Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Original Articles

The Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Social Capital on Self-rated Health and Perceived Quality of Life: A Cross-sectional Survey-based Study in a Minority Group in Iran: Rashid Ahmadifar, Nader Rajabi-Gilan, Shirzad Rostamizadeh, Nsrolah Nadimi, Parviz Sobhani, Adel Irankhah; J Prev Med Public Health. 2025;58(1):11-20. Published online October 5, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.24.210

28,117 View
837 Download

Abstract Summary PDF: Objectives
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of subjective socioeconomic status and social capital on self-rated health and quality of life among a minority group in Iran.
Methods
This cross-sectional study involved 800 individuals from a minority group in Iran. The sampling method was clustering, and data collection was conducted using a questionnaire. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 18 and Stata version 8.
Results
The results of logistic regression analysis revealed that subjective socioeconomic status (odds ratio [OR], 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34 to 1.61), belonging and empathy (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.15), and trust (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13) significantly impacted the quality of life. Additionally, the logistic regression analysis for factors influencing self–rated health demonstrated significant effects for the age group of 31-50 years (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.91), gender (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.92), academic education (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.26), subjective socioeconomic status (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.38), chronic disease (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 2.49 to 8.19), belonging and empathy (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.11), and participation (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.24).
Conclusions
The findings indicate that bonding social capital significantly influences health levels and quality of life. Focusing on delegating local responsibilities to community members and striving to promote participation in health programs, along with increasing the socioeconomic status of minority groups, can effectively improve their health and quality of life.; Summary

Key Message
The overall findings suggest that the dimensions of bonding social capital were more effective in predicting respondents' self-rated health (SRH) and perceived quality of life (QOL). Specifically, the variables of belonging/empathy and trust, were found to increase the likelihood of a positive QOL by 9% and 6%, respectively. The findings also showed that belonging/empathy and participation increase the likelihood of a positive SRH by 6% and 12%, respectively. Additionally, a 1-unit increase in Subjective Socioeconomic Status was associated with a 27% and 47% increase in the likelihood of having a positive SRH and QOL respectively.

Individual-level Associations Between Indicators of Social Capital and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Scores in Communities With High Mortality in Korea: Jang-Rak Kim, Baekgeun Jeong, Ki-Soo Park, Yune-Sik Kang; J Prev Med Public Health. 2020;53(4):245-255. Published online May 21, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.19.336

6,935 View
128 Download
2 Crossref

Objectives
This study examined associations among social capital indicators (social participation and generalized trust) at the individual level and alcohol use, which was quantified using Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores.
Methods
In total, there were 8800 participants in community health interviews, including 220 adults sampled systematically from a resident registration database of each of 40 sub-municipal administrative units of local (city or county) governments. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using polychotomous logistic regression.
Results
The aORs for abstainers versus people with AUDIT scores of 0-7, based on 3 questions on generalized trust, in comparison to those with no positive responses, were 1.15 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.34) for 1 positive response, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.37) for 2 positive responses; and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.61) for 3 positive responses. The aORs for abstainers versus people with AUDIT scores of 0-7, in comparison to participation in no organizations, were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.69) for participation only in informal organizations; 2.16 (95% CI, 1.57 to 2.99) for participation only in religious organizations; 2.41 (95% CI, 1.10 to 5.29) for participation only in volunteer organizations; and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.74) for participation in formal organizations. Participants in formal social organizations, regardless of their participation in informal organizations, were more likely to have AUDIT scores of 8-15 (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.60) or ≥16 (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.23) than to have scores of 0-7.
Conclusions
Our findings may have implications for health policy to reduce alcohol problems.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Religious and secular spirituality: Methodological implications of definitions for health research
Camila Chagas, Leonardo Breno Martins, Fatima Regina Machado, Welligton Zangari, José Carlos Fernandes Galduróz
EXPLORE.2023; 19(1): 6. CrossRef
A Systematic Review on Alcohol Consumption among Non-Religious and Religious Adults
Camila Chagas, Leonardo Breno Martins, Andréia Gomes Bezerra, Tassiane Cristine Santos de Paula, Ana Carolina Adinolfi Xavier, Wellington Zangari, José Carlos Fernandes Galduróz
Substance Use & Misuse.2023; 58(2): 238. CrossRef

English Abstract

A Study of Factors Related to Korean Physicians' Trust in the Government: On the Target for Board Members of Physicians' Associations.: Sunhee Lee, Gunmo Yang, Juhyun Seo, Juhye Kim; J Prev Med Public Health. 2010;43(5):411-422.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.5.411

6,602 View
33 Download
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

OBJECTIVES
This study aims to investigate the factors related to Korean physicians' trust in the government. METHODS: We used structured questionnaires that were composed of multidimensional scales for each of the various categories. RESULTS: The recognition levels of trust of the government by Korean physicians were not high, and they ranged from 3.6 to 4.8 for ten scales. The factors related to trust in the government were categorized into seven factors on the basis of a factor analysis. On the regression analysis, a positive relationship was found between "the individual propensity to trust" and trust in the government, while a negative relationship was found between "the recognition level regarding the government as an authoritarian power" and trust in the government. "Confidence about participation in the policy process" as internal efficacy and "belief in governmental ability and motivation toward public demand" as external efficacy also showed a strong positive relationship with trust in the government. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, we can draw the conclusion that making efforts to improve the recognition level of trust in the government among physicians is an important policy task. To increase the trust level, participation of physicians in the policy process in various ways and open communication between the physicians'associations and the government should be facilitated.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The Relationship between Trust in Healthcare System and Health Examination Participation
Baek-Geun Jeong, In-Kyoung Hwang, Hae-Sook Sohn, Kwang-Wook Koh, Tae-Ho Yoon, Jeong-Hun Lim
Journal of agricultural medicine and community health.2010; 35(4): 395. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search