- Prevalence of Positive Carriage of Tuberculosis, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci in Patients Transported by Ambulance: A Single Center Observational Study
-
Young Sun Ro, Sang Do Shin, Hyun Noh, Sung-Il Cho
-
J Prev Med Public Health. 2012;45(3):174-180. Published online May 31, 2012
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.3.174
-
-
9,422
View
-
82
Download
-
6
Crossref
-
Abstract
PDF
- Objectives
An ambulance can be a potential source of contagious or droplet infection of a community. We estimated the prevalence of positive carriage of tuberculosis (TB), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) in patients transported by ambulance. MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study. We enrolled all patients who visited a tertiary teaching hospital emergency department (ED). Blood, sputum, urine, body fluid, and rectal swab samples were taken from patients when they were suspected of TB, MRSA, or VRE in the ED. The patients were categorized into three groups: pre-hospital ambulance (PA) group; inter-facility ambulance (IA) group; and non-ambulance (NA) group. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model for the prevalence of each infection. ResultsThe total number of patients was 89206. Of these, 9378 (10.5%) and 4799 (5.4%) were in the PA and IA group, respectively. The prevalence of TB, MRSA, and VRE infection were 0.3%, 1.1%, and 0.3%, respectively. In the PA group, the prevalence of TB, MRSA, and VRE were 0.3%, 1.8%, and 0.4%. In the IA group, the prevalence of TB, MRSA, and VRE were 0.7%, 4.6%, and 1.5%, respectively. The adjusted ORs (95% CI) of the PA and IA compared to the NA group were 1.02 (0.69 to 1.53) and 1.83 (1.24 to 2.71) for TB, 2.24 (1.87 to 2.69) and 5.47 (4.63 to 6.46) for MRSA, 2.59 (1.78 to 3.77) and 8.90 (6.52 to 12.14) for VRE, respectively. ConclusionsA high prevalence of positive carriage of TB, MRSA, and VRE in patients transported by metropolitan ambulances was found.
-
Summary
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- ドクターヘリの機内環境でMRSAを認めるか?(Can methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus be found in the environment of a physician–staffed helicopter emergency medical service?)
高橋 治郎, 世良 紳語, 井上 貴博, 宮本 聡美, 上野 太輔, 稲吉 祐樹, 椎野 泰和 Nihon Kyukyu Igakukai Zasshi: Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine.2023; 34(2): 67. CrossRef - Medical transport-associated infection: Review and commentary making a case for its legitimacy
Diego Schaps, Anjni Patel Joiner, Deverick J. Anderson Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.2022; 43(4): 497. CrossRef - Risk of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus(VRE) acquisition during ambulance transport: A retrospective propensity-score–matched cohort analysis
Diego Schaps, Andrew W. Godfrey, Deverick J. Anderson Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.2022; 43(4): 442. CrossRef - Hand Hygiene in Emergency Medical Services
Jonathan Teter, Michael G. Millin, Rick Bissell Prehospital Emergency Care.2015; 19(2): 313. CrossRef - Empfehlungen zur Prävention und Kontrolle von Methicillin-resistenten Staphylococcus aureus-Stämmen (MRSA) in medizinischen und pflegerischen Einrichtungen
C. Ruscher Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.2014; 57(6): 695. CrossRef - Infection Prevention in the Emergency Department
Stephen Y. Liang, Daniel L. Theodoro, Jeremiah D. Schuur, Jonas Marschall Annals of Emergency Medicine.2014; 64(3): 299. CrossRef
|