Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Original Articles

Reconstruction of Radiation Dose Received by Diagnostic Radiologic Technologists in Korea: Yeongchull Choi, Jaeyoung Kim, Jung Jeung Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Won Jin Lee; J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(5):288-300. Published online August 23, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.064

9,154 View
152 Download
8 Crossref

Objectives
Diagnostic medical radiation workers in Korea have been officially monitored for their occupational radiation doses since 1996. The purpose of this study was to design models for reconstructing unknown individual radiation doses to which diagnostic radiation technologists were exposed before 1996.
Methods
Radiation dose reconstruction models were developed by using cross-sectional survey data and the personal badge doses of 8167 radiologic technologists. The models included calendar year and age as predictors, and the participants were grouped into six categories according to their sex and facility type. The annual doses between 1971 and 1995 for those who were employed before 1996 were estimated using these models.
Results
The calendar year and age were inversely related to the estimated radiation doses in the models of all six groups. The annual median estimated doses decreased from 9.45 mSv in 1971 to 1.26 mSv in 1995, and the associated dose variation also decreased with time. The estimated median badge doses from 1996 (1.22 mSv) to 2011 (0.30 mSv) were similar to the measured doses (1.68 mSv to 0.21 mSv) for the same years. Similar results were observed for all six groups.
Conclusions
The reconstruction models developed in this study may be useful for estimating historical occupational radiation doses received by medical radiologic technologists in Korea.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Trends in Occupational Radiation Doses for U.S. Radiologic Technologists Performing General Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Procedures, 1980–2015
Daphnée Villoing, David Borrego, Dale L. Preston, Bruce H. Alexander, André Rose, Mark Salasky, Martha S. Linet, Choonsik Lee, Cari M. Kitahara
Radiology.2021; 300(3): 605. CrossRef
Estimation of the historical radiation dose of Korean radiation workers, 1961–1983
Dalnim Lee, Won Jin Lee, Young Woo Jin, Jiyeong Kim, Soojin Park, Sunhoo Park, Songwon Seo
Journal of Radiological Protection.2021; 41(4): 1005. CrossRef
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE CHARACTERISTICS AND FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH RADIATION DOSES AMONG KOREAN RADIATION WORKERS
Jiyeong Kim, Songwon Seo, Dal Nim Lee, Soojin Park, Ki-Jung Im, Sunhoo Park, Young Woo Jin
Radiation Protection Dosimetry.2020; 189(1): 106. CrossRef
Thyroid cancer risks among medical radiation workers in South Korea, 1996–2015
Won Jin Lee, Dale L. Preston, Eun Shil Cha, Seulki Ko, Hyeyeun Lim
Environmental Health.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
ESTIMATION OF ORGAN DOSES AMONG DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL RADIATION WORKERS IN SOUTH KOREA
Yeongchull Choi, Eun Shil Cha, Ye Jin Bang, Seulki Ko, Mina Ha, Choonsik Lee, Won Jin Lee
Radiation Protection Dosimetry.2018; 179(2): 142. CrossRef
Projected lifetime cancer risks from occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea
Won Jin Lee, Yeongchull Choi, Seulki Ko, Eun Shil Cha, Jaeyoung Kim, Young Min Kim, Kyoung Ae Kong, Songwon Seo, Ye Jin Bang, Yae Won Ha
BMC Cancer.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessing the health effects associated with occupational radiation exposure in Korean radiation workers: protocol for a prospective cohort study
Songwon Seo, Wan Young Lim, Dal Nim Lee, Jung Un Kim, Eun Shil Cha, Ye Jin Bang, Won Jin Lee, Sunhoo Park, Young Woo Jin
BMJ Open.2018; 8(3): e017359. CrossRef
Occupational radiation exposure and its health effects on interventional medical workers: study protocol for a prospective cohort study
Seulki Ko, Hwan Hoon Chung, Sung Bum Cho, Young Woo Jin, Kwang Pyo Kim, Mina Ha, Ye Jin Bang, Yae Won Ha, Won Jin Lee
BMJ Open.2017; 7(12): e018333. CrossRef

Psychological Distress and Occupational Injury: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey 2000-2003.: Jaeyoung Kim; J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(3):200-207.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.200

5,573 View
71 Download
24 Crossref

Abstract PDF

OBJECTIVES
This study examined whether serious psychological distress (SPD) is associated with occupational injury among US employees. METHODS: The employed population aged 18-64 years was examined (n=101,855) using data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2000-2003. SPD was measured using the Kessler 6-item Psychological Distress Scale (K-6), a screening scale designed to identify persons with serious mental illness. The predicted marginal prevalence of psychological distress and occupational injury with the adjusted odds ratio were estimated using multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The age-adjusted 3-month prevalence of occupational injury was 0.80+/-0.12% in workers with SPD, which was 37% greater than in workers without SPD (0.58+/-0.03%). The odds of occupational injury in workers with SPD were higher compared to workers without SPD (OR=1.34, 95% CI=0.93-1.92), after controlling for sex, age, race, education, occupation, and activity limitation by at least one medical condition. Male, service and blue collar occupation, and activity limiation by co-morbidity showed significantly higher odds of occupational injury for workers with SPD. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that SPD accounts for an increased likelihood of occupational injury among US employees. A further longitudinal study is needed to differentiate the mechanism or causal pathways linking individual injury risk at the workplace, SPD, and socioeconomic factors.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The psychological responses of British amateur point-to-point jockeys to personal injury
E. Davies, L. Steel
Comparative Exercise Physiology.2023; 19(1): 1. CrossRef
Application of Forecasting as an Element of Effective Management in the Field of Improving Occupational Health and Safety in the Steel Industry in Poland
Tomasz Małysa
Sustainability.2022; 14(3): 1351. CrossRef
Is Injury an Occupational Hazard for Horseracing Staff?
Emma Davies, Will McConn-Palfreyman, John K. Parker, Lorna J. Cameron, Jane M. Williams
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(4): 2054. CrossRef
Concurrent Mental Illness and Financial Barriers to Mental Health Care Among a Nationally Representative Sample of Orthopaedic Trauma Survivors
Tarun K. Jella, Thomas B. Cwalina, Heather A. Vallier
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma.2022; 36(12): 665. CrossRef
A narrative review of the risk factors and psychological consequences of injury in horseracing stable staff
E. Davies, W. McConn-Palfreyman, J.M. Williams, G.P. Lovell
Comparative Exercise Physiology.2021; 17(4): 303. CrossRef
Occupational injury and psychological distress among U.S. workers: The National Health Interview Survey, 2004–2016
Ja K. Gu, Luenda E. Charles, Desta Fekedulegn, Claudia C. Ma, John M. Violanti, Michael E. Andrew
Journal of Safety Research.2020; 74: 207. CrossRef
The Impact of COVID-19 on Staff Working Practices in UK Horseracing
Emma Davies, Will McConn-Palfreyman, Jane M. Williams, Geoff P. Lovell
Animals.2020; 10(11): 2003. CrossRef
Does organizational climate moderate the relationship between job stress and intent to stay?
Louis Tze-Ngai Vong, Henrique Fátima Boyol Ngan, Patrick Chun-Pong Lo
Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management.2018; 9(1): 2. CrossRef
Self-reported occupational injuries among industrial beef slaughterhouse workers in the Midwestern United States
Jessica H. Leibler, Melissa J. Perry
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene.2017; 14(1): 23. CrossRef
Prevalence of serious psychological distress among slaughterhouse workers at a United States beef packing plant
Jessica H. Leibler, Patricia A. Janulewicz, Melissa J. Perry
Work.2017; 57(1): 105. CrossRef
Acute joint pain in the emerging green collar workforce: Evidence from the linked National Health Interview Survey and Occupational Information Network (O*NET)
Samuel R. Huntley, David J. Lee, William G. LeBlanc, Kristopher L. Arheart, Laura A. McClure, Lora E. Fleming, Alberto J. Caban‐Martinez
American Journal of Industrial Medicine.2017; 60(6): 518. CrossRef
Systematic review of stress-related injury vulnerability in athletic and occupational contexts
Harnoor Singh, David E. Conroy
Psychology of Sport and Exercise.2017; 33: 37. CrossRef
Injury modules in national surveys as a source of injury data in low and middle income countries
Safa Abdalla
Injury Prevention.2017; 23(3): 149. CrossRef
On-Duty Nonfatal Injury that Lead to Work Absences Among Police Officers and Level of Perceived Stress
Christine West, Desta Fekedulegn, Michael Andrew, Cecil M. Burchfiel, Siobán Harlow, C. Raymond Bingham, Marjorie McCullagh, Sung Kyun Park, John Violanti
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine.2017; 59(11): 1084. CrossRef
Changing Rates of Suicide Ideation and Attempts Among Inuit Youth: A Gender‐Based Analysis of Risk and Protective Factors
Sarah L. Fraser, Dominique Geoffroy, Eduardo Chachamovich, Laurence J. Kirmayer
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.2015; 45(2): 141. CrossRef
Higher psychological distress is associated with unintentional injuries in US adults
Jana McAninch, Christina Greene, John D Sorkin, Marie-Claude Lavoie, Gordon S Smith
Injury Prevention.2014; 20(4): 258. CrossRef
Serious psychological distress among non-Hispanic whites in the United States: the importance of nativity status and region of birth
Florence J. Dallo, Tiffany B. Kindratt, Tracy Snell
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.2013; 48(12): 1923. CrossRef
Injury among a population based sample of career firefighters in the central USA
Sara A Jahnke, Walker S Carlos Poston, Christopher Keith Haddock, Nattinee Jitnarin
Injury Prevention.2013; 19(6): 393. CrossRef
A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Fatigue-related Risk Factors for Occupational Injury
A. Arlinghaus, D. A. Lombardi, J. L. Willetts, S. Folkard, D. C. Christiani
American Journal of Epidemiology.2012; 176(7): 597. CrossRef
Performance of the 6-item Kessler scale for measuring serious mental illness in Hong Kong
Sing Lee, Adley Tsang, King Lam Ng, Yee Ling Ma, Wanjun Guo, Arthur Mak, Kathleen Kwok
Comprehensive Psychiatry.2012; 53(5): 584. CrossRef
The association between general psychological distress and delusional-like experiences: A large population-based study
Sukanta Saha, James G. Scott, Daniel Varghese, John J. McGrath
Schizophrenia Research.2011; 127(1-3): 246. CrossRef
Job strain and other work conditions: relationships with psychological distress among civil servants in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Claudia S. Lopes, Ricardo Araya, Guilherme L. Werneck, Dóra Chor, Eduardo Faerstein
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.2010; 45(3): 345. CrossRef
Validity Study of Kessler’s Psychological Distress Scales Conducted Among Patients Admitted to French Emergency Department for Alcohol Consumption–Related Disorders
Benjamin Arnaud, Laurent Malet, Frédérique Teissedre, Marie Izaute, Fares Moustafa, Julie Geneste, Jeannot Schmidt, Pierre‐Michel Llorca, Georges Brousse
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research.2010; 34(7): 1235. CrossRef
Associations between psychological distress, workplace accidents, workplace failures and workplace successes
Michael F. Hilton, Harvey A. Whiteford
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.2010; 83(8): 923. CrossRef

Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening among US Women: Trends from 2000 to 2005.: Jaeyoung Kim, Soong Nang Jang; J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(3):186-194.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.186

6,424 View
88 Download
47 Crossref

Abstract PDF

OBJECTIVES
This study describes trends in the socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women aged 40 or over, from 2000 to 2005. We assessed 1) the disparities in each socioeconomic dimension; 2) the changes in screening mammography rates over time according to income, education, and race; and 3) the sizes and trends of the disparities over time. METHODS: Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 2000 to 2005, we calculated the age-adjusted screening rate according to relative household income, education level, health insurance, and race. Odds ratios and the relative inequality index (RII) were also calculated, controlling for age. RESULTS: Women in their 40s and those with lower relative incomes were less likely to undergo screening mammography. The disparity based on relative income was greater than that based on education or race (the RII among low-income women across the survey years was 3.00 to 3.48). The overall participation rate and absolute differences among socioeconomic groups changed little or decreased slightly across the survey years. However, the degree of each socioeconomic disparity and the relative inequality among socioeconomic positions remained quite consistent. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the trend of the disparity in breast cancer screening varied by socioeconomic dimension. ontinued differences in breast cancer screening rates related to income level should be considered in future efforts to decrease the disparities in breast cancer among socioeconomic groups. More focused interventions, as well as the monitoring of trends in cancer screening participation by income and education, are needed in different social settings.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Advancing Mammographic Screening Among Underserved Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Strategies to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake
Allegra Ferrari, Deborah Jael Herrera, Wessel Van De Veerdonk, Wendy D’haenens, Andrea Ruiz Alejos, Nigus Bililign Yimer, Sheila Orwa, Liesbet Van Bos, Sarah Talboom, Lilu Ding, Mathieu Goossens, Guido Van Hal
Public Health Reviews.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Socioeconomic disparities in mammography screening in the United States from 2012 to 2020
Mariko Ando, Aki Yazawa, Ichiro Kawachi
Social Science & Medicine.2024; 340: 116443. CrossRef
Coverage of mammography imaging in and outside an organized breast cancer screening program – variation by age and sociodemographic groups
Joanna Fuhrmann, Sirpa Heinävaara, Tytti Sarkeala, Milla Lehtinen, Maiju Pankakoski
Acta Oncologica.2024; 63: 833. CrossRef
Effect of residence in nonmetropolitan counties on stage and tumor size at diagnosis in patients with breast cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis
Jorge Benavides‐Vasquez, Chan Shen, Alicia McDonald, Li Wang
The Journal of Rural Health.2023; 39(2): 408. CrossRef
Factors Associated With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Women With Dense Breasts
Matthew M Miller, Ramapriya Ganti, Kathy Repich, James T Patrie, Roger T Anderson, Jennifer A Harvey
Journal of Breast Imaging.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of COVID-19 and Socioeconomic Factors on Delays in High-Risk MRI Breast Cancer Screening
Helena Teng, Wilfred Dang, Belinda Curpen
Tomography.2022; 8(5): 2171. CrossRef
Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient-Reported Deterrents to Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening of Patients With Dense Breasts
Matthew M. Miller, Kathy Repich, James T. Patrie, Roger T. Anderson, Jennifer A. Harvey
American Journal of Roentgenology.2021; 217(5): 1069. CrossRef
Women’s Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada
Cynthia Mbuya Bienge, Nora Pashayan, Jennifer Brooks, Michel Dorval, Jocelyne Chiquette, Laurence Eloy, Annie Turgeon, Laurence Lambert-Côté, Jean-Sébastien Paquette, Emmanuelle Lévesque, Julie Hagan, Meghan Walker, Julie Lapointe, Gratien Dalpé, Palmira
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(2): 95. CrossRef
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening volumes and patient screening behaviors
Matthew M. Miller, Max O. Meneveau, Carrie M. Rochman, Anneke T. Schroen, Courtney M. Lattimore, Patricia A. Gaspard, Richard S. Cubbage, Shayna L. Showalter
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2021; 189(1): 237. CrossRef
Negative impact of the COVID-19 state of emergency on breast cancer screening participation in Japan
Yasuhiro Toyoda, Kota Katanoda, Kanako Ishii, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Takahiro Tabuchi
Breast Cancer.2021; 28(6): 1340. CrossRef
Influencia de la vía diagnóstica en la clínica y el uso de terapias no convencionales en mujeres con cáncer de mama de la cohorte DAMA
Isabel Torá-Rocamora, Jaume Grau, Blanca Oliver-Vall-llosera, Xavier Bargalló, Marta Aldea, Rosa Puigpinós-Riera
Gaceta Sanitaria.2020; 34(2): 157. CrossRef
Socioeconomic disparity trends in diagnostic imaging, treatments, and survival for non‐small cell lung cancer 2007‐2016
Monica Shah, Ambica Parmar, Kelvin K. W. Chan
Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3407. CrossRef
Financial Hardship, Healthcare Utilization, and Health Among U.S. Cancer Survivors
Zhiyuan Zheng, Xuesong Han, Jingxuan Zhao, Matthew P. Banegas, Reginald Tucker-Seeley, Ashish Rai, Stacey A. Fedewa, Weishan Song, Ahmedin Jemal, K. Robin Yabroff
American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2020; 59(1): 68. CrossRef
The breast cancer paradox: A systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe
Dinah Smith, Katie Thomson, Clare Bambra, Adam Todd
Cancer Epidemiology.2019; 60: 77. CrossRef
Long-Term Impact of a Culturally Tailored Patient Navigation Program on Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening in Refugee Women After the Program's End
Sebastian A. Rodriguez-Torres, Anne Marie McCarthy, Wei He, Jeffrey M. Ashburner, Sanja Percac-Lima
Health Equity.2019; 3(1): 205. CrossRef
Prevalence of and factors associated with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening among World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees, 2015–2016
Janette Yung, Jiehui Li, Hannah T. Jordan, James E. Cone
Preventive Medicine Reports.2018; 11: 81. CrossRef
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Stomach Cancer Screening in Korea, 2005–2015: After the Introduction of the National Cancer Screening Program
Eun-young Lee, Yoon Young Lee, Mina Suh, Eunji Choi, Tran Thi Xuan Mai, Hyunsoon Cho, Boyoung Park, Jae Kwan Jun, Yeol Kim, Jin Kyung Oh, Moran Ki, Kui Son Choi
Yonsei Medical Journal.2018; 59(8): 923. CrossRef
Racial Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Ahmed T. Ahmed, Brian T. Welch, Waleed Brinjikji, Wigdan H. Farah, Tara L. Henrichsen, M. Hassan Murad, John M. Knudsen
Journal of the American College of Radiology.2017; 14(2): 157. CrossRef
Baby Boomers and Birth Certificates: Early-Life Socioeconomic Status and Cancer Risk in Adulthood
Antoinette M. Stroup, Kimberly A. Herget, Heidi A. Hanson, Diana Lane Reed, Jared T. Butler, Kevin A. Henry, C. Janna Harrell, Carol Sweeney, Ken R. Smith
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2017; 26(1): 75. CrossRef
Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys
David Mark Kelly, Carla Estaquio, Christophe Léon, Pierre Arwidson, Hermann Nabi
BMJ Open.2017; 7(12): e016941. CrossRef
Disparities in the use of screening magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in community practice by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status
Jennifer S. Haas, Deirdre A. Hill, Robert D. Wellman, Rebecca A. Hubbard, Christoph I. Lee, Karen J. Wernli, Natasha K. Stout, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Louise M. Henderson, Jennifer A. Alford‐Teaster, Tracy L. Onega
Cancer.2016; 122(4): 611. CrossRef
A Community-Based Partnership to Successfully Implement and Maintain a Breast Health Navigation Program
Bettina F. Drake, Shivon Tannan, Victoria V. Anwuri, Sherrill Jackson, Mark Sanford, Jennifer Tappenden, Melody S. Goodman, Graham A. Colditz
Journal of Community Health.2015; 40(6): 1216. CrossRef
National Trends and Disparities in Mammography Among Commercially Insured Women, 2001-2010
J. Frank Wharam, Bruce E. Landon, Xin Xu, Fang Zhang, Dennis Ross-Degnan
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice.2015; 21(5): 426. CrossRef
The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gianfranco Damiani, Danila Basso, Anna Acampora, Caterina B.N.A. Bianchi, Giulia Silvestrini, Emanuela M. Frisicale, Franco Sassi, Walter Ricciardi
Preventive Medicine.2015; 81: 281. CrossRef
Predictors of Non-Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening among Hospitalized Women
Waseem Khaliq, Ali Aamar, Scott M. Wright, Aamir Ahmad
PLOS ONE.2015; 10(12): e0145492. CrossRef
Opportunities and Challenges for the Use of Large-Scale Surveys in Public Health Research: A Comparison of the Assessment of Cancer Screening Behaviors
Jada G. Hamilton, Nancy Breen, Carrie N. Klabunde, Richard P. Moser, Bryan Leyva, Erica S. Breslau, Sarah C. Kobrin
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2015; 24(1): 3. CrossRef
Association Between Individual and Geographic Factors and Nonadherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines
Kevin A Henry, Kaila McDonald, Recinda Sherman, Anita Y Kinney, Antoinette M Stroup
Journal of Women's Health.2014; 23(8): 664. CrossRef
Barriers to Cancer Screening among Medical Aid Program Recipients in the Republic of Korea: A Qualitative Study
Yoon Young Lee, Jae Kwan Jun, Mina Suh, BoYoung Park, Yeol Kim, Kui Son Choi
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2014; 15(2): 589. CrossRef
Changes in access to screening mammography, 2008–2011
Elena B. Elkin, J. Paige Nobles, Laura C. Pinheiro, Coral L. Atoria, Deborah Schrag
Cancer Causes & Control.2013; 24(5): 1057. CrossRef
Commercial Insurance Triples Chances of Breast Cancer Survival in a Public Hospital
Runhua Shi, Glenn Mills, Jerry McLarty, Gary Burton, Zhenzhen Shi, Jonathan Glass
The Breast Journal.2013; 19(6): 664. CrossRef
Breast cancer knowledge and practices among D/deaf women
Barbara A. Berman, Angela Jo, William G. Cumberland, Heidi Booth, Jon Britt, Carolyn Stern, Philip Zazove, Gary Kaufman, Georgia Robins Sadler, Roshan Bastani
Disability and Health Journal.2013; 6(4): 303. CrossRef
Do breast cancer risk factors differ among those who do and do not undertake mammography screening?
Kerri R Beckmann, David M Roder, Janet E Hiller, Gelareh Farshid, John W Lynch
Journal of Medical Screening.2013; 20(4): 208. CrossRef
Attending breast cancer screening alone does not explain the detection of tumours at an early stage
Samiratou Ouédraogo, Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo, Julie Gentil, Marie-Laure Poillot, Vincent Dancourt, Patrick Arveux
European Journal of Cancer Prevention.2013; 22(2): 103. CrossRef
Patient navigation for breast and colorectal cancer in 3 community hospital settings
Elisabeth A. Donaldson, David R. Holtgrave, Renea A. Duffin, Frances Feltner, William Funderburk, Harold P. Freeman
Cancer.2012; 118(19): 4851. CrossRef
Use of Annual Mammography Among Older Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Phyllis Brawarsky, Bridget A. Neville, Garrett M. Fitzmaurice, Michael J. Hassett, Jennifer S. Haas
Journal of General Internal Medicine.2012; 27(5): 500. CrossRef
Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey
N. Duport
Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique.2012; 60(6): 421. CrossRef
Cancer in Relation to Socioeconomic Status
David R. Risser, Eric A. Miller
Southern Medical Journal.2012; 105(10): 508. CrossRef
Using breast cancer quality indicators in a vulnerable population
Formosa Chen, Melissa Puig, Irina Yermilov, Jennifer Malin, Eric C. Schneider, Arnold M. Epstein, Katherine L. Kahn, Patricia A. Ganz, Melinda Maggard Gibbons
Cancer.2011; 117(15): 3311. CrossRef
Use of Evidence-Based Strategies to Promote Mammography Among Medically Underserved Women
Rebecca Lobb, Kelly Morrison Opdyke, Cheryl J. McDonnell, Mary Grace Pagaduan, Marc Hurlbert, Kathryn Gates-Ferris, Banghee Chi, Jennifer D. Allen
American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2011; 40(5): 561. CrossRef
Sociodemographic gradients in breast and cervical cancer screening in Korea: the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS) 2005-2009
Mi Jin Park, Eun-Cheol Park, Kui Son Choi, Jae Kwan Jun, Hoo-Yeon Lee
BMC Cancer.2011;[Epub] CrossRef
Socioeconomic inequalities in attending the mass screening for breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands—associations with stage at diagnosis and survival
M. J. Aarts, A. C. Voogd, L. E. M. Duijm, J. W. W. Coebergh, W. J. Louwman
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2011; 128(2): 517. CrossRef
Impact of age-specific recommendation changes on organized breast screening programs
Heather Bryant, Verna Mai
Preventive Medicine.2011; 53(3): 141. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Mammography Screening in Reducing Breast Cancer Mortality in Women Aged 39–49 Years: A Meta-Analysis
Maria C. Magnus, Ma Ping, Miao Miao Shen, John Bourgeois, Jeanette H. Magnus
Journal of Women's Health.2011; 20(6): 845. CrossRef
Do Community Health Worker Interventions Improve Rates of Screening Mammography in the United States? A Systematic Review
Kristen J. Wells, John S. Luque, Branko Miladinovic, Natalia Vargas, Yasmin Asvat, Richard G. Roetzheim, Ambuj Kumar
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2011; 20(8): 1580. CrossRef
Trends of Mammography Use in a National Breast Cancer Screening Program, 2004-2008
Sun Mi Lim, Hoo-Yeon Lee, Kui Son Choi, Jae Kwan Jun, Eun-Cheol Park, Yeonju Kim, Mi Ah Han, Dong Kwan Oh, Jung Im Shim
Cancer Research and Treatment.2010; 42(4): 199. CrossRef
Trends in Socioeconomic Disparities in Organized and Opportunistic Gastric Cancer Screening in Korea (2005-2009)
Hoo-Yeon Lee, Eun-Cheol Park, Jae Kwan Jun, Myung-Il Hahm, Kyu-Won Jung, Yeonju Kim, Mi Ah Han, Kui Son Choi
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2010; 19(8): 1919. CrossRef
Survival trends in children with hepatoblastoma
John D. Horton, Sukhyung Lee, Shaun R. Brown, Julia Bader, Donald E. Meier
Pediatric Surgery International.2009; 25(5): 407. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search