Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Prev Med Public Health > Volume 45(6); 2012 > Article
Original Article
Relationship Between Cigarette Smoking and Muscle Strength in Japanese Men
Takeshi Saito1,2, Nobuyuki Miyatake1, Noriko Sakano1, Kanae Oda1, Akihiko Katayama1, Kenji Nishii3, Takeyuki Numata2
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 2012;45(6):381-386.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.6.381
Published online: November 29, 2012
  • 12,423 Views
  • 134 Download
  • 24 Crossref
  • 27 Scopus

1Department of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.

2Okayama Southern Institute of Health, Okayama Health Foundation, Okayama, Japan.

3Okayama Health Foundation Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Corresponding author: Nobuyuki Miyatake, MD. 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan. Tel: +81-87-891-2465, Fax: +81-87-891-2134, miyarin@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
• Received: June 22, 2012   • Accepted: September 11, 2012

Copyright © 2012 The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • Objectives
    To investigate the link between cigarette smoking and muscle strength in Japanese men.
  • Methods
    We used data on 4249 Japanese men, aged 43.3±13.9 years, in this cross-sectional investigation study. Grip strength and leg strength were measured as indicators of overall muscle strength. Meanwhile, subjects' cigarette smoking habits were recorded by trained medical staff. The effect of cigarette smoking on muscle strength was evaluated.
  • Results
    A total of 1618 men (38.1%) were smokers and 1481 men (34.9%) exercised regularly. Significant differences in muscle strength were noted between men with and without a Brinkman index of 400 or greater, after adjusting for age. After adjusting for age, height, body weight and exercise habits, associations between the Brinkman index and leg strength and the ratio of leg strength to body weight were attenuated.
  • Conclusions
    Cigarette smoking might be negatively associated with muscle strength, especially grip strength in Japanese men.
Cigarette smoking is a worldwide public health challenge, and it has been reported that, in Japan, 32.2% of men and 8.4% of women are current smokers [1]. Cigarette smoking is also a strong risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease in a dose-dependent manner [2]. Therefore, curbing smoking habits is urgently necessary.
It is also well known that low and declining muscle strength is linked to increased mortality, independent of physical activity and muscle mass [3]. Levels of maximal oxygen uptake (aerobic exercise level) and muscle strength were recommended by as the Exercise and Physical Activity Reference Quantity for Health Promotion 2006 study sponsored by Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [4]. In a previous study, we demonstrated that aerobic exercise level and cigarette smoking are closely linked [5], and suggested that curbing smoking habits was would be useful for increasing aerobic exercise level. Therefore, smoking habits may also affect muscle strength. Although resistance training has also been advocated as the most suitable exercise for increasing muscle strength [6,7], the link between cigarette smoking and muscle strength in a large sample of Japanese has not yet been fully discussed. In this study, we evaluated the effect of cigarette smoking on muscle strength in Japanese men.
Subjects
We used data on 4249 men (43.1±13.9 years), aged 20 to 79 years, in a cross-sectional study. Subjects met the following criteria: 1) they underwent an annual health check-up from June 1999 to November 2009 at the Okayama Southern Institute of Health, 2) as part of their annual health check-up, they had muscle strength, exercise habits and smoking habits evaluated, 3) all subjects provided written informed consent for the use of their data in the study (Table 1). Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Okayama Health Foundation.
Anthropometric Measurements
The anthropometric parameters were evaluated by using the indicators of height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), abdominal circumference, and hip circumference. BMI was calculated by weight/(height)2 (kg/m2). The abdominal circumference was measured at the umbilical level and the hip was measured at the widest circumference over the trochanter in standing subjects after normal expiration.
Cigarette Smoking
The data on cigarette smoking was obtained through structured interviews conducted by public health nurses trained for this study. The subjects were asked if they currently smoked cigarettes. When the answer was 'yes', they were classified as current smokers and further questions were asked regarding the average number of cigarettes smoked per day and at what age they started smoking. In the case of a 'no' answer, they were classified as non smokers. We could not classify those who used to smoke but had since stopped smoking.
Based on answers to those questions, the cumulative amount of cigarette consumption was expressed as the Brinkman index (number of cigarette consumed per day multiplied by years of smoking) [8]. A Brinkman index greater than or equal to 400 was classified as a heavy current smoker and less than 400 was a light current smoker.
Muscle Strength
To assess muscle strength, grip and leg strength were measured [9]. Grip strength and leg strength were measured using a dynamometer suited for each measurement (THP-10, Sakai, Tokyo, Japan; COMBIT CB-1, Minato, Osaka, Japan; respectively). Isometric leg strength was measured by seating the subject in a chair, instructing him or her to grasp the armrests to fix the body position, and then instructing the subject to extend his or her leg to 60° with a dynamometer attached to the ankle joint by a strap. More detailed descriptions of the procedure have been published in previous reports [9,10], which have also shown the accuracy of this type of measurement [10]. All muscle strength measurements were recorded in 2 trials; the strongest performance was the one used for analysis. To standardize the influence of body weight, we calculated the ratio of leg strength to body weight; a ratio of 1.0 kilogram in leg strength per kilogram body weight has been a standard in past studies [10].
Exercise Habits
Using the structured method of the National Nutrition Survey in Japan, data on exercise habits were obtained through structured interviews conducted by staff trained for this study. The subjects were asked if they currently exercise (over 30 minutes per session, 2 times per week for a duration of 3 months). When the answer was 'yes,' they were classified as subjects with regular exercise habits. When the answer was 'no,' they were classified as subjects without regular exercise habits.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as means±standard deviation values. A comparison of parameters, that is, age, and anthropometric and muscle strength parameters, between smoking and non-smoking subjects was made using the unpaired t-test. Covariance analysis was used to adjust for age, and a multiple logistic regression analysis and odds ratio was also used and adjusted for various potential confounders; p<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Correlation coefficients were calculated and used to test the significance of the linear relationship between muscle strength and the Brinkman index. In addition, a partial correlation coefficient was calculated to adjust for age, height and body weight.
Clinical profiles and a comparison of parameters between smoking and nonsmoking subjects are summarized in Table 1. A total of 1618 men (38.1%) had smoking habits and 1481 men (34.9%) had exercise habits. Height, body weight, and muscle strength parameters were significantly higher, while age and exercise habits were significantly lower, in current smokers than in nonsmokers. We compared muscle strength between smoking and nonsmoking men classified by age group (Table 2). Among men in their 20's, those who smoked had significantly higher left-hand grip strength significantly lower leg strength/body weight than those who did not smoke. Among men in their 30's, those who smoked also had significantly higher left-hand grip strength than those who did not smoke. However, differences such as these were not noted among any other age groups.
We also investigated the relationship between cigarette smoking and muscle strength (Table 3). The Brinkman index (n=1618, 499±406) was weakly and negatively correlated with parameters of muscle strength, that is, grip strength, leg strength and leg strength/body weight. After adjusting for age, height, and body weight, however, no clear relationship, expressed as a partial correlation coefficient, was noted between the Brinkman Index and muscle.
We also evaluated the relationship between smoking habits and exercise habits (Table 4). Men who smoked cigarettes were significantly less likely to have exercise habits (424 men, 26.2%) than those who do not smoke (1057 men, 40.2%), even after adjusting for age, height, and body weight.
We compared muscle strength between men along their classification by the Brinkman index (Table 5). Parameters of muscle strength, that is, grip strength, leg strength, and leg strength/body weight in men with a Brinkman index greater than or equal to 400 were significantly lower than those in men with a Brinkman index less than 400. Significant differences in grip strength were remained even after adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits. However, differences in leg strength and leg strength/body weight were attenuated and not statistically significant after adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits. Finally, we investigated the relationship between each of three types of smoking habits (non smoker; light current smoker, Brinkman index <400; heavy current smoker, ≥400 Brinkman index) and muscle strength (Table 6). Even after adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits, a significant relationship between smoking habits and grip strength was noted by logistic regression analysis.
The main finding of this study was that cigarette smoking was associated with muscle strength in Japanese men. The relationship between cigarette smoking and muscle strength has been studied previously [11-13]. Kumar and Kumar [11] have reported that muscle strength, as measured by the Kraus-Weber physical fitness test, showed a significant decrease in cigarette-smoking athletes ages 19 to 30 years, compared to nonsmoking athletes. Lee et al. [12], in their cross-sectional study of sarcopenia in 4000 community-dwelling older Chinese men and women was associated with cigarette smoking, chronic illness, physical inactivity, underweight, poorer physical strength in the upper limbs, as well as poorer overall well-being. In a longitudinal study, Kok et al. [13] reported that knee muscle strength was inversely associated with cigarette smoking. In addition, smoking 100 g a week resulted in a reduction of 2.9% knee muscle strength in men and a reduction of 5.0% in women.
In this study, we solely evaluated the relationship between cigarette smoking and grip strength, leg strength, and leg strength/body weight in Japanese men. Without adjusting for confounding factors, muscle strength in cigarette-smoking men, was higher than that in men who did not smoke. However, such differences were attenuated when factoring in age group, particularly among the elderly groups of subjects. The maximum of the differences in strength between current smokers and non smokers were almost 1 kg in each age group. According to the National Nutrition Survey in Japan, the prevalence of subjects with exercise habits increases with age, while daily step counts and smoking habits decrease with age [14]. Thus, lower exercise intensity and shorter exercise time in elderly adults, in addition to smoking habits, may have affected our results.
It is well known that exercise habits are closely associated with muscle strength [15]. Exercise habits were also closely linked to cigarette smoking in this study. After adjusting for muscle confounding factors, including exercise habits, grip strength in current smokers with a Brinkman index greater than 400 was significantly lower than that in current smokers with an index of less than 400. In turn, differences in leg strength and leg strength/body weight were attenuated and not statistically significant after adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits.
The reasons for this discrepancy between leg strength and grip strength are not clear. Perhaps leg strength is employed more in daily life than in grip strength. The difference in daily usage might affect these results. We have also reported that aerobic exercise level defined by ventilatory threshold was associated with cigarette smoking in Japanese [5]. Taken together, the degree of smoking in heavy current smokers may affect muscle strength, especially grip strength. A combination of promoting exercise habits and prohibiting smoking habits should be considered for improving muscle strength in Japanese men.
Potential limitations remain in this study. First, our study was a cross sectional and not a longitudinal study. Second, 4249 men in our study voluntarily underwent measurements: They were therefore more likely to be health-conscious compared with the average person. Third, we could not show a clear relationship between cigarette smoking and muscle strength in men. Fourth, we did not evaluate women. Fifth, we could not identify the mechanism that the links cigarette smoking and muscle strength. Smokers often have hormonal disorders, nutritional deficits, and lower levels of current and past leisure-time physical activity [16]. In addition, those are potential factors that may influence muscle strength and could not be evaluated in this study.
Nonetheless, it seems reasonable to suggest that prohibiting smoking and promoting exercise habits might result in improved muscle strength in some Japanese men. To demonstrate this clearly, further prospective studies of the Japanese are needed.
This research was supported in part by Research Grants from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan.

The authors have no conflicts of interest with the material presented in this paper.

  • 1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The national nutrition survey in Japan. cited 2012 May 19. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r98520000020qbb-att/2r98520000021c19.pdf (Japanese)
  • 2. Peto R. Smoking and death: the past 40 years and the next 40. BMJ 1994;309(6959):937-939. 7950669ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 3. Metter EJ, Talbot LA, Schrager M, Conwit R. Skeletal muscle strength as a predictor of all-cause mortality in healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57(10):B359-B365. 12242311ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Exercise and physical activity reference quantity for health promotion. 2006. cited 2012 May 19. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2006/07/dl/s0719-3b.pdf (Japanese)
  • 5. Miyatake N, Numata T, Nishii K, Sakano N, Suzue T, Hirao T, et al. Relation between cigarette smoking and ventilatory threshold in the Japanese. Environ Health Prev Med 2011;16(3):185-190. 21431801ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Geliebter A, Maher MM, Gerace L, Gutin B, Heymsfield SB, Hashim SA. Effects of strength or aerobic training on body composition, resting metabolic rate, and peak oxygen consumption in obese dieting subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66(3):557-563. 9280173ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Rhodes EC, Martin AD, Taunton JE, Donnelly M, Warren J, Elliot J. Effects of one year of resistance training on the relation between muscular strength and bone density in elderly women. Br J Sports Med 2000;34(1):18-22. 10690445ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 8. Brinkman GL, Coates EO Jr. The effect of bronchitis, smoking, and occupation on ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1963;87: 684-693. 14015517PubMed
  • 9. Miyatake N, Wada J, Saito T, Nishikawa H, Matsumoto S, Miyachi M, et al. Comparison of muscle strength between Japanese men with and without metabolic syndrome. Acta Med Okayama 2007;61(2):99-102. 17471310PubMed
  • 10. Kigawa A, Yamamoto T, Koyama Y, Kageyama S, Arima K. Evaluation of knee extensor strength for prevention of sports injury. Jpn Orthop Soc Sports Med 1987;6: 141-145. (Japanese)
  • 11. Kumar PR, Kumar NV. Effect of cigarette smoking on muscle strength of flexibility of athletes. Indian J Exp Biol 1998;36(11):1144-1146. 10085784PubMed
  • 12. Lee JS, Auyeung TW, Kwok T, Lau EM, Leung PC, Woo J. Associated factors and health impact of sarcopenia in older chinese men and women: a cross-sectional study. Gerontology 2007;53(6):404-410. 17700027ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Kok MO, Hoekstra T, Twisk JW. The longitudinal relation between smoking and muscle strength in healthy adults. Eur Addict Res 2012;18(2):70-75. 22178906ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. The national nutrition survey in Japan. cited 2012 Aug 14. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/2008/04/dl/h0430-2g.pdf (Japanese)
  • 15. Miyatake N, Saito T, Miyachi M, Tabata I, Numata T. Evaluation of muscle strength and its relation to exercise habits in Japanese. Acta Med Okayama 2009;63(3):151-155. 19571902PubMed
  • 16. Szulc P, Duboeuf F, Marchand F, Delmas PD. Hormonal and lifestyle determinants of appendicular skeletal muscle mass in men: the MINOS study. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(2):496-503. 15277176ArticlePubMed
Table 1.
Clinical profiles and comparison of parameters between smoking and non-smoking subjects
Current smokers Nonsmokers p-value
No. of subjects 1618 2631
Age 40.8±12.5 44.9±14.5<0.001 <0.001
Height (cm) 169.6±5.9 168.7±6.3<0.001 <0.001
Body weight (kg) 70.8±12.1 70.1±11.4 0.03
Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.6±3.8 24.6±3.5 0.99
Right grip strength (kg) 44.9±8.0 43.3±8.4 <0.001
Left grip strength (kg) 42.9±7.6 41.2±8.0 <0.001
Leg strength (kg) 66.6±16.9 64.8±17.5 0.001
Leg strength/body weight 0.95±0.22 0.93±0.23 0.01
Subjects with exercise habits 424 (28.6%) 1057 (71.4%) <0.001

Values are presented as mean±SD.

Table 2.
Comparison of muscle strength between smoking and non-smoking men by age group
Current smokers Nonsmokers p-value
20-29 y
 No. of subjects 379 477
 Right grip strength (kg) 47.3±7.7 46.4±7.6 0.10
 Left grip strength (kg) 44.8±7.5 43.8±7.3 0.05
 Leg strength (kg) 71.6±16.3 72.7±16.7 0.33
 Leg strength/body weight 1.02±0.22 1.06±0.23 0.01
30-39 y
 No. of subjects 437 591
 Right grip strength (kg) 46.7±7.2 45.9±7.7 0.11
 Left grip strength (kg) 44.6±7.0 43.6±7.3 0.02
 Leg strength (kg) 69.7±16.7 71.1±16.8 0.17
 Leg strength/body weight 0.98±0.21 1.00±0.23 0.19
40-49 y
 No. of subjects 375 526
 Right grip strength (kg) 45.7±7.4 45.3±7.8 0.45
 Left grip strength (kg) 43.8±6.9 43.5±7.3 0.44
 Leg strength (kg) 68.6±15.3 67.7±16.2 0.41
 Leg strength/body weight 0.96±0.21 0.94±0.21 0.16
50-59 y
 No. of subjects 292 598
 Right grip strength (kg) 42.1±7.1 42.4±7.5 0.62
 Left grip strength (kg) 40.3±6.7 40.5±7.5 0.82
 Leg strength (kg) 60.7±14.8 61.6±14.4 0.41
 Leg strength/body weight 0.88±0.19 0.89±0.19 0.46
60-69 y
 No. of subjects 113 429
 Right grip strength (kg) 36.8±6.9 37.4±6.8 0.43
 Left grip strength (kg) 36.0±6.5 36.0±6.6 0.99
 Leg strength (kg) 51.4±12.4 53.2±13.0 0.19
 Leg strength/body weight 0.79±0.18 0.81±0.19 0.36
70-79 y
 No. of subjects 22 110
 Right grip strength (kg) 33.5±7.4 32.3±7.0 0.45
 Left grip strength (kg) 31.3±7.3 30.7±6.7 0.71
 Leg strength (kg) 41.3±12.2 41.6±10.5 0.85
 Leg strength/body weight 0.69±0.19 0.66±0.18 0.49

Values are presented as mean±SD.

Table 3.
Relationship between muscle strength and Brinkman index
Correlation coefficient Partial correlation coefficient1
Right grip strength (kg) -0.208 0.020
Left grip strength (kg) -0.197 0.012
Leg strength (kg) -0.200 0.010
Leg strength/body weight -0.208 0.013

1 Adjusting for age, height and body weight.

Table 4.
The relationship between cigarette smoking and exercise habits
Regular exercise habits No exercise habits p-value p-value1
Current smokers 424 (26.2) 1194 (73.8) <0.001 <0.001
Nonsmokers 1057 (40.2) 1574 (59.8)

Values are presented as number (%).

1 Adjusting for age, height and body weight.

Table 5.
Comparison of muscle strength between smokers by Brinkman index
Brinkman index ≥400 Brinkman index <400 p-value p-value1 p-value2
No. of subjects 847 771
Right grip strength (kg) 43.8±8.0 46.2±7.8 <0.001 <0.001 0.004
Left grip strength (kg) 41.9±7.5 44.1±7.5 <0.001 <0.001 0.001
Leg strength (kg) 64.0±16.7 69.5±16.6 <0.001 <0.001 0.37
Leg strength/ body weight 0.91±0.21 0.99±0.22 <0.001 0.03 0.38

1 Adjusting for age.

2 Adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits.

Table 6.
Relationship between degree of smoking and muscle strength by logistic regression analysis
Right grip strength (kg) Left grip strength (kg) Leg strength (kg) Leg strength/body weight
Current smokers (400≤Brinkman index) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
Current smokers (Brinkman index <400) 0.983 (0.968, 0.998) 0.987 (0.971, 1.002) 0.993 (0.985, 1.000) 0.609 (0.360, 1.031)
Nonsmokers 0.974 (0.963, 0.986) 0.971 (0.960, 0.983) 0.997 (0.991, 1.003) 0.819 (0.548, 1.224)

Data are expressed as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

Adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Examining factors contributing to the socioeconomic inequalities in handgrip strength among older adults in India: a decomposition analysis
      Manacy Pai, T. Muhammad
      Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Association of smoking cessation with dynapenia among older lifetime smokers in Korea
      Keunjoong Yoo, Yong Soon Park, Hye Jin Kim, Jeong Hyeon Kim
      Tobacco Induced Diseases.2024; 22(August): 1.     CrossRef
    • Association between Handgrip Strength, Skinfold Thickness, and Trunk Strength among University Students
      Snehil Dixit, Kumar Gular, Ajay Prashad Gautam, Ravi Shankar Reddy, Irshad Ahmad, Jaya Shanker Tedla, Vani Taneja
      Diagnostics.2023; 13(5): 904.     CrossRef
    • The impact of monthly air pollution exposure and its interaction with individual factors: Insight from a large cohort study of comprehensive hospitalizations in Guangzhou area
      Xu Ju, Wumitijiang Yimaer, Zhicheng Du, Xinran Wang, Huanle Cai, Shirui Chen, Yuqin Zhang, Gonghua Wu, Wenjing Wu, Xiao Lin, Ying Wang, Jie Jiang, Weihua Hu, Wangjian Zhang, Yuantao Hao
      Frontiers in Public Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The immediate effect of thoracolumbar manipulation and diaphragmatic release on inspiratory muscle strength in healthy smokers: A randomized clinical trial
      Ali Albarrati, Mohammed Taher, Rakan Nazer, Thamer Alshameri
      Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2022; 35(1): 85.     CrossRef
    • Comparison of Neck Circumference, Waist Circumference, and Skinfold Thickness in Measuring the Subcutaneous Fat Distribution and Their Association with Handgrip Strength: Cross-Sectional Study
      Faisal Asiri, Snehil Dixit, Saud F. Alsubaie, Kumar Gular, Adel Alshahrani, Ravi Shankar Reddy, Ajay Prashad Gautam, Jaya Shanker Tedla
      International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(21): 14283.     CrossRef
    • Association of dietary and lifestyle inflammation scores with muscle strength and muscle endurance among Tehranian adults
      Elaheh Asgari, Kurosh Djafarian, Sakineh Shab-Bidar
      Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • A nomogram predicting subclinical extension of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese individuals
      Pingping Lin, Sainan Zhu, Guohong Zhang, Yuanshen Huang, Ping Tu, Shuxia Yang, Hang Li
      Medicine.2021; 100(7): e24767.     CrossRef
    • Energy Intake Is Highly Associated with Handgrip Strength in Community-Dwelling Elderly Adults
      Ronit Doyev, Rachel Axelrod, Lital Keinan-Boker, Tal Shimony, Rebecca Goldsmith, Lesley Nitsan, Rita Dichtiar, Tali Sinai
      The Journal of Nutrition.2021; 151(5): 1249.     CrossRef
    • Preliminary screening for sarcopenia and related risk factors among the elderly
      Li-Chu Wu, Hsueh-Hui Kao, Hong-Jhe Chen, Pin-Fang Huang
      Medicine.2021; 100(19): e25946.     CrossRef
    • Healthy Behaviors Associated with Changes in Mental and Physical Strength in Urban African American and White Adults
      Marie Fanelli Kuczmarski, Elizabeth Orsega-Smith, Nicolle A. Mode, Rita Rawal, Michele K. Evans, Alan B. Zonderman
      Nutrients.2021; 13(6): 1824.     CrossRef
    • Association of Cigarette Smoking with Muscle Mass Reduction and Low Muscle Strength in Community-Dwelling Elderly Men
      Eriko NOGAMI, Nobuyuki MIYAI, Yan ZHANG, Masato SAKAGUCHI, Hiroko HAYAKAWA, Sonomi HATTORI, Miyoko UTSUMI, Yuji UEMATSU, Mikio ARITA
      Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi (Japanese Journal of Hygiene) .2021; 76: n/a.     CrossRef
    • Weakened Grip Strength Over 40 Years in a Community-Dwelling Cohort in Tanushimaru, Japan
      TAKAHIRO YOSHIKAWA, KEN-ICHIRO SASAKI, HISASHI ADACHI, TATSUYUKI KAKUMA, SACHIKO HATADA-KATAKABE, YUUKI TAKATA, YOSHIHIRO FUKUMOTO
      The Kurume Medical Journal.2021; 68(3.4): 191.     CrossRef
    • Clusters of cardiovascular risk factors and its association with muscle strength in adults
      Tiago Rodrigues de Lima, David A. González-Chica, Diego A. Santos Silva
      The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • The association between healthy lifestyle score with cardiorespiratory fitness and muscle strength
      Saba Mohammadpour, Mahtab Ghanbari, Hossein Shahinfar, Fateme Gholami, Kurosh Djafarian, Sakineh Shab‐Bidar
      International Journal of Clinical Practice.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Periodontal status of 33–44-year-old male bodybuilders and its relationship with protein supplement intake: An observational comparative study
      Fawaz Pullishery, AbdulrahmanMohammed Dada, MohammedRoshdy Aboelaza, MohamedAbdelmegid Shalaby
      Advances in Human Biology.2020; 10(3): 176.     CrossRef
    • Physical Exercise−Mediated Changes in Redox Profile Contribute to Muscle Remodeling After Passive Hand-Rolled Cornhusk Cigarette Smoke Exposure
      Anand Thirupathi, Silvia Scarparo, Paulo L. Silva, Luis F. Marqueze, Franciane T. F. Vasconcelos, Seigo Nagashima, Eduardo B. B. Cunha, Lúcia de Noronha, Paulo C. L. Silveira, Renata T. Nesi, Yaodong Gu, Ricardo A. Pinho
      Frontiers in Physiology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Comparison of functional exercise capacity, quality of life and respiratory and peripheral muscle strength between patients with stable angina and healthy controls
      Irem Huzmeli, Aysel-Yildiz Ozer, Oguz Akkus, Nihan Katayıfcı, Fatih Sen, Saadet Ufuk Yurdalan, Mine Gulden Polat
      Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Relationship between Smoking History and Diaphragm Thickness and Muscle Strength in Young Men
      Nan-Soo Kim, Young-Su Park
      Archives of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy.2020; 16(2): 65.     CrossRef
    • Muscle Dysfunction in Smokers and Patients With Mild COPD
      Jéssica Fonseca, Aline Gonçalves Nellessen, Fabio Pitta
      Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention.2019; 39(4): 241.     CrossRef
    • Handgrip strength and associated sociodemographic and lifestyle factors: A systematic review of the adult population
      Tiago Rodrigues de Lima, Diego Augusto Santos Silva, João Antônio Chula de Castro, Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro
      Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2017; 21(2): 401.     CrossRef
    • La dysfonction musculaire en cas de tabagisme actif
      S. Rouatbi, S. Ben Moussa, F. Guezguez, H. Ben Saad
      Science & Sports.2017; 32(4): e119.     CrossRef
    • The Relationship Between Lower Limb Bone and Muscle in Military Recruits, Response to Physical Training and Influence of Smoking Status
      Zudin Puthucheary, Mehdi Kordi, Jai Rawal, Kyriacos I. Eleftheriou, John Payne, Hugh E. Montgomery
      Scientific Reports.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
    • Relationship between cigarette smoking and one leg with eyes closed balance in Japanese men
      Takeshi Saito, Nobuyuki Miyatake, Kenji Nishii
      Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine.2015; 20(5): 388.     CrossRef

    Relationship Between Cigarette Smoking and Muscle Strength in Japanese Men
    Relationship Between Cigarette Smoking and Muscle Strength in Japanese Men
    Current smokers Nonsmokers p-value
    No. of subjects 1618 2631
    Age 40.8±12.5 44.9±14.5<0.001 <0.001
    Height (cm) 169.6±5.9 168.7±6.3<0.001 <0.001
    Body weight (kg) 70.8±12.1 70.1±11.4 0.03
    Body mass index (kg/m2) 24.6±3.8 24.6±3.5 0.99
    Right grip strength (kg) 44.9±8.0 43.3±8.4 <0.001
    Left grip strength (kg) 42.9±7.6 41.2±8.0 <0.001
    Leg strength (kg) 66.6±16.9 64.8±17.5 0.001
    Leg strength/body weight 0.95±0.22 0.93±0.23 0.01
    Subjects with exercise habits 424 (28.6%) 1057 (71.4%) <0.001
    Current smokers Nonsmokers p-value
    20-29 y
     No. of subjects 379 477
     Right grip strength (kg) 47.3±7.7 46.4±7.6 0.10
     Left grip strength (kg) 44.8±7.5 43.8±7.3 0.05
     Leg strength (kg) 71.6±16.3 72.7±16.7 0.33
     Leg strength/body weight 1.02±0.22 1.06±0.23 0.01
    30-39 y
     No. of subjects 437 591
     Right grip strength (kg) 46.7±7.2 45.9±7.7 0.11
     Left grip strength (kg) 44.6±7.0 43.6±7.3 0.02
     Leg strength (kg) 69.7±16.7 71.1±16.8 0.17
     Leg strength/body weight 0.98±0.21 1.00±0.23 0.19
    40-49 y
     No. of subjects 375 526
     Right grip strength (kg) 45.7±7.4 45.3±7.8 0.45
     Left grip strength (kg) 43.8±6.9 43.5±7.3 0.44
     Leg strength (kg) 68.6±15.3 67.7±16.2 0.41
     Leg strength/body weight 0.96±0.21 0.94±0.21 0.16
    50-59 y
     No. of subjects 292 598
     Right grip strength (kg) 42.1±7.1 42.4±7.5 0.62
     Left grip strength (kg) 40.3±6.7 40.5±7.5 0.82
     Leg strength (kg) 60.7±14.8 61.6±14.4 0.41
     Leg strength/body weight 0.88±0.19 0.89±0.19 0.46
    60-69 y
     No. of subjects 113 429
     Right grip strength (kg) 36.8±6.9 37.4±6.8 0.43
     Left grip strength (kg) 36.0±6.5 36.0±6.6 0.99
     Leg strength (kg) 51.4±12.4 53.2±13.0 0.19
     Leg strength/body weight 0.79±0.18 0.81±0.19 0.36
    70-79 y
     No. of subjects 22 110
     Right grip strength (kg) 33.5±7.4 32.3±7.0 0.45
     Left grip strength (kg) 31.3±7.3 30.7±6.7 0.71
     Leg strength (kg) 41.3±12.2 41.6±10.5 0.85
     Leg strength/body weight 0.69±0.19 0.66±0.18 0.49
    Correlation coefficient Partial correlation coefficient1
    Right grip strength (kg) -0.208 0.020
    Left grip strength (kg) -0.197 0.012
    Leg strength (kg) -0.200 0.010
    Leg strength/body weight -0.208 0.013
    Regular exercise habits No exercise habits p-value p-value1
    Current smokers 424 (26.2) 1194 (73.8) <0.001 <0.001
    Nonsmokers 1057 (40.2) 1574 (59.8)
    Brinkman index ≥400 Brinkman index <400 p-value p-value1 p-value2
    No. of subjects 847 771
    Right grip strength (kg) 43.8±8.0 46.2±7.8 <0.001 <0.001 0.004
    Left grip strength (kg) 41.9±7.5 44.1±7.5 <0.001 <0.001 0.001
    Leg strength (kg) 64.0±16.7 69.5±16.6 <0.001 <0.001 0.37
    Leg strength/ body weight 0.91±0.21 0.99±0.22 <0.001 0.03 0.38
    Right grip strength (kg) Left grip strength (kg) Leg strength (kg) Leg strength/body weight
    Current smokers (400≤Brinkman index) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference) 1.0 (reference)
    Current smokers (Brinkman index <400) 0.983 (0.968, 0.998) 0.987 (0.971, 1.002) 0.993 (0.985, 1.000) 0.609 (0.360, 1.031)
    Nonsmokers 0.974 (0.963, 0.986) 0.971 (0.960, 0.983) 0.997 (0.991, 1.003) 0.819 (0.548, 1.224)
    Table 1. Clinical profiles and comparison of parameters between smoking and non-smoking subjects

    Values are presented as mean±SD.

    Table 2. Comparison of muscle strength between smoking and non-smoking men by age group

    Values are presented as mean±SD.

    Table 3. Relationship between muscle strength and Brinkman index

    Adjusting for age, height and body weight.

    Table 4. The relationship between cigarette smoking and exercise habits

    Values are presented as number (%).

    Adjusting for age, height and body weight.

    Table 5. Comparison of muscle strength between smokers by Brinkman index

    Adjusting for age.

    Adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits.

    Table 6. Relationship between degree of smoking and muscle strength by logistic regression analysis

    Data are expressed as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

    Adjusting for age, height, body weight, and exercise habits.


    JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    TOP