Lairson, Melissa DiCarlo, Ashish A. Deshmuk, Heather B. Fagan, Randa Sifri, Nora Katurakes, James Cocroft, Jocelyn Sendecki, Heidi Swan, Sally W. Vernon, Ronald E. Myers
Cancer.2014; 120(7): 1042. CrossRef
Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans
Ken Resnicow, Yan Zhou, Sarah Hawley, Masahito Jimbo, Mack T. Ruffin, Rachel E. Davis, Deirdre Shires, Jennifer Elston Lafata
Patient Education and Counseling.2014; 97(3): 370. CrossRef
A lesson in business: cost-effectiveness analysis of a novel financial incentive intervention for increasing physical activity in the workplace
Mary Anne T Dallat, Ruth F Hunter, Mark A Tully, Karen J Cairns, Frank Kee
BMC Public Health.2013;[Epub] CrossRef
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests
Adrian GK Edwards, Gurudutt Naik, Harry Ahmed, Glyn J Elwyn, Timothy Pickles, Kerry Hood, Rebecca Playle
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2013;[Epub] CrossRef
Colorectal Cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Need for Screening
Mahmoud H. Mosli, Mahmoud S. Al-Ahwal
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2012; 13(8): 3809. CrossRef

English Abstract

Ten Year Trend of Cancer Incidence in Seoul, Korea: 1993-2002.: Myung Hee Shin, Hyun Kyung Oh, Yoon Ok Ahn; J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(2):92-99.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.2.92

4,776 View
33 Download
23 Crossref

Abstract PDF

OBJECTIVES
Effective cancer prevention and control measures can only be done when dependable data on the cancer incidence is available. The Seoul Cancer Registry (SCR) was founded to provide valid, comparable and representative cancer incidence data for Koreans. We aimed to compare the cancer incidence in the first (1993-1997) and second term (1998-2002) of the SCR, and we analyzed the annual incidence trend during that 10 years. METHODS: The SCR detects potential cancer cases through the Korean Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) data, the health insurance claims, the individual hospital's discharge records and the death certificates. About 87% of the SCR data is registered through the KCCR. The rest of the data is registered by SCR registrars who visit about 70~80 mid-sized hospitals in Seoul to review and abstract the medical records of the potential cancer patients. RESULTS: The total number of new cancer cases was higher in 1998~2002 than in 1993~1997 by 20.6% for men and 18.4% for women, respectively. The age-standardized rate (ASR) of total cancer per 100,000 increased 1% (from 295.4 to 298.3) for men and 5.1% (from 181.5 to 190.7) for women, between the two periods. The commonest cancer sites during 1998-2002 for men were stomach, liver, bronchus/lung, colorectum, bladder and prostate, and the commonest cancer sites for women were breast, stomach, colorectum, cervix uteri, thyroid and bronchus/lung. Compared with the ASRs in 1993, the ASRs in 2002 increased for colorectum (58.4% for men, 27.1% for women), prostate (81.5%), breast (58.3% for women), thyroid (141% for women), and bronchus/lung (15.4% for women). The ASRs for stomach (-18.7% for men, -20.7% for women) and uterine cervix cancer (-39.7%) had decreased. CONCLUSIONS: The cancer incidence is increasing in Seoul, Korea, especially for the colorectum and prostate for men, and for the breast, colorectum, bronchus/lung and thyroid for women.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Common Causes of Postmenopausal Bleeding in Korean Women: 10-Year Outcomes from a Single Medical Center
Min Kyoung Kim, Yeon Soo Jung, Seung Joo Chon, Bo Hyon Yun, SiHyun Cho, Young Sik Choi, Byung Seok Lee, Seok Kyo Seo
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2017; 32(5): 830. CrossRef
Changes of Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Anaplastic and Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma
Doh Young Lee, Jae-Kyung Won, Se-Hoon Lee, Do Joon Park, Kyeong Cheon Jung, Myung-Whun Sung, Hong-Gyun Wu, Kwang Hyun Kim, Young Joo Park, J. Hun Hah
Thyroid.2016; 26(3): 404. CrossRef
Breast Cancer Trend in Iran from 2000 to 2009 and Prediction till 2020 using a Trend Analysis Method
Bibihajar Zahmatkesh, Afsaneh Keramat, Nasrinossadat Alavi, Ahmad Khosravi, Ahmad Kousha, Ali Ghanbari Motlagh, Mahboobeh Darman, Elham Partovipour, Reza Chaman
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2016; 17(3): 1493. CrossRef
The study for the Epidemiologic Characteristics of Cancer Patients in Jeju Special Self-governing Province
Weon-Young Chang
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2015; 16(2): 1292. CrossRef
Interaction Effect between Weight Perception and Comorbidities on Weight Control Behavior in Overweight and Obese Adults: Is There a Sex Difference?
Jun Hyun Hwang, Dong Hee Ryu, Soon-Woo Park
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2015; 30(8): 1017. CrossRef
Diagnosis and Treatment of <i>Helicobacter Pylori</i> Infection: Korean and Overseas Guidelines
Ji Min Choi, Sang Gyun Kim
The Korean Journal of Medicine.2015; 89(2): 157. CrossRef
Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea, 2013 revised edition
Sang Gyun Kim, Hye‐Kyung Jung, Hang Lak Lee, Jae Young Jang, Hyuk Lee, Chan Gyoo Kim, Woon Geon Shin, Ein Soon Shin, Yong Chan Lee
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2014; 29(7): 1371. CrossRef
Current status of functional dyspepsia in Korea
Hyuk Lee, Hye-Kyung Jung, Kyu Chan Huh
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2014; 29(2): 156. CrossRef
Overview of Cancer Registration Research in the Asian Pacific from 2008-2013
Malcolm A. Moore
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013; 14(8): 4461. CrossRef
Effect of Rubus coreanus Miquel on prostate tumour growth
Eun Young Baek, Seung Min Lee, Jung eun Lee, Eunkyo Park, Yuri Kim, In-Kyung Jung, Jung-Hyun Kim
Journal of Functional Foods.2013; 5(3): 1478. CrossRef
Thyroid Cancer is the Most Common Cancer in Women, Based on the Data from Population-based Cancer Registries, South Korea
S.-S. Kweon, M.-H. Shin, I.-J. Chung, Y.-J. Kim, J.-S. Choi
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013; 43(10): 1039. CrossRef
A Study on Ten Years Trend of Cancer Incidence and Evaluation of Quality of Cancer Registration in Daejeon Metropolitan City and Chungcheongnam-Do, Korea: 2000-2009
Un-Je Park, Hae-Seong Nam, Kwang-Hwan Kim, Chang-Soo Park, In-Sun Kwon, Jeong-A Kim, Tae-Yong Lee
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society.2013; 14(3): 1234. CrossRef
Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment ofHelicobacter pyloriInfection in Korea, 2013 Revised Edition
Sang Gyun Kim, Hye-Kyung Jung, Hang Lak Lee, Jae Young Jang, Hyuk Lee, Chan Gyoo Kim, Woon Geon Shin, Ein Soon Shin, Yong Chan Lee
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2013; 62(1): 3. CrossRef
Recurrence of Colorectal Neoplasm Cannot Be Predicted by Sonic Hedgehog Expression in the Normal Colonic Tissue
Ji Young Lee, Sun-Young Lee, Hye Seung Han, So Young Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Jeong Hwan Kim, In Kyung Sung, Hyung Seok Park, Chan Sup Shim, Choon Jo Jin
Intestinal Research.2012; 10(3): 265. CrossRef
Current status of robotic colorectal surgery
Jung Myun Kwak, Seon Hahn Kim
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2011; 5(1): 65. CrossRef
The Prevalence and Features of Korean Gout Patients Using the National Health Insurance Corporation Database
Chan Hee Lee, Na Young Sung
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases.2011; 18(2): 94. CrossRef
Characteristics of Gastric Cancer in Korea - with an Emphasis on the Increase of the Early Gastric Cancer (EGC)
Ki Joo Kang, Jun Haeng Lee
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2010; 53(4): 283. CrossRef
Diagnosis of Functional Dyspepsia: a Systematic Review
Hye-kyung Jung, Bo Ra Keum, Yoon Ju Jo, Sam Ryong Jee, Poong-Lyul Rhee, Young Woo Kang
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2010; 55(5): 296. CrossRef
Differences in Expression of VEGF-A, VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2 and Microvessel Density in Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis
Eun Hui Jeong, Young Kim, Byeong Woo Min, Kyung Hwa Lee, Hyun Soo Kim, Jae Hyuk Lee
The Korean Journal of Pathology.2010; 44(6): 571. CrossRef
Colonoscopy screening for individuals aged 40–49 years with a family history of stomach cancer in Korea
Yong Sung Choi, Jung Pil Suh, Doo Seok Lee, Eui Gon Youk, In Taek Lee, Suk Hee Lee, Do Sun Kim, Doo Han Lee
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2010; 25(4): 443. CrossRef
Cancer in Patients on Chronic Dialysis in Korea
Jung Eun Lee, Seung Hyeok Han, Byoung Chul Cho, Jung Tak Park, Tae Hyun Yoo, Beom Seok Kim, Hyeong Cheon Park, Shin-Wook Kang, Ho Yung Lee, Dae-Suk Han, Sung Kyu Ha, Kyu Hun Choi
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2009; 24(Suppl 1): S95. CrossRef
A Phase II Trial of Paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and Cisplatin in Patients with Metastatic or Recurrent Gastric Cancer
Gun Hi Kang, Gwang Sil Kim, Hyo Rak Lee, Young Jin Yuh, Sung Rok Kim
Cancer Research and Treatment.2008; 40(3): 106. CrossRef
Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening among US Women: Trends from 2000 to 2005
Jaeyoung Kim, Soong-Nang Jang
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2008; 41(3): 186. CrossRef

Original Article

Nationwide incidence estimation of colorectal cancer by subsite of origin in Korea.: B J Park, M S Lee, Y O Ahn, D S Heo, D H Kim, H Kim, H S Yew, T S Park; Korean J Prev Med. 1996;29(3):555-564.

1,974 View
20 Download

Abstract PDF: Nationwide incidence survey was conducted to estimate the annual incidence rates of colorectal cancer among Koreans between Jan 1, 1988 and Dec 31, 1989. The population of the incidence survey was the beneficiaries of Korea Medical Insurance Corporation(KMIC), Which were about 4,500,000 persons. The medical records of patients with diagnosis of either ICD-9 153(colon cancer), 154(rectal caner), 197(secondary malignat neoplasm of digestive and respiratory system), or 211(benign neoplasm of digestive system) were abstracted for the period with the standard format. The diagnosis was confirmed by one oncologist through the review of these abstracts. The numerator of the rate was finally defined as the incident colorectal cancer cases diagnosed between July 1, 1988 and June 30, 1989. The crude annual incidence of colorectal cancer for men was 13.1 per 100,000 and 10.6 for women, which was still low when compared with those of Japan and China during the same period. Age-adjusted sex ratio was 1.2 for fight-sided colon cancer and 1.9 for left-sided colon cancer. The excess of right colon cancer among postmenopausal women was remarkable, so further analytical approach would be needed to investigate which factors are related with this phenomenon.; Summary

English Abstract

Smoking and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the Korean Elderly.: Hwa Jung Kim, Seung Mi Lee, Nam Kyong Choi, Seon Ha Kim, Hong Ji Song, Yuong Kyun Cho, Byung Joo Park; J Prev Med Public Health. 2006;39(2):123-129.

2,561 View
66 Download

Abstract PDF: OBJECTIVES
The incidence of colorectal cancer increased greatly among the elderly in Korea, but the relationship between smoking and colon cancer remains controversial. Few studies have targeted Asian elderly people. We analyzed the smoking status, the amount smoked, and the smoking duration as risk factors of colorectal cancer to determine their association and causality. METHODS: The cohort members (n=14,103) consisted of 4,694 males and 9,409 females, and they were derived from the Korea Elderly Phamacepidemilogic Cohort (KEPEC), which was a population-based dynamic cohort. They were aged 65 years or more and they lived in Busan Metropolitan City between from 1993-1998; they were beneficiaries of the Korean Medical Insurance Corporation (KMIC). The baseline information was surveyed by a selfadministered mailed questionnaire; after 8.7 person-years of mean follow up period, 100 cases of colorectal cancer occurred. The adjusted relative ratio (aRR) of smoking status, the smoking amount and the smoking duration were calculated from the Cox's proportional hazard model with the never-smokers as a reference group and the Cox model controlled for age, gender, precancerous lesions of CRC, medication history of NSAIDs and antibiotics, the alcohol drinking status and BMI. RESULTS: Compared with the never smokers, the aRRs were 2.03 (95% CI=1.02-4.03) and 1.36 (95% CI=0.80-2.32) for the ex-smokers and current smokers, respectively. Statistical significant trends were not observed for the dose-relationship among the elderly, either for the mean daily amount smoked (p for trend=0.28) or for the total amount (p for trend=0.15). Still, the aRRs were 1.51 (95% CI=0.97-2.34) for the elderly who smoked less than 40 years and 2.35 (95% CI=1.16-4.74) for the elderly who had 40 years or more of smoking (p for trend=0.06). Smokers who started smoking before the age 20 had an increased aRR of 2.15 (95% CI=1.17-3.93) compared to the never smokers. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for age, gender, precancerous lesion of CRC, medication history of NSAIDs and antibiotics, the alcohol drinking status and BMI, smoking increases the risk of colorectal cancer among elderly people. The age when starting smoking is also important.; Summary

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search