Cancer management has become a major policy goal for the government of the Korea. As such, the government introduced the National Cancer Control Plan (NCCP) to reduce the individual and social burdens caused by cancer and to promote national health. During the past 25 years, 3 phases of the NCCP have been completed. During this time, the NCCP has changed significantly in all aspects of cancer control from prevention to survival. The targets for cancer control are increasing, and although some blind spots remain, new demands are emerging. The government initiated the fourth NCCP in March 2021, with the vision of “A Healthy Country with No Concerns about Cancer Anywhere at Any Time,” which aims to build and disseminate high-quality cancer data, reduce preventable cancer cases, and reduce gaps in cancer control. Its main strategies include (1) activation of cancer big data, (2) advancement of cancer prevention and screening, (3) improvement in cancer treatment and response, and (4) establishment of a foundation for balanced cancer control. The fourth NCCP has many positive expectations, similar to the last 3 plans; however, cross-domain support and participation are required to achieve positive results in cancer control. Notably, cancer remains the leading cause of death despite decades of management efforts and should continue to be managed carefully from a national perspective.
Summary
Korean summary
- 기존 1~3차 국가암관리계획의 전반적인 성과를 소개합니다.
- 제4차 국가암관리계획의 목표 및 내용을 기존 계획과 비교하여 설명합니다.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Exploring the experiences of cancer patients: What drives them to seek treatment outside their residential area and what are the experiences resulting from that decision? A qualitative study Jeehee Pyo, Mina Lee, Haneul Lee, Minsu Ock, Ali Haider Mohammed PLOS ONE.2025; 20(3): e0319650. CrossRef
Factors Associated With Continuous Use of a Cancer Education Metaverse Platform: Mixed Methods Study Sunghak Kim, Timothy Jung, Dae Kyung Sohn, Mina Suh, Yoon Jung Chang Journal of Medical Internet Research.2024; 26: e57762. CrossRef
Association between Socioecological Status, Nutrient Intake, and Cancer Screening Behaviors in Adults Aged 40 and Over: Insights from the Eighth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES, 2019) Seungpil Jeong, Yean-Jung Choi Nutrients.2024; 16(7): 1048. CrossRef
Psychometric Characteristics of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Severity Subscale Among Korean Cancer Survivors So-Young Park Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2024; 57(4): 319. CrossRef
Health screening disparities in people living with HIV; A nationwide organized screening setting Boyoung Park, Yoonyoung Jang, Taehwa Kim, Yunsu Choi, Kyoung Hwan Ahn, Jung Ho Kim, Hye Seong, Youn Jeong Kim, Jun Yong Choi, Joon Young Song, Shin-Woo Kim, Sang Il Kim Journal of Infection and Public Health.2024; 17(12): 102567. CrossRef
Validation of self-reported morbidities in the Korean Atomic Bomb Survivor Cohort Ansun Jeong, Somin Jeon, Seong-geun Moon, Mi Kyung Kim, Inah Kim, Yu-Mi Kim, Boyoung Park Epidemiology and Health.2024; 46: e2024058. CrossRef
OBJECTIVES This study aims to investigate the factors related to Korean physicians' trust in the government. METHODS: We used structured questionnaires that were composed of multidimensional scales for each of the various categories. RESULTS: The recognition levels of trust of the government by Korean physicians were not high, and they ranged from 3.6 to 4.8 for ten scales. The factors related to trust in the government were categorized into seven factors on the basis of a factor analysis. On the regression analysis, a positive relationship was found between "the individual propensity to trust" and trust in the government, while a negative relationship was found between "the recognition level regarding the government as an authoritarian power" and trust in the government. "Confidence about participation in the policy process" as internal efficacy and "belief in governmental ability and motivation toward public demand" as external efficacy also showed a strong positive relationship with trust in the government. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, we can draw the conclusion that making efforts to improve the recognition level of trust in the government among physicians is an important policy task. To increase the trust level, participation of physicians in the policy process in various ways and open communication between the physicians'associations and the government should be facilitated.
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Relationship between Trust in Healthcare System and Health Examination Participation Baek-Geun Jeong, In-Kyoung Hwang, Hae-Sook Sohn, Kwang-Wook Koh, Tae-Ho Yoon, Jeong-Hun Lim Journal of agricultural medicine and community health.2010; 35(4): 395. CrossRef