Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Author index
Search
Wenyaw Chan 1 Article
Cost Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial
Swati Misra, David R. Lairson, Wenyaw Chan, Yu-Chia Chang, L. Kay Bartholomew, Anthony Greisinger, Amy McQueen, Sally W. Vernon
J Prev Med Public Health. 2011;44(3):101-110.   Published online May 17, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101
  • 12,506 View
  • 97 Download
  • 15 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives

Screening for colorectal cancer is considered cost effective, but is underutilized in the U.S. Information on the efficiency of "tailored interventions" to promote colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings is limited. The paper reports the results of a cost effectiveness analysis that compared a survey-only control group to a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) web-based intervention (screen for life) and to a tailored interactive computer-based intervention.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial of people 50 and over, was conducted to test the interventions. The sample was 1224 partcipants 50-70 years of age, recruited from Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, a large multi-specialty clinic in Houston, Texas. Screening status was obtained by medical chart review after a 12-month follow-up period. An "intention to treat" analysis and micro costing from the patient and provider perspectives were used to estimate the costs and effects. Analysis of statistical uncertainty was conducted using nonparametric bootstrapping.

Results

The estimated cost of implementing the web-based intervention was $40 per person and the cost of the tailored intervention was $45 per person. The additional cost per person screened for the web-based intervention compared to no intervention was $2602 and the tailored intervention was no more effective than the web-based strategy.

Conclusions

The tailored intervention was less cost-effective than the web-based intervention for colorectal cancer screening promotion. The web-based intervention was less cost-effective than previous studies of in-reach colorectal cancer screening promotion. Researchers need to continue developing and evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Extending analytic methods for economic evaluation in implementation science
    Meghan C. O’Leary, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Leah Frerichs, Jennifer Leeman, Daniel S. Reuland, Stephanie B. Wheeler
    Implementation Science.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Charles R. Rogers, Phung Matthews, Lei Xu, Kenneth Boucher, Colin Riley, Matthew Huntington, Nathan Le Duc, Kola S. Okuyemi, Margaret J. Foster, Joseph Telfair
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(9): e0238354.     CrossRef
  • Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women
    David R. Lairson, Tong Han Chung, Danmeng Huang, Timothy E. Stump, Patrick O. Monahan, Shannon M. Christy, Susan M. Rawl, Victoria L. Champion
    Cancer Prevention Research.2020; 13(3): 309.     CrossRef
  • Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review
    Giridhar Mohan, Sajal K. Chattopadhyay, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Susan A. Sabatino, Devon L. Okasako-Schmucker, Yinan Peng, Shawna L. Mercer, Anilkrishna B. Thota
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2019; 57(4): 557.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost‐effectiveness
    Christen L. Lara, Kelly L. Means, Krystal D. Morwood, Westley R. Lighthall, Sonja Hoover, Florence K.L. Tangka, Cynthia French, Krystal D. Gayle, Amy DeGroff, Sujha Subramanian
    Cancer.2018; 124(21): 4130.     CrossRef
  • The cost of implementing two small media interventions to promote HPV vaccination
    Siddharth S. Karanth, David R. Lairson, Danmeng Huang, Lara S. Savas, Sally W. Vernon, María E. Fernández
    Preventive Medicine.2017; 99: 277.     CrossRef
  • An Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice
    Richard T. Meenan, Melissa L. Anderson, Jessica Chubak, Sally W. Vernon, Sharon Fuller, Ching-Yun Wang, Beverly B. Green
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2015; 48(6): 714.     CrossRef
  • Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review
    Carlo Senore, John Inadomi, Nereo Segnan, Cristina Bellisario, Cesare Hassan
    Gut.2015; 64(7): 1158.     CrossRef
  • Get Screened: A Randomized Trial of the Incremental Benefits of Reminders, Recall, and Outreach on Cancer Screening
    Robert J. Fortuna, Amna Idris, Paul Winters, Sharon G. Humiston, Steven Scofield, Samantha Hendren, Patricia Ford, Shirley X. L. Li, Kevin Fiscella
    Journal of General Internal Medicine.2014; 29(1): 90.     CrossRef
  • Public Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interventions for Increasing Screening Uptake
    Antonio Z. Gimeno Garcia, Noemi Hernandez Alvarez Buylla, David Nicolas-Perez, Enrique Quintero
    ISRN Oncology.2014; 2014: 1.     CrossRef
  • Cost‐effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care
    David R. Lairson, Melissa DiCarlo, Ashish A. Deshmuk, Heather B. Fagan, Randa Sifri, Nora Katurakes, James Cocroft, Jocelyn Sendecki, Heidi Swan, Sally W. Vernon, Ronald E. Myers
    Cancer.2014; 120(7): 1042.     CrossRef
  • Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans
    Ken Resnicow, Yan Zhou, Sarah Hawley, Masahito Jimbo, Mack T. Ruffin, Rachel E. Davis, Deirdre Shires, Jennifer Elston Lafata
    Patient Education and Counseling.2014; 97(3): 370.     CrossRef
  • A lesson in business: cost-effectiveness analysis of a novel financial incentive intervention for increasing physical activity in the workplace
    Mary Anne T Dallat, Ruth F Hunter, Mark A Tully, Karen J Cairns, Frank Kee
    BMC Public Health.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests
    Adrian GK Edwards, Gurudutt Naik, Harry Ahmed, Glyn J Elwyn, Timothy Pickles, Kerry Hood, Rebecca Playle
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2013;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Need for Screening
    Mahmoud H. Mosli, Mahmoud S. Al-Ahwal
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2012; 13(8): 3809.     CrossRef

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health