Objectives Dry eye disease (DED) is an increasingly important public health problem in Korea. Previous studies conducted in Korea have reported inconsistent results regarding the protective effects of vitamin D on DED, and these discrepancies may be related to the relatively simple questionnaire that has been used. Thus, we evaluated the association of serum vitamin D levels with DED using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI).
Methods The present study evaluated data from participants in the Study Group for Environmental Eye Disease (2014-2015). This group included data from 752 participants, and data from 740 participants (253 men and 487 women) were analyzed in the present study. DED severity was evaluated using the OSDI.
Results Higher serum vitamin D levels were associated with a non-significantly reduced risk of DED in the crude analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.991; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.971 to 1.011) and in the adjusted analysis (OR, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.966 to 1.010). In the crude analysis of no/mild DED vs. moderate/severe DED, men exhibited a decreased risk with increasing serum vitamin D levels (OR, 0.999; 95% CI, 0.950 to 1.051), while women exhibited an increased risk (OR, 1.003; 95% CI, 0.979 to 1.027). In these analyses, we found no significant associations.
Conclusions The findings of the present study support previous reports that serum vitamin D levels are not associated with DED.
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Dry Eye Disease: What Is the Role of Vitamin D? Maurizio Rolando, Stefano Barabino International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(2): 1458. CrossRef
Association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with Schirmer tear test 1 and tear film breakup time in dogs Youngsam Kim, Seonmi Kang, Kangmoon Seo Journal of Veterinary Science.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Vitamin D and eye: Current evidence and practice guidelines Bhavya Gorimanipalli, Rohit Shetty, Swaminathan Sethu, Pooja Khamar Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.2023; 71(4): 1127. CrossRef
Serum Vitamin D Levels and Dry Eye Disease in Postmenopausal Women: A Case–Control Study at a Tertiary Care Center in Rural Haryana Diksha Malik, Renu Garg, Sumita Sethi, Rajiv Mahendru, Sanjeet Singh International Journal of Applied & Basic Medical Research.2023; 13(2): 83. CrossRef
Vitamin D and Ocular Diseases: A Systematic Review Hei-Nga Chan, Xiu-Juan Zhang, Xiang-Tian Ling, Christine Huyen-Trang Bui, Yu-Meng Wang, Patrick Ip, Wai-Kit Chu, Li-Jia Chen, Clement C. Tham, Jason C. Yam, Chi-Pui Pang International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(8): 4226. CrossRef
Oral vitamin D3 supplementation for femtosecond LASIK-associated dry eye vitamin D for LASIK dry eye syndrome Ying Lin, Huanjun Su, Jianbin Wu, Muzhi Yuan, Yong Zhang International Ophthalmology.2022; 42(10): 3145. CrossRef
Vitamin D, the Vitamin D Receptor, Calcitriol Analogues and Their Link with Ocular Diseases Miłosz Caban, Urszula Lewandowska Nutrients.2022; 14(11): 2353. CrossRef
Serum Vitamin D Levels and Status in Thai Optic Neuritis Subjects: A Case-Control Study Busayanut Puangsricharoen, Kavin Vanikieti, Panitha Jindahra, Tanyatuth Padungkiatsagul Clinical Ophthalmology.2022; Volume 16: 3381. CrossRef
Research on mechanism of vitamin A combined with regenerated oxidation-reducing nanomedicine in treating rats with dry eye Lei Shi, Ting-Yu Li, Liang-Yu Li, Bao-Ke Hou Materials Express.2022; 12(7): 886. CrossRef
Association Between Dyslipidemia and Dry Eye Syndrome Among the Korean Middle-Aged Population Hye Rin Choi, Jung Hyun Lee, Hyung Keun Lee, Jong Suk Song, Hyeon Chang Kim Cornea.2020; 39(2): 161. CrossRef
Association between vitamin D and dry eye disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Gholamreza Askari, Nahid Rafie, Maryam Miraghajani, Zahra Heidari, Arman Arab Contact Lens and Anterior Eye.2020; 43(5): 418. CrossRef
Vitamin D deficiency is associated with dry eye syndrome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Jing Liu, Yi Dong, Yan Wang Acta Ophthalmologica.2020; 98(8): 749. CrossRef
Nutrition and dry eye: a systematic review Isabel Signes-Soler, Jaime Javaloy Estañ Expert Review of Ophthalmology.2019; 14(3): 133. CrossRef
OBJECTIVES An outbreak of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis (AHC) caused by coxsackie A24 (CA24) virus occurred in South Korea in 2002. CA24 was isolated for the first time from patients with AHC. Therefore, this study was conducted to understand the transmission routes and prevent another AHC outbreaks. METHODS: The authors conducted a questionnaire survey among 1, 730 students from 2 middle schools and 1 technical high school in Gyeongju city. For statistical analysis the chi-square test was used, and chi-square for trend method showing a level of significance less than p< 0.05 was proven to be significant. Variables which were proven to be significant in univariate analysis were analysed by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The attack rate was 57.1%. The student groups with rubbing one's own eyes, computer usage, and sharing cellular phone had a significantly higher AHC attack rate (p< 0.05). According to the multiple logistic regression, the odds ratios for male, high school, computer use, sharing cellular phone, and rubbing one's own eyes were significant (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: The most significant feature of this outbreak was that many students rubbed their own eyes following contact with AHC patients in a deliberate attempt to avoid going to school. Other transmission methods were computer usage and sharing cellular phone. In the future, health and school authorities must plan new strategies for the prevention of AHC.
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of VDT work on eyes and vision among workers in a TV manufacturing plant. The study subjects consisted of 264 screen workers and 74 non-screen workers who were less than 40 years old male and had no history of opthalmic diseases such as corneal opacities, trauma, keratitis, etc and whose visual acuity on pre-employment health examination by Han's test chart was 1.0 or above. The screen workers were divided into two groups by actual time for screen work in a day; Group 1, 60 workers, lesser than 4 hours a day and group 11, 204 workers, more than 4 hours a day. From July to October 1992 a questionnaire was administered to all the study subjects for the general charateristics and subjective eye symptoms after which the opthalmologic tests such as visual acuity, spherical equivalent, lacrimal function, ocular pressure, slit lamp test, fundoscopy were conducted by one opthalmologist. The proportion of workers whose present visual acuity was decreased more than 0. 15 in comparison with that on the pre-employment health examination by Han's test chart was 20.6% in Group Ii, 15.0% in Group I and 14.9% in non-screen workers. However, the differences in proportion were not statistically significant. The proportion of workers with decreased visual acuity was not associated with the age, working duration, use of magnifying glass and type of shift work (independent variables) in all of the three groups. However, screen workers working under poor illumination had a higher proportion of persons with decreased visual acuity than those working under adequate illumination (P<0.05). The proportion of workers whose near vision was decreased was 27.5% in Group II, 18.3% in Group I, and 28.4% in non-screen workers and these differences in proportion were not statistically significant. Changes of near vision were not associated with 4 independent variables in all of the three groups. Six out of sever-subjective eye symptoms except tearing were more common in Group I than in non-screen workers and more common in Group II than in Group I (P<0.01). Mean of the total scores for seven subjective symptoms of each worker (2 points for always, 1 point for sometimes, 0 point for never) was not significantly different between workers with decreased visual acuity and workers with no vision change. However, mean of the total scores for Group II was higher than those for the Group I and non-screen workers (P < 0. 01). Total eye symptom scores were significantly correlated with the grade of screen work, use of magnifying glass, and type of shift work. There was no independent variable which was correlated with the difference in visual acuity between the pre-employment health examination and the present state, the difference between far and near visions, lacrimal function, ocular pressure, and spherical equivalent. Multiple linear regression analysis for the subjective eye symptom scores revealed a positive linear relationship with actual time for screen work and shift work(P<0.01). In this study it was not observed that the VDT work decreased visual acuity but it induces subjective eye symptoms such as eye fatigue, blurred vision, ocular discomfort, etc. Maintenance of adequate illumination in the, work place and control of excessive VDT work are recommended to prevent such eye symptoms.