Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Mammography"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review
Breast Density and Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
Jong-Myon Bae, Eun Hee Kim
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(6):367-375.   Published online October 21, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.054
  • 15,120 View
  • 310 Download
  • 46 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
The established theory that breast density is an independent predictor of breast cancer risk is based on studies targeting white women in the West. More Asian women than Western women have dense breasts, but the incidence of breast cancer is lower among Asian women. This meta-analysis investigated the association between breast density in mammography and breast cancer risk in Asian women.
Methods
PubMed and Scopus were searched, and the final date of publication was set as December 31, 2015. The effect size in each article was calculated using the interval-collapse method. Summary effect sizes (sESs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by conducting a meta-analysis applying a random effect model. To investigate the dose-response relationship, random effect dose-response meta-regression (RE-DRMR) was conducted.
Results
Six analytical epidemiology studies in total were selected, including one cohort study and five case-control studies. A total of 17 datasets were constructed by type of breast density index and menopausal status. In analyzing the subgroups of premenopausal vs. postmenopausal women, the percent density (PD) index was confirmed to be associated with a significantly elevated risk for breast cancer (sES, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.52 to 3.21; I2=50.0%). The RE-DRMR results showed that the risk of breast cancer increased 1.73 times for each 25% increase in PD in postmenopausal women (95% CI, 1.20 to 2.47).
Conclusions
In Asian women, breast cancer risk increased with breast density measured using the PD index, regardless of menopausal status. We propose the further development of a breast cancer risk prediction model based on the application of PD in Asian women.
Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intelligent scoring system based on dynamic optical breast imaging for early detection of breast cancer
    Yaoyao Li, Yipei Zhang, Qiang Yu, Chenglong He, Xiguo Yuan
    Biomedical Optics Express.2024; 15(3): 1515.     CrossRef
  • Physical Activity and Mammographic Density in Japanese Women
    Mihye Lee, Rina Kotake, Hideko Yamauchi
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2024; 33(3): 365.     CrossRef
  • The association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk in Chinese women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Song Bai, Di Song, Ming Chen, Xiaoshu Lai, Jinfeng Xu, Fajin Dong
    BMC Women's Health.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polygenic risk score-based prediction of breast cancer risk in Taiwanese women with dense breast using a retrospective cohort study
    Chih-Chiang Hung, Sin-Hua Moi, Hsin-I Huang, Tzu-Hung Hsiao, Chi-Cheng Huang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer in Korean women
    Yon Ho Jee, Weang-Kee Ho, Sohee Park, Douglas F Easton, Soo-Hwang Teo, Keum Ji Jung, Peter Kraft
    International Journal of Epidemiology.2023; 52(3): 796.     CrossRef
  • Estimating Age-Specific Mean Sojourn Time of Breast Cancer and Sensitivity of Mammographic Screening by Breast Density among Korean Women
    Eunji Choi, Mina Suh, So-Youn Jung, Kyu-Won Jung, Sohee Park, Jae Kwan Jun, Kui Son Choi
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(1): 136.     CrossRef
  • Current Trends in the Utilization of Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer
    I-Wen Pan, Tina W.F. Yen, Isabelle Bedrosian, Ya-Chen Tina Shih
    JCO Oncology Practice.2023; 19(7): 446.     CrossRef
  • International Interobserver Variability of Breast Density Assessment
    Leah H. Portnow, Lina Choridah, Kardinah Kardinah, Triwulan Handarini, Ruud Pijnappel, Adriana M.J. Bluekens, Lucien E.M. Duijm, Peter K. Schoub, Pamela S. Smilg, Liat Malek, Jessica W.T. Leung, Sughra Raza
    Journal of the American College of Radiology.2023; 20(7): 671.     CrossRef
  • Deep Learning Analysis of Mammography for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in Asian Women
    Hayoung Kim, Jihe Lim, Hyug-Gi Kim, Yunji Lim, Bo Kyoung Seo, Min Sun Bae
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(13): 2247.     CrossRef
  • The diagnostic accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography for recurrent breast cancer after breast conserving treatment
    Piyakan Pathanasethpong, Supajit Nawapun, Payia Chadbunchachai, Ongart Somintara, Chaiwat Apivatanasiri, Arunnit Boonrod
    European Journal of Radiology Open.2023; 11: 100514.     CrossRef
  • Fine-needle aspiration biopsy possibilities in studying the molecular genetic landscape of breast tissue
    V.  V.  Rodionov, O.  V.  Burmenskaya, V.  V.  Kometova, A.  A.  Smetnik, M.  V.  Rodionova, D.  Yu.  Trofimov, L.  A.  Ashrafyan, G.  T.  Sukhikh
    Tumors of female reproductive system.2023; 19(4): 16.     CrossRef
  • miR-146a Enhances the Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to Paclitaxel by Downregulating IRAK1
    Yalun Li, Weilong Li, Jun Lin, Chunjing Lv, Guangdong Qiao
    Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals.2022; 37(8): 624.     CrossRef
  • Current status of AYA-generation breast cancer: trends worldwide and in Japan
    Manabu Futamura, Kazuhiro Yoshida
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses
    Matteo Interlenghi, Christian Salvatore, Veronica Magni, Gabriele Caldara, Elia Schiavon, Andrea Cozzi, Simone Schiaffino, Luca Alessandro Carbonaro, Isabella Castiglioni, Francesco Sardanelli
    Diagnostics.2022; 12(1): 187.     CrossRef
  • Global guidelines for breast cancer screening: A systematic review
    Wenhui Ren, Mingyang Chen, Youlin Qiao, Fanghui Zhao
    The Breast.2022; 64: 85.     CrossRef
  • Utility of U-Net for the objective segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region on clinical digital mammograms
    Mika Yamamuro, Yoshiyuki Asai, Naomi Hashimoto, Nao Yasuda, Hiorto Kimura, Takahiro Yamada, Mitsutaka Nemoto, Yuichi Kimura, Hisashi Handa, Hisashi Yoshida, Koji Abe, Masahiro Tada, Hitoshi Habe, Takashi Nagaoka, Seiun Nin, Kazunari Ishii, Yohan Kondo
    Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.2022; 8(4): 045016.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Disparities in Asian Women: The Need for Disaggregated Research
    Lauren Fane, Tithi Biswas, Charulata Jindal, Yuk Ming Choi, Jimmy T. Efird
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(16): 9790.     CrossRef
  • Vertical Breast Displacement in Asian Women During Exercise: influence of Bra Type, Size and Different Parts of the Breast
    Xinyang Sheng, Xiaona Chen, Mark John Lake
    Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe.2022; 30(3): 1.     CrossRef
  • Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature
    Akila Anandarajah, Yongzhen Chen, Graham A. Colditz, Angela Hardi, Carolyn Stoll, Shu Jiang
    Breast Cancer Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach
    William Lotter, Abdul Rahman Diab, Bryan Haslam, Jiye G. Kim, Giorgia Grisot, Eric Wu, Kevin Wu, Jorge Onieva Onieva, Yun Boyer, Jerrold L. Boxerman, Meiyun Wang, Mack Bandler, Gopal R. Vijayaraghavan, A. Gregory Sorensen
    Nature Medicine.2021; 27(2): 244.     CrossRef
  • Association between changes in mammographic density category and the risk of breast cancer: A nationwide cohort study in East‐Asian women
    Soyeoun Kim, Boyoung Park
    International Journal of Cancer.2021; 148(11): 2674.     CrossRef
  • Dense Breast Notification Laws’ Association With Outcomes in the US Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Nancy R. Kressin, Tracy A. Battaglia, Jolie B. Wormwood, Priscilla J. Slanetz, Christine M. Gunn
    Journal of the American College of Radiology.2021; 18(5): 685.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Lesion Detection and Classification in mammograms using Deep Neural
    A R J Silalahi
    IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.2021; 1115(1): 012018.     CrossRef
  • Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer
    Serena C. Houghton, Susan E. Hankinson
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2021; 30(5): 822.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing the Screening Efficiency of Breast Cancer by Combining Conventional Medical Imaging Examinations With Circulating Tumor Cells
    Yang Gao, Wan-Hung Fan, Chaohui Duan, Wenhe Zhao, Jun Zhang, Xixiong Kang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the diagnostic performances of circulating tumor cells and the serum tumor markers CEA, CA125, and CA15-3 for breast cancer: a retrospective case-control study
    Yi Luan, Jie Wei, Ke Wang, Donghao Cai, Xiaohong Luo, Wanhung Fan, Haijiang Wang, Chaohui Duan
    Journal of Bio-X Research.2021; 4(2): 60.     CrossRef
  • Meme kanseri olan Türk kadın hastalarda meme dansitesinin klinik ve patolojik bulgularla ilişkileri
    Nihan TURHAN, Dilek YILMAZ, Levent YEŞİLYURT
    Pamukkale Medical Journal.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidence and assessment of parenchymal patterns of ultrasonography for breast cancer detection among Chinese women: a cross-sectional study
    Zhongtao Bao, Yanchun Zhao, Shuqiang Chen, Xiaoyu Chen, Xiang Xu, Linglin Wei, Ling Chen
    BMC Medical Imaging.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Relationship Between Breast Density Change During Menopause and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Korean Women
    Danbee Kang, Ji-Yeon Kim, Ji-Young Kim, Han Song Mun, Sook Ja Yoon, Jieun Lee, Gayeon Han, Young-Hyuck Im, Soo-Young Shin, Se Kyung Lee, Jong-Han Yu, Kyung-Hyun Lee, Mincheol Kim, Dohyun Park, Yoon-Ho Choi, Ok Soon Jeong, Jean Hyoung Lee, Se Yong Jekal, J
    Cancer Prevention Research.2021; 14(12): 1119.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Portable Microwave Imaging Device for Breast Cancer Detection
    Mio Adachi, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Mio Mori, Kazunori Kubota, Goshi Oda, Takamaro Kikkawa
    Diagnostics.2021; 12(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Primary prevention of breast cancer
    V.F. Levshin
    Profilakticheskaya meditsina.2021; 24(11): 117.     CrossRef
  • Immigration history, lifestyle characteristics, and breast density in the Vietnamese American Women’s Health Study: a cross-sectional analysis
    Eunjung Lee, Namphuong Doanvo, MiHee Lee, Zayar Soe, Alice W. Lee, Cam Van Doan, Dennis Deapen, Giske Ursin, Darcy Spicer, Peggy Reynolds, Anna H. Wu
    Cancer Causes & Control.2020; 31(2): 127.     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients
    Akimitsu Yamada, Kazutaka Narui, Toshihiko Satake, Shoko Adachi, Mikiko Tanabe, Daisuke Shimizu, Takashi Ishikawa, Itaru Endo
    Journal of Surgical Research.2020; 251: 78.     CrossRef
  • Density of breast: An independent risk factor for developing breast cancer, a prospective study at two premium breast centers
    Chia Hwee Lo, Xin Ying Chai, Shirley Shy Wen Ting, Sze Chao Ang, Xinlin Chin, Lay Teng Tan, Peeroo Saania, Tuan Nur' Azmah Tuan Mat, Seniyah Mat Sikin, Anil Gandhi
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(9): 3244.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Breast Density Implications and Breast Cancer Screening
    Jingge Lian, Kangan Li
    Clinical Breast Cancer.2020; 20(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • Breast Cancer Incidence Trends by Estrogen Receptor Status Among Asian American Ethnic Groups, 1990–2014
    Alyssa W Tuan, Brittny C Davis Lynn, Pavel Chernyavskiy, Mandi Yu, Scarlett L Gomez, Gretchen L Gierach, Philip S Rosenberg
    JNCI Cancer Spectrum.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Supplemental breast cancer-screening ultrasonography in women with dense breasts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wei-Hsin Yuan, Hui-Chen Hsu, Ying-Yuan Chen, Chia-Hung Wu
    British Journal of Cancer.2020; 123(4): 673.     CrossRef
  • Mammographic breast density, its changes, and breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women
    Eun Young Kim, Yoosoo Chang, Jiin Ahn, Ji‐Sup Yun, Yong Lai Park, Chan Heun Park, Hocheol Shin, Seungho Ryu
    Cancer.2020; 126(21): 4687.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of automated volumetric breast density software in comparison with visual assessments in an Asian population
    Kartini Rahmat, Nazimah Ab Mumin, Marlina Tanty Ramli Hamid, Farhana Fadzli, Wei Lin Ng, Nadia Fareeda Muhammad Gowdh
    Medicine.2020; 99(39): e22405.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence of Women with Dense Breasts in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Cross-sectional Study
    Hye-Mi Jo, Eun Hye Lee, Kyungran Ko, Bong Joo Kang, Joo Hee Cha, Ann Yi, Hae Kyoung Jung, Jae Kwan Jun
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2019; 51(4): 1295.     CrossRef
  • Methodological Challenges and Updated Findings from a Meta-analysis of the Association between Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer
    Daniela Bond-Smith, Jennifer Stone
    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.2019; 28(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI
    Daniel Förnvik, Masako Kataoka, Mami Iima, Akane Ohashi, Shotaro Kanao, Masakazu Toi, Kaori Togashi
    European Radiology.2018; 28(8): 3194.     CrossRef
  • Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?
    Sergio J. Sanabria, Orcun Goksel, Katharina Martini, Serafino Forte, Thomas Frauenfelder, Rahel A. Kubik-Huch, Marga B. Rominger
    European Radiology.2018; 28(8): 3165.     CrossRef
  • The role of matricellular proteins and tissue stiffness in breast cancer: a systematic review
    Sirio Fiorino, Salomone Di Saverio, Paolo Leandri, Andrea Tura, Chiara Birtolo, Mauro Silingardi, Dario de Biase, Eli Avisar
    Future Oncology.2018; 14(16): 1601.     CrossRef
  • Molecular mechanisms of the preventable causes of cancer in the United States
    Erica A. Golemis, Paul Scheet, Tim N. Beck, Eward M. Scolnick, David J. Hunter, Ernest Hawk, Nancy Hopkins
    Genes & Development.2018; 32(13-14): 868.     CrossRef
  • Inactivated Sendai virus particle upregulates cancer cell expression of intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 and enhances natural killer cell sensitivity on cancer cells
    Simin Li, Tomoyuki Nishikawa, Yasufumi Kaneda
    Cancer Science.2017; 108(12): 2333.     CrossRef
Original Article
Rates of Change to a Positive Result in Subsequent Screening Mammography in Korean Women: A Retrospective Observational Study
Jong-Myon Bae, Sang Yop Shin, Eun Hee Kim, Yoon-Nam Kim, Chung Mo Nam
J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(1):48-52.   Published online December 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.14.042
  • 9,502 View
  • 82 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Objectives
This retrospective cohort study aimed at calculating some parameters of changes in the findings of the subsequent screening mammography (SSM) in female Korean volunteers.
Methods
The study included screenees aged 30 to 79 years who underwent SSM voluntarily after testing negative in the baseline screenings performed between January 2007 and December 2011. A change to a positive result was defined as category 4 or 5 by using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. The proportion of results that had changed to positive (CP, %) was calculated by dividing the number of cases with results that were positive in the SSM by the total number of study participants. The rate of results that had changed to positive (CR, cases per 100 000 screenee-months) was calculated by dividing the number of cases with results that were positive in the SSM by the total number of months of the follow-up period.
Results
The overall CP and CR in all age groups (n=77 908) were 2.26% and 93.94 cases per 100 000 screenee-months, respectively. The median CP interval in the subjects who had positive SSM results was 30 to 36 months, while that in the age group of 30 to 39 years was shorter.
Conclusions
Different screening intervals should be considered among women aged between 30 and 59 years. In addition, a strategy for a screening program should be developed for the age group of 30 to 39 years, in particular.
Summary

JPMPH : Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health