KSPM
Search
- Page Path
- HOME > Search
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Effect of Repeated Public Releases on Cesarean Section Rates.
- Won Mo Jang, Sang Jun Eun, Chae Eun Lee, Yoon Kim
- J Prev Med Public Health. 2011;44(1):2-8.
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.1.2
- 7,093 View
- 101 Download
- 15 Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF - OBJECTIVES
Public release of and feedback (here after public release) on institutional (clinics and hospitals) cesarean section rates has had the effect of reducing cesarean section rates. However, compared to the isolated intervention, there was scant evidence of the effect of repeated public releases (RPR) on cesarean section rates. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of RPR for reducing cesarean section rates. METHODS: From January 2003 to July 2007, the nationwide monthly institutional cesarean section rates data (1 951 303 deliveries at 1194 institutions) were analyzed. We used autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) time-series intervention models to assess the effect of the RPR on cesarean section rates and ordinal logistic regression model to determine the characteristics of the change in cesarean section rates. RESULTS: Among four RPR, we found that only the first one (August 29, 2005) decreased the cesarean section rate (by 0.81 percent) and continued to have an impact period through the last observation in May 2007. Baseline cesarean section rates (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1 to 7.1) and annual number of deliveries (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 4.7) of institutions in the upper third of each category at before first intervention had a significant contribution to the decrease of cesarean section rates. CONCLUSIONS: We could not found the evidence that RPR has had the significant effect of reducing cesarean section rates. Institutions with upper baseline cesarean section rates and annual number of deliveries were more responsive to RPR. -
Summary
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Is a rising cesarean delivery rate explained by late birth trend? A decomposition analysis of health insurance claims data (2013–2022) from South Korea
Jin‐Hwan Kim, Saerom Kim, Jeong‐Won Oh, Myung‐Hee Kim
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2025; 169(1): 310. CrossRef - Utilization of Acid Suppressants After Withdrawal of Ranitidine in Korea: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Jeong Pil Choi, Sangwan Kim, Jung Su Park, Mi-Sook Kim, Nam-Kyong Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Joongyub Lee
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health.2025; 58(1): 21. CrossRef - Changes in cesarean section rate before and after the end of the Korean Value Incentive Program
YouHyun Park, Jae-hyun Kim, Kwang-soo Lee
Medicine.2022; 101(33): e29952. CrossRef - Mechanisms and impact of public reporting on physicians and hospitals’ performance: A systematic review (2000–2020)
Khic-Houy Prang, Roxanne Maritz, Hana Sabanovic, David Dunt, Margaret Kelaher, Lamberto Manzoli
PLOS ONE.2021; 16(2): e0247297. CrossRef - Ordinal classification of the affectation level of 3D-images in Parkinson diseases
Antonio M. Durán-Rosal, Julio Camacho-Cañamón, Pedro Antonio Gutiérrez, Maria Victoria Guiote Moreno, Ester Rodríguez-Cáceres, Juan Antonio Vallejo Casas, César Hervás-Martínez
Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Is a hospital quality policy based on a triad of accreditation, public reporting and inspection evidence-based? A narrative review
Astrid Van Wilder, Luk Bruyneel, Dirk De Ridder, Deborah Seys, Jonas Brouwers, Fien Claessens, Bianca Cox, Kris Vanhaecht
International Journal for Quality in Health Care.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Impact of public release of performance data on the behaviour of healthcare consumers and providers
David Metcalfe, Arturo J Rios Diaz, Olubode A Olufajo, M. Sofia Massa, Nicole ABM Ketelaar, Signe A. Flottorp, Daniel C Perry
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub] CrossRef - Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section
Innie Chen, Newton Opiyo, Emma Tavender, Sameh Mortazhejri, Tamara Rader, Jennifer Petkovic, Sharlini Yogasingam, Monica Taljaard, Sugandha Agarwal, Malinee Laopaiboon, Jason Wasiak, Suthit Khunpradit, Pisake Lumbiganon, Russell L Gruen, Ana Pilar Betran
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub] CrossRef - Impact of State Reporting Laws on Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in U.S. Adult Intensive Care Units
Hangsheng Liu, Carolyn T. A. Herzig, Andrew W. Dick, E. Yoko Furuya, Elaine Larson, Julie Reagan, Monika Pogorzelska‐Maziarz, Patricia W. Stone
Health Services Research.2017; 52(3): 1079. CrossRef - Effects of Korean hand acupressure on opioid-related nausea and vomiting, and pain after caesarean delivery using spinal anaesthesia
Na Young Ahn, Hye-Ja Park
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice.2017; 28: 101. CrossRef - Ordinal Regression Methods: Survey and Experimental Study
Pedro Antonio Gutierrez, Maria Perez-Ortiz, Javier Sanchez-Monedero, Francisco Fernandez-Navarro, Cesar Hervas-Martinez
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.2016; 28(1): 127. CrossRef - Exploring the transparency mechanism and evaluating the effect of public reporting on prescription: a protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Xin Du, Dan Wang, Xuan Wang, Shiru Yang, Xinping Zhang
BMC Public Health.2015;[Epub] CrossRef - Application of propensity scores to explore the effect of public reporting of medicine use information on rational drug use in China: a quasi-experimental design
Xiaopeng Zhang, Lijun Wang, Xinping Zhang
BMC Health Services Research.2014;[Epub] CrossRef - Changes in the Cesarean Section Rate in Korea (1982-2012) and a Review of the Associated Factors
Sung-Hoon Chung, Hyun-Joo Seol, Yong-Sung Choi, Soo-young Oh, Ahm Kim, Chong-Woo Bae
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2014; 29(10): 1341. CrossRef - Managing the Primary Cesarean Delivery Rate
DAVID WARE BRANCH, ROBERT M. SILVER
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology.2012; 55(4): 946. CrossRef
Original Article- Regional Variations in the Cesarean Section Rate and It's Determinants in Korea.
- Hye Kyung Kim, Jeon Un Lee, Kang Won Park, Ok Ryun Moon
- Korean J Prev Med. 1992;25(3):312-329.
- 2,889 View
- 35 Download
-
Abstract
PDF
- The purpose of this study is to estimate cesarean section rate in Korea and analyze the socioeconomic variables and health resources which affect regional variation in the rate. Samples were drawn from the record of vaginal and cesarean section deliveries based upon insurance claim bills which have been submitted to the National Federation of Medical Insurance for the first three months, January through March, 1991. The results are obtained as follows: It was found that, cesarean section rate was increasing rapidly up to 23.1% in 1991. Cesarean section per 10 thousand insured people was 4.8 and the number of cesarean section per 10 thousand insured eligible(15-49 years old) female was 7.6. The fee for normal delivery was 109,489 won and that for cesarean section was 390,024 won. The average days of hospitalization in normal delivery was 2.3 days, and those in cesarean section was 7.6 days. On the average cesarean section has a longer of stay as much as by 4.3 days and cost 3.6 times more than normal deliveries. Cesarean section rates vary among medical facilities: 19.8% at clinics 37.6% in small-scale hospitals, and 29.1% in general hospitals. The regional variation of cesarean section rates was also fairly prominent. The South Cheju Gun has the highest rate of cesarean section, 56.2%. Meanwhile no cesarean section cases has been reported in Sunchang Gun during the period of this study. The variation is noted among provinces. The rate for Cheju province has been 3.4 times higher than that for Chunnam. The number of cesarean section per 10 thousand insured people vary greatly among regions, too. This study has found that there exists significant regional variations among various geographic units in terms of average length of stay, average cost, number of obsretricians and number of beds. Multiple regression analysis was done to identify factors explaining the regional variance of various cesarean section rates: In the urban areas, no significant explaining variables were noted except the number of beds for the dependent variable of cesarean section cases per 10 thousand insured eligible females. The smaller the number of bed, the more cases of cesarean section was noted for an urban area. The is mostly because the rate of cesarean section is higher in medium-size hospitals than in large general hospitals. In the rural areas, the factor of education has been found significant for all three dependent variables. The higher the educational level, the rate of cesarean section is most likely to rise. An income variable measured by the amount of monthly insurance contribution has been identified a powerful predictor in explaining the variance of cesarean section rates. The same has been noted for the number of obstetricians. Similar findings are observed for the country as a whole. The income level has been found as the most powerful explaining factor in the regional variance of cesarean section rates. In general the rate is higher in the urban areas, and lower in the area with more small hospitals. As this is the initial attempt to identify the factors relevant to the regional difference in the rates of cesarean section, more elaborated study is urgently required.
-
Summary
First
Prev
