Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Wenyaw Chan

1 Article

Cost Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial: Swati Misra, David R. Lairson, Wenyaw Chan, Yu-Chia Chang, L. Kay Bartholomew, Anthony Greisinger, Amy McQueen, Sally W. Vernon; J Prev Med Public Health. 2011;44(3):101-110. Published online May 17, 2010; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101

14,197 View
100 Download
17 Crossref

Objectives

Screening for colorectal cancer is considered cost effective, but is underutilized in the U.S. Information on the efficiency of "tailored interventions" to promote colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings is limited. The paper reports the results of a cost effectiveness analysis that compared a survey-only control group to a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) web-based intervention (screen for life) and to a tailored interactive computer-based intervention.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial of people 50 and over, was conducted to test the interventions. The sample was 1224 partcipants 50-70 years of age, recruited from Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, a large multi-specialty clinic in Houston, Texas. Screening status was obtained by medical chart review after a 12-month follow-up period. An "intention to treat" analysis and micro costing from the patient and provider perspectives were used to estimate the costs and effects. Analysis of statistical uncertainty was conducted using nonparametric bootstrapping.

Results

The estimated cost of implementing the web-based intervention was $40 per person and the cost of the tailored intervention was $45 per person. The additional cost per person screened for the web-based intervention compared to no intervention was $2602 and the tailored intervention was no more effective than the web-based strategy.

Conclusions

The tailored intervention was less cost-effective than the web-based intervention for colorectal cancer screening promotion. The web-based intervention was less cost-effective than previous studies of in-reach colorectal cancer screening promotion. Researchers need to continue developing and evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Extending analytic methods for economic evaluation in implementation science
Meghan C. O’Leary, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Leah Frerichs, Jennifer Leeman, Daniel S. Reuland, Stephanie B. Wheeler
Implementation Science.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Charles R. Rogers, Phung Matthews, Lei Xu, Kenneth Boucher, Colin Riley, Matthew Huntington, Nathan Le Duc, Kola S. Okuyemi, Margaret J. Foster, Joseph Telfair
PLOS ONE.2020; 15(9): e0238354. CrossRef
Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women
David R. Lairson, Tong Han Chung, Danmeng Huang, Timothy E. Stump, Patrick O. Monahan, Shannon M. Christy, Susan M. Rawl, Victoria L. Champion
Cancer Prevention Research.2020; 13(3): 309. CrossRef
Examining the Effectiveness of Provider Incentives to Increase CRC Screening Uptake in Neighborhood Healthcare: A California Federally Qualified Health Center
Melissa Barajas, Florence K. L. Tangka, James Schultz, Kulin Tantod, Ying Marilyn Kempster, Ndukaku Omelu, Sonja Hoover, Melonie Thomas, Valerie Richmond-Reese, Sujha Subramanian
Health Promotion Practice.2020; 21(6): 898. CrossRef
Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review
Giridhar Mohan, Sajal K. Chattopadhyay, Donatus U. Ekwueme, Susan A. Sabatino, Devon L. Okasako-Schmucker, Yinan Peng, Shawna L. Mercer, Anilkrishna B. Thota
American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2019; 57(4): 557. CrossRef
Colorectal cancer screening interventions in 2 health care systems serving disadvantaged populations: Screening uptake and cost‐effectiveness
Christen L. Lara, Kelly L. Means, Krystal D. Morwood, Westley R. Lighthall, Sonja Hoover, Florence K.L. Tangka, Cynthia French, Krystal D. Gayle, Amy DeGroff, Sujha Subramanian
Cancer.2018; 124(21): 4130. CrossRef
The cost of implementing two small media interventions to promote HPV vaccination
Siddharth S. Karanth, David R. Lairson, Danmeng Huang, Lara S. Savas, Sally W. Vernon, María E. Fernández
Preventive Medicine.2017; 99: 277. CrossRef
An Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice
Richard T. Meenan, Melissa L. Anderson, Jessica Chubak, Sally W. Vernon, Sharon Fuller, Ching-Yun Wang, Beverly B. Green
American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2015; 48(6): 714. CrossRef
Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review
Carlo Senore, John Inadomi, Nereo Segnan, Cristina Bellisario, Cesare Hassan
Gut.2015; 64(7): 1158. CrossRef
Get Screened: A Randomized Trial of the Incremental Benefits of Reminders, Recall, and Outreach on Cancer Screening
Robert J. Fortuna, Amna Idris, Paul Winters, Sharon G. Humiston, Steven Scofield, Samantha Hendren, Patricia Ford, Shirley X. L. Li, Kevin Fiscella
Journal of General Internal Medicine.2014; 29(1): 90. CrossRef
Public Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interventions for Increasing Screening Uptake
Antonio Z. Gimeno Garcia, Noemi Hernandez Alvarez Buylla, David Nicolas-Perez, Enrique Quintero
ISRN Oncology.2014; 2014: 1. CrossRef
Cost‐effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care
David R. Lairson, Melissa DiCarlo, Ashish A. Deshmuk, Heather B. Fagan, Randa Sifri, Nora Katurakes, James Cocroft, Jocelyn Sendecki, Heidi Swan, Sally W. Vernon, Ronald E. Myers
Cancer.2014; 120(7): 1042. CrossRef
Communication preference moderates the effect of a tailored intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans
Ken Resnicow, Yan Zhou, Sarah Hawley, Masahito Jimbo, Mack T. Ruffin, Rachel E. Davis, Deirdre Shires, Jennifer Elston Lafata
Patient Education and Counseling.2014; 97(3): 370. CrossRef
A lesson in business: cost-effectiveness analysis of a novel financial incentive intervention for increasing physical activity in the workplace
Mary Anne T Dallat, Ruth F Hunter, Mark A Tully, Karen J Cairns, Frank Kee
BMC Public Health.2013;[Epub] CrossRef
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests
Adrian GK Edwards, Gurudutt Naik, Harry Ahmed, Glyn J Elwyn, Timothy Pickles, Kerry Hood, Rebecca Playle
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2013;[Epub] CrossRef
An Automated Intervention With Stepped Increases in Support to Increase Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening
Beverly B. Green, Ching-Yun Wang, Melissa L. Anderson, Jessica Chubak, Richard T. Meenan, Sally W. Vernon, Sharon Fuller
Annals of Internal Medicine.2013; 158(5_Part_1): 301. CrossRef
Colorectal Cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Need for Screening
Mahmoud H. Mosli, Mahmoud S. Al-Ahwal
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2012; 13(8): 3809. CrossRef

Author index