Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

Original Article

Public Preferences for Allocation Principles for Scarce Medical Resources in the COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea: Comparisons With Ethicists’ Recommendations: Ji-Su Lee, Soyun Kim, Young Kyung Do; J Prev Med Public Health. 2021;54(5):360-369. Published online August 26, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.21.333

3,842 View
158 Download
5 Crossref

Abstract Summary PDF Supplementary Material

Objectives
The purpose of this study was to investigate public preferences regarding allocation principles for scarce medical resources in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, particularly in comparison with the recommendations of ethicists.
Methods
An online survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 1509 adults residing in Korea, from November 2 to 5, 2020. The degree of agreement with resource allocation principles in the context of the medical resource constraints precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic was examined. The results were then compared with ethicists’ recommendations. We also examined whether the perceived severity of COVID-19 explained differences in individual preferences, and by doing so, whether perceived severity helps explain discrepancies between public preferences and ethicists’ recommendations.
Results
Overall, the public of Korea agreed strongly with the principles of “save the most lives,” “Koreans first,” and “sickest first,” but less with “random selection,” in contrast to the recommendations of ethicists. “Save the most lives” was given the highest priority by both the public and ethicists. Higher perceived severity of the pandemic was associated with a greater likelihood of agreeing with allocation principles based on utilitarianism, as well as those promoting and rewarding social usefulness, in line with the opinions of expert ethicists.
Conclusions
The general public of Korea preferred rationing scarce medical resources in the COVID-19 pandemic predominantly based on utilitarianism, identity and prioritarianism, rather than egalitarianism. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for discrepancies between public preferences and ethicists’ recommendations.

Summary

Korean summary
코로나19 대유행으로 가시화된 의료자원의 부족 상황에서 서로 다른 의료자원 배분 원칙에 대한 일반 대중의 선호를 조사한 연구이다. 제시된 여러 원칙 중에서, 공리주의, 한국인 아이덴티티, 약자우선주의에 기초한 배분 원칙이 가장 높은 선호를 보였다. 이러한 결과는, 일반 상황과 달리 감염병 대유행 상황에서는 공리주의에 기초한 배분 원칙을 강화하되 사회적 유용성도 자원 배분의 주요 원칙으로 받아들일 수 있다는 윤리학자들의 견해와는 차이를 보인다.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Explicit discrimination and ingroup favoritism, but no implicit biases in hypothetical triage decisions during COVID-19
Nico Gradwohl, Hansjörg Neth, Helge Giese, Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Health Professional vs Layperson Values and Preferences on Scarce Resource Allocation
Russell G. Buhr, Ashley Huynh, Connie Lee, Vishnu P. Nair, Ruby Romero, Lauren E. Wisk
JAMA Network Open.2024; 7(3): e241958. CrossRef
What are the views of Quebec and Ontario citizens on the tiebreaker criteria for prioritizing access to adult critical care in the extreme context of a COVID-19 pandemic?
Claudia Calderon Ramirez, Yanick Farmer, Andrea Frolic, Gina Bravo, Nathalie Orr Gaucher, Antoine Payot, Lucie Opatrny, Diane Poirier, Joseph Dahine, Audrey L’Espérance, James Downar, Peter Tanuseputro, Louis-Martin Rousseau, Vincent Dumez, Annie Descôtea
BMC Medical Ethics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Consensual ideas for prioritizing patients: correlates of preferences in the allocation of medical resources
Adrian Furnham, Charlotte Robinson, Simmy Grover
Ethics & Behavior.2023; 33(7): 568. CrossRef
Public voices on tie-breaking criteria and underlying values in COVID-19 triage protocols to access critical care: a scoping review
Claudia Calderon Ramirez, Yanick Farmer, Marie-Eve Bouthillier
Discover Health Systems.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Special Article

Ethical Perspectives on the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Epidemic in Korea: Ock-Joo Kim; J Prev Med Public Health. 2016;49(1):18-22. Published online January 29, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.16.013

11,684 View
201 Download
16 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Ethical considerations are essential in planning for and responding to outbreaks of infectious diseases. During the outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in the Republic of Korea in 2015, serious challenges emerged regarding important ethical issues, such as transparency and the protection of privacy. The development of bioethics in Korea has been influenced by individualistic perspectives applied in clinical contexts, leading to a paucity of ethical perspectives relevant to population-level phenomena such as outbreaks. Alternative theories of public health ethics include the perspectives of relational autonomy and the patient as victim and vector. Public health actions need to incorporate clear and systematic procedures founded upon ethical principles. The MERS-CoV epidemic in Korea created significant public support for more aggressive early interventions in future outbreaks. This trend makes it all the more imperative for ethical principles and procedures to be implemented in future planning and responses to outbreaks in order to promote perceptions of legitimacy and civic participation.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

1965 US Voting Rights Act Impact on Black and Black Versus White Infant Death Rates in Jim Crow States, 1959–1980 and 2017–2021
Tamara Rushovich, Rachel C. Nethery, Ariel White, Nancy Krieger
American Journal of Public Health.2024; 114(3): 300. CrossRef
Government Initiatives for Research Ethics During COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea
Young Su Park, Ock-Joo Kim
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
How Can We Deal with Psychosocial Issues in an Emerging Infectious Disease Outbreak? Lessons from a Qualitative Study for the MERS Outbreak in Korea
Hye Yoon Park, Haewoo Lee, Ji-yeon Lee, Kyoung-Ho Song, Yeonjae Kim, So Hee Lee
Infection & Chemotherapy.2023; 55(3): 355. CrossRef
Investing in community power building to increase civic engagement through voting: lessons from the Building Healthy Communities initiative
Monique Gill, Benjamin Gronowski, Elliott Moon, Claire Devine, Megan Holtorf, Bill Wright
Journal of Community Practice.2023; 31(2): 174. CrossRef
The relationship between moral sensitivity and caring behavior among nurses in iran during COVID-19 pandemic
Fatemeh Hajibabaee, Waliu Jawula Salisu, Elham Akhlaghi, Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani, Maryam Mohamadzadeh Nojeh Dehi, Shima Haghani
BMC Nursing.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Vote like your health depends on it: Voter engagement in the healthcare setting
Margaret N. Jones, Andrew F. Beck
Journal of Hospital Medicine.2022; 17(7): 577. CrossRef
Ethical Challenges Experienced by Physicians and Nurses in Caring for Patients with COVID-19: A Qualitative Study
Kobra Rashidi, Fateme Goudarzi, Mohsen Fadavi, Forouzan Akrami
Shiraz E-Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Safe and Accessible Voting: The Role of Public Health
Edward P. Ehlinger, Carmen Rita Nevarez
American Journal of Public Health.2021; 111(1): 45. CrossRef
How lessons learned from the 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak affected the response to coronavirus disease 2019 in the Republic of Korea
Tae Un Yang, Ji Yun Noh, Joon-Young Song, Hee Jin Cheong, Woo Joo Kim
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(2): 271. CrossRef
Nursing Heroes Under Social Pressure: An Review of the Refusal to Care
Jeong Yun PARK
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics.2021; 24(1): 89. CrossRef
Vector control in Zika-affected communities: Local views on community engagement and public health ethics during outbreaks
Monica Schoch-Spana, Crystal Watson, Sanjana Ravi, Diane Meyer, Laura E. Pechta, Dale A. Rose, Keri M. Lubell, Michelle N. Podgornik, Tara Kirk Sell
Preventive Medicine Reports.2020; 18: 101059. CrossRef
A general approach to compensation for losses incurred due to public health interventions in the infectious disease context
Søren Holm
Monash Bioethics Review.2020; 38(S1): 32. CrossRef
The COVID-19 Pandemic: Collective Action and European Public Policy under Stress
Mitja Kovac, Amira Elkanawati, Vita Gjikolli, Ann-Sophie Vandenberghe
SSRN Electronic Journal.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression of survivors 12 months after the outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome in South Korea
Hye Yoon Park, Wan Beom Park, So Hee Lee, Jeong Lan Kim, Jung Jae Lee, Haewoo Lee, Hyoung-Shik Shin
BMC Public Health.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
The Covid-19 pandemic: collective action and European public policy under stress
Mitja Kovac, Amira Elkanawati, Vita Gjikolli, Ann-Sophie Vandenberghe
Central European Journal of Public Policy.2020; 14(2): 47. CrossRef
MERS-CoV infection in South Korea and strategies for possible future outbreak: narrative review
Chulwoo Park
Journal of Global Health Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef

English Abstracts

'Informed Consent' in Public Health Activities: Based on the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, UNESCO.: Kwang Ho Meng; J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(5):339-344.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.5.339

4,197 View
114 Download
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

OBJECTIVES
The objective of this paper is to discuss the importance of obtaining informed consent for conducting epidemiological studies and public health activities, based on the Report of the UNESCO's Working Group on Informed Consent. METHODS: The Report of the UNESCO's Working Group on Informed Consent was reviewed and discussed in connection with the ethical considerations of public health activities and epidemiological research. RESULTS: It was at the Nuremberg Trial for the German war criminals of the Second World War that the principle of 'consent' was first stated as a consequence of the medical abuses carried out during the War. As a result of the Trial, the Nuremberg Code came out in 1947. Since then, various international declarations or ethical principles on 'informed consent' have been developed and published. These ethical principles on 'informed consent' have mostly to do with the clinical research that involves human subjects, and not with epidemiological studies and public health activities. However, UNESCO recently issued a comprehensive Report on Informed Consent based on the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights adopted in 2005, and this included detailed guidelines on informed consent in epidemiological studies and public health activities. CONCLUSIONS: Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights emphasizes the principle of autonomy to protect the human rights of the human subjects involved in any public health activities and epidemiological research. As a practical guideline, obtaining informed consent is strongly recommended.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Differences Between Patient and Provider Perceptions of Informed Decision Making About Epidural Analgesia Use During Childbirth
Holly Bianca Goldberg, Allison Shorten
The Journal of Perinatal Education.2014; 23(2): 104. CrossRef
A European study on alcohol and drug use among young drivers: the TEND by Night study design and methodology
Roberta Siliquini, Simone Chiadò Piat, Francisco Alonso, Axel Druart, Marcin Kedzia, Antonio Mollica, Valeria Siliquini, Daniel Vankov, Anita Villerusa, Lamberto Manzoli
BMC Public Health.2010;[Epub] CrossRef

Ethical Considerations in Genomic Cohort Study.: Eun Kyung Choi, Ock Joo Kim; J Prev Med Public Health. 2007;40(2):122-129.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2007.40.2.122

4,440 View
36 Download
1 Crossref

Abstract PDF

During the last decade, genomic cohort study has been developed in many countries by linking health data and genetic data in stored samples. Genomic cohort study is expected to find key genetic components that contribute to common diseases, thereby promising great advance in genome medicine. While many countries endeavor to build biobank systems, biobank-based genome research has raised important ethical concerns including genetic privacy, confidentiality, discrimination, and informed consent. Informed consent for biobank poses an important question: whether true informed consent is possible in populationbased genomic cohort research where the nature of future studies is unforeseeable when consent is obtained. Due to the sensitive character of genetic information, protecting privacy and keeping confidentiality become important topics. To minimize ethical problems and achieve scientific goals to its maximum degree, each country strives to build population-based genomic cohort research project, by organizing public consultation, trying public and expert consensus in research, and providing safeguards to protect privacy and confidentiality.

Summary

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical trials and ethics
Inae Lim, Sun Young Rha
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2010; 53(9): 774. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search